Wrote a new system design concept. Available for public preview at:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dianna-the-iana-decentralized-design-concept-64279
Please join the conversation.
Topic: Namecoin into i2p integration [WORKS!] (Read 11325 times)
I think you have to understand that Namecoin as a project has been dormant since last October at least, it needs developers like you to keep the project going. I believe your contribution has been fantastic, don't worry if the masses are a bit slow to catch on. What you really need is publicity for what you have done on the bitcoin-centric blogs like Betabeat and various others.
Yep, I noticed that. I prepare new design concept for a public trial. If someone have their thoughts about the future of namecoin, we may discuss in PM. 
posted proposal for namecoin design improvoment. mirror
Techs please follow and comment.
There is almost no feedback from community. Either I hit a wall by my head, or namecoin devs are dead... I don't know.
Techs please follow and comment.
There is almost no feedback from community. Either I hit a wall by my head, or namecoin devs are dead... I don't know.
I think you have to understand that Namecoin as a project has been dormant since last October at least, it needs developers like you to keep the project going. I believe your contribution has been fantastic, don't worry if the masses are a bit slow to catch on. What you really need is publicity for what you have done on the bitcoin-centric blogs like Betabeat and various others.
Techs please follow and comment.
There is almost no feedback from community. Either I hit a wall by my head, or namecoin devs are dead... I don't know.
I'm wondering myself why there is no response.
But I think you should proceed with this project nether then less.
i2p could really need a system like namecoin to be more accessible.
Currently there are enough nmc so the once that get lost are not problematic.
And in the future the protocol can be changed to either remove the loosing part or get them back into the system.
==cut==
Falling into namecoin internals I found it not suitable for use in a current design.
I think you're so much skeptical about namecoin. It works pretty well *now*. Namecoin is still very young project and there may be some development fixing those issues. There's only few namecoin users right now, so namecoin update can work like bitcoin updates year or two ago; satoshi simply posted new bitcoin version and everybody updated without any boring discussion like BIP16/17 :-D.
I see bigger threat in lacking namecoin development than in missing features in current implementation.
Falling into namecoin internals I found it not suitable for use in a current design.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/my-appeal-to-vinced-and-namecoin-developers-design-proposals-62017
I'll look around what can we do with that.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/my-appeal-to-vinced-and-namecoin-developers-design-proposals-62017
I'll look around what can we do with that.
This sounds very interesting.
It could make i2p much more end user friendly.
Will certainly follow the process.
It could make i2p much more end user friendly.
Will certainly follow the process.
While inspecting namecoin code i found it destroys coins for name registration. This is made for figthing with squaters. But actually it is namecoin suicid.
I wrote a public appeal to khal:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/my-appeal-to-vinced-and-namecoin-developers-design-proposals-62017
http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2548#p2548
Please vote for removal of this algo from namecoin if you care.
I wrote a public appeal to khal:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/my-appeal-to-vinced-and-namecoin-developers-design-proposals-62017
http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2548#p2548
Please vote for removal of this algo from namecoin if you care.
I love this!! Following! +1000
I promised in this thread a reward of 100 BTC if lightweight namecoin Java client will be integrated into i2p router with ability to surf .bit eepsites.
If you want to help, this is donation page
http://i2psupport.org/supportus.html
If you want to help, this is donation page
http://i2psupport.org/supportus.html Everyone that loves this should really consider donating to the Namecoin project. Looking at their block history they have received a pitifully low amount of support from the community, lets see if we can pony up some love for these guys
http://dot-bit.org/Dot-BIT_Namecoin_Project:Site_support
I agree, NameCoin needs a community support. It is in very poor state now.http://dot-bit.org/Dot-BIT_Namecoin_Project:Site_support
I posted an initial proposal to I2P developers: http://zzz.i2p/topics/1091 (I2P link!)
Also this is discussed here: http://forum.i2p2.de/viewtopic.php?t=5767
Quote
I2P has ugly and not authoritative DNS system, but has very strong anonymous crypted network.
Tor has authoritative .onion domains, but they are looks not user-friendly.
NameCoin Has authoritative anonymous domain system, but has no anonymous network implementations.
They all made for each other.
Tor has authoritative .onion domains, but they are looks not user-friendly.
NameCoin Has authoritative anonymous domain system, but has no anonymous network implementations.
They all made for each other.
You got it. Gonna follow this.
Website updated http://i2psupport.org/
Sources are available on github (with all instructions)
https://github.com/pentarh/NameCoin-I2P-Resolver
Launched IP4-mirror of i2psupport.bit:
http://i2psupport.org/
I2P Binaries comming soon with site update.
https://github.com/pentarh/NameCoin-I2P-Resolver
Launched IP4-mirror of i2psupport.bit:
http://i2psupport.org/
I2P Binaries comming soon with site update.
How to check out?
Configure your proxy to 94.75.233.174 port 4444. Thats all.
Proxy does not support regular ICANN domains and IP. .i2p and .bit (configured for i2p) only!!! 150 Kb/sec total traffic shaper enabled.
My own site supporting this project:
http://i2psupport.bit/
Site from screenshot (not mine, just domain is my own):
http://www.pent.bit/
Other .i2p also should work... sometime http://forum.i2p/
domain i2psupport.bit is resolved to (absolutely no any IP-address):
Configure your proxy to 94.75.233.174 port 4444. Thats all.
Proxy does not support regular ICANN domains and IP. .i2p and .bit (configured for i2p) only!!! 150 Kb/sec total traffic shaper enabled.
My own site supporting this project:
http://i2psupport.bit/
Site from screenshot (not mine, just domain is my own):
http://www.pent.bit/
Other .i2p also should work... sometime http://forum.i2p/
domain i2psupport.bit is resolved to (absolutely no any IP-address):
Code:
[root@server ~]$ ./namecoind name_scan d/i2psupport 1
[
{
"name" : "d/i2psupport",
"value" : "{\"i2p\": { \"destination\": \"SN8pNsF~NHZek2NRUootxO465FnrcpZcdcRzQXGvjmwXER7HQKw5j~S4mEZuFEFMWTDXI3MTACJfN9y87sLBPHnJA0CEXjYKf2hM4YNJ2fLUXCZi0uLDaW-rUz4vEpUJF1-rcE~D4tiFO-2MKVNJLoGKvO87808XL0ejtdNCE-apxOWsGNBmxDdOM6dPx~F6tzmA-m8EeAzXvE-ZD8Q5yQX2dIiDXTFRTgfKQG0acyuNwBOWxRb2MvyoyxiKQFhcn2V~jR0Ub4~1eHNMq-308j1d1nZNPEPxnQPcMYY22lU427GASGYMOpngFH-Z8l1cKpiBAYCvDR1kvUASctLfBIE9U3IWRsYhQHhMPi5ZPuWNkM5U5oH4DXPctDmDsiIAtB-l4vUWTTkxmwU0~65URyb4EDFEVzcfmZuD0xMCq8Me9q1OgkhfIjdoCC-35D8cKPygCMdfZh4ZOHg932NmNLT5fTaKIiri~MSl4GwQPdC27iV7DRDZJV0YrjhIYJccAAAA\" } }",
"txid" : "9f4903a2061d78398842619e49aacfca0e2021d3e2fd2ebc8d06f9effb311b27",
"address" : "MxR1e7obQ5KcuaofuzXbceL3Aj1wfWME7v",
"expires_in" : 35983
}
]
pent, you didn't say anything in the direct oposite of my post :-).
We can discuss what is main purpose of Internet/Tor/I2P, but the fact is that Tor is TCP mixing network (not HTTP-only mixing network).
look, I know the Tor can almost all what i2p can. but the differ is in project purposes, in what they were designed for. We can discuss what is main purpose of Internet/Tor/I2P, but the fact is that Tor is TCP mixing network (not HTTP-only mixing network).
Jump to: