The multiculturalism problem in Europe (and Germany) is basically a moslem problem. They do not integrate, they don't want to integrate and the cannot (because of their religious and cultural mental programming) integrate. Moslems and non-Moslems can only co-exists without violence (I do not say "peacefully") under hard dictatorship. Without that you cannot live in peace with moslems, once they reached a certain number. This is proved by reality in dozens of countries.
In Germany moslems (so called youngsters by the media) are killing young german males. Every week. They do it very brutally by jumping on the head. For nothing reasonably, the real motivation behind is applying power for the own ethnic/religious group. Very simple.
Mainstream media ignores this. Justice is weak. Churches and mayors are talking about "tolerance" and "racism" and "fight against right people". The brutality and insanity of young moslems is increasing, therefore.
But most of the young germans are too brainwashed and damaged by leftist ideology, gender mainstreaming, computer games, disfunctional families and ... to take a stand. They are too stupid, pussified, timid and cowardly to take back control over street life in the big cities. The young moslems here are running around as they are the kings of the country. No south american poor and uneducated latino macho would tolerate this moslem behaviour, they are showing here, for even one second.
This is so simple, but the germans (and the other europeans) don't get it.
This is the first time in which I come across such a simple, yet very realistic explanation of what is going on here in Europe.
I'm in Amsterdam at the moment and this is all too evident. It's the same as in south-eastern Europe, where the gypsies are doing the same as the moslems- killing and pillaging. And the local population are helpless in front of these bullsh*t EU tolerance policies...
Multiculturalism, depending in how things pan out, can have two effects on a native population. The first effect, the effect which is most lauded by the political left, is that it peacefully injects new influences into the native culture, we all get along hand in hand, make friendships with people whose heritage spawns from another continent, a different religious background, a markedly different racial type etc. This trend of course, will bring about changes to the character of the native culture. Depending on the nature of such changes and the attitudes of the native population, these changes can of course be viewed as positive and negative, and one mans negative may well be another man's positive. Ultimately, immigration and mixing of genetics is obviously a desirable thing to a certain extent, as the physical condition and appearance alone of any traditionally closed or isolated communities around the world should demonstrate. On the otherhand, perhaps a native population may possess peculiar and very specific talents, which will be lost should blood and cultures mix. For example, some Australian aboriginals have the ability to go into drug induced trances and perform the amazing feat of drawing a rough map of areas of land which have been under sea for 20'000 years, the accuracy of which modern day western scientists can verify using technological instruments (yes, this has been done). The Aboriginal's explanation as to how he could accomplish this task, was that he simply 'asked his ancestors' to tell him. My contention is that should this Aboriginal have married a white woman, then it would become increasingly unlikely that any of his successors be capable of performing a similar feat, as since the 'channels to the ancestors' would not be so clear for his offspring. No doubt, I have lost anyone who is reading this, but my contention (backed up by the latest genetic and psychological research), is that in addition to physical characteristics, that our mental characteristics are also essentially a product of our ancestry. The idea of a mind being born as a 'blank sheet', waiting to be coloured in by life experience, is now largely seen as a defunct view of the human mind, although this is still the prevailing view in the political mainstream, with anyone who dares to deviate from it, risking being labelled as a racist.
So whilst mixing of cultures and bloods plays an important role in injecting fresh ideas and characteristics into a population, it can also have the effect of diluting pre-existing cultural ideas and characteristics, both positive and negative ones. Whilst it wouldn't be controversial to point out that any population with too narrow a genepool will suffer, it would certainly be controversial to state that probably, there is a limit to which the extent of genepool mixing may be considered as beneficial. Perhaps too much racial mixing just results in a loss of identity, leaving an unhinged, homogenised, easy to manipulate consumerist population, increasingly trained to be slaves to their own base impulses. So that is the multiculturalism when populations integrate.
However, large swathes of immigrants from Muslim lands, have shown the tendency not to integrate into their host cultures. In contrast to Westerners and other ethnic minorities, Muslim communities have held a much firmer grip on their traditional values and practices, just as they also have had an overwhelming tendency to breed within their own distinct religious and racial group (45% of Muslims in UK marry 1st cousins, the majority of the rest, marry 2nd cousins). This pattern is pretty much consistent across the whole of Western Europe and the end result has been a growing number of 'island' communities, whose traditional and clear values, stand often in direct opposition to those of the liberal, consumerist and increasingly self homogenising culture that surrounds them. In the face of the increasing corruption of modern day Western consumer culture, perhaps there are strong arguments in favour of Muslim communities holding tight to their own values, as well as strong arguments against the much lower level of personal freedom within Muslim communities. Whatever the case, when situations arise where there are two very distinct groups of people that see themselves as very different to one another, some form of sectarian tension inevitably develops.
As has been discussed already in this thread (sorry, off topic quite some time ago), most German youth are 'too stupid' or 'brainwashed' to see the wood from the trees on such issue. What I would say is that as a legacy of the war guilt, the expression of any kind of sentiment that can be seen to allude to something along the lines of being proud of ones own culture, or feeling somewhat unsettled by and alien to the cultures of recent immigrant populations, would be a fast track to social ostracisation. In otherwords, not cool, just don't go there. Whilst this self denying effect may be most pronounced in Germany, the same changes have occurred in the collective conscious across the whole of Western Europe. In the UK, the majority of people who tend to be actively up in arms about 'immigration' or the muslimification of many areas of the UK's inner cities tend to be from a neglected white impoverished working class background and I am sure the same general rule applies across Europe. This would suggest that sectarianism thrives on poverty. Thus, so long as the wealth keeps rolling in, people in the West will tend to be more focused on getting on with living their lives and will tend not to pay too much attention to any negative aspects of multiculturalism, and can afford to subscribe and/or pay lip service to the prevailing socially approved leftist attitude towards people and communities of different ethnic background and creed, whilst focusing only on the positive. The danger will come when or if, one day, the wealth in the West actually does stop rolling and a significant proportion of the population are facing poverty. That is when the shit could start. People who are getting slapped down in life, have an emotional need to find an easy scapegoat. I believe that those scapegoats could turn out to be the insular Muslim communities which have established themselves sporadically throughout Western nations. The angry mob, will not be so likely to direct its attention towards the parasite vampires operating in the world of high finance, that are as we speak, sucking the wealth of the planet dry, or direct its anger towards the adherents of the Zionist ideology that have presided over the course of Western and by default, global history over the past 100 years. No. The dispossessed population will direct its angst towards the Muslim populations who 'hate us' and who are 'stealing our jobs and using up our homes'.
Despite what one German poster stated about everything being sweet with multiculturalsim where he lives, recently a spate of mainstream politicians across the EU, I am talking David Cameron, Angela Merkel have made public statements proclaiming that 'the multicultural experiment has failed'. Also in Britain, their has been the emergence of a fringe political group called the English Defence League. Although labelled as an extremist right wing racist group, the EDF state that they love homosexuals, black, yellow, and brown people, they love the Queen, they love Jews and support Israel, and they even love all people of all religions, except Muslims. They just hate those Muslims! Although many of the people who may subscribe to the EDF may well be of your regular simple minded bonehead variety, I would suspect that due to its largely politically correct and Zionist friendly credentials, that the EDF is in fact in some way a project of the British internal security service, whose purpose is to misdirect any outbreak of social angst onto Muslim communities, as opposed to it being directed on more deserving targets or in ways that is not so easy for the established powers to control. Perhaps this is all happening by design, from the breaking down of traditional Western values and the homogenisation of multi ethnic Western populations into mindless, rootless consumers constantly seeking yet further gratification of the base instincts, to the emergence of the segregated populations who stand out in stark contrast to the cultural milieu that surrounds them.
Whether it was faked by the anti-semitic Tsarist secret police or not, it all seems a bit like what was described in the Protocols of Zion to me.
