Wow, I didn't even know that one could increase his signature campaign counter in a way like this.
Generally in bounties they say something like "only constructive posts with at least xxx words are accepted in xxx threads", which reduces the level of insignificant information generated by forum members.
It is also something new to me when they pay for posts in BTC, usually a certain number of stakes is given to a bounty participant.
Well, sad to say, but Nexybit seems to be another scam project.
Topic: Nexybit, horrible rates, Self escrow and accepts bounty campaign (only) posters. (Read 575 times)
May 13, 2018, 12:52:50 PM
April 12, 2018, 09:15:14 PM
OP, there is absolutely no such thing as "self-escrow". If you ever hear anyone telling you that they're going to escrow the deal themselves, whether it's a campaign manager or someone looking to buy $5 worth of bitcoin, run for the hills.
"Self-escrow" is a made-up term that you'll only see on this forum and nowhere else. It's a term employed to scam people or to defend scammers who engage in such shady behavior. A person you're trading with cannot also act as the escrow for the deal. It's absurd on its face, so I'm not sure why it's not immediately a dead giveaway that a scam is happening.
I didn't look at the link in the OP, but if Nexybit actually said they were "self-escrowing" the funds then that's scammy. It sound more like they just didn't escrow the money at all. There's a big difference, but the outcomes are often the same.
"Self-escrow" is a made-up term that you'll only see on this forum and nowhere else. It's a term employed to scam people or to defend scammers who engage in such shady behavior. A person you're trading with cannot also act as the escrow for the deal. It's absurd on its face, so I'm not sure why it's not immediately a dead giveaway that a scam is happening.
I didn't look at the link in the OP, but if Nexybit actually said they were "self-escrowing" the funds then that's scammy. It sound more like they just didn't escrow the money at all. There's a big difference, but the outcomes are often the same.
April 12, 2018, 08:22:43 PM
First of all, we appreciate your concern. There are a few points we would like to make on our side.
1. We do not know what you have against self-escrow. As long as the participants are paid as due, what other problem is there? We hope to continue a long campaign and therefore will always pay our participants. Though our account is a newbie due to our company being also new, the people behind it have been on this forum for a long while and have considerable experience with such campaigns.
1. We do not know what you have against self-escrow. As long as the participants are paid as due, what other problem is there? We hope to continue a long campaign and therefore will always pay our participants. Though our account is a newbie due to our company being also new, the people behind it have been on this forum for a long while and have considerable experience with such campaigns.
Does not seem to be very professional to me. And you have completed payment now, so i guess self escrowing is fine. Why you could not post from your accounts tho, instead of making a new one? If you were so sure about your managing skills, you would have used your main account instead of making a new alt.
We made this account as a company account. Those other accounts were our personal accounts.
2. The example you gave about the bounty poster did not show the whole picture as that person did not change their signature and therefore was not a true participant.
Does not matter, you still accepted him. The difference is that he did not get paid because of his own mistake, and you would have paid the user anyway with the signature. Therefore IT DOES show the whole picture, and the capability of the person behind the campaign that how poorly managed campaign this is.
It does matter because as we stated above, we read each and every post made by our participants. Even if that person did not make that mistake and kept our signature, they would not have been paid because their posts would have been considered spam. Our whole response was
Quote
2. The example you gave about the bounty poster did not show the whole picture as that person did not change their signature and therefore was not a true participant. The person in charge of managing this campaign reads each and every post made by its participants and has so far not found any post notably "spammy". If there was anyone who posted such as the example you had given, we would have warned them that such posts do not qualify and would result in that person being cut. Also, we do not see a problem if the reason our participants post is for bounty as long as they do not spam or make posts that are negative to this forum.
Thank you for your opinion and concern.
April 12, 2018, 04:13:50 PM
I am a participant of this signature campaign. OP, do you count every user from this campaign as a spammer? Will every participant of this campaign is going to be marked as spammer?? Maybe it is better to me to go away...
That's not for me to decide, you should know this by yourself whether you are spamming or not. I just generally meant that their campaign accepts spammers as well as trashposters. You are not worst of them, but definetly could work out on your grammar as well as the content of your posts.
It's up to you whether you want to support such a campaign.
but the effort in the sense of quality of posting should be done or you will stay Member for a looooong time and any tea cups business will not help here 
2$ per week for such active posting, all those people who joined the campaign must be or insane or shitpostes!
April 12, 2018, 07:41:25 AM
I am a participant of this signature campaign. OP, do you count every user from this campaign as a spammer? Will every participant of this campaign is going to be marked as spammer?? Maybe it is better to me to go away...
That's not for me to decide, you should know this by yourself whether you are spamming or not. I just generally meant that their campaign accepts spammers as well as trashposters. You are not worst of them, but definetly could work out on your grammar as well as the content of your posts.
It's up to you whether you want to support such a campaign.
April 12, 2018, 07:30:08 AM
I am a participant of this signature campaign. OP, do you count every user from this campaign as a spammer? Will every participant of this campaign is going to be marked as spammer?? Maybe it is better to me to go away...
April 12, 2018, 05:40:32 AM
If you guys want to stop campaigns from being ran by the team its self, or want to stop worrying about the horrid rates, THEN STOP JOINING THE DAMN CAMPAIGNS THAT ARE DOING THIS.
If people don't sign up for the campaign then there will be no worries, but as you see there are hundreds of idiots on alt accounts willing to join about anything.
-snip-
Well, those two statements contradict each other to some extent. If the people that are aware of this *issue* don't join the campaign(s), it will have next to no effect on it anyways. There are thousands of farmed accounts waiting in line. If people don't sign up for the campaign then there will be no worries, but as you see there are hundreds of idiots on alt accounts willing to join about anything.
-snip-
April 12, 2018, 04:58:01 AM
If you guys want to stop campaigns from being ran by the team its self, or want to stop worrying about the horrid rates, THEN STOP JOINING THE DAMN CAMPAIGNS THAT ARE DOING THIS.
If people don't sign up for the campaign then there will be no worries, but as you see there are hundreds of idiots on alt accounts willing to join about anything.
There is nothing wrong with a company running its own campaign, but they should at least escrow the campaign funds to make users confident they'll be paid. I don't think companies should run a campaign themselves, but we cannot stop that unless ppl just stop joining them.
If a company runs a campaign themselves, they allow almost any account to join, they can run without paying, they allow spam like crazy. If they hire a competent manager they at least show that they care about their rep a little and want things to run smooth. They show that participants will be paid.
If people don't sign up for the campaign then there will be no worries, but as you see there are hundreds of idiots on alt accounts willing to join about anything.
There is nothing wrong with a company running its own campaign, but they should at least escrow the campaign funds to make users confident they'll be paid. I don't think companies should run a campaign themselves, but we cannot stop that unless ppl just stop joining them.
If a company runs a campaign themselves, they allow almost any account to join, they can run without paying, they allow spam like crazy. If they hire a competent manager they at least show that they care about their rep a little and want things to run smooth. They show that participants will be paid.
Yeah agree that you guys shouldn't have to join such campaigns run by the project themselves or those campaigns that don't escrow funds because there is a a factor of doubt in it that either they will pay the campaign participants or not.
There are also some campaigns that that pays really low for promoting their signatures. I think we should also have to boycott those campaigns. Atleast old members like sr or hero should have to bycott them for themselves and for the betterment of this forum as well.
April 12, 2018, 04:32:16 AM
If you guys want to stop campaigns from being ran by the team its self, or want to stop worrying about the horrid rates, THEN STOP JOINING THE DAMN CAMPAIGNS THAT ARE DOING THIS.
If people don't sign up for the campaign then there will be no worries, but as you see there are hundreds of idiots on alt accounts willing to join about anything.
There is nothing wrong with a company running its own campaign, but they should at least escrow the campaign funds to make users confident they'll be paid. I don't think companies should run a campaign themselves, but we cannot stop that unless ppl just stop joining them.
If a company runs a campaign themselves, they allow almost any account to join, they can run without paying, they allow spam like crazy. If they hire a competent manager they at least show that they care about their rep a little and want things to run smooth. They show that participants will be paid.
If people don't sign up for the campaign then there will be no worries, but as you see there are hundreds of idiots on alt accounts willing to join about anything.
There is nothing wrong with a company running its own campaign, but they should at least escrow the campaign funds to make users confident they'll be paid. I don't think companies should run a campaign themselves, but we cannot stop that unless ppl just stop joining them.
If a company runs a campaign themselves, they allow almost any account to join, they can run without paying, they allow spam like crazy. If they hire a competent manager they at least show that they care about their rep a little and want things to run smooth. They show that participants will be paid.
April 12, 2018, 04:03:15 AM
Well accusing is a different thing, but to me atleast this whole thing smells miles away. They also took the rule of 100 characters per post away, so you could basically wear the signature, and write a bot which spams the whole forum with nonsense bullshit.
Yeah, it does. I would personally never use their site/service just solely because they have demonstrated their incompetency in managing a simple marketing project.
@Nexybit, it's not about the rates. If people are fine with accepting those rates, then so be it.
But you're accepting spammers and some people who are merit abusers. Of course that's not every single person, but the first person that I saw on your payroll was https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1385913, and he's clearly a merit abuser receiving 30 merits from the same person. Tighten the rules at least, for gods sake.
But at least you have come out and given your side of the story instead of dodging the questions. I appreciate that. Sellingaccs have valid points that you should definitely think about reforming.
April 12, 2018, 04:00:04 AM
First of all, we appreciate your concern. There are a few points we would like to make on our side.
1. We do not know what you have against self-escrow. As long as the participants are paid as due, what other problem is there? We hope to continue a long campaign and therefore will always pay our participants. Though our account is a newbie due to our company being also new, the people behind it have been on this forum for a long while and have considerable experience with such campaigns.
1. We do not know what you have against self-escrow. As long as the participants are paid as due, what other problem is there? We hope to continue a long campaign and therefore will always pay our participants. Though our account is a newbie due to our company being also new, the people behind it have been on this forum for a long while and have considerable experience with such campaigns.
Does not seem to be very professional to me. And you have completed payment now, so i guess self escrowing is fine. Why you could not post from your accounts tho, instead of making a new one? If you were so sure about your managing skills, you would have used your main account instead of making a new alt.
2. The example you gave about the bounty poster did not show the whole picture as that person did not change their signature and therefore was not a true participant.
Does not matter, you still accepted him. The difference is that he did not get paid because of his own mistake, and you would have paid the user anyway with the signature. Therefore IT DOES show the whole picture, and the capability of the person behind the campaign that how poorly managed campaign this is.
3. We have also increased our rates since your post.
The rates are still horrible, although a little bit better. I do not have a problem exactly with the rates, rather with the participants of the campaign.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nexybit-signature-campaign-srhero-signature-revised-413410-rates-revised-3259881
I think that's just someone's post making bonuty, you can see the posters are a newbile, as I know the official bounty articles always rank very high. Can this poster be deceptive?
I think that's just someone's post making bonuty, you can see the posters are a newbile, as I know the official bounty articles always rank very high. Can this poster be deceptive?
Can you post something that makes sense, or stop posting trash on this thread. Thank you.
April 12, 2018, 12:50:43 AM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nexybit-signature-campaign-srhero-signature-revised-413410-rates-revised-3259881
I think that's just someone's post making bonuty, you can see the posters are a newbile, as I know the official bounty articles always rank very high. Can this poster be deceptive?
I think that's just someone's post making bonuty, you can see the posters are a newbile, as I know the official bounty articles always rank very high. Can this poster be deceptive?
April 11, 2018, 11:29:13 PM
First of all, we appreciate your concern. There are a few points we would like to make on our side.
1. We do not know what you have against self-escrow. As long as the participants are paid as due, what other problem is there? We hope to continue a long campaign and therefore will always pay our participants. Though our account is a newbie due to our company being also new, the people behind it have been on this forum for a long while and have considerable experience with such campaigns.
2. The example you gave about the bounty poster did not show the whole picture as that person did not change their signature and therefore was not a true participant. The person in charge of managing this campaign reads each and every post made by its participants and has so far not found any post notably "spammy". If there was anyone who posted such as the example you had given, we would have warned them that such posts do not qualify and would result in that person being cut. Also, we do not see a problem if the reason our participants post is for bounty as long as they do not spam or make posts that are negative to this forum.
3. We have also increased our rates since your post.
4. If any of our company members' responses seemed disrespectful and flippant, we apologize.
All we hoped for our signature campaign is to achieve some company exposure to the bitcoin community while encouraging people to become more active here. We understand your concern for this community and we hope you understand that we also want the best for this forum. We are open to all opinions, be they positive or negative, and thank you for yours.
1. We do not know what you have against self-escrow. As long as the participants are paid as due, what other problem is there? We hope to continue a long campaign and therefore will always pay our participants. Though our account is a newbie due to our company being also new, the people behind it have been on this forum for a long while and have considerable experience with such campaigns.
2. The example you gave about the bounty poster did not show the whole picture as that person did not change their signature and therefore was not a true participant. The person in charge of managing this campaign reads each and every post made by its participants and has so far not found any post notably "spammy". If there was anyone who posted such as the example you had given, we would have warned them that such posts do not qualify and would result in that person being cut. Also, we do not see a problem if the reason our participants post is for bounty as long as they do not spam or make posts that are negative to this forum.
3. We have also increased our rates since your post.
4. If any of our company members' responses seemed disrespectful and flippant, we apologize.
All we hoped for our signature campaign is to achieve some company exposure to the bitcoin community while encouraging people to become more active here. We understand your concern for this community and we hope you understand that we also want the best for this forum. We are open to all opinions, be they positive or negative, and thank you for yours.
April 11, 2018, 09:09:40 AM
What did you expect from a self-managed campaign?
Nothing. Which is why i have made this thread. Although im not a saint, im trying my best to make this forum better.
I'm not sure whether I should tag them, some might scream "fraud", "abuse" and mention how many children died because of me (Ver et. al.). 
You can always warn them, or try to discuss with them about it. However im pretty sure that only people who will cry to you about it, will be the participants. I thought that you liked to use bounty poster tears as a lube, you disappoint me Lauda.
April 11, 2018, 09:00:05 AM
What did you expect from a self-managed campaign? Experience has taught us that they are horrible (Bitmixer before my takeover, Secondstrade et. al.).
I'm not sure whether I should tag them, some might scream "fraud", "abuse" and mention how many children died because of me (Ver et. al.).
I'm not sure whether I should tag them, some might scream "fraud", "abuse" and mention how many children died because of me (Ver et. al.).
April 10, 2018, 09:53:16 AM
-snip-
I do however get opinion as well as everyone else. I even forgot about that, so good that you reminded me! If you have a problem, feel free to make a reputation thread of me as well. Im still more valuable to this forum that you have ever been, and that account was never even sold if that matters.
Ps. Learn to quote properly, there is a preview button next to post.
April 10, 2018, 09:42:37 AM
Oh wow, easy there. Many people actually do post here to contribute, as well as help other people and discuss technical/crypto related stuff.
Also i get paid, if i rank and it is more of a prize for being a valuable member rather than actually just posting to get paid, which is exactly what you are doing currently.
"more of a prize for being a valuable member" whoa there you're going more up your ass right now.[/quote]Also i get paid, if i rank and it is more of a prize for being a valuable member rather than actually just posting to get paid, which is exactly what you are doing currently.
Ooh great job, +1 point in bitcoin policing. So you're saying someone can't come back online after going offline for some time?
Mind pointing out my statement about such a thing? Now you are just making shit up.
Edit: And the cherry on the cake would be the fact that you came back to the forums after many months, suddenly start writing longer posts (which all seem to be very repeative and related to nexybit).
?Those "spammy" posts you're pointing at are my opinions without a sig. Try reporting it to mod and see if they're removed, Monseiur Mod-wannaba
Of course they are, because you would not get into any well paying signature campaign with a decent manager. You have still tried to apply into them, and you maybe have been thinking that you will get accepted LOL.
P.S: The guy who wants to have a moral high-ground about forum-related stuff is someone named "sellingaccs"
That username is really something worth reporting to the mod, there is just no button to report a username though.
Mods do not ban people for trading/buying any accounts, you both should know this (only DT members can tag if they want to).
And don't put me in the same category as that stupid asshat.
April 10, 2018, 09:19:46 AM
Get your head out of your ass if you think people post here to "contribute" just because you don't have a sig(although AFAIK you are already in a pseudo-campaign yourself for a chance to win 20 bucks)
Oh wow, easy there. Many people actually do post here to contribute, as well as help other people and discuss technical/crypto related stuff.
Also i get paid, if i rank and it is more of a prize for being a valuable member rather than actually just posting to get paid, which is exactly what you are doing currently.
Ooh great job, +1 point in bitcoin policing. So you're saying someone can't come back online after going offline for some time?
Mind pointing out my statement about such a thing? Now you are just making shit up.
Those "spammy" posts you're pointing at are my opinions without a sig. Try reporting it to mod and see if they're removed, Monseiur Mod-wannaba
Of course they are, because you would not get into any well paying signature campaign with a decent manager. You have still tried to apply into them, and you maybe have been thinking that you will get accepted LOL.
P.S: The guy who wants to have a moral high-ground about forum-related stuff is someone named "sellingaccs"
That username is really something worth reporting to the mod, there is just no button to report a username though.
Mods do not ban people for trading/buying any accounts, you both should know this (only DT members can tag if they want to).
Also i'd like once again request some kind of proof, that i have tried to buy or sell bitcointalk accounts.
Stop ashaming yourself, and get on shitposting.
April 10, 2018, 09:01:24 AM
OP, It all depend to the participants really. If they join the campaign while the rate is low, let them join. Its all up to them. Lets just wait for whatever the outcome of it all after all you don't lose anything if you don't join to the campaign.
P.S: The guy who wants to have a moral high-ground about forum-related stuff is someone named "sellingaccs"
That username is really something worth reporting to the mod, there is just no button to report a username though.
April 10, 2018, 08:51:32 AM
It's not about that. Maybe i phrased it differently. My point was that such low quality campaigns have negative effect on this forum with a high probability.
But like pointed out before, that campaign (that also you seem to be in) attracts alot of posters who do not contribute (like yourself).
Get your head out of your ass if you think people post here to "contribute" just because you don't have a sig(although AFAIK you are already in a pseudo-campaign yourself for a chance to win 20 bucks)But like pointed out before, that campaign (that also you seem to be in) attracts alot of posters who do not contribute (like yourself).
So you are posting to get paid? HA, i knew it. Your previous posts do look very spammy
Somebody give this guy a cookie , I think he needs it for all his "looking out for spam". /sYou came back here only because of your own greed, and yes im pointing at your first post which was to apply for this sig campaign.
Ooh great job, +1 point in bitcoin policing. So you're saying someone can't come back online after going offline for some time? While you're thinking about that, just go back and have a look and see which signature camp. I was last in. Those "spammy" posts you're pointing at are my opinions without a sig. Try reporting it to mod and see if they're removed, Monseiur Mod-wannabaP.S: The guy who wants to have a moral high-ground about forum-related stuff is someone named "sellingaccs"
Jump to: