Thats alright, any other BitBar pool around?
I have seen a "how to solo mine" guide but can't seem to find it now... Can anyone post somesort of tutorial on how to do it? Thx... I'll edit when I found it.
Topic: Need p2pool for BitBar. Any p2pool gods?? - page 5. (Read 10084 times)
Don't waste your time. He said it doesn't work, at least not yet.
I have been experimenting with my own BitBar p2pool. If anyone wants to help me test it, please use
Address = bitbar1.no-ip.biz:8336
User = Your BitBar Address
Pass = x (or anything)
Fee = 1%
Stats at http://bitbar1.no-ip.biz:8336/static
The addresses of two of my cpuminer workers show up correctly. My other cpuminer worker and cgminer worker don't show up yet. If you want to try this out, please don't throw all your Thash/s at this at once and please check that you get paid when you want to use it for a longer time.
I'm still trying to get it to work in combination with other p2p pools. So, any other p2pools ready yet?
I'll point my 1mh/s at it, see what it does, is this auto payment or what? The stat link you stated seems to be broken...Address = bitbar1.no-ip.biz:8336
User = Your BitBar Address
Pass = x (or anything)
Fee = 1%
Stats at http://bitbar1.no-ip.biz:8336/static
The addresses of two of my cpuminer workers show up correctly. My other cpuminer worker and cgminer worker don't show up yet. If you want to try this out, please don't throw all your Thash/s at this at once and please check that you get paid when you want to use it for a longer time.
I'm still trying to get it to work in combination with other p2p pools. So, any other p2pools ready yet?
EDIT: It's down or do I have to do some magical stuff for it to mine? I just fill in the needed stuff at GUI-Miner but it doesn't "Mine".
Asking for help over in the dev forum at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=194265.new#new
-Robby
I'm really sorry for the people who's hashing power I have wasted with this experiment.
If you appreciate my efforts, please donate some to the guy who pointed a rig at the pool before going to sleep
and any others who have wasted a lot in the name of this test.
If you appreciate my efforts, please donate some to the guy who pointed a rig at the pool before going to sleep
and any others who have wasted a lot in the name of this test.You mean me right? Yea well, was bad. But you tried your best.
I'm really sorry for the people who's hashing power I have wasted with this experiment.
If you appreciate my efforts, please donate some to the guy who pointed a rig at the pool before going to sleep and any others who have wasted a lot in the name of this test.
If you appreciate my efforts, please donate some to the guy who pointed a rig at the pool before going to sleep
and any others who have wasted a lot in the name of this test. Possibly this isn't compatible with a P2Pool? I remember PPC having a similar problem, when Sunny announced that it simply doesn't support P2Pool.
Could be. Even though we did start off from PPC-style compatible code, there could still be some other issues.
The other guy who cloned my code has the same issue, so that rules a few things out.
I think the key might be in that PREFIX. rbdrbd experienced a delay with starting the connection to the BB P2P net, and I think the reason I don't have that is because of a difference in this PREFIX. Still, my prefix might be wrong resulting in blocks not getting through to the network.
Any other ideas?
Possibly this isn't compatible with a P2Pool? I remember PPC having a similar problem, when Sunny announced that it simply doesn't support P2Pool.
Then who the hell's mining 2 blocks every minute?
Possibly this isn't compatible with a P2Pool? I remember PPC having a similar problem, when Sunny announced that it simply doesn't support P2Pool.
Doesn't look good.
Quote
00:19:50

getblock 0000000069f996a9e7aa1dcf026c388f3ddc1b85be31ffd50f29956b693c1f6d
00:19:50

Block not found (code -5)
Hmm...
block found let's see if it pays this time
Ok, great. I hope this does what it should, but I'm still wondering about some of the other parameters....
This should be changed also. And don't forget about subsidy function.
To what? Is changing this important when there is only one P2Pool Node?
How about the symbol parameter? (NVC in the original)
How do you suggest to adjust the subsidy function?
Thanks for your input so far.
Code:
P2P_PREFIX='cdf2c0ef'.decode('hex'),This should be changed also. And don't forget about subsidy function.
To what? Is changing this important when there is only one P2Pool Node?
How about the symbol parameter? (NVC in the original)
How do you suggest to adjust the subsidy function?
Thanks for your input so far.
shares are being accepted
Pool restarted.
So, I was thinking the fact that the blocks didn't seem to get through to the network might be because I was having the p2pool communicate with the Qt client, rather than using a proper bitbard.
So, I have now compiled the bitbard, and I'm using p2pool to connect to bitbard there.
I hope this works better.
So, I was thinking the fact that the blocks didn't seem to get through to the network might be because I was having the p2pool communicate with the Qt client, rather than using a proper bitbard.
So, I have now compiled the bitbard, and I'm using p2pool to connect to bitbard there.
I hope this works better.
Excellent. My room went silent for a few minutes as the pool lost connection and I lay with my laptop in bed, a nice change; and now that humming has returned as you restarted it.
Pool restarted.
So, I was thinking the fact that the blocks didn't seem to get through to the network might be because I was having the p2pool communicate with the Qt client, rather than using a proper bitbard.
So, I have now compiled the bitbard, and I'm using p2pool to connect to bitbard there.
I hope this works better.
So, I was thinking the fact that the blocks didn't seem to get through to the network might be because I was having the p2pool communicate with the Qt client, rather than using a proper bitbard.
So, I have now compiled the bitbard, and I'm using p2pool to connect to bitbard there.
I hope this works better.
I think you're right about that, and I think I know how to fix it. I'm working on that now.
Until then, I will suspend the pool so as not to waste any power.
Until then, I will suspend the pool so as not to waste any power.
BTW i think your blocks are not making it onto the network.
http://bitbar1.no-ip.biz:8336/static/share.html#000000001434e3763fbc593ae27c75903d81e3a29d96ff26d7696037a11a6870
Prev block is 000000007d3a22d3a8c90ddb6bce57186395498fc73fb628281c7851e169e376
23:17:04

getblock 000000007d3a22d3a8c90ddb6bce57186395498fc73fb628281c7851e169e376
23:17:04

{
"hash" : "000000007d3a22d3a8c90ddb6bce57186395498fc73fb628281c7851e169e376",
"confirmations" : 5,
"size" : 265,
"height" : 4553,
"version" : 3,
"merkleroot" : "7ce6aa90ec2901b3c222028f6632dbad228d39c14308ceeaed0bef6d9e919d05",
"mint" : 0.23429600,
"time" : 1367554443,
"nonce" : 3143371264,
"bits" : "1d0092a2",
"difficulty" : 1.74583089,
"previousblockhash" : "0000000029575d10aa1b4fe4d30b32e909ff97a516212223b409ce961d849193",
"nextblockhash" : "000000007f066bf0e276e985b7bc15ad11aff905926ee7143268a594a858ed69",
"flags" : "proof-of-work",
"proofhash" : "000000007d3a22d3a8c90ddb6bce57186395498fc73fb628281c7851e169e376",
"entropybit" : 0,
"modifier" : "8753143b44b210d3",
"modifierchecksum" : "45c57057",
"tx" : [
"7ce6aa90ec2901b3c222028f6632dbad228d39c14308ceeaed0bef6d9e919d05"
],
"signature" : "3045022075a3cdc6fdd321d871ff0694d4cf53f8e3f22833e12ae0c08092d47b74d4e003022100e 27d2f1c894bb912de85618a240a3640161c8088a9ee721d7aec5ace532a26f3"
}
But getblock 000000001434e3763fbc593ae27c75903d81e3a29d96ff26d7696037a11a6870 returns
And the next block (4554) is 000000007f066bf0e276e985b7bc15ad11aff905926ee7143268a594a858ed69
http://bitbar1.no-ip.biz:8336/static/share.html#000000001434e3763fbc593ae27c75903d81e3a29d96ff26d7696037a11a6870
Prev block is 000000007d3a22d3a8c90ddb6bce57186395498fc73fb628281c7851e169e376
Quote
23:17:04

getblock 000000007d3a22d3a8c90ddb6bce57186395498fc73fb628281c7851e169e376
23:17:04

{
"hash" : "000000007d3a22d3a8c90ddb6bce57186395498fc73fb628281c7851e169e376",
"confirmations" : 5,
"size" : 265,
"height" : 4553,
"version" : 3,
"merkleroot" : "7ce6aa90ec2901b3c222028f6632dbad228d39c14308ceeaed0bef6d9e919d05",
"mint" : 0.23429600,
"time" : 1367554443,
"nonce" : 3143371264,
"bits" : "1d0092a2",
"difficulty" : 1.74583089,
"previousblockhash" : "0000000029575d10aa1b4fe4d30b32e909ff97a516212223b409ce961d849193",
"nextblockhash" : "000000007f066bf0e276e985b7bc15ad11aff905926ee7143268a594a858ed69",
"flags" : "proof-of-work",
"proofhash" : "000000007d3a22d3a8c90ddb6bce57186395498fc73fb628281c7851e169e376",
"entropybit" : 0,
"modifier" : "8753143b44b210d3",
"modifierchecksum" : "45c57057",
"tx" : [
"7ce6aa90ec2901b3c222028f6632dbad228d39c14308ceeaed0bef6d9e919d05"
],
"signature" : "3045022075a3cdc6fdd321d871ff0694d4cf53f8e3f22833e12ae0c08092d47b74d4e003022100e 27d2f1c894bb912de85618a240a3640161c8088a9ee721d7aec5ace532a26f3"
}
But getblock 000000001434e3763fbc593ae27c75903d81e3a29d96ff26d7696037a11a6870 returns
Quote
23:21:12

Block not found (code -5)

Block not found (code -5)
And the next block (4554) is 000000007f066bf0e276e985b7bc15ad11aff905926ee7143268a594a858ed69
Bitbar.conf is now in the repository too
@Worker BBrG...FUCA: Please restart your miner, it is producing nonsense.
@Worker BBrG...FUCA: Please restart your miner, it is producing nonsense.
Jump to: