Topic: Natural disasters won't stop Internet access to Bitcoin investments (Read 743 times)

A blimp is the future of internet connectivity?

And how is that supposed to work?

It's going to need regulatory approval for each country it flies to if it is going to be used on a permanent basis in those countries. And that red taps takes years to rip up.

I would much prefer that there be an internet option with almost no latency, reachable from anywhere in the world, does not drop connections - very important - and has OKish upload/download speeds (I'll accept 50mbps). But it just doesn't exist at the moment.

The main problem is until when will this really be felt evenly by all people in the world if they want to invest in bitcoin but if you look at remote areas like where I live 100% dependent on electricity and limited internet. Moreover, the sophistication of the solar-powered aircraft technology that you mentioned above can it spread quickly? how much is the subscription fee? I really don't know how to get such sophisticated internet access services. Now we really depend on the internet and electricity, if there is a blackout in 24 hours everything is quite troublesome. Btw, here we live in a remote area with 5-10 mbps internet power and 450-900 watts of electricity.

Lots of pieces flying in and out, both into people, buildings, etc.
That would be disastrous, in fact.
 
Hopefully, there would be enough measures beforehand to prevent such events from happening.

Internet is forever, it's been existence and have covered more comprehending jobs than we could possibly think of. With the internet, people around the world knows how to handled their situation because they're heightened top. The earning rate of these investors differs. We have the top whales in the system and we know how they dominate the marker with huge prominent investment, while we have the average investors that does handled properly their risk management, because affording to lose is big margin that concerns their portfolio. Bitcoin is accessible for everyone, and mind you not everyone have tendency of earning massive profits in the market. We understand the system and we know what's it's been designated for.

It would become a major issue if such huge batteries are installed in these devices.
Batteries lasting a week will be very huge and this means it can create a huge blast if some kind of short circuit happens.
Just imagine such a device flying above and a blast happens. We can only imagine the consequences of it's impact on us.

You are right that rainy and cloudy days will surely disrupt the internet availability unless there are batteries attached to it that would store energy during days when there is solar energy being consumed by the device and the batteries should be able to store enough energy to be used for at least a week or so without having to need a recharge just for times when there might be no sun for days and we know this happens in a lot of regions where rainy and cloudy days during winters stay pretty long.

I also agree with some other users who are saying that this isn't going to be a solution for the masses because not everyone can possibly afford such a thing unless there are such devices used by internet service providers charging a reasonable fee to provide internet services to people around that area, and in that case, the device will have to be able to generate enough power to be able to bear all the load.

I can't stop imagining the number of issues this can cause. Although you have mentioned that it can get destroyed due to hurricanes but I think it can also be destroyed through hailstorms and lightning strikes.
Since it is based on solar power I wonder how long it can run without solar energy.
For example, if there's a long cloudy day then may be the power will go off.
It can also harm birds since it would definitely emit radiation.

It's quite costly for those who aren't big investors but the ones who already earn more than $1000 per month from Bitcoin investments might not get worried about the costs. But someone who earns around $50 to $100 per month by trading or investing on Bitcoin then for such people it's still costly. I know Starlink is expanding its availability but it's still not available in many countries.

Surely that kind of disaster is inevitable. And to think that disasters could totally change our lives in just a glimpse of an eye, the same applies for our internet connection that helps us access our bitcoin investment. And with this new innovation, that could be quite impressive but it will never guarantee to protect our internet access to our investment 24/7.

Enough of this natural disaster talk already.

If natural disaster comes, all I need to do is my safety and that of my hardware wallet, I can move to next city or country just to have access to the internet, natural disaster don't happen everywhere in the world, the worst natural disaster in the history of mankind happen in a certain place, not even a whole country, we have more than 30 states in my country, a natural disaster can hit a state, and let's say it takes the internet access, millions of people around the world are still running nodes and mining Bitcoin, how is this a big concern?

Things are getting better, we now have starlink like internet too, even the atomic bomb in the past year only took out Hiroshima, other cities and states in Japan survived and not affected, chill out brother it is not that bad, the bitcoin stays in a paper wallet for years and now we have hardware wallet that are more secured because they are offline, for better security sake.

The future is near, many will be creating stuffs like Elon musk starlink some day, and always remember, there is no natural disaster that takes all internet of the world in one swipe, even in movies it only happen in a location.

We've got the Internet as it is, Starlinks, and now possibly these fellas rolling - the question is how sustainable they will be and how much they will be spread with time.

I don't know much about Starlink but I think that it's not enough because people innovate and there's bound to be someone out there that would want to do a competition with your product especially if they find a way that would make sure that they will stand out than the pioneering product and it just so happens that it's Starlink. This looks promising but there's a reason why there aren't a lot of blimps and zeppelin being paraded casually in the skies, remember Hindenburg?

Doesn't it take up a lot of space for this stratospheric innovation??

Yes. Hopefully the innovation they have designed will be sustainable. But, one thing that is a major component going forward is the issue of the price tariff that will be set for users later. If the cost is cheap and can be accessed without any obstacles, I think the technology will be quickly accepted and spread to various corners of the country.

This is just a temporary issue and not a permanent internet outage. The CrowdStrike incident cost the world economy hundreds of billions of dollars, so if the internet really did shut down permanently, our economy could collapse. So, the Internet going down is a very unlikely scenario unless our Earth is seriously affected by something like aliens, nuclear war...otherwise the Internet going down seems impossible.

But you are right, having multiple sources of internet service is better than relying on just one. This could indicate that even if a natural disaster does not prevent us from accessing our bitcoin accounts, but we are still completely dependent on that internet service provider.

That's progress from other parts, but how from our part. When disasters are the number one factor in human life, security and the most important factor in human life. So I think when disaster comes, we don't think about the internet, we just try to save lives.

I probably wouldn't have thought of saving , my laptop, computer or even my smart phone. So the next possibility is that I can't access crypto without that tool. Although there are other facilities that support the connection, I don't have the tools we use. So I think currently crypto and the internet are one and will not be separated. My device is broken, lost, I can't do crypto-related activities even though the internet is still available. 

CMIIW IMO

Yeah, I also thought about that, of course, it's great and beneficial in the long run, but crypto would be down in the priorities when I need to stay safe in the physical sense, not in the financial
But I don't see how the losing your device type of problem may be resolved by projects like that, one option would be to get an "unkillable" phone, like the Kingkong series or something.

It is very impressive how these solar-powered airships provide internet access to the most remote areas, and huge is their potential to connect areas during disasters or in underserved regions. The most recent tests show Sceye providing high-speed internet over 27,000 square miles-great for breaking down the digital divide of places such as the Navajo Nation.

That said, core Bitcoin and crypto success is pegged not only to advancements in the tech of the internet and energy. While better connectivities do help in adoption, the broader crypto movement is driven by decentralization, financial inclusion, and the blockchain technology itself. Power and Internet problems are important, but more and more infrastructure solutions are coming from mesh networks, satellite internet, and local solutions. So, while innovations like Sceye are exciting, they're just a part of a bigger ecosystem that drives crypto success.

I think that you are missing the point here.
In case of a natural disaster, your house might get destroyed, which means that your PC and smartphone could also be destroyed.
I wonder how this local internet connection project would help, if you don't have a PC and smartphone to connect to the Internet in the first place.
That project looks impressive, but when a natural disaster destroys my house, my crypto investments would be the last thing in my list of priorities.
I also wonder what is the overall cost of this Zeppelin and how this project would return the initial investment? Is this local internet service going to be paid?

Yeah, it's very unlikely that there would be shortages of Internet like that, however, it's great that OP raised that topic overall because personally, I would never have seen this ship and the idea behind it myself I hope we will never experience what you described.

It is impressive and definitely a step forward for technology but like any other projects it still has its own challenges to solve. Now to say that natural disasters won’t stop internet access is a bit inaccurate.

If, let’s say, your local community has been hit by a natural disaster and all your devices have been broken or your Wi-fi router was also ruined this innovation will not exactly allow you to connect to an Internet access. You need to have your own. Of course it is helpful to boost speed of the internet but if you don’t have it in the first place then it’s a difficult task to do.

First I thought it's an animation concept design then I realized it is happening in reality.

OceanGate was a crappy design from the start and a lot of people told them not to do it!
Hindenburg went in flames because of hydrogen, it's like worrying something like Fukushima would happen in France where the last major earthquake that killed someone was in 67' and the next Tsunami may be in another geological era!

Blimps hover all day even right now with only one death this century, they are actually safer than airplanes!
Besides it's nothing new, Google has a service like that but it didn't take off because of already cheap 4g access:
https://stratocat.com.ar/fichas-e/2013/DOS-20130220.htm

It's interesting to see the competition between satellite Internet and designs such as this.

Such ships always make me think of the Hindenburg, but I'm sure they thought about it when it was being designed. On the other hand, the guys who made OceanGate also seemed to have everything thought out. Let's just hope the high speed Internet won't fall on someone's house one day

I also used to think that the Internet would never go off until the recent massive technology outage experienced by the cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike. The technology outage caused by a faulty software update disrupted businesses and institutions in some countries. The operations of many airports, airlines, rail companies, government services, banks, stock exchanges, supermarkets, telecoms, health systems and media outlets were disrupted by this outage. This led to Thousands of cancelled flights and tens of thousands were delayed, leading to long lines at airports in the major cities of the world.  We cannot predict the future this is why we should embrace any other source of internet service.



A faulty software update causes havoc worldwide for airlines, hospitals and governments

This is beautiful. I like the color. I watched a video of it on YouTube and it is magnificent. I like to think that there are many more like in development phase and even better than this will come up in the future. However, I don't ever think that a day would come where the internet would go off. Never. I think at this point we are very much advanced for it. And there are many other alternatives to it. The only time where there would not be any access to our bitcoin investment is if a more advanced alien species invades earth and make us their slaves or they destroy the whole earth. For now , natural disasters are the least of our worries.

Having ultra-fast speed is good for streaming 4K or 8K videos but it's not necessary for crypto user even 2G speed is good enough for transacting our bitcoin so this fast internet is not going to bring any positive changes in the bitcoin adoption.

I am not in a place where natural disaster happens often and I never had any problem accessing internet 24/7 for 365 days and even if there's a disaster that wiped all the basic essential infrastructure in an area then I am sure the money won't be the first priority at that time, saving ourselves comes to our mind than anything but digital assets can be destroyed by this even so all you need to do is get a hold of your recovery seeds no matter what.

I’d still call it available globally, considering that although Starlink isn’t in a few countries yet, they are constantly expanding. You can check their coverage on the map to see how widely they’re reaching.  https://www.starlink.com/map

As of this year, starlink already passes 4 million subscribers globally.

starlink is not costly if you can invest in bitcoin.

This is a new innovation, we’re in a digital era so I’m expecting more besides I don’t know much about this technology, even in times of natural disaster we can’t tell our state at the moment and it’s obvious thinking about an investment might be the least thing personally. Let’s imagine in times of disaster can this system function proper without any obstruction due to climate change, comparing this technology in a situations related with harm is not right. I read about the technology and it’s beneficial mostly for those who find it hard using a good internet connection not just in times of trouble.

Starlink is quite good but it's not available globally and that's a disadvantage, and another disadvantage of Starlink is the cost of the plans that they offer. I'm not sure if this new innovation is going to be as costly as Starlink and it's plan but surely it might be a good solution at global scale.

The response to the poor internet connection, with star was a break through and they are leading in the market but the problem is for how long will they be able to keep up with this whole thing, and Elon did is one of his kind and I don't think anyone have this same initiative that Elon is able to do. And I love when others are in competition at least it might even affect the price when star link, and their are people that will want to go for the best so the price does not matter to them.

And the price have skyrocketed and in my country the percentage of those using it will definitely drop because of how high the price as gone. If the new technology is cheaper then the demand will go high and people will start abandoning Elon because the new technology will be cheaper and efficient than star link so this is the difference, what matters is the price.

And with how dollar have now gone high is what will discourage people the most in my country but this is like a individual decision.

In as much as natural disaster is concerned , it can affect bitcoins on a big scale even when the internet is supplied from the atmosphere.  If nothing could harm what is lunched outside the earth, what happens to people who lost their life due to natural disasters will they have access to their bitcoins anymore?. In areas where flood or fire outbreak happens, and life's and property are lost including your hardware wallet.

Even if the gadget is not on the ground , how about the control station on the ground, what if natural disaster destroy it causing various problem

I don't lnow where you live but instead of focusing on natural disaster or global pandemic it would be less self-centered to think about people living in area where there is no or very poor internet connction. Those places are most often found in poor countries where people need Bitcoin because they are unbanked. But they also exist in rich countries, especially wide ones, like Australia or Canada.

Yes, this is also what I'm thinking, I think we all do know about Starlink and the man behind this innovation, and he seems to be the a real visionary that only we can find in superheroes movies, multi-billionaire philanthropist.

But know with a new player or new innovation on the horizon, maybe we can say that the future of Bitcoin is safe with this new invention. I don't know about natural disasters though, let's just hope that none will happen in the future. As it's really hard to fight mother nature, just saying.

I also agree that Starlink is best support to get internet access specially different islands in the world. They are good because their technology is proven about client satisfaction. I have use their service in Maldives which was best for me to access online TV as internet speed was really fast into a deep sea island. This is how I am confident that bitcoin transaction will not stop even natural disaster like earth quake or cyclone. Sceye is now testing by launching test and it is possible they may bring something better than Starlink. Sceye technology would be more robust service during different natural disaster. what do you think?

Starlings is very much okay and has been given the best internet service and speed compared to other network providers, but I also don't see anything bad in having an alternative since we all know what happens when a business has less competition.
 
Even if Sceye is only focused on providing service locally, there is still a high chance of reducing demand for Starlings if their service is as good as they say, which will in turn keep the price a little bit low.

I don't think that there will be ever a situation where there will be prolonged power outage or Internet outage provided we are caught in a World War etc, other than this, there are many alternative sources to get the power and internet, in case of temporary outage. Under normal circumstances, there is nothing to be worried about and the discussion may be irrelevant. In the other case of any extreme situations like War or Nuclear explosion, it may be difficult to survive a living, who would care about the internet/power at that time 

Internet is not even going to be a barrier for Bitcoin users because it is global and almost every organization in this world needs internet connection before they can run efficiently. As other technology are improving, the internet providing sectors will definitely improve too and those that thinks that internet can stop Bitcoin are wrong.

I also have some reservations. The cost of buying the Sceye HAPS airship might make it unaffordable to many. Except a community might put funds together to finance the acquisition. Which means it might not be okay for people who live in mobile homes.

This source of power might be complex to operate. You might spend time learning how to effectively use the internet airship.

I am also concerned about the maintenance. For people living in Africa, it might be expensive to bring in experts or get spare parts to fix it when it becomes faulty.

It could also attract unnecessary attention. As a new invention, your house might become a tourist site where everyone will want to view this strange object. For introverts, it wouldn't be a good experience.

Of course natural disasters won't stop internet connection because natural disasters only happened in certain countries. It's hard to shutdown internet because it was designed to be decentralized, if one node shut down, the other nodes can back up.

The only way to shut down entire internet is by destroying all the satellites.

That's a well saying. The most relevance of this Sceye HAPS airship internet technology is basically on the benefits that it covers a wide range of providing internet access which literally it's advantage for internet users is that it serves as boosters of optimizing Internet capacities.
But it can't be undermined to we're free from internet disruption by the technology because the technology is built by human and still requires natural resources as the sun for energy sustainability which means of the temperature is not enough to conserve energies, then the system would began to loose its velocity of power sustainments.
Moreover, it can be hunted my some anti's since it's an stratosphere technology mounted in the air.

That thing flies at 60 00 feet, there is no wind at that attitude even in CAT5 hurricanes, and only a few record tropical storms have managed to reach that high, meaning no thunder either, besides the range of the amplifier, would be in theory close to 100 km so it could easily stay away from the storm while still providing a signal on the ground under the storm itself.


You need a dish for Starlink!
This thing acts like a cell tower so you only need a device that can usually connect to it over LTE, basically what any smartphone can do.

I think the price will not be competitive if what is offered is a claim of resistance to natural disasters. Starlink is currently very good and its users are increasing. but the claim is better in natural disasters are quite bold. in terms of price, I am sure it will be more expensive. because they also have to provide insurance for their users, I mean the device.
I don't know how far technology will develop in the future. currently for those who enjoy technology from the 90s until now. there have been many surprising technological advances, and in the future maybe technological advances could be even crazier.

I was actually going to ask close to a similar question that you asked, which is, is one or a few number of this, like let's say 10 to 20, be able to cover and provide the world with good internet connectivity and speed, or will every country of the world individually own one, or will it be something that can be owned personally like we do with starlink?

Alot of questions I have in my head, but I am guessing it's because I haven't really gone through the news article shared in the op, I will try to read that and see if I get a better understanding of what this is and how it works.

This will definitely challenge Starlink. They’re dominating in the satellite internet market, and with their massive resources, I’m sure they’ll find a way to compete. However, since this new technology isn’t live yet, it’s hard to say if it will truly be a threat to Starlink. But given its claim of offering better internet connections, even during natural disasters, this innovation could spark stronger competition in the market. Currently, Starlink charges $50 for a residential plan in our country, so it’ll be interesting to see how expensive or affordable this new technology will be in terms of subscription fees.

The valid argument you raised! The future of Bitcoin and other virtual assets is directly linked to technological advancements, particularly the availability of the internet and alternate power sources. It has been noted that the concept of a plane that provides broadband internet using solar power is quite appealing, especially during outbreaks or calamities.

With good internet and power, traders and investors will be able to be active in the market, ensuring that they do not miss out on opportunities even in hard situations. Such advancement in this area will undoubtedly enhance the usage and strength of currencies like bitcoins all over the world!

I'm interested to read your thoughts Jet about this aside from the questions that you've asked. I've mentioned it because that's what I've been seeing in my feed.

Solar flares aren't a conspiracy.

So this is better than Starlink. Because with Starlink, where the atmosphere is cloudy, it affects the speed while for Sceye, it's on the stratosphere which is an outer layer of the Earth and it covers better than Starlink. It is a good technology but we have to see how it is going to be first the first 5 years of its operation. It is solar powered and for sure engineers of it have already made preventive measures for things that might come to it. But then, its technology is still young but promising. I wonder how will the solar flare conspiracists will say about it.

Can it remain geostationary over night? If so does it rely on batteries?
What about high wind speeds, will they drain the batteries if there is limited solar exposure?
How strong is the cover, can it resist the debris falling from the skies these days?
What about maintenance?
Can it be shot down when the inevitable conflict kicks off?
Will it disrupt air traffic?
Will it contribute to global warming? No doubt the wokeratii, who want to restrict the internet, will claim that it does.

Sceye is still a new innovation that is expected to be more developed and deployed from the year 2025 and I have no doubt about its affordability because the growing concern for cryptocurrency in this digital age, would make any individual seek a way to afford it, as well as the merchant producers figuring a way out to subsidize the rate for common users even if it involves some payments of fees in order to gain access.

We are heavily reliant on the Internet and on sources of energy these days. I used to take electricity and Internet connection for granted before my country got hit by a war and due to Russian attacks on our energy infrastructure, we started having blackouts. So it's not just for natural disasters, but also for wars, which are globally on the rise.
I know satellite connection (Starlink) and power stations (Ecoflow) have been a great help to my country and to myself personally in certain scenarios, and more innovation to ensure sustainability and reliability of the Internet is always welcome.
I'm not sure about Sceye specifically, especially since blimps didn't really work out for humanity in the past. I have major concerns about affordability, considering that it's something in the stratosphere, so probably very expensive. I tried to find the numbers, but couldn't. So far, it seems like it's still in rather early stages, and that it's oriented toward local governments rather than individuals, to cover whole areas of customers.

As long as no errors in internet, Bitcoin will still running and that is why we needs to build a new and better internet connection in all place. Many engineer and technicians works together to builds the future of internet speed and connectivity and what @OP said is just one of the newest things because I am sure that will not just stops after release to public. The developments will still running and we will see many more innovations that will useful for human where we can use that to have a better life. The internet connection in the future will be better than today but we must be patience because that still need to be research and develop.

So, HAPS (High Altitude Platform Station) operates at around 60,000 to 65,000 feet above the Earth, potentially offering better latency than Starlink. While I have nothing against Starlink, it’s global and has proven to solve connectivity issues effectively, sometimes even outperforming wired connections, it does face challenges. Cloudy or rainy weather can impact its performance, leading to reduced bandwidth and higher latency. However, these issues aren't constant, so they’re generally tolerable.

HAPS is said to have a lower maintenance cost than Starlink, making it easier to scale and meet user demand. There are many positive aspects of HAPS mentioned, but these are mostly promises for now; we’ll see how it performs when it’s actually implemented, while Starlink has already shown it's stable and can satisfy its users overall.

Regarding the topic "Natural disasters won't stop Internet access to Bitcoin investments," I think this applies to Starlink as well, as its satellite-based system can maintain internet access even in situations where natural disasters disrupt ground-based infrastructure.

Starlink is superb but I guess having another option limits our points of failure. It’s unlikely that we will have a disaster that will wipe out internet access. Something that did that across the whole world would mean big problems. Transacting in Bitcoin would be the least of our problems, all that matters then would be food & water. We will be OK though, I don’t envisage any disasters coming.

I have purchased starlink and i could say that it does pretty work. It is really just that not good on a cloudy day or with having a storm on which you could really be able to expect those connections would drop
or would lessen but we do know that not all the time we will really have bad weather. I do have some other house on a remote place or somewhere on a mountain on which i have decided on buying and this is something which benefits me. I dont see anything bad about it, even into those cruiselines or typical passenger ship on which there's no internet connection when you are on the open sea but thanks with starlink on which we are already that having connections despite that we are on open sea. How much more into those who are living in remote areas? You would really be finding its relevance on this case.
As for Bitcoin investment then  as long there's internet and you have been able to store up your own private keys on whatever form it would be, then you do always have the access into your coins
on which this do matter the most.

That doesn’t mean Starlink is bad; we might have different experiences, but personally, I'm satisfied with it. Based on what I've read in user reviews, most seem to share that satisfaction. Of course, Starlink has some limitations, as it’s not as fast as fiber (wired connections) that has less interference. Still, I believe Starlink is reliable because it's easy to transport and even works in remote areas like mountains with no cellular signal.

OP mentioned "Bitcoin investments," so the internet usage mainly focuses on accessing wallets, exchanges, and financial apps linked to our wallets. These don’t require a lot of bandwidth, so Starlink can easily meet our needs in this context. As for new innovations, they’re always welcome since they push Starlink to improve its service, which benefits all users.

Bro I just do agree with everyone that Starlink is pretty much good right, Since Starlink is using LEO (Low Earth Orbit) satellite constellation so you can huge internet speed in any area on earth as long the government allowed it tho is technically can do anywhere, and There is also One web Viasat and pretty much more in the industry.

Secondly That idea is great but it think its only cover some arena not a wide area am i right?

I know that people can have some choices if they don't have access to Internet, to use Bitcoin as some promising solutions listed below, but honestly I believe that after disasters, catastrophes, there are more important things to care of, then making Bitcoin transactions or trading on Bitcoin market.

[Total privacy Bitcoin]: off grid Transactions LoRaWan/goTenna
Bitcoin without internet: SMS service allows sending BTC with a text
Machankura to use Bitcoin on any phone: https://8333.mobi/

What kind of issues? What gadgets have troubles with your Starlink connection? Is your satellite pointed directly towards the sky? I'm interested in buying one since my fiber connection can be a bit unreliable at times, but there are no reviews from anyone near my area. I think they also limited the maximum speed in my region so its price/performance ratio got worse as of now. It will work if I want to use Electrum or any light client, but I want a faster option to stream videos too.

Trust me Starlink isn't enough. I am using Starlink and sometimes I have issues with my network connecting to my gadgets. Meanwhile, for the main time, Starlink is the most reliable but this innovation seems better than it's worth getting to. I can never get enough of a good thing. There is no limit to the level of internet connectivity we can get in the world.

On the other hand, this will cause improvement/development and competition from Starlink.INC.

I am sure Elon Musk is already up with Starlink and have already got approval in many countries, so all of these innovations are great however the only thing that I want them to improve is the latency which a fiber connection provides. I hope that will be improved in the upcoming years but surely, there is no better way to use the Internet than a Fiber connection / Wired as of now.

I think that regardless how fast and strong a new innovation is, if a destructive natural disaster will hit it hard, I don't think that innovation alone will remain firm and stable. Natural disasters who are very destructive like hurricane, earthquake and even landslide could terribly affect the internet access, and so far, all those great innovations are still affected though.

Am sure there would be need for more than one in different regions of the world just like satellites orbiting space and those high Telecom mast, but only fewer, because I doubt the efficiency of just one hovering in the stratosphere to serve the billions of people in this planet.

There's a link I added which redirects anyone to a live video of this innovation and am sure with good research, we would arrive at a conclusive result on how many will serve well if deployed.

Yew starling is reliable though based on the review it seems like it network/connectivity is really affected by bad weather's like storm, though I don't really how well this does with bad weather's of such and also the price and coverage  will be among the reason others may consider. Though i will go and try to do research find review about this especially in comparison with Starlink.

I have some questions probably for the developers of this technology but maybe I will just ask it here to see how people's opinion on it are. Is it just one of these sort of tech that is needed to be hovering around or several of these kind of balloons will be needed to help people in different parts of the world at once? I believe as time goes on and as technology gets better more of this kind of technology that will be possible to assist with Internet connection even in positions of serious disaster will be developed and then the question about what the fate of Bitcoin will be if there is a collapse to the Internet due to a natural disaster will no longer be asked because we already have the answers.

The project is indeed a good innovation but just like what the above posted, it can easily get destroyed by hurricanes and other natural disasters that has something to do with winds and electricity.  I do not think that there is anything that can prevent natural disasters from wrecking damages to infrastructure if the forced released by the nature is devastating enough to ruin or destroy human made objects.

I see that this is a good addition to enable humankind to enjoy the uninterrupted internet services but still I think it is to be seen if it can really withstand the forces of nature.

Sceye Haps is more like a flight and hurricanes will easily destroy it, though a nice venture, but talking about natural disaster, it's something that takes people's life and properties, and only those who survives the destruction would go back to access their digital assets. Internet and bitcoin technology have been discovered and nothing would stop the both easily, but at a time when humans are running for safety, everyone would realize how life is more crucial than all the digital assets combined.

So, during the  occurrence Internet access will be poor, until the weather returns to normal. Honestly, natural disasters can momentarily stop internet access, and nobody wishes that it happens. 

It’s definitely a new innovation, but isn’t Starlink enough since it already covers global internet, while this one focuses on local coverage? As for stability, I find Starlink very reliable --wherever I go, I’m satisfied. I just bring my power station, and I’m always connected.

I think and know that the future is very bright as regards the emergence of newer innovations that would facilitate the success of anything designed to perform digitally such as Bitcoin or cryptocurrency investments.

The success of Bitcoin and any other top performing cryptocurrency currently, is based on the strides that  technological advancement in internet delivery has made possible.
 Whether you like to admit it or not, a trader or an investor would be unable to make or benefit from any successful investments, if they lack good Internet access and good power supply, no matter how minimal.

As AI integrations and bots have been developing, along with other alternative sources of energy to enable either a capitalist or small time investor take advantage of the cryptocurrency market, the emergence of a solar powered airship with  solar cape, and that can efficiently deliver high Internet speed, is a wonderful new innovation that will boost the growth and acceptance of digital currency in many scenarios mostly as regards the times when natural disasters or a case like global pandemic hits hard and everyone is scampering for safety rather than looking out for their investments.

Now, meet the Sceye Haps, the future of internet speed and connectivity:






Visit the link for more:
https://www.foxnews.com/tech/solar-powered-blimp-could-bring-high-speed-internet-your-area

What are your thoughts?