Topic: NEM Stakes - - - so who got what in the new economy movement ? Find out here~ (Read 3322 times)
August 25, 2015, 06:23:36 PM
Pure FUD /thread.
August 25, 2015, 02:42:14 PM
The recent (august 2015) news is that nem admins/developers have gone extremely desperate in nem thread, and they have now started deleting even factual posts if it's critical of nem. Here is example of deleted post
Then, can we say NEM is 3.33 times(370/111) efficient than Etherium, at least until now?
Nem market cap is fake. 50% of coins are not even released yet. The value will go down as more of these coins are released.
Look at the daily volume. That tells you the real difference between both, and nem is not even close. 2 BTC daily volume vs 5000.
Then, can we say NEM is 3.33 times(370/111) efficient than Etherium, at least until now?
Nem market cap is fake. 50% of coins are not even released yet. The value will go down as more of these coins are released.
Look at the daily volume. That tells you the real difference between both, and nem is not even close. 2 BTC daily volume vs 5000.
You might want to check coinmarket about your "facts". NEM thread allows lots of whining and moaning which you do regularly each week, but using wrong numbers to FUD will get anybody deleted.
THat's fucking nonsense excuse by the developers to delete post. So they deleted post because it's 46% instead of 50%. What a fucking nonsensical excuse. It's actually more than 50% given each developer is sitting on 50 stakes each.
As for volume, it was 2 BTC vs 5000 that day. Ethereum has close to 6000 btc daily volume today vs around 10 btc for nem
Nem developers are getting desperate
The price is all time low (40 sat) and falling every month
The only people that are getting desperate are the ones without patience to see things through.. It was not like Rome was built in one day...
August 25, 2015, 02:04:40 PM
The recent (august 2015) news is that nem admins/developers have gone extremely desperate in nem thread, and they have now started deleting even factual posts if it's critical of nem. Here is example of deleted post
Then, can we say NEM is 3.33 times(370/111) efficient than Etherium, at least until now?
Nem market cap is fake. 50% of coins are not even released yet. The value will go down as more of these coins are released.
Look at the daily volume. That tells you the real difference between both, and nem is not even close. 2 BTC daily volume vs 5000.
Then, can we say NEM is 3.33 times(370/111) efficient than Etherium, at least until now?
Nem market cap is fake. 50% of coins are not even released yet. The value will go down as more of these coins are released.
Look at the daily volume. That tells you the real difference between both, and nem is not even close. 2 BTC daily volume vs 5000.
You might want to check coinmarket about your "facts". NEM thread allows lots of whining and moaning which you do regularly each week, but using wrong numbers to FUD will get anybody deleted.
THat's fucking nonsense excuse by the developers to delete post. So they deleted post because it's 46% instead of 50%. What a fucking nonsensical excuse. It's actually more than 50% given each developer is sitting on 50 stakes each.
As for volume, it was 2 BTC vs 5000 that day. Ethereum has close to 6000 btc daily volume today vs around 10 btc for nem
Nem developers are getting desperate
The price is all time low (40 sat) and falling every month
August 24, 2015, 04:33:10 PM
yes, 46% of coins have not been released and your numbers on coinmarketcap are correct. I'm sure if he would have been more accurate his post wouldn't have been deleted.
August 24, 2015, 03:59:21 PM
The recent (august 2015) news is that nem admins/developers have gone extremely desperate in nem thread, and they have now started deleting even factual posts if it's critical of nem. Here is example of deleted post
Then, can we say NEM is 3.33 times(370/111) efficient than Etherium, at least until now?
Nem market cap is fake. 50% of coins are not even released yet. The value will go down as more of these coins are released.
Look at the daily volume. That tells you the real difference between both, and nem is not even close. 2 BTC daily volume vs 5000.
Then, can we say NEM is 3.33 times(370/111) efficient than Etherium, at least until now?
Nem market cap is fake. 50% of coins are not even released yet. The value will go down as more of these coins are released.
Look at the daily volume. That tells you the real difference between both, and nem is not even close. 2 BTC daily volume vs 5000.
You might want to check coinmarket about your "facts". NEM thread allows lots of whining and moaning which you do regularly each week, but using wrong numbers to FUD will get anybody deleted.
August 24, 2015, 02:07:36 PM
The recent (august 2015) news is that nem admins/developers have gone extremely desperate in nem thread, and they have now started deleting even factual posts if it's critical of nem. Here is example of deleted post
Then, can we say NEM is 3.33 times(370/111) efficient than Etherium, at least until now?
Nem market cap is fake. 50% of coins are not even released yet. The value will go down as more of these coins are released.
Look at the daily volume. That tells you the real difference between both, and nem is not even close. 2 BTC daily volume vs 5000.
Then, can we say NEM is 3.33 times(370/111) efficient than Etherium, at least until now?
Nem market cap is fake. 50% of coins are not even released yet. The value will go down as more of these coins are released.
Look at the daily volume. That tells you the real difference between both, and nem is not even close. 2 BTC daily volume vs 5000.
You might want to check coinmarket about your "facts". NEM thread allows lots of whining and moaning which you do regularly each week, but using wrong numbers to FUD will get anybody deleted.
August 24, 2015, 01:55:45 PM
The recent (august 2015) news is that nem admins/developers have gone extremely desperate in nem thread, and they have now started deleting even factual posts if it's critical of nem. Here is example of deleted post
Then, can we say NEM is 3.33 times(370/111) efficient than Etherium, at least until now?
Nem market cap is fake. 50% of coins are not even released yet. The value will go down as more of these coins are released.
Look at the daily volume. That tells you the real difference between both, and nem is not even close. 2 BTC daily volume vs 5000.
Then, can we say NEM is 3.33 times(370/111) efficient than Etherium, at least until now?
Nem market cap is fake. 50% of coins are not even released yet. The value will go down as more of these coins are released.
Look at the daily volume. That tells you the real difference between both, and nem is not even close. 2 BTC daily volume vs 5000.
July 25, 2015, 09:20:50 AM
nem is a scam
June 29, 2015, 03:25:12 AM
I thought UtopianFuture was TaunSew?
Sure - if you believe some unemployed Danish guy on the NXT forum who spent hours looking at thousands of Bitcointalk accounts and couldn't find another pair of matched accounts, despite this forum being rife with sockpuppets and sockmasters..
April 23, 2015, 01:21:43 PM
I thought UtopianFuture was TaunSew?
April 23, 2015, 03:54:58 AM
No, because that is my conservative estimate, but I CAN show you that UtopianFuture is a liar, a cheater and a thief.
Really?
U do realize utopiafuture is still active on daily basis in NEM? he is petmast3r, dem accusation has been confirmed.
pet mast3r = utopianfuture
speech was confirmed and nem team didnt deny this.
just check posts, its the same dude without a doubt .
NOW whats left 4 me is what r his other sock puppetries that r still active? i know some know.
I'm not surprised. I'd rather err on the side of caution than spread lies. The last thing I want to do is lower myself to the moral standards of UtopianFuture and the NEMorons.
April 23, 2015, 03:42:36 AM
No, because that is my conservative estimate, but I CAN show you that UtopianFuture is a liar, a cheater and a thief.
Really?
U do realize utopiafuture is still active on daily basis in NEM? he is petmast3r, dem accusation has been confirmed.
pet mast3r = utopianfuture
speech was confirmed and nem team didnt deny this.
just check posts, its the same dude without a doubt .
NOW whats left 4 me is what r his other sock puppetries that r still active? i know some know.
April 23, 2015, 01:34:01 AM
72% of coins are in developers/marketers control. "fair distribution" LOL
Yeah, earmarked and under multisig control. Was it a mineable crypto ninja-launched with a linux-only distribution that may or may not compile?
Whatever. I am pretty sure Ripple has their coins secured too. The point still stands that 72% of coins are controlled by around 6 people. This is hilarious when the whole marketing was based on the claim of "fair distribution".
Actually, 72% of the coins are controlled by around 3 people because you have to consider that at least 50% of these "individuals" are sockpuppets of UtopianFuture.
Can you show the 50%?
No, because that is my conservative estimate, but I CAN show you that UtopianFuture is a liar, a cheater and a thief.
April 22, 2015, 09:48:38 PM
72% of coins are in developers/marketers control. "fair distribution" LOL
Yeah, earmarked and under multisig control. Was it a mineable crypto ninja-launched with a linux-only distribution that may or may not compile?
Whatever. I am pretty sure Ripple has their coins secured too. The point still stands that 72% of coins are controlled by around 6 people. This is hilarious when the whole marketing was based on the claim of "fair distribution".
Actually, 72% of the coins are controlled by around 3 people because you have to consider that at least 50% of these "individuals" are sockpuppets of UtopianFuture.
Can you show the 50%?
April 14, 2015, 04:38:55 AM
72% of coins are in developers/marketers control. "fair distribution" LOL
Yeah, earmarked and under multisig control. Was it a mineable crypto ninja-launched with a linux-only distribution that may or may not compile?
Whatever. I am pretty sure Ripple has their coins secured too. The point still stands that 72% of coins are controlled by around 6 people. This is hilarious when the whole marketing was based on the claim of "fair distribution".
Actually, 72% of the coins are controlled by around 3 people because you have to consider that at least 50% of these "individuals" are sockpuppets of UtopianFuture.
April 13, 2015, 03:26:20 PM
NEM is looking worse and worse by the week... 
In a few months we can just change the NEM name to PARETO's BITCH.
In a few months we can just change the NEM name to PARETO's BITCH.
April 13, 2015, 11:23:02 AM
Jabo38, you realize From Above is not Come-from-Beyond right?
From Above is just the euro version of Spoetnik.
And on another topic, where's my NEM stake?
From Above is just the euro version of Spoetnik.
And on another topic, where's my NEM stake?
April 13, 2015, 09:45:21 AM
jabo38!
why are you saying ~70% is FUD. If you add up the numbers you actually get to that percentage!?
why are you saying ~70% is FUD. If you add up the numbers you actually get to that percentage!?
With the funds.
Without the funds. (I believe that 4% and 6% are exchanges)
I'll also add that all funds are kept in multisig accounts and each has its own designated purpose to fuel the NEM ecosystem. Furthermore, I am not a dev, but more of a trusted member of the community and marketer and I am also on of the signers. So it isn't just the "devs" that have control over the funds. Two other marketers are also cosigners. I think that was a pretty cool and brave thing the main devs did, letting other people that aren't devs have power.
I hope to keep their trust!NEM is in beta, but by the time V1 comes (leaving beta) almost all of those funds are planned to be fully distributed, and by then those charts are going to look even better.
April 13, 2015, 09:07:52 AM
there r some things i dont understand about how devs split up
for exmpl
1st
gimre has only 10 stakes. why the hell that its far too small obviously if u look at 2nd
for exmpl
1st
gimre has only 10 stakes. why the hell that its far too small obviously if u look at 2nd
gimre, Jaguar0625 and BloodyRookie got 55 stakes each, those stakes are simply split into smaller portions.
April 13, 2015, 04:15:50 AM
It's really disappointing that such a prominent and respected member of NXT would use half real numbers and the other half lying FUD saying the devs have 72%.
Forgive my little brother, his English is worse than mine and people always get him wrong.