Pages:
Author

Topic: New experience about posting behaviour - page 2. (Read 399 times)

legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1397
December 28, 2019, 08:56:25 PM
#7
Do they only post for fulfill the minimum post requirements or post count?
That's one of negative effects of a forum member participating on a signature campaign, they are talking an advantage.
As you, as campaign manager, you can't do anything since there are rules from the start upon they joining in campaign so here they are.

I also don't know if they don't understand about the rule of minimum posts requirement, maybe they thought no posts should greater than x number of posts or less than, lol, but this is impossible.
TGD
hero member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 620
Wen Rolex?
December 28, 2019, 08:31:51 PM
#6
Some users who are knowledgeable enough can share as much post as they wanted as long as it doesn't seems spam and it does really make sense. This time that almost all we need to understand in a forum and about crypto is already posted here all we need to do is to search. Apparently there are some or lazy newbies who still asks and needs to be answered by other users here even they already reached their quota in paid posting.
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1080
December 28, 2019, 08:24:33 PM
#5
If a member is posting exactly 25 posts week in and week out while being in a campaign which has a maximum post count of 25 it is probably worth looking at their posts with a little more scrutiny than other members. If their posts are of high quality then it is probably okay for them to be doing this however if you think that another member that is not in the campaign could offer better content then it might be worth dropping them from the campaign.

I would not want members that are posting for the sake of earning in my campaign if I was a campaign manager. Many of the members that do this aren't here to help or participate in the community and if they were without a signature campaign it would probably mean they would not be posting that often. Being a manager is all about these little dilemmas and ultimately its your decision what rules you enforce.
copper member
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1814
฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.
December 28, 2019, 02:40:19 PM
#4
Personally being honest, if there were no paying signature campaign in this forum... I don't think it would be as active as it is right now. It would be one hell of a dull place.

Signature campaigns act as an incentive for most members to keep hanging around the forum for extra hours otherwise people would just log in and out without posting anything  Grin

People who post the exact number of minimum required posts per week are probably those chaps who would love to post only 5 - 10 times a week but because of the extra incentive from the signature, they choose to hit the minimum. I don't see any problem with that so long as the posts are good and not spammy.

When i had just joined the forum, most signature campaigns required only 7-10 paid posts per week but right now, i don't think there is such a good campaign that i know that requires 7 posts a week... perhaps times change.
hero member
Activity: 2156
Merit: 670
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
December 28, 2019, 01:35:31 PM
#3
I think it is about someone's habit. There are some people that only post to fulfill their tasks only, but others always post regularly even they have tasks/signature campaigns or not.

-snip- Really disappointed to share with you all that i have got couple of participants there who exactly make 25 post/week. Some of them don't make 1 extra post during participating campaign -snip-
They have not really good habits, but we cannot blame them for the signature campaign case. As long as they fulfill the minimum requirement, it means they do their jobs correctly.

Well, it is my own opinion, buddy. As a manager, you have an option to put someone on your blacklist if he/she didn't meet with your expectation. But it should be only for a vital case.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1302
Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook
December 28, 2019, 01:34:28 PM
#2
It doesn't matter how many posts a user makes per week, some users due to time or maybe knowledge post more than others and it's fine, the major concern should be the quality of the posts, if making more posts will lead to shit posting, then limit yourself to a reasonable number.

There is a campaign willing to pay users for over 50 posts, but many on the campaign make less than even half of that(50). This other campaigns you're talking about, will only pay if users post up to 25 posts, and so many users wouldn't want to post that much, but then they just have to. So is anyone to blame here?
copper member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 737
✅ Need Campaign Manager? TG > @TalkStar675
December 28, 2019, 01:11:50 PM
#1
Dear community users,

Welcome everyone to my thread. Every newbies start their bitcointalk journey with the expectation of learning and sharing their knowledge's. Some of you may know that worldwide crypto based platforms use this forum for their promotional purposes and they run signature campaigns here. Currently there is multiple live signature campaigns going on here and usually they give weekly payments to their campaign participants. From my own point of view its an great opportunity for quality poster and higher ranks holder to earn a handsome amount of money by joining a signature campaign.

Its been only a month that i have started my job as a campaign manager and one thing took my attention during managing my last campaign. As we all know that to join a signature campaign participants have to follow campaign rules and some rules are quite common on every campaign. For every campaign there is rules of minimum posts per week. Basically it depends on campaign owners choice but to stop spamming or unnecessary posting most campaign managers love to keep the amount of minimum post/week as lower as possible. I have got a different experience during managing my last signature campaign where weekly minimum post requirement was 25 post. Really disappointed to share with you all that i have got couple of participants there who exactly make 25 post/week. Some of them don't make 1 extra post during participating campaign and i think other campaign managers have similar kinda experience.

My question is:

Do they only post for fulfill the minimum post requirements or post count?

IMO if there is 25 weekly post requirement on a signature campaign then it doesn't mean that you can't make some extra posts. I have seen a lot of quality posters of this forum who are really active and don't care about the minimum requirements of their posting. They only post for helping this community by sharing their precious knowledge to newbies. For that reason every time they make lots of extra posts/week. As a participant if you only post to get the weekly payment then i don't know how much good to see that. Yeah in many circumstances anyone can make less post for a week and hopefully campaign manager will consider that but who make exact 25 post in every week they should change their habit.

There is multiple signature campaign going on and lots of quality posters are there. I have a suggestion for them who will get the chance to join signature campaign in the future. "Post for forum, Not only for fulfill the weekly minimum post requirement"

Pages:
Jump to: