Everyone most use there brain and don't put yourself in a position for this to happen to them.
Yup. Even if your partner is insistent, you should be firm. If he/she still doesn't understand, it may be best to let him/her go.
Topic: National Revenge Porn Law (Read 2127 times)
Yup. Even if your partner is insistent, you should be firm. If he/she still doesn't understand, it may be best to let him/her go.
Everyone most use there brain and don't put yourself in a position for this to happen to them.
No kidding. Letting someone take compromising pictures of you or outright giving them up of your own volition to another party is pretty much like giving someone your private keys to your BTC wallet. On one hand, your respectability and honor are on the line, and in the other your future finances are at stake. In some cases or even most, people would probably cherish their respect assuming that they're 'richer' in that area than the other. Take some responsibility for yourself and never put yourself in that position. If you want someone to see you naked, that's what mutual, consenting sexual relations are for - as well as nude beaches. Privacy and security is what one makes of it for themselves. Once someone has attained your nude image and is now their personal property, ya might want to ask "how high?" when they say jump - or become their slave if you want your bodily image to remain confidential. For teens that like to sext back and forth, gotta learn things the hard way and this might inspire more responsible parental oversight. 
Well what can you say... More and more internet security, and a fed offense on top off that. Can understand it tho, people kill themselves over getting their nudes all over internet against their will.
Everyone most use there brain and don't put yourself in a position for this to happen to them.
Yes even if sometimes, people can steal your pictures and send them to these sites.
Everyone most use there brain and don't put yourself in a position for this to happen to them.
Claiming that one's computer been hacked is always a good defense .
.Like most defenses that are more excuse than truth, I trust this wouldn't get anyone very far.
Can you still upload images of people who were never your ex girlfriends? My friend from Pakistan sends me his images and I send him my images... He has no reasons to be mad at my ex girlfriends and vice versa...
Not revenge porn.
Your ex-girlfriend should prosecute your friend in Pakistan.
I would like to see your girlfriend try and succeed in that.
Its a stupid law , and that is just an understatement. One could exploit this to infinity, since there is no way of prooving that person charged with uploading the content
really did the act of uploading. Just because something is posted from your account doesnt mean u did it, and prooving innocence would be tough aswell.
Its dumb to record porn of any sort and then whine about it, another case is when the other party doesnt know its being recorded, but thats another thing.
cheers
(Red colorization mine.)really did the act of uploading. Just because something is posted from your account doesnt mean u did it, and prooving innocence would be tough aswell.
Its dumb to record porn of any sort and then whine about it, another case is when the other party doesnt know its being recorded, but thats another thing.
cheers
Quote from: “presumption of innocence.” Cornell University. 27 Feb. 235. link=http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/presumption_of_innocence
Definition from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary
One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each essential element of the crime charged.
Definition provided by Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary.
One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each essential element of the crime charged.
Definition provided by Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary.
Don’t worry: in the U.S., the burden of “proof” is borne by the prosecution.
Claiming that one's computer been hacked is always a good defense
. 
"The idea of a police state is that everything is illegal so that everyone can be thrown into prison for everything."
Its a stupid law , and that is just an understatement. One could exploit this to infinity, since there is no way of prooving that person charged with uploading the content
really did the act of uploading. Just because something is posted from your account doesnt mean u did it, and prooving innocence would be tough aswell.
Its dumb to record porn of any sort and then whine about it, another case is when the other party doesnt know its being recorded, but thats another thing.
cheers
(Red colorization mine.)really did the act of uploading. Just because something is posted from your account doesnt mean u did it, and prooving innocence would be tough aswell.
Its dumb to record porn of any sort and then whine about it, another case is when the other party doesnt know its being recorded, but thats another thing.
cheers
Quote from: “presumption of innocence.” Cornell University. 27 Feb. 235. link=http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/presumption_of_innocence
Definition from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary
One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each essential element of the crime charged.
Definition provided by Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary.
One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each essential element of the crime charged.
Definition provided by Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary.
Don’t worry: in the U.S., the burden of “proof” is borne by the prosecution.
Its a stupid law , and that is just an understatement. One could exploit this to infinity, since there is no way of prooving that person charged with uploading the content
really did the act of uploading. Just because something is posted from your account doesnt mean u did it, and prooving innocence would be tough aswell.
Its dumb to record porn of any sort and then whine about it, another case is when the other party doesnt know its being recorded, but thats another thing.
cheers
really did the act of uploading. Just because something is posted from your account doesnt mean u did it, and prooving innocence would be tough aswell.
Its dumb to record porn of any sort and then whine about it, another case is when the other party doesnt know its being recorded, but thats another thing.
cheers
Can you still upload images of people who were never your ex girlfriends? My friend from Pakistan sends me his images and I send him my images... He has no reasons to be mad at my ex girlfriends and vice versa...
Not revenge porn.
Revenge p is bad but yet an other law!
And if you send images to a friend or you got hacked and there is no reason to think it was revenge p, would you be accountable for that?
Safe from internet hackers...
old school
... Or B/W.
The process is not cheap, unlike taking pictures with your phone. That butt would have a deeper meaning when you know you'll have to spend some times in the bathtub later developing all those pictures. If you never take pictures of her she will know she is a disposable kleenex...
Can you still upload images of people who were never your ex girlfriends? My friend from Pakistan sends me his images and I send him my images... He has no reasons to be mad at my ex girlfriends and vice versa...
Not revenge porn.
Revenge p is bad but yet an other law!
And if you send images to a friend or you got hacked and there is no reason to think it was revenge p, would you be accountable for that?
Safe from internet hackers...
Can you still upload images of people who were never your ex girlfriends? My friend from Pakistan sends me his images and I send him my images... He has no reasons to be mad at my ex girlfriends and vice versa...
Not revenge porn.
Revenge p is bad but yet an other law!
And if you send images to a friend or you got hacked and there is no reason to think it was revenge p, would you be accountable for that?
Safe from internet hackers...
Can you still upload images of people who were never your ex girlfriends? My friend from Pakistan sends me his images and I send him my images... He has no reasons to be mad at my ex girlfriends and vice versa...
Not revenge porn.
Revenge p is bad but yet an other law!
And if you send images to a friend or you got hacked and there is no reason to think it was revenge p, would you be accountable for that?
Can you still upload images of people who were never your ex girlfriends? My friend from Pakistan sends me his images and I send him my images... He has no reasons to be mad at my ex girlfriends and vice versa...
Not revenge porn.
Revenge p is bad but yet an other law!
And if you send images to a friend or you got hacked and there is no reason to think it was revenge p, would you be accountable for that?
Can you still upload images of people who were never your ex girlfriends? My friend from Pakistan sends me his images and I send him my images... He has no reasons to be mad at my ex girlfriends and vice versa...
Not revenge porn.
"Victims" of revenge porn are simply either too vain, or just stupid, or both. (The plague of recent generations.) Older generations were protected somewhat, from their stupidity being immortalized, by the lack of technology and no internet.
Even if this law is passed, it won't change the fact if you have been immortalized in this way. The best way to protect yourself from revenge porn (or being hacked or your little brother finding your porn stash) is, DON'T MAKE PORN VIDEOS.
(Red colorization Goodsense.)Even if this law is passed, it won't change the fact if you have been immortalized in this way. The best way to protect yourself from revenge porn (or being hacked or your little brother finding your porn stash) is, DON'T MAKE PORN VIDEOS.
And so egregiously deny humanity so critical a dialogue on their human condition as that‽‽
LOL! Such suffering they would endure.
"Victims" of revenge porn are simply either too vain, or just stupid, or both. (The plague of recent generations.) Older generations were protected somewhat, from their stupidity being immortalized, by the lack of technology and no internet.
Even if this law is passed, it won't change the fact if you have been immortalized in this way. The best way to protect yourself from revenge porn (or being hacked or your little brother finding your porn stash) is, DON'T MAKE PORN VIDEOS.
(Red colorization Goodsense.)Even if this law is passed, it won't change the fact if you have been immortalized in this way. The best way to protect yourself from revenge porn (or being hacked or your little brother finding your porn stash) is, DON'T MAKE PORN VIDEOS.
And so egregiously deny humanity so critical a dialogue on their human condition as that‽‽
"Victims" of revenge porn are simply either too vain, or just stupid, or both. (The plague of recent generations.) Older generations were protected somewhat, from their stupidity being immortalized, by the lack of technology and no internet.
Even if this law is passed, it won't change the fact if you have been immortalized in this way. The best way to protect yourself from revenge porn (or being hacked or your little brother finding your porn stash) is, DON'T MAKE PORN VIDEOS.
Even if this law is passed, it won't change the fact if you have been immortalized in this way. The best way to protect yourself from revenge porn (or being hacked or your little brother finding your porn stash) is, DON'T MAKE PORN VIDEOS.
Jump to: