It does not matter that xetsr left you "duplicate" negative ratings as him doing so is going to have zero effect on your trust score.
If it were me, I would consolidate both ratings to say what the first one said, and then add that 'it is not recommended dealing with this person at all' as he put on his second rating.
Either way, IMO complaining about a single duplicate rating on your trust profile is really splitting hairs.
Topic: negative feedback abuse - page 2. (Read 1669 times)
the reason for this address i believe is none of your business. -snip-
Then, I guess we're done here.Unlike you, I have no alts. Feedback wont be removed.
xetsr already stated that his feedback will stay, so will mine.(You can retaliate that as many times as you want. Calling me an alt of mexxer-2, xetsr or who else you imagine me to be connected with.)
xetsr feedback didnt bother me until he doubled it and lutpin deleted his past negative on my profile and added a new one very very recently and both neg is about a topic dead long time back. why revive the dead,i dont know and both would not have a proper explanation.
Your positive trust to your alt stands till today. That topic is not dead. Hence the negatives say aswell.moreover, i showed a way to prove that me and netpyder are not the same person, but seems like both person dont want to go to that line for the simple reason they will be proven wrong.
How about you "go that way" and then we remove the feedback once proven wrong?! You're the one that wants to prove something, not we.resulting is abuse of DT
Leaving feedback is no "abuse of DT". It's what the trust system has been designed for, hence we do it.i invite coinmonster to put my name in public and shdvb can crosscheck with that of netpyder. that would make a proper result.
the reason for this address i believe is none of your business. -snip-
Then, I guess we're done here.Unlike you, I have no alts. Feedback wont be removed.
xetsr already stated that his feedback will stay, so will mine.(You can retaliate that as many times as you want. Calling me an alt of mexxer-2, xetsr or who else you imagine me to be connected with.)
xetsr feedback didnt bother me until he doubled it and lutpin deleted his past negative on my profile and added a new one very very recently and both neg is about a topic dead long time back. why revive the dead,i dont know and both would not have a proper explanation.
Your positive trust to your alt stands till today. That topic is not dead. Hence the negatives say aswell.moreover, i showed a way to prove that me and netpyder are not the same person, but seems like both person dont want to go to that line for the simple reason they will be proven wrong.
How about you "go that way" and then we remove the feedback once proven wrong?! You're the one that wants to prove something, not we.resulting is abuse of DT
Leaving feedback is no "abuse of DT". It's what the trust system has been designed for, hence we do it.Also, nice double post. Next time, just use the edit button.
Should be be allowed? No.
Is it done? Yes.
Is anything done about it? No.
Is it done? Yes.
Is anything done about it? No.
i realised that
xetsr feedback didnt bother me until he doubled it and lutpin deleted his past negative on my profile and added a new one very very recently and both neg is about a topic dead long time back. why revive the dead,i dont know and both would not have a proper explanation. moreover, i showed a way to prove that me and netpyder are not the same person, but seems like both person dont want to go to that line for the simple reason they will be proven wrong.
resulting is abuse of DT
Unlike you, I have no alts. Feedback wont be removed.
Should be be allowed? No.
Is it done? Yes.
Is anything done about it? No.
Is it done? Yes.
Is anything done about it? No.
can a user, for instance xetsr double his negative feedback about the same subject from his account and alts on a single user with a difference of more than 4months?
So tell me again, why am I an alt of xetsr?I've been called alt of several guys in the past (mostly mexxer, but there have been others in the mix also), but so far none of those guys came up with any reason other than "both left me a neg".
On another note, when you open a thread about some person (or in this case 2 persons), it would be appreciated if you PM those persons.
and if needed i can prove that me and netpyder are not connected at all.
That's funny, because my feedback proofs quite the opposite.The 1MkRJqUgQ2UkKNwNV88nhaKXN1vRpwQv1z address is used by both your accounts.
https://archive.is/qTwr1#selection-549.22-549.56
https://archive.is/GQaGM#selection-489.17-493.34
I just want to remind,
that it does not affect second feedback from same person to you overall trust score.
can a user, for instance xetsr double his negative feedback about the same subject from his account and alts on a single user with a difference of more than 4months?
isnt that an abuse?
and if needed i can prove that me and netpyder are not connected at all.
i recently did a deal with coinmonster, and on netpyder feedback thing i saw him had a deal with shdvb.
i invite ANY moderator to ask both coinmonster and shdvb to which FirstName and Last Name as well as country that the deal was made
xetsr who never has time when he will be proven wrong but has time to double his negative feedback. since you are a trusted person, i invite you to contact coinmonster and shdvb to cross check this or would you come with the lame excuse that you dont have time again?
Quote
xetsr 140: -0 / +14 2016-02-02 0.00000000 Scammer who leaves positive feedback on his alts. I highly recommend not dealing with this member at all.
Quote
Lutpin 1: -1 / +4 2016-01-01 0.00000000 Reference Left positive feedback with this account to his alt account Netpyder (u=458703).
In difference to his retaliation feedback, this one is based on facts.
1MkRJqUgQ2UkKNwNV88nhaKXN1vRpwQv1z connects both account here (https://archive.is/qTwr1) and here (https://archive.is/GQaGM).
In difference to his retaliation feedback, this one is based on facts.
1MkRJqUgQ2UkKNwNV88nhaKXN1vRpwQv1z connects both account here (https://archive.is/qTwr1) and here (https://archive.is/GQaGM).
Quote
xetsr 140: -0 / +14 2015-10-14 0.00000000 Alt of Netpyder, leaves himself feedback from alts. 1MkRJqUgQ2UkKNwNV88nhaKXN1vRpwQv1z used here (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ebooks-promo-199-each-1066266 - https://archive.is/qTwr1 if deleted) and on his profile https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/nor9865-59502 (https://archive.is/GQaGM - if deleted)
isnt that an abuse?
and if needed i can prove that me and netpyder are not connected at all.
i recently did a deal with coinmonster, and on netpyder feedback thing i saw him had a deal with shdvb.
i invite ANY moderator to ask both coinmonster and shdvb to which FirstName and Last Name as well as country that the deal was made
xetsr who never has time when he will be proven wrong but has time to double his negative feedback. since you are a trusted person, i invite you to contact coinmonster and shdvb to cross check this
or would you come with the lame excuse that you dont have time again? Jump to: