Topic: Neo-colonialism: Is Nigeria Still Under British Rule? - page 2. (Read 338 times)

I’m not sure if this topic should be in Economics board or Politics & Society. But I’m sure that this topic belongs to the Nigerian local board. Most if your topics are centered on Nigeria. It’s time you visit the local board and share your thoughts there.

Good question on the paper and in the news all former British colonised country are free and are now allowed to run an independent government but the reality is that's a fat lie.
I am from a former British colonised country but still our country is still under the watch of the British rule and we still pay a certain percentage to the British government which is sad and we don't have any benefit like it's hard for citizens from our to travel to the UK.

You're wrong, I will also like you to accept this no matter how, we are no more in that era you thought of, there's freedom everywhere and civilization also have made everything clear to the people's eyes, where were you during the Nigerian independence, what have you discovered that led to this and what had for a long time transpired before the independence, if you're too much dependent on a country for your own sustainability then indirectly it's something that has to be said that you're still under their control because they will dictate to you from their policies what they want.

Neo-colonialism and imperialism by kwame Nkrumah was one of the books that expose some of these pre-colonial and post colonial economic dominance, but personally I will like to disagree with some of these postulations because in the present economic and political governance of the Nigerian state, we can see that the direct policies of government are made by indigenous leaders of the Nigerian state, these present policies that are made, gives a direct economic effect of Nigeria at the moment. Of course everybody will have a history some of the realities of the past, some can be cruel and some can be brutal, but in all it points to the fact that we were coming from somewhere,  we where exploited at one point no doubt, one thing is you should understand is the fact that some of this dominance are pre-colonial and in this post colonial era, the effect of government policies is carried by leaders of the moment, so I absorb the colonial masters of the present economic or social political crisis that is bedeviling the Nigerian state.
Those of them at helm's of affairs should start making policies and programs that will better the lots of their people, policies that are geared towards human development and economic Sustainability, and you will see that some of this memories that we have about pre-colonial events will begin to fizzle out and remain as history.  We are not the only country in the world that where colonized by the British, there are lots and lots of countries that were colonized by British and have moved on and developed themselves in an advance manner.

Nigeria has not had a president with the indigenous mindset and that is why the situation is like that and makes for the thought of neocolonialism. Nigeria almost had such leadership in the military government of Gen. Sani Abacha but he didn't rule for long but died mysteriously making people to also think he was set up by powers beyond him. So until Nigeria have gotten a president that thinks like having a separate mindset then it will still look as it is with all the indicators of neocolonialism fully activated.

In the fight to become successful the most powerful enemy we have is ourselves.
Don't blame a system for the lack of success.

Sure there are systems where success is just making a career in the services of states such as North Korea.
History is good to know, but to get hung up on a historical injustice is not helping (you).

Is Nigeria under the British rule? The answer is an emphatic NO. I guess you are making some mistakes with your thought process regarding this.

I know what must have prompted this assumption could be a result of the fact that Nigeria uses English as her official language and still has British practices and pattern of dressing and sometimes do consultation with some British personnel regarding certain internal policies and decision making, but that  does not in any way suggest or support your assertion.

The relationship of Nigeria as a nation to the British is somewhat like that of a father to the son, even after leaving your parents to start up a family of your own, the things you learnt from your parents will still be very much a part of you and ones in a while, your patents will still interfere in your life and I feel thats the situation of things in this context.

And as it relate to other world powers, you have to understand that in terms of development and technology, Nigeria is a developing country regardless of it population and so will need to relate with other top world powers as a subordinate so as to grow in the technological sector

Nigeria, is an independent country and has the right to trade with any country of it's choice, I don't think that Britain, is in anyway directly controlling the trade affairs of Nigeria, the Nigerian, government can choose to do trade business with Britain, if they feel that it'll be more favorable to them compered to other countries. Most of what the OP said was applicable during the colonial days, because the British, we're indirectly ruling Nigeria, but after independence, Nigeria, began to trade with Britain, by choice. Exploitation by developed countries on the undeveloped countries is not peculiar to Nigeria, they'd give you technology, arms and amunitions in exchange for something valuable that you can offer as exchange. You have crude oil but don't have the expertise and machineries to exploit it, they have the companies that'll facilitate productions and sales, without which your oil is not  productive.

Underdeveloped countries should embrace technological advancements and think innovatively, because developed countries can not give you anything for free, it's business and not neocolonialism. Look at a country like china, they developed their economy and technology and today they're among the world powers, both in industrialization and in arsenals.

nigeria is an independent country free from colonisation. so it can determine its own policies. even hongkong, which became a colony of England in 1997, was free and joined china, which has its own power and territory to determine its policies.
even in sports events, Hong Kong has its own flag, whether it is a British colony or has joined China.

The whole world has a bias to western trade and banking via the global reserve currency system.  I agree there is definitely some unfairness and bias in that system but its not especially something I'd place on UK.  Uk is about 8% of global reverse banking from what I've read, there was an empire generations ago and now only a very light voluntary 'commonwealth of nations' which is mostly separated so I don't see the enforcement or rule had by a foreign power especially.
  Its clear Dollar favors those countries closest to its own trade, so the largest trade partners and the banks which are multi national and able to buy US treasury debt as primary dealers then favor their home markets they are receiving a great help from that home advantage.  No Nigerian bank is given primary dealer role on US treasuries that I know of so that part is unfair I agree that much.  Nigeria is part of OPEC, they do have some self control over how and who they sell their oil reserves to as part of that trading cartel.     Other situations like EU is a trading cartel that in effect works against non members, I'd agree to lots of arguments like that but I dont think they are controlling Nigeria remotely; not that I ever read of anyhow.

The answer to the topic of discussion is "YES" . Nigeria is not only under the British rule but, we are under the rule of the first and second world powers.

Neo-colonialism is a concept of governance or principle that  stipulates and promote an indirect capturing and domination of the processes of governance and economy of former colonial territories or states.

Neo-colonialism is mostly an economic domination of formerly colonized areas by their former colonial masters through modern means of economics.

Imperialism and Neo-colonialism started it's foundation in Nigeria as the former Royal Niger Company. The company had the authority of the royal seal to extract and export the natural resources of Nigeria to England for the advancement of their economy and industrial productions.

The system of governance adopted our traditional institution on two grounds 1. For language interpretation and 2. Resistance by the people. This whole adoption was for administrative convinence band elimination of resistance.

The native people became part of the exploitation process of themselves and their generations which we are seeing today. The introduction of the traditional institution into the process for the British government to rule the people through the chiefs and kings, the process provided,  An elite class that  became marchants  through incorporation into this evil of exploitation.

And after the gain of independence, the Nigerian state is still exploited through multinational corporations and companies Like Shell and Chevron, where our people are kept at the levels of artisans and administrators while , they bring their people as technical expartes.

In most cases like the days of colonialism, our people are kept as administrative heads in supporting the transfer of our resources to Europe and America for processing and reintroduction into Nigeria as finished goods.

The end tale of this arrangement is that, Nigeria becomes the source of their raw materials and their market. With this pattern, Nigerians are used to kill the idea of indigenization, production and distribution to show their loyalty to the western imperialist and to keep their administrative positions in those companies.

We must liberate ourselves through enlightenment. Your contributions please.