Pages:
Author

Topic: New World: Global or National? Governance with Blockchain - page 2. (Read 1232 times)

hero member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 816
🐺Spinarium.com🐺 - iGaming casino
With what happens in this year, maybe we will see a new transformation globally because everything has changed because of Coronavirus spreads in many countries. We can say so many guesses about what will happen after this pandemic is over even we can say that the government will use blockchain but we still not ready to use that because we need a big change or it's like a revolution in many sectors. Well, I am not an economist, but I think the government still prefer to use the old system than to try to use the new system. But everything can have a possibility to happen in the future since we can only guess without know if that will happen or not.
sr. member
Activity: 868
Merit: 251
HEX: Longer pays better
Although you have many ideas for blockchain companies in particular and blockchain technology in general during the epidemic season, I believe that no one wants to look for this type of technology. I also see daily articles about blockchain technology that can dominate the world or be part of people's lives. But after 10 years of development, this technology has been widely used? What's worse is that many real estate businesses and distribution companies have used it but it really doesn't have high productivity. Everything needs to go through a fairly long and difficult process to control. I am afraid that blockchain can only be operated in this crypto market.
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 2253
From Zero to 2 times Self-Made Legendary
Before the pandemic, everything went to the point that the world was to become united, because globalization was in full swing.
But now the borders are closed, and this is a mandatory factor for globalization. What will happen next depends on how long we stay in isolation.


The tendency and campaign of all parties starting from the community, the country to WHO is lockdown. Information about corona is still doubtful, but the panic caused by corona is reality. Limiting direct interaction and using technology and internet-based communication tools is a new form of human interaction. Coronavirus in an instant has changed the acceleration into slowing and even death, changing progression to regression.

The corona pandemic is a deadly attack on globalization, the coronavirus has created the 'turning point of globalization', the virus has stopped the massive flow of globalization that has been praised, namely the unlimited movement of people, goods and services globally. Viruses have devastated globalization-capitalism, which is claimed to be unstoppable by any power. Globalization characterized by conditions of interconnection is now replaced by interruption; by interdependence, now interdependence is taken over; by mutual cooperation now exchanged for mutual suspicion.

The world without borders has now become a world that is partitioned, locked, locked and isolated. What has been described as the 'village of the world' is now transformed into the villages of the world, which are isolated from one another. The global world imagined as being built by an 'open society', in which everyone is free to move globally because it is no longer limited by geographical, economic, religious, ideological and cultural barriers, has now transformed into a world with 'society closed society (closed society), in which people cannot freely move, move, or travel, even in their own cities or villages - an irony of globalization.

In the 21st century, the scheme is who moves slowly, he will die! The speed of progress is key. Blockchain is synonymous with algorithms and something that has a wow effect, this wow effect is what makes many countries want to dominate technology and become world rulers in a new form framed in the industrial revolution 4.0

The industrial revolution is a major change in the way humans process resources and produce goods. The industrial revolution was a phenomenon that occurred between 1750 - 1850. At that time, there were massive changes in agriculture, manufacturing, mining, transportation, and technology. These changes have an impact on social, economic, and cultural conditions in the world.

Revolution 1.0 the discovery of a steam engine.
Revolution 2.0 the discovery of electricity.
Revolution 3.0 the invention of the computer.
Revolution 4.0 automation and data exchange trends. cyber-physical systems, internet of things (IoT), cloud computing, and cognitive computing.
sr. member
Activity: 1313
Merit: 278
Before the pandemic, everything went to the point that the world was to become united, because globalization was in full swing.
But now the borders are closed, and this is a mandatory factor for globalization. What will happen next depends on how long we stay in isolation.
full member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 122
Anyway, I continue to think that the world will become more national, because during different pandemics, each state will not reckon with the interests of others. In the scientific field, this cooperation is still possible, but I don’t think so with finances and medical equipment.
If it doesn't go well with finance and medical equipement, then that cooperation is not the best choice to get. Let's just think of everything globally and we will surely find the right way to manage everything.
One of the greatest lessons from the actual corona pandemic is that the health situation of anybody in the planet is important for the safety of all the rest.

no mate  . on this corona pandemic we see how people help each other as well as others countries too and that help can be medical equipements but not mostly money because medical equipment are now out stocks  .

with blockchain , the world can become global because blockchain was online can can be used anywhere  and so far i havent see any country restrict blockchain but they only restrict cryptocurrencies  but i can sense that these crypto restriction can be removed soon
hero member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 757
Anyway, I continue to think that the world will become more national, because during different pandemics, each state will not reckon with the interests of others. In the scientific field, this cooperation is still possible, but I don’t think so with finances and medical equipment.
If it doesn't go well with finance and medical equipement, then that cooperation is not the best choice to get. Let's just think of everything globally and we will surely find the right way to manage everything.
One of the greatest lessons from the actual corona pandemic is that the health situation of anybody in the planet is important for the safety of all the rest.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 507
The new world will be national. The situation with medical equipment clearly demonstrated this, first of all, each country will take care of itself, and even such unions as the EU have shown that no one will help anyone to the detriment of themselves.
Even nationalism helps fast interacting with infected areas, being national means that we are not ready for the next epidimic which will be with a progressive version of one of the viruses.
I think it should be global. The experience teaches us that such major problems can be avoided if we act as a unit. If humanity will keep fighting each others for greed benefits and powers, then nationalism is the perfect framework, but if humanity learned the lesson that we are "as humans" fighting to survive in a real harsh planet, we will spend more energies in creating a better world for everybody.
Viruses and natural dangers make damages globally and all the planet is infected. Let's all focus on reacting over this like we are all now working to fight the same ennemy.
Anyway, I continue to think that the world will become more national, because during different pandemics, each state will not reckon with the interests of others. In the scientific field, this cooperation is still possible, but I don’t think so with finances and medical equipment.
hero member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 757
The new world will be national. The situation with medical equipment clearly demonstrated this, first of all, each country will take care of itself, and even such unions as the EU have shown that no one will help anyone to the detriment of themselves.
Even nationalism helps fast interacting with infected areas, being national means that we are not ready for the next epidimic which will be with a progressive version of one of the viruses.
I think it should be global. The experience teaches us that such major problems can be avoided if we act as a unit. If humanity will keep fighting each others for greed benefits and powers, then nationalism is the perfect framework, but if humanity learned the lesson that we are "as humans" fighting to survive in a real harsh planet, we will spend more energies in creating a better world for everybody.
Viruses and natural dangers make damages globally and all the planet is infected. Let's all focus on reacting over this like we are all now working to fight the same ennemy.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 507
The new world will be national. The situation with medical equipment clearly demonstrated this, first of all, each country will take care of itself, and even such unions as the EU have shown that no one will help anyone to the detriment of themselves.
hero member
Activity: 2184
Merit: 531
I think it should be global but we cannot make it happen because we come from centuries of nationalism. Nationalism isn't that bad but if we could make globalism work and have one world government we would prosper. We'd be able to colonize space much faster and achieve something we are used to seeing in science fiction series like Star Trek.

Blockchain governance could work but we'd need a big reset first because without it it's going to take centuries before people evlove and understand that we could achieve so much more if we worked together instead of spending billions on intercontinental missiles and other things to keep other nations at bay.
sr. member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 278
Definitely national, global does happen time to time, it affects the nation one as well, it is just how the world works and has always been like that, global turning into national.

Maybe it wasn't really all that obvious to people who were watching only their own nations but remember during the 2008 period when Obama was elected which was very difficult thing to do from a black american since there is racism still going on in USA, there was a lot of left leaning parties who won their elections in all around the world, what happened after that? Right parties got more and more avid on what they want and they wanted back, nowadays there is a lot more people who are right leaning who goes out to vote because they saw what left did and didn't want the same thing again.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3684
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Governance is the big problem, and even the European Commission's innovation/blockchain boss in a recent interview said so. Europe's keen on relaxed regulations for crypto, keeping it to the bare minimum of AML and fraud plus data privacy, but even with everything else, governance is the part they're facing challenges with.

Been many people try tackling this problem and even with Bitcoin we still see people disagreeing over how things happened in 2017/18 and continue to do so. Imagine politicians and bureaucrats fighting it out with developers.
legendary
Activity: 3024
Merit: 2148
One of the important things that will change with Corona is our perspective on life. Most of the concepts we think are unshakable will change. The economic crisis triggered by the disease showed us the facts. Economy is based on a balloon. Central authorities are not afraid of corruption in times of crisis. Printing money: As easy as printing paper on a printing press or pressing a key on the keyboard. Technology that will form the basis of its economy in the New World: Blockchain. Large companies will be managed via blockchain. People will want to participate more in decision making mechanisms. This is called: Governance[/size]


“Governance encompasses the system by which an organisation is controlled and operates, and the mechanisms by which it, and its people, are held to account.”* Governance must be used in public administration, even if the new world is national. Enabling people to participate fairly in the system is only possible with Blockchain system. A more decentralized world is waiting for us in the future.


Sources: [Medium] [Linkedin] [Dkbb] [Slideplayer] [Fusunozulke] [Governanceinstitute] [Wikipedia] [house-of-habsburg] [Unescap]


There won't be any big shift because of the coronavirus, this isn't the first epidemic and economic crisis in human history and it's sure not the last. Nothing changed after the 2008 crisis, or the SARS outbreak of 2004. And even if there will be some fundamental changes, it won't be about blockchain. No one cares about blockchain in the real world, and the governments are occasionally talk about it just to look progressive, but no one is going to use it.
copper member
Activity: 351
Merit: 0
Another future name is cryptocurrency
One of the most powerful technologies of the present day is blockchain technology.But it can be said that in the near future, the whole world will be able to bring about a change but there are some bad aspects to it, and the reason why different people are trying to present it badly to the government and that is why it is so easyNo country's government will rely solely on blockchin technology
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1288
New World: Global or National?

World will be still global, but Country economies will be way more selfsufficient and government will own way more industries as right now. Of course such states will cost more so taxes will be higher.
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1192
Globalism have already failed.

It failed when Trump was elected and when brexit happened. These were the major signs and Covid19 is just the final nail in its coffin.

Look at Italy. Nobody in Europe helped them. No help from Germany, no help from France... England didn't give af neither. No point in staying in EU anymore. England saw this coming long ago.

Name of the game is free for all now.

Because globalism has a lot to do with the orwellian vision of a communist society, where everone is supposed to be equal.
The EU was made to unite and equalize, create one big country under a central government, but it doesn't work and it will not work for the same reason why you can't ask everybody to do some physical work and get equal payment for it. Some people are strong, others are weak, some are healthy and some are not. You can't put them all in one basket and tell them to lay bricks and get $10 per hour because some clerk thought it would be a good idea.

Countries should work together for a common goal, but we shouldn't expect equality. IMO nationalism better than globalism, but we shouldn't allow to be ruled by xenophobes.
sr. member
Activity: 1313
Merit: 278
Before the pandemic, everything went to the point that the world was to become united, because globalization was in full swing.
But now the borders are closed, and this is a mandatory factor for globalization. What will happen next depends on how long we stay in isolation.
hero member
Activity: 2534
Merit: 605
Well, what else were you expecting them to do in this kind of situation? I am even pissed with the government of my country for not initiating a lockdown earlier and restricting travels; imagine they did that earlier there wouldn't be any cases at all.

But, now since they left the borders open there has been a lot of cases reported and a few deaths, though I'm very happy that lots of people have recovered from it. Everywhere should be on lockdown now and that's the best thing to do, whether people want it or not. The government and big organizations should also do their best to support the people in this difficult time.
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 2442
Globalism have already failed.

It failed when Trump was elected and when brexit happened. These were the major signs and Covid19 is just the final nail in its coffin.

Look at Italy. Nobody in Europe helped them. No help from Germany, no help from France... England didn't give af neither. No point in staying in EU anymore. England saw this coming long ago.

Name of the game is free for all now.
member
Activity: 515
Merit: 12
With this medical crisis globalisation failed, countries in EU don't support teiself, the example of Germany, or an other example given by Spain, they bout some protection mask and as much i understand americans offer a bigger price, so things are not as they seemed.
Pages:
Jump to: