Topic: NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs - page 1404. (Read 2985369 times)

+100

lol good idea

Why not overwhelm it with some positive connotations? Bung a swastika in there as well.

+1

Reminds me too much of the soviet era... Nuff said! lol

Is this official?

"Hammer and sickle" (even if humorous) especially combined with red background, can give some bad connotations... I wouldn't bring this up here :>

i think people will still be able to redeem their BTT stake after launch

The closing only concerns the stakes traded on NXT AE i guess (bullish  )

Is that a new rule now? Last time you said people can still cash nemstake after the launch.

But what about the cube?

Just kidding. I see the deadline for redemption as being a ***great*** sign. Thank you xtester for your professionalism. Can't wait to see what this brings.

Also agree. Lets not start with this now.

Oh no, not this discussion again lol

 Think that the nem logo is very very nice

We do not want to change it

what about new website/forum design? if i remember correctly, there were some templates already?

Why would you want to do that? The current NEM logo is perfect in my opinion.

Let's promise that nem will be launch at 1 of March 2015

Yay !

Bitcoin multisig implementations need a "combiner". First person signs, then gets passed to the second and third person (if 2 of 3). If any one of them signs then it goes to the combiner and the condition would have been met. The combiner can but not necessarily be one of the three wallets. It can be a creator of the transaction only and not one of the 3 signatories. Once 2 of three sign, the combiner will then see a "true" condition with a long digital signature. This is then  broadcast to the block chain as an actual spend. If the combiner is offline, nothing will be broadcast and the transaction will stay in a hung state until the combiner is online and the script in the combiner is run using bitcoind to send transaction.

Essentially, this is what we call a wallet based on m of n multisigs. All coins today, if they implement multsig at all, use this method. The critical bottleneck is the combiner. Once off line nothing gets transacted. A '3' at the front does not mean anything more than an indicator that it is a multisig address created from m of 3 signatories (therefore 3 as the prefix). It will require m number of addresses to create the multisig address. Theoretically an m of n can still implement a multisig based on the address with a prefix 1. It doesn't prevent any wallet software from doing that, simply because it is a wallet based multisig and the block chain recognises it as a valid Bitcoin address.

In short, the digital signatures of m of n are combined to form the key to sign off the transaction of this multisig account. When they are combined, some machine somewhere must be online to combine it.


Edit: Two wallets implementing multisigs of their own will not talk to each other unless they are using the same implementation solution. Theoretically, one can use the public key of the other wallet, as one of the signatories but the other wallet will have no idea about its "involvement" in this wallet if it runs its multisig using its own software solution.

Nearer than this time last year 

Please help test, everyone! Also, file issues on GitHub: https://github.com/NewEconomyMovement/NemCommunityClient

Great news, launch is near