Topic: Mysterious Bitcoin Block 5035 & the deep story behind (Probably big fraud) - page 2. (Read 3252 times)
June 10, 2014, 12:21:54 PM
Keyword garble to trick automated sentiment trading bots?
June 10, 2014, 12:03:50 PM
This type of thing is always mysterious and possibly exciting but I have no idea what he's talking about. Ask someone else to type it up for you if you're not sure about English. How can you prove there is fraud just from a block?
June 10, 2014, 11:46:47 AM
I don't think there is a point, just trying to create FUD.
I've read SEO spam that makes more sense.
I've read SEO spam that makes more sense.
June 10, 2014, 11:42:09 AM
As we early can see on block 5035 is the enhanched way the early adopters of Bitcoin could easly have found the block through mining, but my doubt is actually in the field of cheatable mining and easy comforting fraud of unknown values.
What most people don't see is the everlastig truth written in most blocks 5035 on especially all coins from old too new too even surround this as an specially featured fraud on non unknown values.
What I particulary take my own feelings around Bitcoin Block 5035 is the way probably told as Satoshi's wallet but truly the way it was spent to other accounts nevertheless the wallet that actually did make my wonder was this wallet which got 50BTC through mining and one mined wallet transfer: https://blockchain.info/address/12higDjoCCNXSA95xZMWUdPvXNmkAduhWv
This is the Block 5035: https://blockchain.info/block/0000000060aa4dc6fb31c82c978d8a51a1bcf2c77fe174a2e30d5d320fa7fb19
Just follow the transfers and you come too the big account.
That wallet is connected too transactions from Block 5035 and it's truly real suspicious as we count on it, being the most unknown reasons for multiple transactions going with most of the 150 BTC to another account which sends nearly 1 BTC too 1Derby* accounts and so on it goes with multiple transactions through many accounts in momentarily feature, where the transactions are dated to same suspicious time, wether this was false data that was written into Bitcoin block explorer is still unknown, but I hardly doubt it was an fraud, but just an exptetatious transfer through 100's of accounts at nearly the same timeframe. Even trying to go deeper through the huge amount of accounts you see clearly this as an suspicious transfer. As knowing each transaction should had had seconds in between each transaction. This is this cause address: https://blockchain.info/address/1FrSBjGSmtwrpmqTBZtyzsANaSPbeZjytp
Knowing that the closest link too 1Derby* accounts is actually John Thomas through an expectable 1Derby account on twitter, I find it hard to believe he have no connection through all of this, is he the early adopter of Bitcoin?, and why are all 1Derby* accounts still to this day without any transactions?, Even enough search on the internet we clearly can find out John Thomas as an Japenese speakable person, but nearly close connection too Mt.Gox as he has the connection to be an hedge trader whom invests many millions of dollars through New York hedges, we can clearly also see this with his trades on S&P500 which have great interest in the Bitcoin investments. And even Exchanges. Can some people or even investments in Bitcoin be made too cheat the market? And be knowing the most expectable situations too fall easly as to keep eventually fraud as an aspect in all of this?
Why I ask this around block 5035 is to clearly not understand the enormous signature that is nearly with all coins ever produced, what we can find out is that information on blocks 5035 is nearly full of accounts with many coins, or even without information cause of too much information (DarkCoin) and while 5035 is resistently an thing that goes around BlackCoin as clearly the wicked thing that happened, even for LTC we clearly see this as an signature placed especially within most coins ever produced. Have you nearly never wondered why most ANN on alternative cryptocurrency is with the same typical theme construction. While people most often aren't able too tell if they mined the coins from early start of most coins? While most coins have signature blocks 5035 as something we really should look into...
I actually don't hope people start to Wonder, but it's nearly the truth openwide too even demolish the existance of Bitcoin and force some programmers to actually create an coin from within people are forced too create SHA512 codes on each fraction of a coin and forcing only 1 share discoveries?
What most people don't see is the everlastig truth written in most blocks 5035 on especially all coins from old too new too even surround this as an specially featured fraud on non unknown values.
What I particulary take my own feelings around Bitcoin Block 5035 is the way probably told as Satoshi's wallet but truly the way it was spent to other accounts nevertheless the wallet that actually did make my wonder was this wallet which got 50BTC through mining and one mined wallet transfer: https://blockchain.info/address/12higDjoCCNXSA95xZMWUdPvXNmkAduhWv
This is the Block 5035: https://blockchain.info/block/0000000060aa4dc6fb31c82c978d8a51a1bcf2c77fe174a2e30d5d320fa7fb19
Just follow the transfers and you come too the big account.
That wallet is connected too transactions from Block 5035 and it's truly real suspicious as we count on it, being the most unknown reasons for multiple transactions going with most of the 150 BTC to another account which sends nearly 1 BTC too 1Derby* accounts and so on it goes with multiple transactions through many accounts in momentarily feature, where the transactions are dated to same suspicious time, wether this was false data that was written into Bitcoin block explorer is still unknown, but I hardly doubt it was an fraud, but just an exptetatious transfer through 100's of accounts at nearly the same timeframe. Even trying to go deeper through the huge amount of accounts you see clearly this as an suspicious transfer. As knowing each transaction should had had seconds in between each transaction. This is this cause address: https://blockchain.info/address/1FrSBjGSmtwrpmqTBZtyzsANaSPbeZjytp
Knowing that the closest link too 1Derby* accounts is actually John Thomas through an expectable 1Derby account on twitter, I find it hard to believe he have no connection through all of this, is he the early adopter of Bitcoin?, and why are all 1Derby* accounts still to this day without any transactions?, Even enough search on the internet we clearly can find out John Thomas as an Japenese speakable person, but nearly close connection too Mt.Gox as he has the connection to be an hedge trader whom invests many millions of dollars through New York hedges, we can clearly also see this with his trades on S&P500 which have great interest in the Bitcoin investments. And even Exchanges. Can some people or even investments in Bitcoin be made too cheat the market? And be knowing the most expectable situations too fall easly as to keep eventually fraud as an aspect in all of this?
Why I ask this around block 5035 is to clearly not understand the enormous signature that is nearly with all coins ever produced, what we can find out is that information on blocks 5035 is nearly full of accounts with many coins, or even without information cause of too much information (DarkCoin) and while 5035 is resistently an thing that goes around BlackCoin as clearly the wicked thing that happened, even for LTC we clearly see this as an signature placed especially within most coins ever produced. Have you nearly never wondered why most ANN on alternative cryptocurrency is with the same typical theme construction. While people most often aren't able too tell if they mined the coins from early start of most coins? While most coins have signature blocks 5035 as something we really should look into...
I actually don't hope people start to Wonder, but it's nearly the truth openwide too even demolish the existance of Bitcoin and force some programmers to actually create an coin from within people are forced too create SHA512 codes on each fraction of a coin and forcing only 1 share discoveries?
Can u please put forward your concern in 2-3 sentences in a better english ? I have encountered so many too in your 3 paragraphs that I have got confused.
June 10, 2014, 11:17:34 AM
Do you even lift?
June 10, 2014, 11:06:40 AM
As we early can see on block 5035 is the enhanched way the early adopters of Bitcoin could easly have found the block through mining, but my doubt is actually in the field of cheatable mining and easy comforting fraud of unknown values.
What most people don't see is the everlastig truth written in most blocks 5035 on especially all coins from old too new too even surround this as an specially featured fraud on non unknown values.
What I particulary take my own feelings around Bitcoin Block 5035 is the way probably told as Satoshi's wallet but truly the way it was spent to other accounts nevertheless the wallet that actually did make my wonder was this wallet which got 50BTC through mining and one mined wallet transfer: https://blockchain.info/address/12higDjoCCNXSA95xZMWUdPvXNmkAduhWv
This is the Block 5035: https://blockchain.info/block/0000000060aa4dc6fb31c82c978d8a51a1bcf2c77fe174a2e30d5d320fa7fb19
Just follow the transfers and you come too the big account.
That wallet is connected too transactions from Block 5035 and it's truly real suspicious as we count on it, being the most unknown reasons for multiple transactions going with most of the 150 BTC to another account which sends nearly 1 BTC too 1Derby* accounts and so on it goes with multiple transactions through many accounts in momentarily feature, where the transactions are dated to same suspicious time, wether this was false data that was written into Bitcoin block explorer is still unknown, but I hardly doubt it was an fraud, but just an exptetatious transfer through 100's of accounts at nearly the same timeframe. Even trying to go deeper through the huge amount of accounts you see clearly this as an suspicious transfer. As knowing each transaction should had had seconds in between each transaction. This is this cause address: https://blockchain.info/address/1FrSBjGSmtwrpmqTBZtyzsANaSPbeZjytp
Knowing that the closest link too 1Derby* accounts is actually John Thomas through an expectable 1Derby account on twitter, I find it hard to believe he have no connection through all of this, is he the early adopter of Bitcoin?, and why are all 1Derby* accounts still to this day without any transactions?, Even enough search on the internet we clearly can find out John Thomas as an Japenese speakable person, but nearly close connection too Mt.Gox as he has the connection to be an hedge trader whom invests many millions of dollars through New York hedges, we can clearly also see this with his trades on S&P500 which have great interest in the Bitcoin investments. And even Exchanges. Can some people or even investments in Bitcoin be made too cheat the market? And be knowing the most expectable situations too fall easly as to keep eventually fraud as an aspect in all of this?
Why I ask this around block 5035 is to clearly not understand the enormous signature that is nearly with all coins ever produced, what we can find out is that information on blocks 5035 is nearly full of accounts with many coins, or even without information cause of too much information (DarkCoin) and while 5035 is resistently an thing that goes around BlackCoin as clearly the wicked thing that happened, even for LTC we clearly see this as an signature placed especially within most coins ever produced. Have you nearly never wondered why most ANN on alternative cryptocurrency is with the same typical theme construction. While people most often aren't able too tell if they mined the coins from early start of most coins? While most coins have signature blocks 5035 as something we really should look into...
I actually don't hope people start to Wonder, but it's nearly the truth openwide too even demolish the existance of Bitcoin and force some programmers to actually create an coin from within people are forced too create SHA512 codes on each fraction of a coin and forcing only 1 share discoveries?
What most people don't see is the everlastig truth written in most blocks 5035 on especially all coins from old too new too even surround this as an specially featured fraud on non unknown values.
What I particulary take my own feelings around Bitcoin Block 5035 is the way probably told as Satoshi's wallet but truly the way it was spent to other accounts nevertheless the wallet that actually did make my wonder was this wallet which got 50BTC through mining and one mined wallet transfer: https://blockchain.info/address/12higDjoCCNXSA95xZMWUdPvXNmkAduhWv
This is the Block 5035: https://blockchain.info/block/0000000060aa4dc6fb31c82c978d8a51a1bcf2c77fe174a2e30d5d320fa7fb19
Just follow the transfers and you come too the big account.
That wallet is connected too transactions from Block 5035 and it's truly real suspicious as we count on it, being the most unknown reasons for multiple transactions going with most of the 150 BTC to another account which sends nearly 1 BTC too 1Derby* accounts and so on it goes with multiple transactions through many accounts in momentarily feature, where the transactions are dated to same suspicious time, wether this was false data that was written into Bitcoin block explorer is still unknown, but I hardly doubt it was an fraud, but just an exptetatious transfer through 100's of accounts at nearly the same timeframe. Even trying to go deeper through the huge amount of accounts you see clearly this as an suspicious transfer. As knowing each transaction should had had seconds in between each transaction. This is this cause address: https://blockchain.info/address/1FrSBjGSmtwrpmqTBZtyzsANaSPbeZjytp
Knowing that the closest link too 1Derby* accounts is actually John Thomas through an expectable 1Derby account on twitter, I find it hard to believe he have no connection through all of this, is he the early adopter of Bitcoin?, and why are all 1Derby* accounts still to this day without any transactions?, Even enough search on the internet we clearly can find out John Thomas as an Japenese speakable person, but nearly close connection too Mt.Gox as he has the connection to be an hedge trader whom invests many millions of dollars through New York hedges, we can clearly also see this with his trades on S&P500 which have great interest in the Bitcoin investments. And even Exchanges. Can some people or even investments in Bitcoin be made too cheat the market? And be knowing the most expectable situations too fall easly as to keep eventually fraud as an aspect in all of this?
Why I ask this around block 5035 is to clearly not understand the enormous signature that is nearly with all coins ever produced, what we can find out is that information on blocks 5035 is nearly full of accounts with many coins, or even without information cause of too much information (DarkCoin) and while 5035 is resistently an thing that goes around BlackCoin as clearly the wicked thing that happened, even for LTC we clearly see this as an signature placed especially within most coins ever produced. Have you nearly never wondered why most ANN on alternative cryptocurrency is with the same typical theme construction. While people most often aren't able too tell if they mined the coins from early start of most coins? While most coins have signature blocks 5035 as something we really should look into...
I actually don't hope people start to Wonder, but it's nearly the truth openwide too even demolish the existance of Bitcoin and force some programmers to actually create an coin from within people are forced too create SHA512 codes on each fraction of a coin and forcing only 1 share discoveries?
Jump to: