Pages:
Author

Topic: Net neutrality just went through, opinions? - page 2. (Read 3058 times)

member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
USA votes to tax and steal the internet (but they thought they were voting "for the Internet" dumb ass sheeople).

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/25/technology/path-clears-for-net-neutrality-ahead-of-fcc-vote.html

Decadence. USA to kill the goose that laid its golden eggs. High tech will run from the USA.

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2015/02/26/nsa-destroying-american-technology/

Quote
NSA Destroying American Technology

American technology companies are losing business on a major scale. The NSA will be responsible for wiping out the United States as a leader in computer science all because they have to listen to the entire world like an old woman addicted to soap operas. I find myself totally shocked at Microsoft. I purchased the latest office at a store. You then have to go online to download the program. They REQUIRE you to have a Microsoft Account. The worse part of this was they demanded I enter a credit card to PROVE who I was acknowledging it would not be used since I already paid for it. I simply refused. They will not refund your money so this is the latest consumer fraud. It is not disclosed that you must PROVE who you are now to use their software. This has gone way too far. There are alternatives out there for word like LibreOffice, and Gnumeric is a better spreadsheet than excel for it can open files excel cannot. There are alternatives to Powerpoint and of course there are alternatives to Outlook such as Thunderbird.

The question is WHY should I have to PROVE who I am to Microsoft to use a product I already paid for? Something just smells funny so the only choice was to walk away and they stole my money for nothing. There are plenty of alternatives and Microsoft just lost all our business.

Now China has dropped most of the leading technology brands of the USA  all because of the NSA and who can blame them? Widespread Western cybersurveillance has just gone too far. I would now rather use any product from someplace else or write my own. US technology has commited suicide for China will be the biggest economy where all the economic growth will be in the years ahead.

This has impacted U.S. network equipment maker Cisco Systems Inc, which in 2012 counted 60 products on the Central Government Procurement Center’s (CGPC) list, but by late 2014 had ZERO according to Reuters. Apple, Intel, McAfee and Citrx have all been dropped. China is shifting to internal alternatives.

The NSA is wiping out the US economy rapidly and Congress, occupied with lawyers, can only argue to uphold laws they write without any comprehension of the consequences. This is all part of the economic decline we see after 2015.75.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 123
"PLEASE SCULPT YOUR SHIT BEFORE THROWING. Thank U"
So the FCC just passed the net neutrality bill. What is your opinion?
The only ones voting no here should be corporations.

No, it should be people who are against one entity have so much power.

they only know how to build pyramids, they want to be at the top of it. that's it. that's their "knowledge". The cats know.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
So the FCC just passed the net neutrality bill. What is your opinion?
The only ones voting no here should be corporations.

No, it should be people who are against one entity have so much power.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU
So the FCC just passed the net neutrality bill. What is your opinion?
The only ones voting no here should be corporations.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 123
"PLEASE SCULPT YOUR SHIT BEFORE THROWING. Thank U"
So who read the 332 pages?

Quote
http://www.infowars.com/congress-stands-up-to-fcc-power-grab-with-bill/

House Representative Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) has introduced a bill to block the FCC from imposing its 332-page “Net Neutrality” Internet takeover plan, which has still not been released to the public over a week after its adoption.

The bill, entitled the Internet Freedom Act (H.R.1212), would not only stop the FCC from “reclassifying broadband Internet access service as a telecommunications service and from imposing certain regulations on providers of such service,” but would also prevent the agency from imposing similar rules unless authorized by Congress.

“Last week’s vote by the FCC to regulate the Internet like a 1930s era public utility is further proof that the Obama administration will stop at nothing in their efforts to control the Internet,” Blackburn said in a press release. “There is nothing ‘free and open’ about this heavy-handed approach.”

“These overreaching rules will stifle innovation, restrict freedoms, and lead to billions of dollars in new fees and taxes for American consumers.”

true the fcc is trying to do the same as the federal reserve,... why isn't the congress, ie the legal body of the usa doing that kind of job? I mean the FDA gaves round up and gmos, the federal reserve exploitation... what will the fcc do?

EX101 ready to laugh on the floor? okay a group of people decided to take away the favorite toys of the kids of the nsa, aka internet... Would you that to those kids? I bet not, but some did, they will pay... (don't fuck with the legions).
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin
February 28, 2015, 12:25:44 PM
#27
So the FCC just passed the net neutrality bill. What is your opinion?

I believe its wrong to say that its important for the average user, i for one dont see anything good comming from this, since the affect from broadband companys trying to limit certain traffic isnt realy shown.
Like we heard often, the devil is in the details, so my question is, if the companies had a chance to interfere with traffic, who will have that power now?
Theres zero chance that this ruling is not going to be exploited.

cheers
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
February 28, 2015, 12:12:05 PM
#26
That's easy. If Soros and the left/lib side like it then it's most likely bad for the rest of mankind Smiley.


If this guy is happy then it is totally bad news for the rest of mankind...  Smiley


https://vine.co/v/O255VDQhBed


legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
February 28, 2015, 05:45:01 AM
#25
That's easy. If Soros and the left/lib side like it then it's most likely bad for the rest of mankind Smiley.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 123
"PLEASE SCULPT YOUR SHIT BEFORE THROWING. Thank U"
February 28, 2015, 03:10:53 AM
#24
you seem to be a bad person, jaysabi, I hope I will be proved wrong.  Undecided

Well, I think your opinion is jaded by the interaction we just had. From my perspective, calling for the deaths of people you don't like makes you a bad person. I find it hard to hold back from someone who actively calls for the "genocide" of any group of people, for any reason whatsoever. Violence is not an acceptable way to deal with people who have a different political opinion than you. I think if you were to read my posts enough, you would realize my reaction was in response to an unacceptable solution (genocide) to a political problem, and nothing more. People who advocate for violence are extremists, and extremist sentiments should be challenged always.

son of bitches that corrupt the dna of the food supply are extremists. there is no way to stop a rapist but to kill him. gmoers are raping the earth food supply. they die. and if you are with them (money etc...) you go with them... ahaha. olo.

furthermore WHO the fuck you pretend to be to tell me what is an acceptable solution and what isn't ? Are you out of your mind? you are insane.

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
February 27, 2015, 10:05:07 PM
#23
^Assuming I'm following you is exactly the type of delusions of grandeur I'd expect you to suffer from.


Soros pushing millions? Google making changes to the text at the last minute? I understand how sweet it is. Sweet to blindly trust them both. It is not as if Soros almost killed the whole UK pension system and made his billions in the 80s. Snowden told us to trust those entities... I believe he said to trust. Yep. He did.

The invention of Bitcoin and its timing could not be any better.


I want to know mtore about my type of delusion of grandeur I am suffering

Cheesy


I thought it was self-explanatory, but apparently not, so I'll explain it to you as you requested. Assuming I'm following you around on the forum is assigning you a level of importance that you don't deserve. Since it's a self-appointed significance, the delusion of your own grandeur is evident in a statement that anyone would take the time to actively follow you on this forum.


But how do you know I do not deserve such a level of importance? I do not believe in casts. Everyone is important. The homeless dude reminds you everyday how lucky you are to have food, a roof above your head and a lovely family. Just to be able to type this to how you 'see' me and life in general may not be much, but I still see it as a blessing. A simple blessing in life perhaps, that so many of us wish they could still have, or never had. We do take a lot of things for granted, until we lose everything. I will make sure to be careful the next time I make an insensitive, not funny, totally misplaced remark when replying to you. Some people are slightly more important than others. Especially on internet forum. I need to remind myself of that fact  Smiley

I still believe soros and his $200 millions he used to push his lobbyists for that net neutrality will have more direct impact on all of us than my posts on this forum though. Any thoughts on him and his millions pushing for a freer internet?




legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
February 27, 2015, 09:40:04 PM
#22
you seem to be a bad person, jaysabi, I hope I will be proved wrong.  Undecided

Well, I think your opinion is jaded by the interaction we just had. From my perspective, calling for the deaths of people you don't like makes you a bad person. I find it hard to hold back from someone who actively calls for the "genocide" of any group of people, for any reason whatsoever. Violence is not an acceptable way to deal with people who have a different political opinion than you. I think if you were to read my posts enough, you would realize my reaction was in response to an unacceptable solution (genocide) to a political problem, and nothing more. People who advocate for violence are extremists, and extremist sentiments should be challenged always.


Yep. I agree with you... Especially on bitcointalk, with so many bright minds....

 Wink



legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
February 27, 2015, 09:37:23 PM
#21
you seem to be a bad person, jaysabi, I hope I will be proved wrong.  Undecided

Please. I want to say I do not believe he/she/they is a bad person. People just having different opinions on a subject. It is a waste of energy and health to be mad at someone on a online forum when you have a life.

I find liberals (defined as US liberals, not UK liberals, different animals) funny... Until they eventually morph into socialist murderers, like in venezuela for examples...

 Smiley


legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001
February 27, 2015, 07:34:56 PM
#20
FCC Commissioner says the document is worse than you can imagine

Quote
Pai and fellow Republican FCC commissioner Mike O’Rielly, who have been consistent critics of the FCC’s new rules, said once they are published people will realise that they will stifle innovation and lead to taxes and increased rates for the public.

“When you see this document, it’s worse than you imagine,” said O’Rielly at a conference in Washington organised by the think tank TechFreedom.

The FCC on Thursday voted through strict new rules to regulate broadband and protect net neutrality – the principle that all information and services should have equal access to the internet.

More...http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/feb/27/republicans-strike-back-fcc-member-star-wars-net-neutrality
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001
February 27, 2015, 07:31:18 PM
#19
FCC Hides details of new internet rules

Quote
Why won't they release the rules?!?!

It's been less than 24 hours since the Federal Communications Commission voted to approve strict new regulations on Internet providers, but that's the leading question coming from its critics.

Conservatives are demanding that the FCC release a full copy of the regulations that it's planning to impose on companies such as Comcast and Verizon — and taking the agency's silence as evidence of a cover-up. Readers of an FCC blog post  have suspiciously mused that "these new regulations should have been published by now." It's much the same over on Twitter.

More...http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2015/02/27/theres-already-a-conspiracy-theory-brewing-over-net-neutrality/?hpid=z14
WW3
newbie
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
February 27, 2015, 06:29:53 PM
#18

Maybe, perhaps an alternative secured tld through something in tails live cd or something, idk.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
February 27, 2015, 05:15:42 PM
#17
I'm on Cox, which just bumped their speed for all plans without bumping their prices, and is part of a consortium of broadband providers giving out free WiFi at hotspots in commercial districts for their customers to log into without paying more. I don't stream HD because I can't afford it, and even if I could, I wouldn't screw my neighbors' bandwidth by streaming HD. Screw mob greed and #firstworldproblems. If you give a shit about being nice to your neighbors, pay for a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dedicated_line for all your high-bandwidth video.


It's exactly what a pressitute was saying on a show that shocked me... My opinion: I paid X up/down. I get X up/down full time 24/7 rocking or not rocking who cares, MY BW. not yours. I do what ever I want with my bandwidth. I PAID FOR IT. some people those days are strange... I don't understand them, and then they try to cloak under respect your neighbor, it's so pathetic, I don't get it how could they still cling to such an old strategy to prove their points... certainly, because it works in certain part of America gmo feeded... LoL... KeeeeKKKKkooooooo lol. then the first because, more rolf : because who cares why? you don't gain any moral high ground here... it's so lame, impossible to discuss such people...

I don't watch TV so I guess we'll just have to take your word for it. I don't get consistent, advertised speeds when only running a speed test, because... ? Put up YOUR alternate theory to "assholes treating the neighborhood's internet like it's their dedicated line" or withdraw your baseless contrarianism.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
February 27, 2015, 05:13:40 PM
#16
you seem to be a bad person, jaysabi, I hope I will be proved wrong.  Undecided

Well, I think your opinion is jaded by the interaction we just had. From my perspective, calling for the deaths of people you don't like makes you a bad person. I find it hard to hold back from someone who actively calls for the "genocide" of any group of people, for any reason whatsoever. Violence is not an acceptable way to deal with people who have a different political opinion than you. I think if you were to read my posts enough, you would realize my reaction was in response to an unacceptable solution (genocide) to a political problem, and nothing more. People who advocate for violence are extremists, and extremist sentiments should be challenged always.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
February 27, 2015, 05:09:06 PM
#15
I'm on Cox, which just bumped their speed for all plans without bumping their prices, and is part of a consortium of broadband providers giving out free WiFi at hotspots in commercial districts for their customers to log into without paying more. I don't stream HD because I can't afford it, and even if I could, I wouldn't screw my neighbors' bandwidth by streaming HD. Screw mob greed and #firstworldproblems. If you give a shit about being nice to your neighbors, pay for a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dedicated_line for all your high-bandwidth video.


It's exactly what a pressitute was saying on a show that shocked me... My opinion: I paid X up/down. I get X up/down full time 24/7 rocking or not rocking who cares, MY BW. not yours. I do what ever I want with my bandwidth. I PAID FOR IT. some people those days are strange... I don't understand them, and then they try to cloak under respect your neighbor, it's so pathetic, I don't get it how could they still cling to such an old strategy to prove their points... certainly, because it works in certain part of America gmo feeded... LoL... KeeeeKKKKkooooooo lol. then the first because, more rolf : because who cares why? you don't gain any moral high ground here... it's so lame, impossible to discuss such people...

This is my opinion as well.
The largest cable provider in Norway, Get, seems to live by this rule as well. Hope they don't change.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 123
"PLEASE SCULPT YOUR SHIT BEFORE THROWING. Thank U"
February 27, 2015, 04:59:09 PM
#14
you seem to be a bad person, jaysabi, I hope I will be proved wrong.  Undecided
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
February 27, 2015, 04:55:21 PM
#13
^Assuming I'm following you is exactly the type of delusions of grandeur I'd expect you to suffer from.


Soros pushing millions? Google making changes to the text at the last minute? I understand how sweet it is. Sweet to blindly trust them both. It is not as if Soros almost killed the whole UK pension system and made his billions in the 80s. Snowden told us to trust those entities... I believe he said to trust. Yep. He did.

The invention of Bitcoin and its timing could not be any better.


I want to know more about my type of delusion of grandeur I am suffering

Cheesy


I thought it was self-explanatory, but apparently not, so I'll explain it to you as you requested. Assuming I'm following you around on the forum is assigning you a level of importance that you don't deserve. Since it's a self-appointed significance, the delusion of your own grandeur is evident in a statement that anyone would take the time to actively follow you on this forum.
Pages:
Jump to: