From a bitcoiner's perspective of privacy, it is not a choice. Because licensed casinos will always force KYC, which most bitcoiners are NOT OK with.
Bitcoin nowadays is not synonymous with privacy. Almost every exchange/trading site are asking for KYC/AML verification and bitcoiners STILL use them. So I say there will still be those who will use licensed casinos despite KYC, especially because these licensed casinos can't just run with players money. That's a huge pro, thereby, a choice.
Reputable BTC casinos have proof of funds, or proof of liabilities, or proof of solvency. They have cold storage addresses that show they can pay you. They have provably fair games, or games which are not unfair if it can't be proven. And for most of them, they don't even ask for any info from you except your bitcoin address (and username and password, and 2FA code.) All other details are optional I think.
The good ones that have been around, they pay out.
But yeah, if you don't mind playing in a casino with a 5% to 10% to 30% house edge, that's your choice.
Of course, it is still better playing in BTC casinos. With the
low HE,
provably fair and all that.
My point is, finding a reputable one is the crux of the matter. Often times, players are left with no avenue of recourse when a site refuses to pay out.
And anyway, BTC casinos also resort to documentation/verification when they're delaying pay out.
So, comply with KYC for licensed sites, play on good reputable BTC sites, or take risks with other BTC sites. It's all choices.
It's really tiring seeing people criticize others when they choose to comply or go with sites that use KYC. Just because it's bitcoin.
Far as I'm concerned, it's a currency. Shouldn't be restricted just because it must be anonymous.