Topic: NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs - page 1056. (Read 2985369 times)

that's actually a very nice distribution there on the explorer so long as the funds at the top are handled nice and openly.

that's actually a very nice distribution there on the explorer so long as the funds at the top are handled nice and openly.

hes able to leave his job because the hard work he has been doing has paid off in the form of VC funding.

all stakes not sent out to sock accounts are held in multisig accounts, publicly accessible and verifiable. there is no reason to assume that the stakes not sent out because the accounts were flagged as socks would end up in anyones pockets. its quite frankly a ridiculous and totally irrational accusation to make.

Can someone else in the dev team please review my claim? I feel like Makoto is blinded and will not open his mind to the reality that linking me with another account is wrong. I do not have any other stakes, and the way I have been accused is out of line. What can I do or say to get that through to you?

Hello all,

I have been trying to sort all this out with Makoto for 5 month now

we have to write here as Makoto is no paying attention to us and this is our last resource.

Just want to let you know, I'm JAMTHIRTEEN that made a sockpuppet redemption claim on nem forum. The claim is for my account and my girlfriend acccount (JAMTHIRTEEN NBXVHA-S2TOYM-H4GFFO-V3SGIN-SP6DLT-HERCMK-RBN3 and MAMEN NBKEYS-BJB74B-5M7Q4Z-Y6N5AZ-JPDUY7-5T7UHZ-VINH ). If you need anything else please ask.
 
The problem is that I work with other two colleagues that also have NEM Stakes and we did it all from our work place that's why you might think there is one person with 5 Stakes but we are 3 people. Same Ip address from work place.
 
To help you in the investigation my work colleagues BTT account are:
 
1 JERJU80 NC7IWM-24KC6K-BT7SH2-2VOESS-QNGCTA-CSDKZT-CK72
2 SANDRAMABE NC2V53-WKYFCC-MKETYL-M3IXHJ-VF3HJZ-B4IHTC-LQDZ
3 OSCARVENEGAS NC7545-ULAZAR-5CEWIU-R3H5R6-6Z6SGH-XP64NX-JNUY
 
Please let me know if they should send you a separate email, please advise as we don't want to confuse or complicate this unnecessarily

 We can provide any evidence you require to send  and we can send our passports, names and anything you need to clear this. we have took some photos working in the office with the client open in the PC, we can send this photos to you if you tell us how or any other photo you like us to take.


Then he offered us only one stake. One of his  post here he said t  ''Same IP + same fingerprint means the same computer. The rules were 2 stakes, which were meant to be 1 for you and 1 for a friend/loved one.'' If thats the case why he offered us only one stake? It should it be 2! Now we are genuine and we should have received 5 as we did it from our work place.  There was not rule you could not do it from work where other people can create accounts. You keep changing the rules all the time.

Now this is the last emal with Makoto:

Quote from: makoto1337 on June 29, 2015, 08:19:07 AM
We will give a stake back to sandramabe. Can you give me a NEM address to send to?

Thanks Smiley

Thank you but as I told you in my last email sandramabe is the stake of one of my job partner Jerju80...
i'm jamthirteen and my Nem address is NBXVHA-S2TOYM-H4GFFO-V3SGIN-SP6DLT-HERCMK-RBN3
I will pass your information to Jerju80 so that he can send you an email about his stake and wife's.
We all follow all the instructions from the begining of NEM to get the stake and we think it is not fair to receive just on for sandramabe...We would like you to think about it and change your mine. Please let me know if we could add any other information you need.

thanks in advance
Jamthirteen
hello there
did you read my last message?
update please

============

Please can you tell me what happened?

I have not words!!

It's pretty obvious now why Makoto was in charged of the doing another round of socks elimination to fund the exit of his job.

It's wrong, ethically wrong getting a  salary taking the stakes of other people and accusing them of being a sock. Don't quit your job and give all the stakes to the people.

I don't tend to write in the forum but I do like to read  and learn a lot from it. In my own eyes there is a lot of wrong doing here and this is not a good image for  NEM.  What I don't understand  as the above statement says I totally agree that the latest round of sock removals was handeled pretty terribly.  why are these people not given their NEM if this is the case?

Also, I like to know how this guy if he is not in the NEM team how does he know  so much? what kind of information he has access to and why?  Is you are not a member of the NEM team why do you get involved in certain areas regarding NEM? I am worry if a member that is not part of the team has certain information. I did not like the heat of the discussion of the last few days from both sides, this is not good at all and they should reach an agreement and talk like civilise people and stop all this non sense. If they are the legitimate  owners of these stakes they should be given to them. Also, Makoto said in http://cointelegraph.com/news/114932/nem-right-now-we-have-the-best-designed-blockchain-platform-in-existence ''I am able to leave my job, which I am already in the process of doing. This will give me more time to work on NEM and also to push the development of the NEM ecosystem forward''

He has been handling the socks list, where will he get the money from to live now? This makes me think somehow where the Socks NEM Stake will go. These are just my thoughts and opinions.

What is the best method to upgrade, uninstall previous version and delete everything left manually, or just install new version over the top? I'm using win 7. Does uninstalling delete the blockchain too?

I totally agree that the latest round of sock removals was handeled pretty terribly.
However will you stop stating that those stakes are kept for themselves ? Do you not understand that the devs don't own any of those stakes ? They didn't get a single stake more than they would have gotten had there been 0 socks. So complain all you want - i get it - just stop with that bullshit. It's just not true and it won't get you your stakes either.

Well, Makoto always have the chance to repair to his mistakes. If he's really interested in doing that.

I don't understand how you Patmast3r cannot help us anymore, since you were (together with Makoto) the person to be contacted for any Sockpuppets complains.

I don't think they'll get their stakes. I just said that I agree that stuff didn't go as it should have. It's not up to me to give out any stakes.
I do want to point out that there is a good reason why this stuff suffered - Makoto was absurdly busy with important stuff (VC funding didn't come out of the blue). I understand the anger but I don't blame makoto for prioritzing.

I just wanted to state my opinion. I can't help so I'll shut up now.

I don't think they'll get their stakes. I just said that I agree that stuff didn't go as it should have. It's not up to me to give out any stakes.
I do want to point out that there is a good reason why this stuff suffered - Makoto was absurdly busy with important stuff (VC funding didn't come out of the blue). I understand the anger but I don't blame makoto for prioritzing.

I just wanted to state my opinion. I can't help so I'll shut up now.

I totally agree that the latest round of sock removals was handeled pretty terribly

Can Jamthirteen  and dannac  get their stakes, I want to talk about other things. I am  tired of this

I totally agree that the latest round of sock removals was handeled pretty terribly.
However will you stop stating that those stakes are kept for themselves ? Do you not understand that the devs don't own any of those stakes ? They didn't get a single stake more than they would have gotten had there been 0 socks. So complain all you want - i get it - just stop with that bullshit. It's just not true and it won't get you your stakes either.

I'm not management.
I didn't tell you to move on.
I said it was handled badly not that the analysis was incorrect itself.
I couldn't decipher the rest.