I still think Merit is a cool enough part of this forum to warrant it's own child board in the Meta section.
I agree 100% that Merit should have its own child board. I think Merit is one of the most important elements in Bitcointalk right now. It is a make or break for those who wanted to join Signature Campaign. I for one, haven't join any signature campaign ever since I became a Junior member because the stakes for a Junior member are not commensurate with the amount of work needed to be done in order to earn the stakes. Some ICOs require between 10-20 quality posts a week for a Signature campaign and that's a lot of work. In addition, some if not most of ICOs now only allow the rank of Member above in order to be eligible for participation in the Signature Campaign.
I know of a few people who signed up around the same time as me, during the month in which Merit system was introduced. They've been Junior members ever since. Some have spend countless number of hours (trying to produce) high quality posts in various section of the forum but to no avail. Only a few 'good samaritan' members who are kind enough to give out sMerit. Most are hoarding them, or are not even aware that sMerit can and should be handed out. I mean there is no incentives for higher rank members to hand out sMerits right?
What's more disturbing is that during my conversation with other members some think that members only give away sMerits to the people they know, which is not what the system is intended. I know that the system is not perfect. Perhaps creators or originators of this system should come out with "incentives" in order to encourage higher rank members with lots of Merit to award lower rank members who needed them most, otherwise at some point lower rank members who couldn't move up in the rank would be discouraged, and perhaps abandon the board altogether.
Some say "newbies" are the new currencies on bitcointalk. They are "buyers" and "consumers" of information. The higher rank members on the other hand are "sellers" of information. At the end, without buyers, there will be no one to buy.