I think back in the days, that's when majority of projects did this, some even went as far as asking their members to contribute a fee so as to help them with listing, and judging by your analysis, it looks accurate. I think the reason they will even try to list on a shit exchange is to fulfill all righteousness by showing that indeed they listed thus one can't accuse them much. Like you said, it is planned and if you watch closely too, they are always surrounded by hype which fades away once public sale finishes.
Nevertheless, this was the nature of most ICO projects, but nowadays any investor participating in any IEO done on a shit exchange should blame himself for anything that comes out of it.
Topic: New projects plan from the very start - page 2. (Read 686 times)
What the author wrote is very similar to the truth. I often ask myself such a question, well, have all the admins and developers not so professionals that they don’t understand the obvious things for the development of the project and its cryptocurrency? Of course, they understand everything and, apparently, their goal is only to make money. Perhaps this does not apply to all 100% of projects, but most of them probably work according to this scheme. I agree that it is very difficult now to choose a really worthwhile project and to do it every day is getting harder and harder.
Judging from the post, the author most likely made a bad investment.Let's say I'm more optimistic about the IEO.Before investing, we all have the opportunity to study the project in detail, to communicate in a group with other investors.What's the problem?
Most of the time that can be the case as investors failed to do much deeper research. And after being victimized by scammed projects, they will begin to bad-mouth the project. There's nothing more we can do aside from learning from our mistake. We should know more about about the project before investing our money to avoid making mistakes from this venue of investment.In the otherside, it's also an acceptable reality as the last point of what OP has said, scammers are very good in planning the path to ensure that it will runaway clean after listing the project inside unknown exchange and being completely dumped.
1. Attract investors with good discount price
2. Make enough money from IEO fund raising
3. Use very low fund to list on shit exchange
4 Abandon the project slowly
This is all planned from the beginning....
Now the question is which developer doesn't know that listing on low exchange won't do any good? are devs that stupid? no they are not,infact they are the ones that understand more about crypto that any other.
Once the Binance was a beginner exchange. Listing on small exchanges may be related to the development team’s budgets. 2. Make enough money from IEO fund raising
3. Use very low fund to list on shit exchange
4 Abandon the project slowly
This is all planned from the beginning....
Now the question is which developer doesn't know that listing on low exchange won't do any good? are devs that stupid? no they are not,infact they are the ones that understand more about crypto that any other.
Judging from the post, the author most likely made a bad investment.Let's say I'm more optimistic about the IEO.Before investing, we all have the opportunity to study the project in detail, to communicate in a group with other investors.What's the problem?
1. Attract investors with good discount price
2. Make enough money from IEO fund raising
3. Use very low fund to list on shit exchange
4 Abandon the project slowly
This is all planned from the beginning....
Now the question is which developer doesn't know that listing on low exchange won't do any good? are devs that stupid? no they are not,infact they are the ones that understand more about crypto that any other.
I disagree. All of us deal with short-term fundamentals such as exchange listing and price. But let's remember, we want some real use and the long-term future of the project! 2. Make enough money from IEO fund raising
3. Use very low fund to list on shit exchange
4 Abandon the project slowly
This is all planned from the beginning....
Now the question is which developer doesn't know that listing on low exchange won't do any good? are devs that stupid? no they are not,infact they are the ones that understand more about crypto that any other.
1. Attract investors with good discount price
2. Make enough money from IEO fund raising
3. Use very low fund to list on shit exchange
4 Abandon the project slowly
This is all planned from the beginning....
Now the question is which developer doesn't know that listing on low exchange won't do any good? are devs that stupid? no they are not,infact they are the ones that understand more about crypto that any other.
a project that has a plan like this is a very irresponsible project. when they have the support of investors, but they ignore it. I think, many investors are hesitant to invest because of things like this. because of that, it is very much required for investors to conduct very in-depth research on the projects they will support. I'm sure, if it's a flawed project, then you will find mistakes when doing research.2. Make enough money from IEO fund raising
3. Use very low fund to list on shit exchange
4 Abandon the project slowly
This is all planned from the beginning....
Now the question is which developer doesn't know that listing on low exchange won't do any good? are devs that stupid? no they are not,infact they are the ones that understand more about crypto that any other.
in terms of listing, I think they all target a very popular market, it's just that it's not so easy to do listing there. so I think they deliberately put their coins into the low exchangers so that their products are fast to trade. it's just that, some projects are satisfied with something like that.
if your standard just about the great project in development just the coin listed and have good price like IEO/ICO ofering it's a wrong bro, because if this the standard many project are failed, because 90% of new project the coin price after listing is undervalued than ico price offering
If the project fails to deliver the promised working product, I will accuse the team too. The price is linked to the value of the project and temporary dumps will not be a dominant factor in the fate of the project. The coin price can go up and down, the bounty hunters only share the negative sides of the whole process, it is not the right strategy for reaching the high prices from my experience.
Before they make plans, of course, those who know better at first, we as investors or prize hunters must be more selective before putting money into any project, but the fact that identifying fraudulent projects in the beginning is not easy, most projects are now visible real.
1. Attract investors with good discount price
2. Make enough money from IEO fund raising
3. Use very low fund to list on shit exchange
4 Abandon the project slowly
This is all planned from the beginning....
Now the question is which developer doesn't know that listing on low exchange won't do any good? are devs that stupid? no they are not,infact they are the ones that understand more about crypto that any other.
2. Make enough money from IEO fund raising
3. Use very low fund to list on shit exchange
4 Abandon the project slowly
This is all planned from the beginning....
Now the question is which developer doesn't know that listing on low exchange won't do any good? are devs that stupid? no they are not,infact they are the ones that understand more about crypto that any other.
That's not a good sign but at least you already know where the project is heading or even a clue on what the project is aiming like they either want the project to succees or just raise a lot of money. First is when they choose the rated s for shitty exhange to lauch their IEO then don't expect from them too much that they would list on other exchanges as good as Binance
New IEO projects or non IEO projects must always find way to attract investors, if a project received too low funds from investors the project will surely fail, lots of fund is needed for every projects to achieve their goals, i am just trying to prove that not all projects that try to attract investors one way or the other are scam projects
1. Attract investors with good discount price
2. Make enough money from IEO fund raising
3. Use very low fund to list on shit exchange
4 Abandon the project slowly
This is all planned from the beginning....
Now the question is which developer doesn't know that listing on low exchange won't do any good? are devs that stupid? no they are not,infact they are the ones that understand more about crypto that any other.
2. Make enough money from IEO fund raising
3. Use very low fund to list on shit exchange
4 Abandon the project slowly
This is all planned from the beginning....
Now the question is which developer doesn't know that listing on low exchange won't do any good? are devs that stupid? no they are not,infact they are the ones that understand more about crypto that any other.
If this is the plan since the beginning then the project is a scam and just want money from investors.
This is why there are so many people who dont want to buy from ICO.
ANd this is why most investors wants to have IEO in a great exchange to be secure that they are on a good project.
Everything was planned from scratch. You may be able to understand that those who must be familiar with crypto. However, they list projects that they develop on exchanges that have small volumes.
I see many of these projects growing on small exchanges. But if you look at the sales activity, nothing at all. As the project dies, I am also confused, is this their goal for project registration on the exchange? I think this is a very bad form of development and the goal is that they just want to raise investor funds and run away with this fund.
that's not the main problem, the problem, is they launch some project without any mature preparation, I think they are in a hurry, and only chasing crowdfunds and not looking the preparation, in case we can know about the projct in roadmap, they tell to us make the concept in 2016 but all of media like Facebook, twitter, telegram, github, website and other just created in 2018 or 2019, This is nonsense, and they seem lie to investorsI see many of these projects growing on small exchanges. But if you look at the sales activity, nothing at all. As the project dies, I am also confused, is this their goal for project registration on the exchange? I think this is a very bad form of development and the goal is that they just want to raise investor funds and run away with this fund.
Just waiting what have you talking about is true or not because we always get many sweet promised from an ICO or IEO owner before their project is listing.
can the team also prohibit the dex to add their token?
i have followed some projects particularly in EOS platform where their token wasn't added on newdex but they specifically intend to add their token on binance dex. at first they were denied but in the end they successfully made it in binance dex and no other exchange added them.
You're missing something, "the exit scam" but sometimes they just run away with the money they got from the investors.
If they don't have funds to be listed on some big exchanges then theres no reason to invest in them because in this way
if you still not believe and went to invest in their project, then you are suicidal to your investment which is not good to do.
If they don't have funds to be listed on some big exchanges then theres no reason to invest in them because in this way
if you still not believe and went to invest in their project, then you are suicidal to your investment which is not good to do.
3. Use very low fund to list on shit exchange
3. But the project is an IEO right? so it means that there's already an exchange that will list it as soon as the project's concern. And if the developers want to expand the listing, depends on their taste of exchange.They can list it on an expensive exchange and pay the fee accordingly but if they don't care about the volume, just to say that they have listed it to an exchange, yeah they will fund it with a very low budget.
Your logic is correct, but that is just an assumption, even though there is no data that says like that but there are indeed many projects that do that,
many projects go slowly when the ICO is carried out successfully,
but since there is IEO, ICO scams can be avoided a little so that investors do not have to worry when investing.
many projects go slowly when the ICO is carried out successfully,
but since there is IEO, ICO scams can be avoided a little so that investors do not have to worry when investing.
listing on shit exchanges it is opne of the biggest problem right now. I am ready to wait for few more month before listing than to see my coin on some shit exchange
The exchange is the main issue among the investors and the bounty hunters, teams also want to increase their partnerships after they get listed at the best crypto exchanges. Small exchanges also are known as a cave for the dead coins, listing on those exchange will lead to the same treatment by the investors. It is conjecture of the markets and there will be the opposite arguments always. Developers are not deceiving, they also can see the risks in the project launching. If there are other exchanges that developers applied for the listing, balming the team is understandable. Waiting period must be the boring and investors become impatient traders if they don't see news regarding the new exchanges.~
I did not notice that many of the projects raised good funds during the ico, most projects raise a lot of money in the ieo and on good exchanges, these coins are developing.If the project fails to deliver the promised working product, I will accuse the team too. The price is linked to the value of the project and temporary dumps will not be a dominant factor in the fate of the project. The coin price can go up and down, the bounty hunters only share the negative sides of the whole process, it is not the right strategy for reaching the high prices from my experience.
~
I did not notice that many of the projects raised good funds during the ico, most projects raise a lot of money in the ieo and on good exchanges, these coins are developing.Jump to: