Pages:
Author

Topic: New Sig Spammer/Blacklist (Clean start for all) (Read 1375 times)

copper member
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1814
฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.
from the updated OP this is what i think new and unique list..looking forward for whom will be added  Grin
Assholes

Code:
Vadi2323
I don't know what chronicsky did but i sure do know Vadi2323 has been up to lately. What I think is that the list is specifically for cheats and spammers, not persons who are a pain in the butt or trolls. Such people don't deserve any attention whatsoever...

Edit:

I surely hadn't looked into the list yet before i made the comment, I thought @Sadlife was suggesting them to be added... my bad.
sr. member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 269
OP has been updated with all the current spammers from cryptotalk campaign. Will update the cheaters and other sections when I have time.
from the updated OP this is what i think new and unique list..looking forward for whom will be added  Grin


Assholes

Code:
chronicsky
Vadi2323
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 4603
Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing
OP has been updated with all the current spammers from cryptotalk campaign. Will update the cheaters and other sections when I have time.
copper member
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1280
https://linktr.ee/crwthopia
I hope this becomes a Global standard in BTCT. Like every manager uses this kind of system and rulings so that everyone would know how to follow and what to follow, correctly. I think it could be applied here in the forum just like the different ISO standards that are agreed upon on different industries.

Maybe it could increase the quality of members partaking in the signature campaign too.
hero member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 877
I think burstposting isn't really a bad thing because some people are exceptionally fast readers and typers, You should probably be more leinent on burstposting.

See the definition of burst posting. You need to be super human to be able to read first and then write constructively in less than 5 mins and keep on repeating the process.


Burstposting definition- A person that makes a posts then 1-5 minutes later makes another, and another, and another. I will not add someone here for burstposting if they have 1 post right after another every once in awhile. Sometimes a person reads the forum and makes a reply, then sees another topic they have a constructive reply for, but if quite a few of your posts are 1 right after the other, then you'll find yourself here.
copper member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 737
✅ Need Campaign Manager? TG > @TalkStar675
If a user is a burstposter then they can be burstposters not in campaigns unless the posts are super constructive and on point. Most times that's not the case though.  Campaigns are a privilege, not a right. Users are not entitled to be in campaigns. If they cannot attempt to follow the managers rules, then they should not try to join.
Its better to make 1 quality post rather than 100 useless. Yeah its true that to fulfill campaign rules sometime participants need to increase his activity but it doesn't mean that he will have to choose the way of burstposting or spamming. If he isn't able to maintain his post standard then its pretty much clear that he isn't worthy of that spot to continue his campaign.  

Special thanks to TalkStar. Added all the Loan defaulters from his LIST.
Glad to see those scammers in your list. Thanks
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 4603
Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing
I think burstposting isn't really a bad thing because some people are exceptionally fast readers and typers, You should probably be more leinent on burstposting.
If a user is a burstposter then they can be burstposters not in campaigns unless the posts are super constructive and on point. Most times that's not the case though.  Campaigns are a privilege, not a right. Users are not entitled to be in campaigns. If they cannot attempt to follow the managers rules, then they should not try to join.


Special thanks to TalkStar. Added all the Loan defaulters from his LIST.
jr. member
Activity: 49
Merit: 2
I think burstposting isn't really a bad thing because some people are exceptionally fast readers and typers, You should probably be more leinent on burstposting.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 4603
Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing
If these positive things are made public that will encourage other people too and the wrong perceptions will also change.
But it will create some chaos into his PM,people will start PMing him about to review their tags and convincing them to remove it which may kill DT members time.

What can be done is make a thread here for the people who want their tag to be reviewed again.

That won't help either because then everyone would spam the thread to review their tags.

There could be an automated system whereby a button appears in front of the tag after certain time period (e.g 3 months) and a request can be sent to the person who gave the tag to be reviewed. If he request is declined the next and final review button will appear after 6 months. Something like this will prevent the spam and also help those who want to improve themselves.
Self Moderated thread could be an option but other thing you mentioned looks too much importance to be given for the scammers who are supposed to get red tag for any reason.
The only people who will get a review are the people in list #1, the spammer and burstposter list. All the other are permanent.

hero member
Activity: 2366
Merit: 793
Bitcoin = Financial freedom
If these positive things are made public that will encourage other people too and the wrong perceptions will also change.
But it will create some chaos into his PM,people will start PMing him about to review their tags and convincing them to remove it which may kill DT members time.

What can be done is make a thread here for the people who want their tag to be reviewed again.

That won't help either because then everyone would spam the thread to review their tags.

There could be an automated system whereby a button appears in front of the tag after certain time period (e.g 3 months) and a request can be sent to the person who gave the tag to be reviewed. If he request is declined the next and final review button will appear after 6 months. Something like this will prevent the spam and also help those who want to improve themselves.
Self Moderated thread could be an option but other thing you mentioned looks too much importance to be given for the scammers who are supposed to get red tag for any reason.
hero member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 877
If these positive things are made public that will encourage other people too and the wrong perceptions will also change.
But it will create some chaos into his PM,people will start PMing him about to review their tags and convincing them to remove it which may kill DT members time.

What can be done is make a thread here for the people who want their tag to be reviewed again.

That won't help either because then everyone would spam the thread to review their tags.

There could be an automated system whereby a button appears in front of the tag after certain time period (e.g 3 months) and a request can be sent to the person who gave the tag to be reviewed. If he request is declined the next and final review button will appear after 6 months. Something like this will prevent the spam and also help those who want to improve themselves.
hero member
Activity: 2366
Merit: 793
Bitcoin = Financial freedom
If these positive things are made public that will encourage other people too and the wrong perceptions will also change.
But it will create some chaos into his PM,people will start PMing him about to review their tags and convincing them to remove it which may kill DT members time.

What can be done is make a thread here for the people who want their tag to be reviewed again.
hero member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 877

Don't you think it is the responsibly of the New DT Members also to check & revise their ratings from time to time and not just tag and forget ?
Eh, I don't review my tags periodically but if someone PMs me asking to get a negative removed I do listen to their request and will remove a feedback if enough time has passed and there haven't been any further instances of shenanigans.  In fact I did exactly that for a member about 3 days ago.  But it's been my experience that most negs members earn probably deserve to stay put.

There are spammers here and there who are always complaining about this system and its a general perception that DT members are rude and never listen to the people. You reviewed a member 3 days ago and probably remove the tag if he had improved. No one in the forum knew about it.  Undecided

There is always a black listing and spammer listing thing everywhere. Will it be good if you people also list the members whom you got their tag removed and they have become better . 

If these positive things are made public that will encourage other people too and the wrong perceptions will also change.
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 7011
Top Crypto Casino
99.9% forgiveness of old blacklisted! this is a rare example.
It is indeed rare--but I betcha that if the members of the old list are still active here, they'll eventually start pulling the same crap.  Maybe that's me being pessimistic, but a lot of shitposters just don't have it in them to make well thought out posts and to not post-burst, etc.

In any case, there aren't a hell of a lot of signature campaigns around anymore anyway, are there?  I have the Services section on ignore, but last I checked there were only a handful of them--and from what I've heard there aren't even that many bounties around either.  So the forgiveness might actually be somewhat of a moot point.

Don't you think it is the responsibly of the New DT Members also to check & revise their ratings from time to time and not just tag and forget ?
Eh, I don't review my tags periodically but if someone PMs me asking to get a negative removed I do listen to their request and will remove a feedback if enough time has passed and there haven't been any further instances of shenanigans.  In fact I did exactly that for a member about 3 days ago.  But it's been my experience that most negs members earn probably deserve to stay put.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 6194
Meh.
Great initiative by the greatest manager. Well done yahoo!
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 4603
Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing


Don't you think it is the responsibly of the New DT Members also to check & revise their ratings from time to time and not just tag and forget ?

Depends on the reason they were tagged.




Decided to change a list and make assholes have their own list. Rule breakers will be grouped in with the scammers.
hero member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 877
In the spirit of forgive and forget, I would like to give 99.9% of the users of the forum a fresh start. The new list will contain users from the most recent payouts who were banned for various reasons, mainly spamming/burstposting.

I will be keeping separate lists in this thread as well. I don't want to have the same problem as I do now and forget why I even added someone to the lists. I also will only review accounts that are on the spamming/burstposting list. All other lists are permanent. They will get no review nor have a chance to be removed.

I have been allowing neg trusted accounts into campaigns depending on the reason they have been tagged.


This decision of your may bring new culture in this forum. Its been a feeling here that once you are in the "Bad List" of any DT Member, you will always have to remain there. It seems like a Jail with no bail  Cheesy 
But this will be a healthy step for those who want to improve themselves.


With the New DT system we have, it's quite possible to see lots of users tagged by new DT users from the past who may not have revised their ratings yet.

Don't you think it is the responsibly of the New DT Members also to check & revise their ratings from time to time and not just tag and forget ?
hero member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 657
No dream is too big and no dreamer is too small
In the spirit of forgive and forget, I would like to give 99.9% of the users of the forum a fresh start. The new list will contain users from the most recent payouts who were banned for various reasons, mainly spamming/burstposting.

That's very generous of you, the decision is good for forgiving spamming/burstposting since a member can learn from his mistake and he can also improve if he wish to be accepted in your campaign again. This is a new opportunity for those who are in the old list, so hopefully they will try their best this time to follow the rules all the time and to contribute in the forum as well.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Burstposting definition- A person that makes a posts then 1-5 minutes later makes another, and another, and another. I will not add someone here for burstposting if they have 1 post right after another every once in awhile. Sometimes a person reads the forum and makes a reply, then sees another topic they have a constructive reply for, but if quite a few of your posts are 1 right after the other, then you'll find yourself here.
I think I fit this definition, but I'd like to think I'm not a spammer. Apart from just posting a lot, I often prepare posts for a long time, then post them all at once. But I assume you also check the quality of those posts, and in most cases burst posting indeed doesn't produce quality.
Quote
A person that makes a posts then 1-5 minutes later makes another, and another, and another.
In some cases I also fit in this criteria but I do not think it's what I intend to do. I am online most of the time. I have notifications on almost for all the boards. I also have notification on for some topics I follow. So making few quick posts is basically a very normal occurrence for me.


I think this explains all and differ some of us who post a lot.
Quote
Sometimes a person reads the forum and makes a reply, then sees another topic they have a constructive reply for
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Burstposting definition- A person that makes a posts then 1-5 minutes later makes another, and another, and another. I will not add someone here for burstposting if they have 1 post right after another every once in awhile. Sometimes a person reads the forum and makes a reply, then sees another topic they have a constructive reply for, but if quite a few of your posts are 1 right after the other, then you'll find yourself here.
I think I fit this definition, but I'd like to think I'm not a spammer. Apart from just posting a lot, I often prepare posts for a long time, then post them all at once. But I assume you also check the quality of those posts, and in most cases burst posting indeed doesn't produce quality.
Pages:
Jump to: