Topic: my story, Thoughts on BFL (Read 3198 times)

Using all this hardware and software to mine bitcoins, is not easy or simple once you start moving away from GPU's and guiminer.
Sure It could be easier, but It also slows down progress as things change and need improving.
The key to remember, it's not impossible, others are doing it, so nothing is stopping you from doing it.
I do mean nothing, if you think their is something, it's you. You choose not to.

It is very rewarding, when you do these more difficult tasks and I don't mean in any finiancial way.
I find it great to look at it and just go, I did that. It works and it was damn hard to get working.

People are willing to help if you are polite and ask specific questions.
Their are also a fair amount of instructions and step-by-step guides for most of it out their.
It does sound very technical, but don't be afraid to ask questions. Google is a great asset also.

However their are many ways to make your mark in bitcoin, as has already been mentioned.
Keep learning it is possible for anyway, given enough time and patience to learn;
how to use Linux, how to compile a program and to command line start a program with specific prompts.

Ahh Thanks for bring this topic back into focus, Someone else who isn't driven 100% by profit, After giving tis more thought since thread started, I think I will have to do thi plan:-

1) keep the GPU's mining
2) get a jalapeno (this will tripple my hasing power and at less than a price of a GPU)
3) Even get a FPGA of some other make (to have some variation)

Running the three things will keep me mining, Keep me supporting the network, and as you said, not betting on just one horse.

People talk about the resale value separating GPU from FPGA/ASIC. 
Much more important is the divide between GPU/FPGA vs ASIC when it comes to reprogramming.

P2P Crypto currencies are here to stay, Bitcoin, Bitcoin 2.0 or something else. They will need hashing power.
I will spend my money building general purpose computing power since profit maximizing isn't what drives me.

Sure I might buy some ASICs too at some point but knowing that it's betting on just one horse.
Even bitcoin might change algorithm if threatened.
Being future proof is worth something even to non-idealists hedging in the market.

Meh, just turn it off in the summer.

Sorry but, ease of mining is really not that important. Mining isn't for everybody (a lot of people, but not everybody).

If you want coins, buy them -- it's really easy, and there are dozens of ways to do it. Most coins are bought, not mined. (If everyone mined coins, and no one bought, the price would be zero.)

If you are buying GPU hardware to mine right now, there's a good chance that you are going to lose money -- even if you don't pay for electricity.

It made me forget what this thread was about.

I lol'd

This is what i'm trying to say, I want to live in a crypto-currency enviroment, I am mining now so I can survive when fiat currencys sink (probably not in my life time) I don't calculat electric mainly because it's more of a belief and not a bussines.




It's an all electric flat, and the rig is in the hall. Mmmmmm nice and warm in the winter.



I am in the UK so we dont have a summer  

Then worry of cooling costs in the summer. During the winter my room was warm toasty compared to the rest of the house, now I have to keep the AC going so I don't melt. And this is only with a 6850 and 5770 chugging .5GH/s.

You can ignore power costs in the winter if you have an electric heater .

What is the purpose of mining for you then if you dont calculate power cost ?

No matter how slow/fast you mine, powercost is the direct cost to you for running your business(mining) so no matter how many coins you generate there is still the powercost to calculate out of the generated coins to see how much you actually earned.

If you mine to simply hold the coins until its worth more thus ignoring powercost right now, then you should buy coins which would follow the same method as mining atm except at zero powercost required for the calculation.

Stephen Gornick:-

It is true there are alot of unknowns, But this how I think it through in my head**

There is going to be a reward drop to 25BTC (around end dec IIRC) and even if BFL dont get anyware near the hashing rate claimed or near the shipping date, the network rate will hike up to put lower rig's (GPU's) just out the field compleatly.
Even if it takes a year down the line for all this to happen (I WILL be mining till its not worth it) I still want to up it.

So if I can get a jalepeno that will tripple my output (or at least double if spec not good on release) and be less than a price of a GPU.


You have noticed I dont say power usage, Mainly because I enjoy mining, I don't smoke/drink/live life (lol) so a few quid a week in power is not a problem, I have a pay meter and its really not alot a week.

**Thinking in my head may have no affect on actual productsor serveces, This is limited one per coustomer over a 2 year period, you may have to pay back more than you invested, and is not a registerd product, may be used at owners risk.

Or better, the mining speculation subforum:
 - http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=81.0


You are essentially asking for unknowns.  Is it a good idea to send cash to a third party in return for the promise of future delivery of hardware when

 - eventual delivery date of purchased hardware
 - the mining difficulty
 - bitcoin exchange rate

are all unknowns?

That's what your question boils down to.

What is known is that with mining being technically available to anyone, anywhere, capacity will be added by those up to the point that it no longer remains profitable to do so.

For GPUs, the test as to whether or not to start mining or to add capacity was closely related to the cost of electricity (and, of course, is there technical skills, spare time, physical space that is secure with with adequate power and ability to remove heat, etc.)

It wasn't always so though.  In April through June, 2011, for example, GPU mining was fantastically profitable regardless of what you paid for electricity. The reason difficulty didn't jump faster was the difficulty in finding GPUs to acquire -- they were selling way higher than list price.  Eventually, the exchange rate dropped and equilibrium was found -- and the cost of electricity become the decision maker as far as whether or not to mine, to add capacity, or to shut down.

With ASICs it is once again access to the hardware that limits growth.  Everyone receiving the first ASICs will likely find mining to be very profitable.  The problem is, it is unproven if BFL can actually deliver these, or if they do, will it be long after the block reward drop in December, or will they trickle out where by the time you get yours the mining difficulty will already have risen so dramatically.

Someone wanting to mine and with access to plenty of capital would hedge their bets, ... some GPU mining, some FPGA mining and some orders in to BFL.  The safest bet today though is someone who already has large amounts of GPU mining capacity and whose electicity is cheap.  For them, profitability is still good, the GPUs will still have some value in five months (though selling now would probably yield more than after December), and the GPUs were cheaper to acquire than FPGAs so there isn't as much capital invested.  

If that describes you (yes, your 1.2 Ghash/s fits that bill ... though you haven't indicated what your cost per kWh for electicity), then keep your rig or even get another if you have cheap electricity and mine til it no longer makes sense.

But until BFL proves they have a functioning ASIC that can be shipped in quantity, any money sent their way is for purely speculative purposes with no guarantee.


Exactly.  GPU mining essentially was a less risky form of speculating on the future BTC/USD exchange rate and future difficulty as you could also liquidate the hardware and get back a decent percent of the investment.   Ask most anyone who bought hardware in the past four months and you'ld find that they would have been better off holding those funds as BTCs until today, and then buying that same amount of hardware today (they'ld have the same hardware, but more BTCs left over than what mining for four months would have produced, after subtracting those BTCs that went to cover the cost of electricity).  The only ones this isn't true for are those who aren't paying for electricity or get it at a really cheap rate.

To sum it up though, if BFL does actually ship, in quantity and on the October schedule that they've mentioned, those who are the first to receive them will likely be very happy with their purchases.  But it is quite a gamble if that truly happens.

The problem with that, Is once I have bought some coins, I will hold on to them, probably untill it becomes a world currency, I doubt I could afford more anytime soon, So I'm in the "slow and steady" side of things.

I think we have to decide if were in it for the money or the idea, I'm not intrested in mining loads of coins, waiting till I can get 1 million for it then cash in, I want to buy my bread and milk with BTC

That's debatable, although the real answer depends on too many unknowns at this point.  By the end of the year it should be easier to make a judgement, which is why I skipped FPGAs and am waiting for BFL ASIC production to reach full capacity before I consider buying new equipment.  I'll run my GPUs in the winter to help heat, and I will likely at least get a Jalapeno to do my part to secure the network.

If you sincerely believe that and you think the price is likely to go up over the next couple years, then you should be buying bitcoins instead of mining equipment.

I've got quit a bit riding on the same side of that bet .

I still think its a risk, I would love to put my coins back into my mining production, I set a price to build my rig, cant afford more, so looking to sell rig, use coins to "upgrade" depending on views.


This is something I have considered, It comes down to "do I think bitcoin will fail" my answer is no.

ASICs are way faster per dollar and per watt (upwards of 10x) than FPGAs.  However, if Bitcoin dies ASICs become garbage and FPGAs can be repurposed.  Place your bet accordingly.

This, it USED to be "buy Field Programmable Gate Arrays" but now the mythical ASIC's are supposedly coming out, Causing alot of spook