Topic: NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs - page 1477. (Read 2985369 times)

Yeah, NEM is the most tradest one.

5300 trades with NEMstake on Asset Exchange.

It need to celebrate.

This is not about NXT this is all about NEM. When we compare the price of NEM to NXT or to BTC that doesn't mean comparing the technologies but more like speculating the future market cap of NEM in terms of NXT and BTC. The main reason we would have to fall into comparing NEM price to NXT is that we are still stuck with NXT Asset Exchange "NXT AE" for trading NEMstakes. This phase will be over pretty soon "probably in few days". Once NEM will be freed from the NXT world and gets traded directly to BTC in the exchange sites it would them jump into a totally new stage/value.

Yes you should expect NEM to be traded for a value higher than 0.0000125 BTC by the launch date or few months later. The main point here is trying to evaluate the real value of NEM. This is to be determined by how it will grow after launch. There is high potential that NEM community will grow much faster than any other crypto currency at least in the first year. So fasten your seat belt and get ready for an exciting ride.

Remember that the majority of NEM adaptors right after launch will be more like miners type of investors. We haven't seen any of that kind of share holders yet. For that particular reason NEM is expected to sky rocket on the launch date, cause PoI will be fun to try/taste. From that perspective NEM will indeed reach 0.0000125 in few days after launch. The question actually how it would be able to sustain at that level. It will probably all come to how fun PoI will be . PoI on its own forces the harvesters/miners to become good citizens in the economy. The obvious would be trying to buying, selling and trading stuff for NEMs to gain higher importance level hense the economy will move from day one and that will out stand any other crypto currency rush you've ever seen.

Remember to stay CALM

Maybe he's getting at the fact that CfB thinks that PoI would clearly be better than PoS if it really works
And I agree! That's why I'm really looking forward to the whitepaper. It could really make some big waves.

I wouldn't compare NEM to NXT for a very simple reason: We are not there yet - where they were year ago.

Regarding NXT code: I've said it few times already, and I can say it again, it's truly ASTONISHING what JeanLucPicard did with the code.

CfB has said many times that he doubts POI will work. Nothing new really if that's what you're getting at ?
I think the main reason is that people think it's a completely new thing. POI is an improvement over POS but POS isn't completely scratched it's just broadend with a few more factors so it's not just balance that counts but also activity. 

https://nxtforum.org/general-discussion/price-speculation/msg138611/#msg138611

Is there some documentation on how the Proof of Importance algorithm works and how it avoids sybill attacks? Or do we have to wait for a white paper?

Lompakon käännöksessä oli muutama kirjoitusvirhekin, jotka korjaan, mutta en pitänyt
omasta tekstistäni teknisten sanojen kohdalla. Mitä ehdotetaan:
- remote harvesting
- local harvesting

Jätetäänkö alkuperäiseksi? Muutama teksti jää myös kankeaksi/kääntämättä, koska asettelu ei mahdollista
ihan kaikkea.Korjataan nekin ehdotuksien mukaan.

Vimeisimmästä päivityksestä voi vaihtaa kielen suomeksi.

Let's not put other software down.
I would simply say NEM is a quite solid piece of software

I was writing one answer to rockethead ... but noticed that he has got already better answers

You beat me tooit!

Satoshi and BCNext working together to create a Utopian Future. 

satoshi and bcnext working on nem? wow thats cool.. nem will be huge!

You seem to say some people are going to win the Nobel prize? What are you trying to tell us? Are you saying that this is not the first crypto the devs are developing? That is something new. Maybe you want to share more with us.

Who are those lucky .... Nobel prize winners ?
Here is not suspected the success of NEM development. I guess NEM has devs, who are not doing their first project. Better chances ...

Only one time is needed if you do it right.

True. Unfortunately the optimal development is may be found only after many projects. How many cryptocoins one group must build?

very different kinds of testing that (could) bare very different results. for optimal development i would assume a combination of the two would be best practice. test-driven development followed by a rigorous (closed) testing once a new version is released internally then followed by even more rigorous public testing. ie. test the crap out of everything as hard as possible.

Have you lost the focus?
If the test-driven development is not used, it doesn't mean there is no testing!

Testing code is no silver bullet, but it helps
There are a lot of places in the code that benefit from unit tests and I can't imagine developing something as complex as NIS without it.

BTW, how many accounts do you have on BTT? It seems weird that anyone would be against testing code...