Nexus - Pure SHA3 + CPU/GPU + nPoS + 15 Active Innovations + More to Come - page 257.

go6ooo1212

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1000

quarkchain.io

Quote from: yampi on March 30, 2015, 04:14:11 PM

I bet I'll be a hero member before the next version gets released.

How much do you intend betting in this statement

yampi

sr. member

Activity: 433

Merit: 250

I bet I'll be a hero member before the next version gets released.

KryptoKash

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 275

If you fail...just dont fail again

Quote from: BitcoinSanDiego on March 30, 2015, 03:38:31 PM

Has OP KryptoKash disappeared? No information about 1.0.3 updates or this "marketing plan"

I never disappear... Information will be released as we progress. We have a process we are working on.
Edit: I am currently working on paper work (corp. formation and a few other things which we have to do before we can take the next step).

chinchs

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 1000

Quote from: BitcoinSanDiego on March 30, 2015, 03:38:31 PM

Has OP KryptoKash disappeared? No information about 1.0.3 updates or this "marketing plan"

Last activity was today. would be good if he shows up

BitcoinSanDiego

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Has OP KryptoKash disappeared? No information about 1.0.3 updates or this "marketing plan"

Razerglass

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

https://bmy.guide

and i was kinda hoping for another dump like the last few sundays

cestballot

sr. member

Activity: 318

Merit: 250

Nexus pool : http://nexusniropool.cestballot.fr/

http://coinshieldpool.cestballot.fr/

Task Type : Maintenance
status : Done

~~Edit 1 :Pool down for 5 minutes~~
Edit 2 :Pool Up

with 2200+ connections for 720+ request/s

Next time, we will have pool status here : http://coinshieldpool.cestballot.fr/
I'll keep you posted... I am realy busy IRL, I'll have time for more dev next week

Best regards

Cest Ballot

Videlicet

legendary

Activity: 868

Merit: 1058

Creator of Nexus http://nexus.io

Difficulty goes down a little quickly, 75% for 3x block time, tweaking that in 1.0.3. When in doubt check coinshield.io, current height 211,162 so no you are not forked. Cheesy

Thank You,
Viz.

COOLERbyPSP

member

Activity: 124

Merit: 10

http://joxi.ru/aD2P4kpTkGYe23.png
is diff really was so low?
or I'm at forked blockchain? Undecided

Resynced wallet from yesterday's backup, nothing changes.

Quote

{
"blocks" : 211152,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"prime difficulty" : 6.31191950,
"hash difficulty" : 25.65002018,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

BitSlapper

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: mumus on March 25, 2015, 09:10:12 AM

Quote from: BitSlapper on March 25, 2015, 08:46:59 AM

Hey cwrmyy888 .

So I updated my drivers and ran a test on my dev machine again.

It seems with the latest drivers I get about 42 MH/s . I think I was using 13.12 when I was getting close to 50 MH/s .

So 44 MH/s on the latest drivers is actually quite good.

I wrote about the GPU miner performance difference between drivers here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9991629
And also this article talks about it in general: http://cryptomining-blog.com/4519-getting-the-optimum-mining-performance-on-amd-gpus/

Hey mumus thank you for the link in the forum and your research into the issue at the time.

Hopefully AMD's OpenCL libraries will become more stable in the future.

There's actually another issue I found while working on the NVIDIA integration that might help to improve performance for some older AMD cards.

It will be hard to test since I have only one old(ish) card, an HD 6950, and it's unreliable...

So I guess we'll see when I release the next version.

After the NVIDIA integration is finished I was thinking of trying to pick up an old 4870x2 for testing older cards.

Most likely only a small portion of miners are actually using old cards but it would be cool to test with.

BitSlapper

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: cwrmyy888 on March 25, 2015, 10:27:22 AM

Quote from: BitSlapper on March 25, 2015, 08:46:59 AM

Hey cwrmyy888 .

So I updated my drivers and ran a test on my dev machine again.

It seems with the latest drivers I get about 42 MH/s . I think I was using 13.12 when I was getting close to 50 MH/s .

So 44 MH/s on the latest drivers is actually quite good.

Thank you very much, I found the problem, the problem is the algorithm.good DEV

I'm glad you found the issue.

If you have any more issues please don't hesitate to ask and I'll try to help you solve them.

Also, if you have any issues with the miner or CoinShield in general you can post on the CoinShield talk forum for fast replies:

http://coinshieldtalk.org/

If you haven't made an account there yet you should. That's where all of the voting for garbage coin cleanup is happening.

cwrmyy888

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 10

Quote from: mumus on March 25, 2015, 09:10:12 AM

Quote from: BitSlapper on March 25, 2015, 08:46:59 AM

Hey cwrmyy888 .

So I updated my drivers and ran a test on my dev machine again.

It seems with the latest drivers I get about 42 MH/s . I think I was using 13.12 when I was getting close to 50 MH/s .

So 44 MH/s on the latest drivers is actually quite good.

I wrote about the GPU miner performance difference between drivers here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9991629
And also this article talks about it in general: http://cryptomining-blog.com/4519-getting-the-optimum-mining-performance-on-amd-gpus/

Thank you very much, I found the problem, the problem is the algorithm.Thank you,i like this coin!

cwrmyy888

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 10

Quote from: BitSlapper on March 25, 2015, 08:46:59 AM

Hey cwrmyy888 .

So I updated my drivers and ran a test on my dev machine again.

It seems with the latest drivers I get about 42 MH/s . I think I was using 13.12 when I was getting close to 50 MH/s .

So 44 MH/s on the latest drivers is actually quite good.

Thank you very much, I found the problem, the problem is the algorithm.good DEV

mumus

sr. member

Activity: 291

Merit: 250

Quote from: BitSlapper on March 25, 2015, 08:46:59 AM

Hey cwrmyy888 .

So I updated my drivers and ran a test on my dev machine again.

It seems with the latest drivers I get about 42 MH/s . I think I was using 13.12 when I was getting close to 50 MH/s .

So 44 MH/s on the latest drivers is actually quite good.

I wrote about the GPU miner performance difference between drivers here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9991629
And also this article talks about it in general: http://cryptomining-blog.com/4519-getting-the-optimum-mining-performance-on-amd-gpus/

BitSlapper

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Hey cwrmyy888 .

So I updated my drivers and ran a test on my dev machine again.

It seems with the latest drivers I get about 42 MH/s . I think I was using 13.12 when I was getting close to 50 MH/s .

So 44 MH/s on the latest drivers is actually quite good.

Stenull

hero member

Activity: 585

Merit: 500

Quote from: BitcoinSanDiego on March 25, 2015, 12:20:45 AM

What you guys think about a different exchange ticker?

I like XCS

Since there is a new core release 1.0.3 soon, think about the long-term how you want this coin to be perceived in marketplace for traders.

A ticker hardly gives any value to anything. Perhaps a tiny tiny boost to some real shitcoin....
That's my thoughts about that.
Better to stay focused on real development!

BitcoinSanDiego

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

What you guys think about a different exchange ticker?

I like XCS

Since there is a new core release 1.0.3 soon, think about the long-term how you want this coin to be perceived in marketplace for traders.

BitSlapper

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: cwrmyy888 on March 24, 2015, 09:55:45 AM

Quote from: BitSlapper on March 24, 2015, 08:15:39 AM

Quote from: cwrmyy888 on March 24, 2015, 06:48:00 AM

Quote from: BitSlapper on March 23, 2015, 01:52:49 PM

Quote from: cwrmyy888 on March 23, 2015, 01:06:30 PM

AMD Radeon R9 290X

42000 KHhash/s

Is normal?

thank you

You should get closer to 50,000 kh/s .

What version of the miner are you using?

Easy way to find out is that the GUI reports the version in 1.3 if you see no version then your before 1.3.

Also, what are your settings?

I do not know how to set, need to overclock?

Version 1.2
Where to download the 1.3 version, thank you very much！！！

I'm not sure why the original post hasn't been updated yet. I know Viz has been very busy.

Maybe KryptoKash can update the original post with the latest version of the miner?

Here is the link to it from my dropbox. I'm the dev of the miner so it's built right from my source on my dev machine.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/k8q4jjzdazfisc3/skminer__v1_3__win_x64.zip?dl=0

This version will apply the settings automatically for you. So no need to mess with overclock settings yourself.

Please let me know if this helped to increase your performance

.

Thank you for your reply, but if there were no change

Hmm are you using everything from v 1.3 including the .bat file?

Don't use anything from the older miner.

If you are using the new miner and it's files and weren't changing settings before then that's pretty weird.

I test with an R9 290 and I get between 49 MH/s and 50 MH/s, letting the miner choose the settings.

Try putting this in the .bat file as another option: --auto-settings true

Also, do you have the latest catalyst drivers installed?

BitcoinSanDiego

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Alright I read up on all the information I could and downloaded the CSD 1.0.2 wallet. Got some buy orders in on Bittrex. I am looking forward to the POS in 1.0.3 and hopefully open-source of the project. Proof-of-stake addition should really make the network kick ass. Open-sourcing will allow more exchanges to view the source code and consider adding it to the market. I made a coin request on Poloniex and Cryptsy.

COOLERbyPSP

member

Activity: 124

Merit: 10

Only 17-18 MH/s on 270x =(

Topic: Nexus - Pure SHA3 + CPU/GPU + nPoS + 15 Active Innovations + More to Come - page 257. (Read 785531 times)