New Eth Genoil Branch (with Claymore kernels)

Saint79

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Quote from: goobur on August 30, 2017, 01:08:59 AM

Quote from: Saint79 on August 29, 2017, 10:59:29 PM

7*R9 390
With claymore 221 Mh
With this miner 218 Mh

Interesting, is that a measured hash rate, or the reported hash rate? There are two possibilities for this difference
1. I messed up the launch params on hawaii archs, in which case you may be able to fix it with

Code:

-eint k

where k is some value > 0, and is 8 by default.
2. There's too much variance in the reported hashrate, and it needs to be averaged by the miner over a longer period of time (which I'll probably add in the next release, because my reported rates are all over the place sometimes too.)

I try -eint from 0 to 8 <8 drops hashrate.
This miner reported hash, pool average hash `same as claymore.

(Sorry for bad english)

xxcsu

hero member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 597

Quote from: FQ_Neronk on August 30, 2017, 02:58:17 AM

Will be WIN version?

And donate to ETH?)

Download link for windows version

FQ_Neronk

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Will be WIN version?

And donate to ETH?)

goobur

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

Quote from: Saint79 on August 29, 2017, 10:59:29 PM

7*R9 390
With claymore 221 Mh
With this miner 218 Mh

Interesting, is that a measured hash rate, or the reported hash rate? There are two possibilities for this difference
1. I messed up the launch params on hawaii archs, in which case you may be able to fix it with

Code:

-eint k

where k is some value > 0, and is 8 by default.
2. There's too much variance in the reported hashrate, and it needs to be averaged by the miner over a longer period of time (which I'll probably add in the next release, because my reported rates are all over the place sometimes too.)

Saint79

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

7*R9 390
With claymore 221 Mh
With this miner 218 Mh

goobur

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

Quote from: UberMakedonische on August 29, 2017, 05:49:35 PM

Tested on XFX RX 570 4GB.
27.1 mh/s with this miner
27.0 with Claymore

Nice work!!!
Thanks

Thanks,
Although you should be wary of the reported hash rate -- I really should average it over a longer period of time. Check your pool's stats and see if you're getting a benefit (I believe you should be getting approx +1% in the measured rate, but you shouldn't take my word for it, you should definitely verify for yourself.)

UberMakedonische

member

Activity: 120

Merit: 10

Tested on XFX RX 570 4GB.
27.1 mh/s with this miner
27.0 with Claymore

Nice work!!!
Thanks

goobur

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

Quote from: Tmdz on August 29, 2017, 01:19:17 PM

Requires too many .dlls to run on out of date win 8.1

If you need, you can recompile to run on windows 8.1.

Tmdz

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1000

Requires too many .dlls to run on out of date win 8.1

goobur

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

Quote from: sabercrypto on August 29, 2017, 03:21:12 AM

it doesnt submit reported hashrate on ethermine. Sad

Unfortunately, this wasn't a feature of ethminer, and I didn't add it into this version.

I may add it in future releases though.

bclcjunkie

hero member

Activity: 833

Merit: 1001

hey man relax, i support "there's no free lunch" principle and good work should always be paid.. now i totally agree claymore deserves the fee he charges in fact all my gpu miners are running on his software because his is the most stable in my environment lol.. just trying to clarify since goobur didn't mention it anywhere and if there's i'd like to know how it's being charged is all... besides if his hash rate is on the same level then that also makes decision easier for me whether it's stable or not and whether i should make the switch... i just don't like my miners being diverted and mine on some pools temporarily... btw good work on the guides.

Quote from: Mattthev on August 29, 2017, 04:40:30 AM

Quote from: bclcjunkie on August 29, 2017, 04:05:36 AM

anyone tested this on nvidia cards? i assume no devfee here? been waiting for this for quite some time now..

What is wrong with you people? Do you know how much time it cost do something like that? Or even PBE, SRB, Watttool and nobody send any tip to them. You won't get something for nothing! There is 0.5% even pools have bigger fees -_- If there would be no fee nobody would send him any tip.
Same with Robinh00d or whatever the nickname was, he post here weeks ago beta drivers for DAG issue, thousands of you use it and he got nothing, he can't even buy a coffee.
I also got 0 tip for my guides, only from my grateful customers that I appreciate.

P.S.
Put this into your bat file for no dev fee, but you truly s*ck if you use it.

Code:

--i-suck

UnclWish

sr. member

Activity: 1484

Merit: 253

Quote from: goobur on August 28, 2017, 11:18:06 PM

Quote from: UnclWish on August 28, 2017, 09:03:13 PM

Tried this miner on GCN1.0 cards. Speed of ether mining is the same as in Claymore's Dual Miner solo mode. Maybe some 1-2% difference...
Good job!

Thanks man : )

Do you mind telling me which cards in specific?

Sapphire 270X 4Gb and Asus 280X 3Gb.

cdrx

full member

Activity: 441

Merit: 109

Any video tutorial on how to use this on win10 x64? Thanks for link...

Mattthev

sr. member

Activity: 966

Merit: 359

👉MINING-BIOS.eu💲⛏

Quote from: bclcjunkie on August 29, 2017, 04:05:36 AM

anyone tested this on nvidia cards? i assume no devfee here? been waiting for this for quite some time now..

What is wrong with you people? Do you know how much time it cost do something like that? Or even PBE, SRB, Watttool and nobody send any tip to them. You won't get something for nothing! There is 0.5% even pools have bigger fees -_- If there would be no fee nobody would send him any tip.
Same with Robinh00d or whatever the nickname was, he post here weeks ago beta drivers for DAG issue, thousands of you use it and he got nothing, he can't even buy a coffee.
I also got 0 tip for my guides, only from my grateful customers that I appreciate.

P.S.
Put this into your bat file for no dev fee, but you truly s*ck if you use it.

Code:

--i-suck

bclcjunkie

hero member

Activity: 833

Merit: 1001

anyone tested this on nvidia cards? i assume no devfee here? been waiting for this for quite some time now..

sabercrypto

member

Activity: 181

Merit: 10

it doesnt submit reported hashrate on ethermine. Sad

sabercrypto

member

Activity: 181

Merit: 10

thanks for this. will try it to my rigs later

goobur

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

Quote from: UnclWish on August 28, 2017, 09:03:13 PM

Tried this miner on GCN1.0 cards. Speed of ether mining is the same as in Claymore's Dual Miner solo mode. Maybe some 1-2% difference...
Good job!

Thanks man : )

Do you mind telling me which cards in specific?

UnclWish

sr. member

Activity: 1484

Merit: 253

Tried this miner on GCN1.0 cards. Speed of ether mining is the same as in Claymore's Dual Miner solo mode. Maybe some 1-2% difference...
Good job!

goobur

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

reserved

Topic: New Eth Genoil Branch (with Claymore kernels) (Read 4347 times)