New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?

simon66

sr. member

Activity: 423

Merit: 250

Quote from: pawel7777 on February 06, 2016, 04:33:54 PM

Quote from: amaclin on February 06, 2016, 12:56:18 AM

...
Ok, this bubble is alive even today

If it don't burst - it ain't bubble. Choose different word.

You aren't the Pawel Pszona they think is Satoshi from this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/i-think-that-i-found-satoshi-nakamoto-1345468 are you?

Shocked

pawel7777

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1561

Quote from: amaclin on February 06, 2016, 12:56:18 AM

...
Ok, this bubble is alive even today

If it don't burst - it ain't bubble. Choose different word.

BitNow

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1003

OT

Quote from: siameze on February 06, 2016, 12:13:48 PM

Quote from: amaclin on February 06, 2016, 12:06:21 PM

Quote from: farreli on February 06, 2016, 11:21:16 AM

Oh for sure we need

"we need" is not equal to "anyone wants to pay for it"

Such idealogy just smacks of communism doesn't it? Life is not fair, neither should we expect it to be.

/OT

siameze

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1000

Quote from: amaclin on February 06, 2016, 12:06:21 PM

Quote from: farreli on February 06, 2016, 11:21:16 AM

Oh for sure we need

"we need" is not equal to "anyone wants to pay for it"

Such idealogy just smacks of communism doesn't it? Life is not fair, neither should we expect it to be.

alani123

legendary

Activity: 2422

Merit: 1451

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: amaclin on February 06, 2016, 12:56:18 AM

Quote from: TooDumbForBitcoin on February 05, 2016, 09:34:52 PM

Good time for this post. Marks the one year anniversary of Amaclin's prediction of $10 BTC "...within three months..."

I was wrong.
I thought that bitcoiners are more clever and able to do basic arithmentics

I was wrong.
They are dumb hodlers

Ok, this bubble is alive even today

Hey man, love your work. What brings you back to this forum? Did you suddenly feel an urge to bash bitcoiners?

amaclin

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1019

Quote from: farreli on February 06, 2016, 11:21:16 AM

Oh for sure we need

"we need" is not equal to "anyone wants to pay for it"

farreli

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

Oh for sure we need a decentralized monetary system, and a decentralized world too.

You mention Tragedy of commons , an example of that you have in 2008 Lehman brothers collapse, pursuing they own rationale incentives, the banks and investment funds destroyed their loveled system, a flawed one , more than malleable,...

I have no time to arguee more,... but think , we have a world of 6 billion people , and surprise !! there are almost 100 people who control all this minds, they have the power. You are a smart guy, give me a reason why you are not in this group of 100.

In the year 2116 people will laugh about this social-economical comepetitive system, and for sure they will ask themselves,.... why.

In the year 1816 there was 8 year old children working at coal mines, not too smart i think , better for society in overal to keep those children learning things, so we ask ourselves today ,.... why.

Bitcoin and other cryptos are flawed? ok, but we are on the way, we have to explore , if we take a snapshop of global economy today , is not very promising , and is not a fair game, ...as a westerner i believe i have no more rights over a chinesse , indian or Tuvalu citizen to live in this world, so i dont pursue be millonarie, i pursue a better world for all

amaclin

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1019

Quote from: TooDumbForBitcoin on February 05, 2016, 09:34:52 PM

Good time for this post. Marks the one year anniversary of Amaclin's prediction of $10 BTC "...within three months..."

I was wrong.
I thought that bitcoiners are more clever and able to do basic arithmentics

I was wrong.
They are dumb hodlers

Ok, this bubble is alive even today

TooDumbForBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1638

Merit: 1001

Quote from: amaclin on February 05, 2016, 04:17:08 PM

Quote from: farreli on February 04, 2016, 03:53:00 PM

but nobody cares about the code....someone will fix it !

Who? You? Me? Thanks, but no thanks

Quote

I think bitcoin its a powerful idea

Just one another ponzi scheme.

Quote

, and maybe a decentralized system is not cheaper, but i think its needed

No, it is not needed.

Quote

Bitcoin will have a brillant future as an alternative currency : scarcity, secret, special, tool, elite ,... = value

No, there is no future for any crypto. It is too expensive for maintaining.

Quote

So we have a brillant currency

Wrong. You have nothing, but 50 GB of junk data on your harddrive and a dream to be a $ millionare.

Good time for this post. Marks the one year anniversary of Amaclin's prediction of $10 BTC "...within three months..."

amaclin

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1019

Quote from: farreli on February 04, 2016, 03:53:00 PM

but nobody cares about the code....someone will fix it !

Who? You? Me? Thanks, but no thanks

Quote

I think bitcoin its a powerful idea

Just one another ponzi scheme.

Quote

, and maybe a decentralized system is not cheaper, but i think its needed

No, it is not needed.

Quote

Bitcoin will have a brillant future as an alternative currency : scarcity, secret, special, tool, elite ,... = value

No, there is no future for any crypto. It is too expensive for maintaining.

Quote

So we have a brillant currency

Wrong. You have nothing, but 50 GB of junk data on your harddrive and a dream to be a $ millionare.

farreli

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

Congratulations Amaclin for your successful attack . It seems that you have excellent coding skills, and thank you for invest your time showing to the bitcoin world such attack its feasible and possible.

Im totally agree with you, people only take things for free. Who support the core developers ? Bitcoin world, a 6 billion capitalization currency, lots of software implementations, lots of apps, lots os business, lots of transactions, but nobody cares about the code....someone will fix it ! they say

I think bitcoin its a powerful idea, and maybe a decentralized system is not cheaper, but i think its needed, its very possitive to have an alternative system, im convinced bitcoin will never scale and i think its better for the bitcoin ecosystem. Bitcoin will have a brillant future as an alternative currency : scarcity, secret, special, tool, elite ,... = value

So we have a brillant currency, but we dont want flaws, so a professional team of developers , 10 full time c developers well motivated and well payd its mandatory, how? through commissions... bitcoin network users must to pay for this service or there is no brillant future for bitcoin.

arnuschky

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 502

Is there any script or webservice that allows one to check transactions for low-s signatures? Basically a service that does https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12624538 automatically.

amaclin

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1019

Quote from: RussianRaibow on October 18, 2015, 08:34:30 AM

That was a fact. You or me stating that fact makes no difference whatsoever.
So, you did not say what is your next plan?
Going back to your boring job or buying some BTC as retirement fund? Roll Eyes

I am 100% sure that BTC (or any other crypto) is bad investment. Point.

RussianRaibow

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

I AM A SCAMMER

Quote from: amaclin on October 17, 2015, 01:50:10 AM

Quote from: RussianRaibow on October 16, 2015, 05:29:59 PM

Quote from: amaclin on October 15, 2015, 06:05:10 PM

Quote from: RussianRaibow on October 15, 2015, 05:34:16 PM

So, are you sad that your latest attempt to save people from this great Ponzi

I do not remember when and where I said this.
These are your words, not mine.

What a big fat liar you are! Here is what you said...

I did not say that this attempt is latest. No, I am not sad.

That was a fact. You or me stating that fact makes no difference whatsoever. So, you did not say what is your next plan? Going back to your boring job or buying some BTC as retirement fund? Roll Eyes

amaclin

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1019

Quote from: RussianRaibow on October 16, 2015, 05:29:59 PM

Quote from: amaclin on October 15, 2015, 06:05:10 PM

Quote from: RussianRaibow on October 15, 2015, 05:34:16 PM

So, are you sad that your latest attempt to save people from this great Ponzi

I do not remember when and where I said this.
These are your words, not mine.

What a big fat liar you are! Here is what you said...

I did not say that this attempt is latest. No, I am not sad.

RussianRaibow

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

I AM A SCAMMER

Quote from: Bifta on October 16, 2015, 05:33:14 PM

Quote from: RussianRaibow on October 16, 2015, 05:29:59 PM

Quote from: amaclin on October 15, 2015, 06:05:10 PM

Quote from: RussianRaibow on October 15, 2015, 05:34:16 PM

So, are you sad that your latest attempt to save people from this great Ponzi

I do not remember when and where I said this.
These are your words, not mine.

What a big fat liar you are! Here is what you said...

Quote from: amaclin on October 05, 2015, 02:30:29 PM

Quote from: unamis76 on October 05, 2015, 02:22:44 PM

Besides this, Satoshi seems to have had quite a few reasons to develop
Bitcoin such as fleeing from banks, creating a trustless system, etc.

OK. So my reason is to protect your life savings from this ponzi scheme called bitcoin

I want to prove that decentralized trustless system can not exists in long term.
It either transforms to centralized system or loses its security.

I think he was being sarcastic when he said that.

Sarcastic or not, there is no point in blatantly denying something that someone actually said.

Bifta

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: RussianRaibow on October 16, 2015, 05:29:59 PM

Quote from: amaclin on October 15, 2015, 06:05:10 PM

Quote from: RussianRaibow on October 15, 2015, 05:34:16 PM

So, are you sad that your latest attempt to save people from this great Ponzi

I do not remember when and where I said this.
These are your words, not mine.

What a big fat liar you are! Here is what you said...

Quote from: amaclin on October 05, 2015, 02:30:29 PM

Quote from: unamis76 on October 05, 2015, 02:22:44 PM

Besides this, Satoshi seems to have had quite a few reasons to develop
Bitcoin such as fleeing from banks, creating a trustless system, etc.

OK. So my reason is to protect your life savings from this ponzi scheme called bitcoin

I want to prove that decentralized trustless system can not exists in long term.
It either transforms to centralized system or loses its security.

I think he was being sarcastic when he said that.

RussianRaibow

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

I AM A SCAMMER

Quote from: amaclin on October 15, 2015, 06:05:10 PM

Quote from: RussianRaibow on October 15, 2015, 05:34:16 PM

So, are you sad that your latest attempt to save people from this great Ponzi

I do not remember when and where I said this.
These are your words, not mine.

What a big fat liar you are! Here is what you said...

Quote from: amaclin on October 05, 2015, 02:30:29 PM

Quote from: unamis76 on October 05, 2015, 02:22:44 PM

Besides this, Satoshi seems to have had quite a few reasons to develop
Bitcoin such as fleeing from banks, creating a trustless system, etc.

OK. So my reason is to protect your life savings from this ponzi scheme called bitcoin

I want to prove that decentralized trustless system can not exists in long term.
It either transforms to centralized system or loses its security.

amaclin

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1019

Quote from: gmaxwell on October 15, 2015, 06:57:34 PM

I don't agree, not even in the most lax of terms.

I mean you force somebody to do something.
I do not want to discuss now your good intentions. They are good. Today. Yours.
I absolutely agree that transaction malleability should be fixed. (OK, in fact not absolutely, but who cares?)
Was wondering why it was not fixed in BIP-66 when we changed the rules by "voting method".

I only notice that this is one another small step from decentralization to dictate.
You force the people which agreed to consenus rules in the past do something, but tell them that the consensus rules
have not changed. What if I say: "OK, do not use Bitcoin Core! It is too old software, use [name]"

Technically saying, if developers are able to force miners to upgrade their software today to "improved version"
then it woluld be possible to force them switch to a hardfork tomorrow.

siameze

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1000

Quote from: gmaxwell on October 15, 2015, 06:57:34 PM

I also called in this thread multiple times for help driving that 5% down to nothing and no one else cares, so-- how much can the negative impact matter when basically none of all the noisy people in this thread cared to lift a finger to help mitigate it?

I dunno, maybe some folks are busy working on producing results instead of kvetching about it on btctalk/reddit ?

Topic: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest? (Read 41229 times)