if we could have another system named reputation we could differentiate between real scammers and victims of trust abuse.
I was actually thinking of the same thing such as this. So, mine was like, when giving a red tag, there can be options from which the member who will tag a certain user, can chose from. This way, one can easily identify why a user was tagged, especially bounty managers, without looking at their trust history.
Example: Let's say a forum member 1 was spamming the forum and there was forum member 2 who decided to red tag Forum member 1. The latter can choose from different options as to where Forum Member 1 actions falls into. Like A. Spammer/Trolls B. Scammer C.Alt Account D. Hacked Account etc.
When one of this options where clicked, it will automatically reflect on Forum Member 1's reputation.
This way, bounty managers and other members can easily determine whether an account can be accepted in signature campaigns, in bounties, to transact with, and others. This notion is also because of the fact that members with red tagged are often misunderstood and viewed as all scammers despite having different issues with regards to their tags. This is because red tag has become a stigma, a symbol for scammers.
Anyway, as this was an additional opinion, of course there will be some cons with it. There of course is the abuse of this proposed idea.
?
