What I have put in bold is a confirmation bias. You have cashed out $1k in the same way you could have cashed out betting alone.
True if OP has the capacity and brave enough to risk that huge amount of money. Remember the win is from the shared amount of money and the bet might be lower if it was done alone.
There are lots of aspects to consider here like @harizen stated.
...
For me it has a lot of advantages -
- it minimizes losses
No, it does not minimize them, especially if we talk in percentage terms. If the RTP is 95%, whether you bet with your friends or alone, whether you bet $1k or $1M, the return is 95%. If you mean in absolute terms, how much cash you lose, of course, you lose less in relation to the bet you and your friends have made, but because if you win you will win less too.
It does minimize the losses because the bankroll is being filled up by more than 1 person. Imagine if there is $1000 bankroll filled alone by 1 person, and lost the amount. The impact to his financial status is negative $1000 while when that $1000 is the total fund shared by 4 individual and lost, the only impact to the person is only $250 not $1000. Advantages always had its disadvantage. With lower losses comes lower profit since the winnings is also shared by all individual.