Topic: Neluns - The Next Exit Scam after Raising Over $100 million? - page 4. (Read 16332 times)
This project is looking really dangerous to me because it's raised too much and also their commitment is not accurate as well. Their commitment was they will start distribution 28-30 OCTOBER but they didn't started yet. I am really shocked.
I heard about this project for the first time. It's a good thing you haven't seen it before. I'm sorry for the investors who deposited money.
According to what I've been able to gather, the exchange listing that was promised to be announced today is yet to materialize. Also, bounty hunters are being threatened to have their rewards slashed for being "Stupid" and "Idiot".
Ok. Very corporate speak. very professional.
Bots are back on the ANN thread too
Ok. Very corporate speak. very professional.
Bots are back on the ANN thread too
There's also a Scam Accusation thread on the main board.
Would be particularly interested if anyone has NELUNS' BTC
Nice to read some things that you are here wrote, nice to read the text of people and not bots...
and now as for Neluns
I want to completely dispel your doubts about the SEC notice
I guarantee you 100% that Neluns did not and will not make notifications to the SEC
I'll show you the original documents now
on the example of another company that notified the SEC
Here are the data of this company on the site SEC:
Notice of Exempt Offering of Securities
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1724831/000172483117000002/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml (2017-12-11)
and here:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1724831/000172483118000002/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml (2018-05-16)
resume:
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001724831
This is how these documents look
and it is necessary to apply to SEC before the start of ICO and not after its completion
I remind you this is just an example of real documents.
and now as for Neluns
I want to completely dispel your doubts about the SEC notice
I guarantee you 100% that Neluns did not and will not make notifications to the SEC
I'll show you the original documents now
on the example of another company that notified the SEC
Here are the data of this company on the site SEC:
Notice of Exempt Offering of Securities
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1724831/000172483117000002/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml (2017-12-11)
and here:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1724831/000172483118000002/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml (2018-05-16)
resume:
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001724831
This is how these documents look
and it is necessary to apply to SEC before the start of ICO and not after its completion
I remind you this is just an example of real documents.
Neluns claims to be registered in NYC and SEC compliant. However, for such an "American" company, they seem to quite incapable of finding that one English dude to write their PR as exemplified here: https://medium.com/@iconeluns/the-manhattan-blockchain-fund-is-an-anchor-investor-of-neluns-b2d99656eb12
I believe most of ICOs are getting their threads hyped, even though it's against the rules. When I worked for one ICO, we had such offers regularly. Newbie activity costs the least, so this project probably didn't raise much money even if they are saying the opposite. As for English, I believe that projects can actually apply to SEC even if they are not registered in the US. After all, this is the most famous STO regulator in the world for now. The whole project doesn't look very nice to me, though, since it doesn't offer anything new.The Russian article is pretty good in showing that the project is at least lying to people if not planning to dump everyone.
Add the amount they claimed to have raised and it becomes all the more worrisome that they need to bump their threads in the first place. Numerous ICOs have successfully raised a fraction of that without bumping. You don't raise over a hundred million without crossing a few oceans and knowing some highly-placed individuals. So why bump - using accounts that can barely string two words together. I'd assume as a financial company based in NYC, quality control will be of paramount importance in whatever service they choose to engage - including bumps and writers.
Apparently, not the case here. Not only are they shitposting, but their articles are also poorly written too. Makes you wondered what they submitted to the "SEC" or pitched to "VCs". To cap it off, they are security token, meaning no good listing anytime soon (they can always pin that on the SEC conveniently), or (and based on their "quality control" or lack of) get listed on some shit exchange and keep stumbling all over their roadmap.
Interesting times.
Neluns claims to be registered in NYC and SEC compliant. However, for such an "American" company, they seem to quite incapable of finding that one English dude to write their PR as exemplified here: https://medium.com/@iconeluns/the-manhattan-blockchain-fund-is-an-anchor-investor-of-neluns-b2d99656eb12
I believe most of ICOs are getting their threads hyped, even though it's against the rules. When I worked for one ICO, we had such offers regularly. Newbie activity costs the least, so this project probably didn't raise much money even if they are saying the opposite. As for English, I believe that projects can actually apply to SEC even if they are not registered in the US. After all, this is the most famous STO regulator in the world for now. The whole project doesn't look very nice to me, though, since it doesn't offer anything new.The Russian article is pretty good in showing that the project is at least lying to people if not planning to dump everyone.
They are a clear scam. First they are saying they raised $136 m with just some 850 investors which they are claiming as institutional investors, seems absurd. Then the Manhattan fund which was supposed to have invested $1.5 million has a website hosted on same server as their official websites.
They are clearly a scam.
They are clearly a scam.
no wonder will be like this ,
since they claim ico raised more than 100,000,000 usd its too much ,
since market still on slow performance.
i also read more more thread about neluns scam,
but , i think we need more a perfect proof about this cases.
since they claim ico raised more than 100,000,000 usd its too much ,
since market still on slow performance.
i also read more more thread about neluns scam,
but , i think we need more a perfect proof about this cases.
Neluns thread here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annico-neluns-new-generation-financial-ecosystem-4694028 exhibits all the hallmarks of a botted thread with numerous newbie accounts raining platitude about the project, answering each other, and completely ignoring questions directed to them. But that's not the problem
Neluns claims to be registered in NYC and SEC compliant. However, for such an "American" company, they seem to quite incapable of finding that one English dude to write their PR as exemplified here: https://medium.com/@iconeluns/the-manhattan-blockchain-fund-is-an-anchor-investor-of-neluns-b2d99656eb12
Then, you've got the "Binance List in Progress" thingy on their site. Anybody who's been around long enough knows NDA prevents startups from naming exchanges they are in discussion with (at least the top 50), not to mention stamping it on their homepage.
Then you've got this Russian language investigation put together by a very astute and concerned community member: https://ttrcoin.com/threads/neluns-io-scam.2796/
Concerned by all these, I went into their TG channel to alert them to the concerns on BTT. Next thing I knew, I got the boot.
Neluns claims to be registered in NYC and SEC compliant. However, for such an "American" company, they seem to quite incapable of finding that one English dude to write their PR as exemplified here: https://medium.com/@iconeluns/the-manhattan-blockchain-fund-is-an-anchor-investor-of-neluns-b2d99656eb12
Then, you've got the "Binance List in Progress" thingy on their site. Anybody who's been around long enough knows NDA prevents startups from naming exchanges they are in discussion with (at least the top 50), not to mention stamping it on their homepage.
Then you've got this Russian language investigation put together by a very astute and concerned community member: https://ttrcoin.com/threads/neluns-io-scam.2796/
Concerned by all these, I went into their TG channel to alert them to the concerns on BTT. Next thing I knew, I got the boot.
Jump to: