Topic: New information from Satoshi? - page 2. (Read 377 times)

While I was reading, I'm looking for the source and there's a suspicious link removed on op's post until I've read this.


He's right.

And found this article[1] in 2014.

[1] https://www.newsweek.com/2014/03/14/face-behind-bitcoin-247957.html

True, but it is more likely that there is no Satoshi Nakamoto. Most likely, this is a group of programmers performing a secret order for a form of payment that cannot be tracked. It is even possible that this is a government project for pumping and laundering money. It seems unlikely to me that one person can create a product of this scale.

Why are you writing about something that happened six years ago? None of this is new information. Everyone has moved on.

What is the authorities going to do with Satoshi, they can do nothing as the current development is not under him, the only party that is going to gain anything is the media who is after the real identity as they will get some clicks whenever they come up with a theory on who the real Satoshi Nakamoto is and that is what we saw in the past few years and nothing substantial.

If Satoshi Nakamoto was a media maniac he would have already appeared by now and that is not who he is as a person and he will never shill to make money or media attention.

Every year there's always a new version claiming that he is Satoshi Nakamoto. I think the real Satoshi Nakamoto wants a private life so whoever claims he/she is the real Satoshi Nakamoto don't believe them. The real Satoshi Nakamoto if he/she wants to reveal his/her identity the moderators of this forum will verify it for sure. Or he/she will provide the evidence that he is the creator of bitcoin. So don't waste our time finding someone who doesn't want to be found.

Certainly. A waste of time.
His identification would be good for authorities and terrible for the ecosystem and for bitcoin decentralization.

Everything he says would impact bitcoin price, he could have huge control over development, and he (as a human) could also be corrupted and starting chilling shitcoins in his twitter to make money.... like jameson loop.

I dream of the day that people finally stop wasting time finding out who Satoshi Nakamoto really is(because good luck with that, and knowing who he/she/they really is/are isn't going to help anyone besides the authorities), and focus on other things that's more worth the time instead.

After identify of the Satoshi market can be highly effected and maybe that's the other reason of why the identify is still unknown. There are already many possibilities and theories about Satoshi, even some people named themselves Satoshi, one of them is craig wright. if you google "Fake Satoshi" you will see his name first in the list. According to another theory, Satoshi is not just one person and there are some people they made a team and call is Satoshi. However, I personally hope none ever understands his/her real identity.

There have already been a lot of different information and different versions about the personality of Satoshi Nakamoto. Satoshi Nakamoto took the necessary steps to hide his identity. He either counted on never to be revealed, or must prepare evidence in case his identity is revealed.
Therefore, if the real Satoshi himself does not want to appear, all actions to establish him will be ineffective. Any versions, guesses and assumptions will not lead to anything.

In 2014, Leah McGrath Goodman published a report in Newsweek claiming that Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto, a 64-year-old Japanese-American man from Southern California, was the creator of Bit[Suspicious link removed]dman claims that Doreen Nakamoto "implicitly" identified himself as Satoshi Nakamoto in an interview with Goodman; However, Doreen Nakamoto later vehemently denied any involvement in the creation of bitcoin.

McGrath Goodman is a distinguished reporter who has won awards in his career and has published articles in prestigious publications such as the Wall Street Journal, Fortune and the Guardian. In an interview with Anthony Pompliano, he explained that he now has new information about Nakamoto's identity and intends to write more about it. Goodman stated:

As my report was being published, the Department of Homeland Security launched an investigation.
I received many emails; But I received a special email from a group who wanted to divulge real information, and I hope to write more about it and provide more information about my initial report.

There are many more secrets, and they are not all just about Durin, and I think we all knew that.

Just focusing on Dorin was not very satisfying; There are definitely more tips and I really hope to be able to publish them as well.
Also, I want to respect the privacy and feelings of the people who spoke to me.

Goodman quoted Nakamoto as saying:

I no longer participate in this work and I can not talk about it.
This project has been entrusted to other people and they are now in charge of it. I have nothing to do with them anymore.

Police officers at the scene later confirmed that Goodman's quote from Nakamoto was correct.

In an interview with Pompliano, McGrath Goodman said that the issue of his relationship and interaction with Nakamoto before the face-to-face meeting was quite clear. He explained:

We've been exchanging emails for weeks. I even sent him an email with Bitcard given to me by Gavin Andresen. He also received all these emails before the interview, knowing that we were going to talk about bitcoin.

I was disappointed that he later claimed that he did not know what the subject of the conversation was. He certainly knew we wanted to talk about bitcoin. We've been talking about this for weeks on the Internet before I actually went to his house.

Thanks for reading this article. Good luck