Topic: NA - page 636. (Read 893613 times)

Thanks for your continued efforts veertje! It's much appreciated

I tested http://gulden.p2p.0x0a.nl:27100/static and it is ok.

Found two blocks and payout recieved. Stats are ok also now, just the time of blockfind is a bit off, but that' s a minor issue.

So it can be added to the list.

I think it's good that litebit is the main exchange for the big public. Price has to be formed on bittrex and that's ok. More exchanges is not better.

If people are interested in NLG they are refered to litebit or bittrex. If you add another btc-exchange than there will come more and more autosellers for BTC and coinhoppers. I say: just keep it this way. The main attraction to the coin will come from promoting the coin to the big public and they will buy mostly with fiat on litebit directly. That proces will go slowly until reached a certain point.

For btc-echanges it should be the other way around: They should ask NLG that they may add NLG, instead of begging to be on the exchange. Let us do different than most other coins, we have litebit as the main exchange  for the public.

Yep, fiat isn't an option right now, the move with litebit is a good step in the middle where it is possible to get NLG with Euro without first exchange to BTC. So imho a good low level option to promote the coin in public.

I agree here, mintpal is the new top dog alt coin exchange, cryptsy adds some really shit coins you never hear of before real legit coins. You have to wonder how that happens...

However I would suggest NLG takes a different approach and gets tied more to Fiat/NLG exchange so it has a value independent of bitcoin because bitcoin is being saturated across so many things.

TBH I wouldn't push for more exchanges for NLG unless it's fiat or mintpal because it's the best.

Sorry guys but I noticed the stats of miners did not autorefresh...

Fix for Wallet sync issues has been added to the website, this will include making sure you on the right blockchain.

https://guldencoin.com/synchronisation/

Miners pool on 34094

http://guldencoin.miners-pool.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool

Still looks good.

Can the dev confirm the right chain? I'm on 34090 Hardcore also is on 34090 but miners-pool is on 34005. I already reloaded with hardconnect to seeds but still get 34090...

Edit. we are all on the same chain 34101 now. miners-pool stats did not autorefresh...

Craptsy is more than happy killing coins for his own gain. But at first there should be some trading volume, otherwise these exchanges are a no go. I'm picking up some NLG at Bittrex but even trading over there is still soo low on volume you fall asleep watching the graph. Craptsy takes your votes money and puts you on the list whenever Big V decides. I would suggest Mintpal first, https://www.mintpal.com/voting ,but even there it will be hard to be selected and there should be some donations to buy votes.

Hey Hardcore,

It might be possible you have a incorrect node you looking at somewhere , I know you were doing your own config at one stage and also you changed firewall rules? Maybe just give it a once over and see.

I enjoy mining at your pool and will switch back when you have found the cause.

http://www.reddit.com/r/GuldenCoin/comments/23njuo/last_version_guldencoin_wallet_v1140unkbeta/

Vote for your coin!
Stem op jouw coin!

https://cryptsy.freshdesk.com/support/discussions/topics/4000273368

please vote and command on cryptsy

Hardcoreminers Block: 33792

Guldencoin miner-pool Block: 33845

I have change the page on reddit new wallet links to 1.1.4 and set the new .conf

http://www.reddit.com/r/GuldenCoin/comments/234dyi/guldencoin/

You're welcome. Good work and fine you read it on time and made it work! Another one on the good chain.

Ouch. The stats were (and still are) definitely off as the client showed block 33534 at that time* instead of 42152, but that still indicated a gap of 150 blocks. The node was connected to 9 other nodes, but apparently it was on the wrong chain indeed; now that I've added the seed nodes in the configuration as per page 1 (which I should've done at the beginning), it's successfully getting to block 33737. Interestingly in the other chain block 33535 was the latest at 17:48 GMT, i.e. a long time without a block, and a much shorter chain. I'm not sure how my node got stuck on the wrong chain, but since adding the nodes fixed it for me (and resetting the blocks/chainstate), perhaps they could be hard-coded into the client?

Fortunately in a way, the only other miner on the pool beside me did 1.6 kH/s for well under an hour. My sincere apologies to miner Gebjfv4CbdpqJMqnC8Ajvbt1aoMEQEVd72, and to the Guldencoin team as well. I screwed the pooch!. Big thanks to you veertje - good catch (although the p2pool stats might still be off)!

Having reset the Gulden client and p2pool daemon, I can now actually confirm that the p2pool node is working - addresses mining on http://gulden.p2p.0x0a.nl:27100/ show up successfully on http://dutchpool.org:27100/current_payouts after getting a share.

Additionally, I've now made my node public (addnode=gulden.p2p.0x0a.nl) and upped the maxconnections in the hope that that might help resolve some isolated nodes, particularly those that were connected to gulden.p2p.0x0a.nl earlier and received wrong blocks as well :/

* I've seen the stats problem before with p2pool, but as the only difference between Spekske and my node should be the front-end (same p2pool code for the backend), I might finally be able to find out why this happens - if I can find the functional difference!

I am starting to think NLG is a practical coin to use as a currency. I will keep close eye on this one.