Wouldn't these spamtransactions be lost after some time when no miner includes them in a block?
Miners love these txs because the fee is 0.0002 per kb today 
Topic: New achivement. The biggest tx - page 2. (Read 3439 times)
Wouldn't these spamtransactions be lost after some time when no miner includes them in a block?
I know that this would mean that the miner had to keep all transactions in the RAM but i think it's better to adjus the RAM instead giving in to spam.
I know that this would mean that the miner had to keep all transactions in the RAM but i think it's better to adjus the RAM instead giving in to spam.
It is still not crashing at my end. In case, it is crashing at your end, here is a list of alternatives...
The crash/hang is actually a symptom of the site activating its DDoS defenses.If you are on an ISP with few bitcoiners the DDoS defenders are unlikely to activate the throttle/reduction and other defenses. You may be also accessing that site during the time when most of the people are asleep in your area.
Thanks for the alternate links, but please be aware of the above issues when posting easily clickable links. I have a proxy/vpn on the opposite side of the Globe, that does succeed loading that page.
You might like to place a bet on your prediction on bitbet.us as well 
What is a reason to bet bitcoins if they would cost nothing when (and if) I win? Soon does not mean anything. Give us a specific period like you did last time and we'll meet again
Before halving block reward.I dont think, you have read your tarrot cards properly this time as well. Here is something I am copying from elsewhere...
Previous Scenario :-
2012 end: Block reward halving
2013 beginning: Hard Fork
2013 mid: Cyprus crisis
2013 end: Bitcoin reached ATH
Current Scenario :-
2015 mid: Greece crisis
2016 beginning: Hard Fork
2016 mid: Block reward halving
2016 end: ? ? ?
You might like to place a bet on your prediction on bitbet.us as well
Soon does not mean anything. Give us a specific period like you did last time and we'll meet again
Before halving block reward. By the way, bitcoin has not yet died even after three months of your death prediction.
I was wrong. It will die soon.Soon does not mean anything. Give us a specific period like you did last time and we'll meet again
OK, there are 330k such outputs in blockchain now
One block can reduce this number by 5569
So we need 60 blocks in a row filled by 1 tx just to eliminate these spam outputs from a blockchain
One block can reduce this number by 5569
So we need 60 blocks in a row filled by 1 tx just to eliminate these spam outputs from a blockchain
By the way, bitcoin has not yet died even after three months of your death prediction.
I was wrong. It will die soon. So just getting all of someones satoshis together takes up an entire block and crashes block explorers?
Why is it being marked as a double spend by blockchain.info?
Seems weird to me, with stress tests and forks recently there have been a few mishaps in the last few days, this seems like another.
Why is it being marked as a double spend by blockchain.info?
Seems weird to me, with stress tests and forks recently there have been a few mishaps in the last few days, this seems like another.
This one is not crashing...
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/bb41a757f405890fb0f5856228e23b715702d714d59bf2b1feb70d8b2b4e3e08
Kinda cool way to show the weakness of the "web-based services" paradigm: they can't tell the sudden spike of popularity from a garden-variety DDoS. And all this added JavaScript sauce, it could really serve as an example how not to design UI widget architectures.
It is still not crashing at my end. In case, it is crashing at your end, here is a list of alternatives...
When you check an address balance or a transaction status online, which block explorer do you use ? If you run a service depending on a third party API, which block explorer's API you rely upon ?
Update: I'm listing out the outcome of this thread here...
1. https://blockchain.info/
2. https://blockr.io/
3. https://blockexplorer.com/
4. https://www.biteasy.com/
5. https://chain.so/btc
6. https://helloblock.io/
7. http://bitcoinchain.com/block_explorer
8. https://bkchain.org/btc
9. http://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/
10. http://www.blocktrail.com
11. http://explorer.chain.com/
Update: I'm listing out the outcome of this thread here...
1. https://blockchain.info/
2. https://blockr.io/
3. https://blockexplorer.com/
4. https://www.biteasy.com/
5. https://chain.so/btc
6. https://helloblock.io/
7. http://bitcoinchain.com/block_explorer
8. https://bkchain.org/btc
9. http://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/
10. http://www.blocktrail.com
11. http://explorer.chain.com/
So just getting all of someones satoshis together takes up an entire block and crashes block explorers?
Why is it being marked as a double spend by blockchain.info?
Seems weird to me, with stress tests and forks recently there have been a few mishaps in the last few days, this seems like another.
Why is it being marked as a double spend by blockchain.info?
Seems weird to me, with stress tests and forks recently there have been a few mishaps in the last few days, this seems like another.
This one is not crashing...
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/bb41a757f405890fb0f5856228e23b715702d714d59bf2b1feb70d8b2b4e3e08
Kinda cool way to show the weakness of the "web-based services" paradigm: they can't tell the sudden spike of popularity from a garden-variety DDoS. And all this added JavaScript sauce, it could really serve as an example how not to design UI widget architectures.
So just getting all of someones satoshis together takes up an entire block and crashes block explorers?
Why is it being marked as a double spend by blockchain.info?
Seems weird to me, with stress tests and forks recently there have been a few mishaps in the last few days, this seems like another.
Why is it being marked as a double spend by blockchain.info?
Seems weird to me, with stress tests and forks recently there have been a few mishaps in the last few days, this seems like another.
This one is not crashing...
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/bb41a757f405890fb0f5856228e23b715702d714d59bf2b1feb70d8b2b4e3e08
So just getting all of someones satoshis together takes up an entire block and crashes block explorers?
Why is it being marked as a double spend by blockchain.info?
Seems weird to me, with stress tests and forks recently there have been a few mishaps in the last few days, this seems like another.
Why is it being marked as a double spend by blockchain.info?
Seems weird to me, with stress tests and forks recently there have been a few mishaps in the last few days, this seems like another.
Block:
https://blockchain.info/block/000000000000000003dd2fdbb484d6d9c349d644d8bbb3cbfa5e67f639a465fe
https://blockchain.info/block/000000000000000003dd2fdbb484d6d9c349d644d8bbb3cbfa5e67f639a465fe
Here it all started: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3cf6qg/need_help_moving_coins_to_new_address/
By the way, bitcoin has not yet died even after three months of your death prediction. Good luck in reading tarrot cards
captain obvious detected 
Don't make jokes out of Danny, it's not obvious for everyone for example for people in this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11816136. The BTC0.05569000 total is paid to the same address as the coinbase transaction. As such, it would appear that the transaction was built by the pool, and that the entire transaction is fees.
captain obvious detected 
This block crashes many web-based blockchain browsers, including the linked one.
So the relevant information is:
1) mined by Chinese pool f2pool
2) contains only 2 transactions: coinbase and single regular one
3) the regular one has no fees, but 5569 inputs and 1 one output. It appears to mop up dust outputs for a total of BTC0.05569000
4) it probably should get a medal for UTxO minification
5) the total block size is 999,923 bytes
So the relevant information is:
1) mined by Chinese pool f2pool
2) contains only 2 transactions: coinbase and single regular one
3) the regular one has no fees, but 5569 inputs and 1 one output. It appears to mop up dust outputs for a total of BTC0.05569000
4) it probably should get a medal for UTxO minification
5) the total block size is 999,923 bytes
The BTC0.05569000 total is paid to the same address as the coinbase transaction. As such, it would appear that the transaction was built by the pool, and that the entire transaction is fees.
This block crashes many web-based blockchain browsers, including the linked one.
So the relevant information is:
1) mined by Chinese pool f2pool
2) contains only 2 transactions: coinbase and single regular one
3) the regular one has no fees, but 5569 inputs and 1 one output. It appears to mop up dust outputs for a total of BTC0.05569000
4) it probably should get a medal for UTxO minification
5) the total block size is 999,923 bytes
Edit: Nothing to add, just quoting the reply from Danny in case he changes it:
The BTC0.05569000 total is paid to the same address as the coinbase transaction. As such, it would appear that the transaction was built by the pool, and that the entire transaction is fees.
So the relevant information is:
1) mined by Chinese pool f2pool
2) contains only 2 transactions: coinbase and single regular one
3) the regular one has no fees, but 5569 inputs and 1 one output. It appears to mop up dust outputs for a total of BTC0.05569000
4) it probably should get a medal for UTxO minification
5) the total block size is 999,923 bytes
Edit: Nothing to add, just quoting the reply from Danny in case he changes it:
This block crashes many web-based blockchain browsers, including the linked one.
So the relevant information is:
1) mined by Chinese pool f2pool
2) contains only 2 transactions: coinbase and single regular one
3) the regular one has no fees, but 5569 inputs and 1 one output. It appears to mop up dust outputs for a total of BTC0.05569000
4) it probably should get a medal for UTxO minification
5) the total block size is 999,923 bytes
So the relevant information is:
1) mined by Chinese pool f2pool
2) contains only 2 transactions: coinbase and single regular one
3) the regular one has no fees, but 5569 inputs and 1 one output. It appears to mop up dust outputs for a total of BTC0.05569000
4) it probably should get a medal for UTxO minification
5) the total block size is 999,923 bytes
The BTC0.05569000 total is paid to the same address as the coinbase transaction. As such, it would appear that the transaction was built by the pool, and that the entire transaction is fees.
Jump to: