Topic: new projects should be about new features - page 4. (Read 639 times)
I take the example: almost every new exchange project has the same system foundation, some seem to work to bring up new options, but they forget to increase user comfort in increasing liquidity. Trying something new but letting go of many important things won't mean much. I think only large-scale funding can make projects ensure good progress.
One of the biggest problems that crypto developers face is that technology changes rapidly. It is very hard to stay current, they new to introduce better feature than what we have already in this space, who agrees?
I guess Moore's Law is also applicable to crypto. We need to update to the ever changes here, that's why we have seen so many forks, updates specially on those name coins.
Just recently, ETH will be releasing an update, ETH 2.0, and I think this is a respond to the ever changing climate we have seen so far in crypto sphere.
Even though its constantly changing they can adopt it everytime and changs on the one that will improve best the platform right. See how eth will change their nature from POW to POS, since they see a good development and a leap for this major decision.
One of the biggest problems that crypto developers face is that technology changes rapidly. It is very hard to stay current, they new to introduce better feature than what we have already in this space, who agrees?
New projects can initiate that, they should be the one to develop new features and not to copy paste a token/coin that is already in the market. This is also why some projects are dying because of being incompetent and can’t innovate, if they do adopt the growing technology then chances are, investors will see them as an opportunity. One of the biggest problems that crypto developers face is that technology changes rapidly. It is very hard to stay current, they new to introduce better feature than what we have already in this space, who agrees?
Very few feature need in cryptocurrency where new project is gathering old project feature. New projects with very bad new features and with gathering old feature, this types of project are available I'm cryptocurrency. I have also some feature but new project is in rush to add old where new technology is achieving huge success. 
One of the biggest problems that crypto developers face is that technology changes rapidly. It is very hard to stay current, they new to introduce better feature than what we have already in this space, who agrees?
Agreed with you. They could bring coins and tokens of same genre but with different nature. They could bring it if it's advanced than the old one.
But there's no use of brining the coin that basically does the same or less than just another coin. Coins and tokens that are just for speculations are useless at the moment.
I think the first is about an idea or concept, a new project should have a new concept about the project. Because there is nothing interesting about a new project if the concept is the same as another project.
Yes if you create different project here better if you have new about it like example new way of promoting this then with big funds and long
Then actually do this if you know that this can be useful in future because many users really want that so that's why they do risk or invest in that then this will really so example of this is the big faucets of xrb in the past then turn to nano now that don't have fees every transaction
Then actually do this if you know that this can be useful in future because many users really want that so that's why they do risk or invest in that then this will really so example of this is the big faucets of xrb in the past then turn to nano now that don't have fees every transaction
I prefer to say that this is a complex problem, not a difficult one. Crypto developers will definitely do a review of the problems that often occur in the community related to various things, then try to find a solution with a combination of blockchain and cryptocurrency, find unique innovations that will form specific niches. Serious projects, with high funding, are sure to easily attract investors. It will not be difficult to form a market network if the product is realistic and solutive.
Yes you are right but this just refers to the ideal market environment but what we are seeing is according to normal greedy human psychology where they will rush to copy others just to make a quick buck which results in defaming of overall market too. There should be some global ico authority that should only allow legit, unique and quality projects to continue and not allow others only then we can get rid of such issues from the market.
Let me give advice to those who develop new projects for the crypto ecosystem. No need to constantly search for new projects. No need to constantly look for new ideas. There are many good ideas. They need to bring good ideas back into the system. Good advertising good programmers!
And the people who want to get rich quick can abandon a perfectly good
alt coin project for a newer project offering the same solution as the one they left.
Projects take time to grow and develop, the serious ones that is
alt coin project for a newer project offering the same solution as the one they left.
Projects take time to grow and develop, the serious ones that is
One of the biggest problems that crypto developers face is that technology changes rapidly. It is very hard to stay current, they new to introduce better feature than what we have already in this space, who agrees?
I don't agree. I see two other problems in crypto space:
1. Everybody(*) wants to get rich quick (hence the huge number of clones, shitcoins, useless tokens and unrealistic promises)
2. Everybody(*) wants to "upgrade" existing successful coins (coming with ideas for Bitcoin PoW is already a classic), and for this I also have a good example here.
With the huge market caps of the top coins, maybe they feel too intimidated to start their own new proper coin? Who knows? But we need new ideas, they help the ecosystem.
(*) not everybody ad literam, just a big enough number of people, of course.
They should accept and have it always in their minds that technology keeps innovating and there's no way to delay the upgrades and changes because it is constant.
If they are not prepared for it, they should accept it too that their projects will be left behind by the emerging projects. But in the world of ICOs, I don't think that there will be a new project that will be the same as the old ones.
If they are not prepared for it, they should accept it too that their projects will be left behind by the emerging projects. But in the world of ICOs, I don't think that there will be a new project that will be the same as the old ones.
The old features are going to be old because a day later a new concept comes offering better solution to the old problem and because implementing deserves another fork means there will be another code examination and debugging the line of codes and while doing so another concept emerges. But that's the beauty of having an opensource project because a lot of coders can participate and propose/
Sharding still is new to solve the scalability. If ETH will be successful in this ETH2, many projects will probably follow as well.
Sharding still is new to solve the scalability. If ETH will be successful in this ETH2, many projects will probably follow as well.
One of the biggest problems that crypto developers face is that technology changes rapidly. It is very hard to stay current, they new to introduce better feature than what we have already in this space, who agrees?
Jump to: