Author

Topic: NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs - page 642. (Read 2985503 times)

sr. member
Activity: 289
Merit: 250
hero member
Activity: 802
Merit: 501
member
Activity: 143
Merit: 10
Next stop 100 sat  Grin
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
why does NEM have such a small traded volume? It has a huge market cap, as it is in the top 10, but in terms of daily volume, NEM is ranked 40th at the time I write this post

because zero inflation = zero sellpressure

only NEM volume is true trading

zero volume by coin inflation

example BTC alone have 1.35 million $ inflation each day by new mined coins

NEM have 0 inflation

the new lower tx fees active just a few days once first services and app go into heavy used mode

the tx fee will create a "virtual" deflation

virtual because the coins not really burned but end in hands of harvesters

but opposite to BTC or other pow coin miners

NEM harvesting nodes have no need to sell a lot of gathered fees for cover their power cost

as it is with bitcoin miners where deepens on hw generation 30-90% of mined BTC value have to made liquid (sell for $)
to be able pay the power cost of mining gear


conclusio: zero inflation mean less volume
because all trading volume on NEM/XEM is true trading
and no inflation based volume
but it also mean high coin circulation will create a "virtual" deflation because the fees
get "stuck" at harvesting nodes who normaly not in sell gains instant mode but instead suck up and keep hold the fees in their wallets
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1001
why does NEM have such a small traded volume? It has a huge market cap, as it is in the top 10, but in terms of daily volume, NEM is ranked 40th at the time I write this post

Very little sell support, most people are quietly holding.

I expect volume to increase significantly after catapult is launched...  Smiley
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
why does NEM have such a small traded volume? It has a huge market cap, as it is in the top 10, but in terms of daily volume, NEM is ranked 40th at the time I write this post
hero member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 506
I'm happy to announce that NEM is an official sponsor for Inside Fintech 2016 in Seoul.  http://www.insidefintechconference.com/seoul/2016

And on NEM community member, Rene, will be giving a talk about Apostille.  http://www.insidefintechconference.com/seoul/2016/speakers

Thats awesome news! Cheesy

The name Rene is interesting.  Rene sounds like a name of a beautiful young woman in Germany and Sweden, someone who likes to sing and do embroidery.  NEM's first female?   Huh



Oh.... Never mind...

your trolling is annoying.

it´s not even funny
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 506
I'm happy to announce that NEM is an official sponsor for Inside Fintech 2016 in Seoul.  http://www.insidefintechconference.com/seoul/2016

And on NEM community member, Rene, will be giving a talk about Apostille.  http://www.insidefintechconference.com/seoul/2016/speakers

Thats awesome news! Cheesy

The name Rene is interesting.  Rene sounds like a name of a beautiful young woman in Germany and Sweden, someone who likes to sing and do embroidery.  NEM's first female?   Huh



Oh.... Never mind...
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
mining is so 2012-2013
We will be looking into it.
hero member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 506
I'm happy to announce that NEM is an official sponsor for Inside Fintech 2016 in Seoul.  http://www.insidefintechconference.com/seoul/2016

And on NEM community member, Rene, will be giving a talk about Apostille.  http://www.insidefintechconference.com/seoul/2016/speakers

great news! i hope there will be a youtube recording like last time too
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
mining is so 2012-2013
I'm happy to announce that NEM is an official sponsor for Inside Fintech 2016 in Seoul.  http://www.insidefintechconference.com/seoul/2016

And on NEM community member, Rene, will be giving a talk about Apostille.  http://www.insidefintechconference.com/seoul/2016/speakers
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1001
Is there a new wallet or something because mine wont send out any transac tions.

What version are you on?

The hardfork has happened with the lower fees, but I did not think that would stop you from sending unless you are on a real old version.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 506
Is there a new wallet or something because mine wont send out any transac tions.

Did NEM unintentionally fork?   Lips sealed  Huh  Shocked
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 100
Is there a new wallet or something because mine wont send out any transac tions.
hero member
Activity: 704
Merit: 500
Today supernode reward is 645xem! that happend??

yesterday it was like ~440.

140k\ 645xem = 217 nodes
140k\ 440xem = 317 nodes

The difference is 100 nodes

Upd:
~317 nodes * 645 = ~200000xem

Devs, did you increase node reward?

Yes I noticed this too, nice surprise!

Hopefully the award increased and not 100 nodes dropped off Smiley

Between Round 1393/1394, some Nodes had fail the tests (Chain part).
After that, everything works very well.   Wink    and now the rewards again  ~440 xem


Some? 100 of 300 mean every third!

And there is no pays yet, there you get 440 number?

Sorry, due to unknown resaons we had lots of "chain part test" failures at end of round 1393 / begin of round 1394.
Everything went back to normal after that.
Noderewards payout was not increased.


So AntiNoise was right. He is a nem team member?

And maybe you should change reward rules? i mean node can be forgiven, and should get reward if failing test once. per week. because those errors a so random (except balance test of course) Smiley
hero member
Activity: 687
Merit: 500
Today supernode reward is 645xem! that happend??

yesterday it was like ~440.

140k\ 645xem = 217 nodes
140k\ 440xem = 317 nodes

The difference is 100 nodes

Upd:
~317 nodes * 645 = ~200000xem

Devs, did you increase node reward?

Yes I noticed this too, nice surprise!

Hopefully the award increased and not 100 nodes dropped off Smiley

Between Round 1393/1394, some Nodes had fail the tests (Chain part).
After that, everything works very well.   Wink    and now the rewards again  ~440 xem


Some? 100 of 300 mean every third!

And there is no pays yet, there you get 440 number?

Sorry, due to unknown resaons we had lots of "chain part test" failures at end of round 1393 / begin of round 1394.
Everything went back to normal after that.
Noderewards payout was not increased.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
www.pumpmycoin.com
don't forget that nem is a pos and that work will depend on the active network and is the main goal at this stage and the subsequent pr moves play a very important role
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
Just a link I found, thought it might be interesting...

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Concern_troll
hero member
Activity: 704
Merit: 500
Today supernode reward is 645xem! that happend??

yesterday it was like ~440.

140k\ 645xem = 217 nodes
140k\ 440xem = 317 nodes

The difference is 100 nodes

Upd:
~317 nodes * 645 = ~200000xem

Devs, did you increase node reward?

Yes I noticed this too, nice surprise!

Hopefully the award increased and not 100 nodes dropped off Smiley

Between Round 1393/1394, some Nodes had fail the tests (Chain part).
After that, everything works very well.   Wink    and now the rewards again  ~440 xem


Some? 100 of 300 mean every third!

And there is no pays yet, there you get 440 number?
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
NEM has a ton of potential I love this coin, just bought a bunch more at these low prices!!

Prices are about to go even lower unless change is done.  Imagine the discounts at 10 Satoshi.  Cheesy

Artificial drama creator, no need for that. NEM is already good without the artificial drama. Pass it along.

If you cannot see into yourself then who can you see?


Is your father Will Smith? Is that you jaden?



As far as you know, I AM DOING A PUBLIC SERVICE.  There's rot in NEM and I have the answers to remove it.

State your proof and sources, otherwise you are just another empty voice in the land of the internet. Personal opinion does not count as proof.
Jump to: