As a manager, don't you check the post history, or rather accept members based on the trust rating on their profile?
Whatta kind question to a manager for an obvious answer. This is obviously written on every rules of every campaigns he manage or any campaign manager out there. 
Topic: Neutral tag about my post quality - page 2. (Read 524 times)
In this case it's not fine for the campaign. There is another user in the same campaign who has same type of feedback. I am sure he is working on it too.
so you're just proving that this neutral feedback doesn't mean anything, because it's still firmly in your campaign. I guess the reason is not just because it is from JG, knowing your previous history of conflict.
As a manager, don't you check the post history, or rather accept members based on the trust rating on their profile?
The neutral tag maybe very annoying, but at the same time it's usually hard for the person in question to reverse his decisions based on the very many past threads about his tags in this board, so I guess you will have to live with that until he decides to change his mind.
I don't know much about your posting quality but if it was just one post then, I think just deleting the post with no tag should have been ok since it's a self-moderated thread. The tag would only make sense if you made many more low quality posts in the same thread after several warnings or deletions.
I don't know much about your posting quality but if it was just one post then, I think just deleting the post with no tag should have been ok since it's a self-moderated thread. The tag would only make sense if you made many more low quality posts in the same thread after several warnings or deletions.
I would like to know if, among all the campaign managers I worked with and the rest of the community, if they think that my participations are of low value to justify such a tag?
I am more than happy to have you in the campaign as I told you in the Telegram conversation. There are no complaint about your posts habit and post quality. In fact, I consider you as the show stopper for the campaign you are now.But this neutral tag with questioning your post quality is not something I would like to consider in the campaign participants feedback page. It's not a negative tag but it's directly questioning your post quality. The product of a signature campaigner is the posts they make and if the product itself is in question then it does not look nice especially when it's given by a DT status user and showing on trusted feedback section.
Neutral feedback is fine.
In this case it's not fine for the campaign. There is another user in the same campaign who has same type of feedback. I am sure he is working on it too.
Neutral feedback is fine. based on what was written, it seems that you were writing in a self-moderated gambling thread started by JollyGood. He must have deleted some of your posts. somehow I'm not very surprised, because it happened by Jolly, but to be honest all mega threads in gambling discussions are mostly spam and signature quota fulfilment.
I don't think it will affect your participation in the campaigns, at least not in those managed by experienced managers (you mentioned some of them). they will always first trust their judgment by looking at your post history, and only after that, they rely on the assessment of the importance of feedback on your trust page.
I don't think it will affect your participation in the campaigns, at least not in those managed by experienced managers (you mentioned some of them). they will always first trust their judgment by looking at your post history, and only after that, they rely on the assessment of the importance of feedback on your trust page.
Hello everybody,
A few weeks ago I noticed that I had received a neutral tag, which I found strange at first, because I hadn't done anything about it.
When I went to check, I was somewhat perplexed, not realizing why:
When I read it, I thought about questioning it, but then I thought I'd better ignore it.
But, meanwhile, I was informed that the information contained in that tag may be limiting some bonuses in campaigns. Also the managers of SINBAD (my current campaign) are questioning the quality of my posts, because of this tag.
The reason for this tag, I still couldn't figure it out until today. Although the post that prompted this tag was deleted from the tag author's self-moderated thread, the post was commented on by other users and generated conversations appropriate to the topic of the thread.
In this sense, he decided to contact JollyGood via MP, requesting that he review the situation and the possibility of revising this tag. But only the answer, although polite, limited itself to saying that it would only review the situation in 8-12 months, and that this would not have an impact on the campaigns in which it participates (something that it is creating).
I always try to collaborate in the best possible way with the whole community and maintain a good relationship with everyone. And I never needed to make low quality posts to meet campaign objectives, making more than enough posts for the minimum requirements of the campaigns. So I feel a little wronged by this situation.
I would like to know if, among all the campaign managers I worked with and the rest of the community, if they think that my participations are of low value to justify such a tag?
Campaign managers I've worked with (I think that includes everyone...):
icopress / Hhampuz / CryptopreneurBrainboss / Royse777 / Joerii
Thank you for your attention and I appreciate any help you can provide on this topic.
A few weeks ago I noticed that I had received a neutral tag, which I found strange at first, because I hadn't done anything about it.
When I went to check, I was somewhat perplexed, not realizing why:
When I read it, I thought about questioning it, but then I thought I'd better ignore it.
But, meanwhile, I was informed that the information contained in that tag may be limiting some bonuses in campaigns. Also the managers of SINBAD (my current campaign) are questioning the quality of my posts, because of this tag.
The reason for this tag, I still couldn't figure it out until today. Although the post that prompted this tag was deleted from the tag author's self-moderated thread, the post was commented on by other users and generated conversations appropriate to the topic of the thread.
In this sense, he decided to contact JollyGood via MP, requesting that he review the situation and the possibility of revising this tag. But only the answer, although polite, limited itself to saying that it would only review the situation in 8-12 months, and that this would not have an impact on the campaigns in which it participates (something that it is creating).
I always try to collaborate in the best possible way with the whole community and maintain a good relationship with everyone. And I never needed to make low quality posts to meet campaign objectives, making more than enough posts for the minimum requirements of the campaigns. So I feel a little wronged by this situation.
I would like to know if, among all the campaign managers I worked with and the rest of the community, if they think that my participations are of low value to justify such a tag?
Campaign managers I've worked with (I think that includes everyone...):
icopress / Hhampuz / CryptopreneurBrainboss / Royse777 / Joerii
Thank you for your attention and I appreciate any help you can provide on this topic.
Jump to: