It's going to very interesting to see.
Look what happens with the value of worthless clones, some still have value while offering nothing new. With FAR less of a community than 1000+ to start!!
Topic: NEM - copycat scam? - page 3. (Read 3973 times)
Don't forget my words - NEM-devs will create a good and stable coin using the best pieces of NXT combined with the idea of an equal share !!! NEM will be the big train you'll miss 
According to this forum, every alt is a scam. At least NEM is attempting fair distribution.
Seeing as NxT copy every feature that eMu bring to the development table, so if we go with your logic - then the NxT you are defending is actually also a copy cat coin?
Just making sure that i'm not the only one that feels NxT hasn't got even one single unique feature that eMunie hasn't had in beta for a few months already.
Just making sure that i'm not the only one that feels NxT hasn't got even one single unique feature that eMunie hasn't had in beta for a few months already.
Would be good to hodl both.
NEM is not a copy
I think nem will do better than nxt
Its not a copy cat scam, its just a copy cat.....openly so.
Not anymore, devs decided to write new code from scratch, using best of NXT plus NEMs own improvements.
Its not a copy cat scam, its just a copy cat.....openly so.
You could say this about any Bitcoin clone... aka 98% of all altcoins.
To me NEM seems like a copycat scam. Anyone can just copy the code of NxT and then use it to their advantage. After all the NEM coins are "equally distributed", who would be dumb enough to buy in, thus increasing the value?
They just make silly attempts to ruin the image of Nxt. Clones are useless because they can't copy transparent forging. Anyways, soon they will give up and buy Nxt themselves 
http://bitcoinmagazine.com/9826/nxt-proof-stake-new-alternative-altcoin/
To me NEM seems like a copycat scam. Anyone can just copy the code of NxT and then use it to their advantage. After all the NEM coins are "equally distributed", who would be dumb enough to buy in, thus increasing the value?
Jump to: