Negative rating from a banned user | Bitcointalksearch.org

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Quickseller on June 29, 2015, 09:47:21 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Quickseller on June 29, 2015, 09:29:44 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Trust ratings are meaningless here. This is how trust works:

[]http://s17.postimg.org/7ioymnagv/Capture.png[/img]

(logged into an old account of mine, BespokeServicesLTD, now banned, thanks scumbag mods)

Not suggesting a screencap is proof, but mods can verify this is genuine Undecided

that screen shot is fake. That account didn't even send him negative trust. You are trolling.

I am sure by now that you are paying a fee to be able to post. Is it really worth paying to be able to troll?

You are wrong. How about this:
I don't think you're trying to scam, just clueless. So let's make a gentlemen's bet:
I give you the password to that account, you log in, and see for yourself.
If you're wrong, you apologize, and never post on Bitcointalk again.

Deal, interweb sleuth?

Thanks but I think I'll pass. Nothing in it for me

How about I sweeten the deal: Do you trust Xialla? I can PM Xialla the password, and if the screencap is genuine, all you have to do is make a single post in this thread, admitting that you are wrong, and, since you tend to make ridiculous claims and are clueless, should never be taken seriously.
In turn, I promise to post whatever you feel is appropriate.

Deal?

you can report the PM to an admin asking them to post it here. If I am wrong then I will admit I am wrong.

I don't want you to post anything. You are annoying and a troll.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Quickseller on June 29, 2015, 09:29:44 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Trust ratings are meaningless here. This is how trust works:

[]http://s17.postimg.org/7ioymnagv/Capture.png[/img]

(logged into an old account of mine, BespokeServicesLTD, now banned, thanks scumbag mods)

Not suggesting a screencap is proof, but mods can verify this is genuine Undecided

that screen shot is fake. That account didn't even send him negative trust. You are trolling.

I am sure by now that you are paying a fee to be able to post. Is it really worth paying to be able to troll?

You are wrong. How about this:
I don't think you're trying to scam, just clueless. So let's make a gentlemen's bet:
I give you the password to that account, you log in, and see for yourself.
If you're wrong, you apologize, and never post on Bitcointalk again.

Deal, interweb sleuth?

Thanks but I think I'll pass. Nothing in it for me

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: ?? on ??

Trust ratings are meaningless here. This is how trust works:

[]http://s17.postimg.org/7ioymnagv/Capture.png[/img]

(logged into an old account of mine, BespokeServicesLTD, now banned, thanks scumbag mods)

Not suggesting a screencap is proof, but mods can verify this is genuine Undecided

that screen shot is fake. That account didn't even send him negative trust. You are trolling.

I am sure by now that you are paying a fee to be able to post. Is it really worth paying to be able to troll?

Xialla

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1001

/dev/null

thanks for evidence, anyway why is trust rating made by your second account removed now? you did it or some mods?

Xialla

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1001

/dev/null

Quote from: el kaka22 on June 29, 2015, 08:59:45 AM

However almost no one will care on 'Untrusted feedback' (i.e. feedback from people not from DefaultTrust's trust list), especially for those have no reference and stating fake things/trolling.

well and this is whole point...because even you are not painted red on forum post, once somebody will check your profile, if it is red, it is just not trustworthly at all and for me doesn't matter so much if you had 10 red from noobs or 2 red from DT2 users..

trust system is generally sick and I really hope, that it will be redesigned on new forum..

el kaka22

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 1165

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on June 28, 2015, 08:29:26 PM

Quote from: Digital_Lord on June 27, 2015, 08:31:31 PM

Quote from: Omikifuse on June 27, 2015, 07:49:19 PM

Lesson of the day: never open a thread to complain about troll trust ratings. Things will get worse in the end, much worse

true, no-one will take my ratings seriously now

@Digital_Lord

No one takes trust ratings serious anyway.

They are completely useless due to non moderation and the ease of feedback farming.

~BCX~

The trust ratings from DefaultTrust (depth 2) matters because they affect the value of the account and it will affect the reputation because a 'Warning! Trade with extreme caution' tag will appear at the profile and the user's posts if they have negative feedback from trusted members. However almost no one will care on 'Untrusted feedback' (i.e. feedback from people not from DefaultTrust's trust list), especially for those have no reference and stating fake things/trolling.

BitcoinEXpress

legendary

Activity: 1210

Merit: 1024

Quote from: Digital_Lord on June 27, 2015, 08:31:31 PM

Quote from: Omikifuse on June 27, 2015, 07:49:19 PM

Lesson of the day: never open a thread to complain about troll trust ratings. Things will get worse in the end, much worse

true, no-one will take my ratings seriously now

@Digital_Lord

No one takes trust ratings serious anyway.

They are completely useless due to non moderation and the ease of feedback farming.

~BCX~

1FfmbHfnpaZjKFvyi1okTjJJu

full member

Activity: 164

Merit: 100

Im not 1FfmbHfnpaZjKFvyi1okTjJJusN455paPH

Quote from: Hexcoin on June 27, 2015, 02:34:02 AM

Quote from: 1FfmbHfnpaZjKFvyi1okTjJJu on June 27, 2015, 02:10:18 AM

to keep trusted system from spamer seems we need to change the order of the trusted feedback
may be newbie can't give negative/positif feedback, only Sr. member above can give feedback Undecided

i think it will be much better if untrusted feedback will have 2 sections, one from Sr Member and higher ranks and another is from Full Members and below to avoid trust spam

I agree it because some time
i see new member created just for give neagative trust and and just for troll only

Digital_Lord

hero member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 502

👉bit.ly/3QXp3oh | 🔥 Ultimate Launc

Quote from: Omikifuse on June 27, 2015, 07:49:19 PM

Lesson of the day: never open a thread to complain about troll trust ratings. Things will get worse in the end, much worse

true, no-one will take my ratings seriously now

Omikifuse

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1009

Lesson of the day: never open a thread to complain about troll trust ratings. Things will get worse in the end, much worse

Hexcoin

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Quote from: 1FfmbHfnpaZjKFvyi1okTjJJu on June 27, 2015, 02:10:18 AM

to keep trusted system from spamer seems we need to change the order of the trusted feedback
may be newbie can't give negative/positif feedback, only Sr. member above can give feedback Undecided

i think it will be much better if untrusted feedback will have 2 sections, one from Sr Member and higher ranks and another is from Full Members and below to avoid trust spam

1FfmbHfnpaZjKFvyi1okTjJJu

full member

Activity: 164

Merit: 100

Im not 1FfmbHfnpaZjKFvyi1okTjJJusN455paPH

to keep trusted system from spamer seems we need to change the order of the trusted feedback
may be newbie can't give negative/positif feedback, only Sr. member above can give feedback Undecided

jaberwock

legendary

Activity: 2660

Merit: 1074

wtf I'm hallucinating or even Tomatocage left a troll positive feedback regarding the, errrr, penis issue:

Digital_Lord does indeed have a penis. His boyfriend told me so.

ajareselde

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1000

Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin

Quote from: --Encrypted-- on June 26, 2015, 12:55:08 PM

Quote from: ajareselde on June 26, 2015, 12:44:18 PM

Things like this show just how much moderating trust is needed. I don't where's the problem in giving one or two staff members the job of trust moderation,
or hire a new one that would do that. It's not like they are swamped with moderation today when so many users help in preventing spam and scams.
For leading forum representing a revolutionary way of payment, this is a shame imo.

cheers

I don't think trust spam is a good enough reason to make moderation a necessity. those spams are worthless, they don't damage the trust system as much as some people from the default trust do.

IMO we only need some set of official rules and a sub board to make a topic in when someone breaks them. not moderation

I'm not only talking about trust spam, it's a whole range from that, to fake loans and rep abuse. To people that don't have feedback from anyone on default trust, such feedbacks DO matter.
And what you wrote above is useless if there's noone to enforce those rules, hence moderation is obviously needed.

cheers

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Lol. It seems that by creating this thread, the OP went from having one negative rating that no one will take seriously to having a bunch of trolling ratings on his profile that will cause most of his ratings be overall not taken seriously, and the ones on his profile that do not include trades should certainly not be taken seriously.

Tomatocage

legendary

Activity: 1554

Merit: 1222

brb keeping up with the Kardashians

There you go, man. I hope this helps

--Encrypted--

copper member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1007

hee-ho.

Quote from: ajareselde on June 26, 2015, 12:44:18 PM

Things like this show just how much moderating trust is needed. I don't where's the problem in giving one or two staff members the job of trust moderation,
or hire a new one that would do that. It's not like they are swamped with moderation today when so many users help in preventing spam and scams.
For leading forum representing a revolutionary way of payment, this is a shame imo.

cheers

I don't think trust spam is a good enough reason to make moderation a necessity. those spams are worthless, they don't damage the trust system as much as some people from the default trust do.

IMO we only need some set of official rules and a sub board to make a topic in when someone breaks them. not moderation

ajareselde

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1000

Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin

Things like this show just how much moderating trust is needed. I don't where's the problem in giving one or two staff members the job of trust moderation,
or hire a new one that would do that. It's not like they are swamped with moderation today when so many users help in preventing spam and scams.
For leading forum representing a revolutionary way of payment, this is a shame imo.

cheers

el kaka22

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 1165

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

Quote from: Digital_Lord on June 25, 2015, 06:43:48 PM

Quote from: el kaka22 on June 25, 2015, 06:21:23 PM

If some banned users to leave you a false feedback, then it probably don't show up as a default trust in the future, because most members in default trust won't give this kind of random feedback. You may negative feedback him as 'He left a false feedback in my profile'.

This has been said 4 or 5 times in the thread before, lets hope the mods will see pass all the words and mark this as spam

Nope, because along with some existing points, I've added some new points into it. So if mods are watching through this thread and every word of my reply, then they won't delete the reply.

BitcoinEXpress

legendary

Activity: 1210

Merit: 1024

Quote from: Digital_Lord on June 23, 2015, 09:11:30 PM

I have a negative rating from a banned user with red trust, he says that 33BTC was risked and for the comment he says Has no penis
can i have this manually removed please?

Just to make you feel better since you're a newbie I doubled the amount of risked BTC left by the banned user and countered his claim of "has no penis" with

"I can personally attest that BuddyIsrael is incorrect, Digital_Lord in fact does have a penis!"

Let me know if this helps.

Grin

~BCX~

Topic: Negative rating from a banned user (Read 2126 times)