Topic: NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs - page 1433. (Read 2985369 times)
January 17, 2015, 11:05:43 PM
January 17, 2015, 10:55:42 PM
January 17, 2015, 10:41:13 PM
support NEMstake
January 17, 2015, 09:59:31 PM
We need a fixed date for NEM launch. It doesn't matter next month or in a year. All we need is a fixed announced date of launch. At this moment I do believe nothing can help spreading NEM than a fixed announced dates from now on. Not just a launch date but for whatever will come after that as well.
What date do u want? Make your choice, it doesnt matter because they will have a delay then people will cry again
January 17, 2015, 09:08:37 PM
We need a fixed date for NEM launch. It doesn't matter next month or in a year. All we need is a fixed announced date of launch. At this moment I do believe nothing can help spreading NEM than a fixed announced dates from now on. Not just a launch date but for whatever will come after that as well.
January 17, 2015, 08:50:09 PM
January 17, 2015, 08:04:47 PM
Although i'm an horrible hairy troll, i have to say that NEM is the only crypto worth giving a shit right now !
That's because Nothing Else Matters.
January 17, 2015, 04:30:20 PM
Although i'm an horrible hairy troll, i have to say that NEM is the only crypto worth giving a shit right now !
January 17, 2015, 02:59:11 PM
wait and see
lol. I'll be dead. I don't want to wait and see. But here are my 2 cents.
Who is in Mars that we need to communicate with? Darth Vader?
Light maybe 40% faster in vacuum but to go up to outer space and back has 2 factors to consider: latency and weather.
Finally, based on Shannon–Hartley theorem, bandwidth is limited to megabits for satellite transmissions. So, I am not sure if he knows what he is talking about. Powerful light beams? That is also subject to weather and clouds. It needs clear line of sight.
All I'd say is good luck. I won't be around if it ever happens at all, for sure.
Edit: One more thing. Bandwidth spectrum is a limited commodity.
I can appreciate your thoughts but trust me, it's not everyday that you get to challenge a man of his calibre. When he talks about technology and internet, he knows a thing or two(co-founded zip2 and paypal, remember?), when he talks about space, science and engineering he also seems to know a thing or two, being the founder, CEO and CTO of a private company who builds rockets for a living(and makes money out of it by delivering cargo for NASA) and at the same time being CEO of a company who builds probably the most advanced cars in the world. All this(and the satellite part) is actually part of a grand vision he has and through which he pushes step by step - to help speed up the advent of sustainable production and consumption of energy(in the case of cars) and advance civilization to a multi-planetary species(in the case of rockets).
So my suggestion would be to do your homework and see what this guys is really upto before you even think of laying out arguments against something you lack info of. He might really surprise you actually.
P.S. Here is an older yet interesting video worth the watch: http://www.ted.com/talks/elon_musk_the_mind_behind_tesla_spacex_solarcity?language=en
Anyway lets get back to NEM.
January 17, 2015, 02:54:49 PM
Good to see lots of important topics being discussed on here.
Just a shame they've got FUCK ALL TO DO WITH NEM!!!!!
Just a shame they've got FUCK ALL TO DO WITH NEM!!!!!
as i read the first line of your post i saw a glimmer of hope that you had come to your senses... but then you let me down.. i have faith in you.. someday you will see the light
leave your trolling days behind and contribute to this community.. i wont lose hope in you son.. iv always been proud of you.. i know all you need is support.. how are things with your therapist recently? are ye getting on? hes a good guy so dont mess him about, you have to put in some effort if you want to get better, we talked about this before so i wont repeat myself. keep me up to date on your progress ok.. drop by any time for some tea and biscuits, you know your always welcome here.. cya now and tell your mammy i said howayadoin, i keep meaning to call over but you know how things are with work and family and things.. anyway, cya later dude. 
So you think your average cryptocurrency that tons of other coins also do is going to be the one that ushers in a new world financial order. Let me see, it's me who needs the therapist, right?
ugh, don't post pictures of that fucking leftist fucking pig on the NEM thread please.
January 17, 2015, 02:38:02 PM
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2015-01-17/elon-musk-and-spacex-plan-a-space-internet#p1
Revealed: Elon Musk's Plan to Build a Space Internet
Revealed: Elon Musk's Plan to Build a Space Internet
This man seems to be the most important entrepreneur/engineer/scientist alive today. I have studied a lot of people in the mentioned fields but did not find anyone coming close to combining the mind of a genius with an unbeatable capacity to organize people and get things done. If you live today and don't know about this guys you're simply missing it out.
January 17, 2015, 02:34:05 PM
So this means if light travels through FuckingNEMs head then v=c?
January 17, 2015, 02:03:57 PM
http://www.askamathematician.com/2011/08/q-if-light-slows-down-in-different-materials-then-how-can-it-be-a-universal-speed/
So technically it doesn't slow down but it does take longer to travel through something other than vacuum
So technically it doesn't slow down but it does take longer to travel through something other than vacuum
January 17, 2015, 01:49:26 PM
speed of light in vacuum is theoretical maximum, water, glass etc slow it down. Refraction etc wouldn't happen otherwise
January 17, 2015, 11:56:25 AM
...
Light maybe 40% faster in vacuum...
Light maybe 40% faster in vacuum...
so was Einstein wrong afterall ?
No faster in vacuum vs in fibre.
I still think that's technically not correct. It may take longer for light to travel through fiber but light always travels at the same speed so the difference is prob something other than speed.
Maybe it's because it doesn't travel straight through the fibre and therefore the way is just longer ?
January 17, 2015, 11:36:41 AM
...
Light maybe 40% faster in vacuum...
Light maybe 40% faster in vacuum...
so was Einstein wrong afterall ?
No faster in vacuum vs in fibre.
January 17, 2015, 10:59:15 AM
...
Light maybe 40% faster in vacuum...
Light maybe 40% faster in vacuum...
so was Einstein wrong afterall ?
January 17, 2015, 10:36:51 AM
wait and see
lol. I'll be dead. I don't want to wait and see. But here are my 2 cents.
Who is in Mars that we need to communicate with? Darth Vader?
Light maybe 40% faster in vacuum but to go up to outer space and back has 2 factors to consider: latency and weather.
Finally, based on Shannon–Hartley theorem, bandwidth is limited to megabits for satellite transmissions. So, I am not sure if he knows what he is talking about. Powerful light beams? That is also subject to weather and clouds. It needs clear line of sight.
All I'd say is good luck. I won't be around if it ever happens at all, for sure.
Edit: One more thing. Bandwidth spectrum is a limited commodity.
January 17, 2015, 09:15:04 AM
wait and see
January 17, 2015, 08:20:50 AM
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2015-01-17/elon-musk-and-spacex-plan-a-space-internet#p1
Revealed: Elon Musk's Plan to Build a Space Internet
Revealed: Elon Musk's Plan to Build a Space Internet
Jump to: