Topic: Nfts are altcoins in pictures (Read 298 times)
I agree especially when they have utility cases. An example is the 2D and 3D NFTs of Metaisland.
I agree. They are been attached monetary value. An example is Metaisland NFTs. As utility NFTs they are going valued to FIAT and can be exchanged
NFTs go beyond artistic pictures. They are supposed to be unique virtual collectibles. The most common NFTs we see are pictures, because it is easier to produce, create and launch for speculative profit and hype.
But the most useful NFTs are the virtual items which can be used inside online multiplayer games or metaverses. This is the real practical usage for NFT. Unfortunatelly this potential isn't being explored by the industry, as there aren't viral NFT games and metaverses going on right now. This niche is pretty dead, saturated and vicious in this year of 2022.
But the most useful NFTs are the virtual items which can be used inside online multiplayer games or metaverses. This is the real practical usage for NFT. Unfortunatelly this potential isn't being explored by the industry, as there aren't viral NFT games and metaverses going on right now. This niche is pretty dead, saturated and vicious in this year of 2022.
metaverse is still in the early stage so i won't say, this niche is already dead. let's see in the coming months or years, once devs are seeing the demand with meta, they may develop this into something attractive to all generations. as people are still looking for possible ventures via digital mode, metaverse has still the chance to blow up in the future.
https://www.businessinsider.com/charts-meta-metaverse-spending-losses-reality-labs-vr-mark-zuckerberg-2022-10
I read that investments in the metaverses are declining and companies are losing money because people do not want to live in these metaverses, and scammers use cheating opportunities to earn money.
Nfts are altcoins in pictures format.
It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
NFTs seems more like Art.
It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
NFTs seems more like Art.
I agree that NFTs are art but a lot of people make NFTs carelessly and hope that their NFTs will go to the moon. I'm not a fan of NFTs but when I see an NFT with beautiful art it feels like I want to invest there and I want to have some shares from that art.
NFTs go beyond artistic pictures. They are supposed to be unique virtual collectibles. The most common NFTs we see are pictures, because it is easier to produce, create and launch for speculative profit and hype.
But the most useful NFTs are the virtual items which can be used inside online multiplayer games or metaverses. This is the real practical usage for NFT. Unfortunatelly this potential isn't being explored by the industry, as there aren't viral NFT games and metaverses going on right now. This niche is pretty dead, saturated and vicious in this year of 2022.
But the most useful NFTs are the virtual items which can be used inside online multiplayer games or metaverses. This is the real practical usage for NFT. Unfortunatelly this potential isn't being explored by the industry, as there aren't viral NFT games and metaverses going on right now. This niche is pretty dead, saturated and vicious in this year of 2022.
metaverse is still in the early stage so i won't say, this niche is already dead. let's see in the coming months or years, once devs are seeing the demand with meta, they may develop this into something attractive to all generations. as people are still looking for possible ventures via digital mode, metaverse has still the chance to blow up in the future.
NFTs go beyond artistic pictures. They are supposed to be unique virtual collectibles. The most common NFTs we see are pictures, because it is easier to produce, create and launch for speculative profit and hype.
But the most useful NFTs are the virtual items which can be used inside online multiplayer games or metaverses. This is the real practical usage for NFT. Unfortunatelly this potential isn't being explored by the industry, as there aren't viral NFT games and metaverses going on right now. This niche is pretty dead, saturated and vicious in this year of 2022.
But the most useful NFTs are the virtual items which can be used inside online multiplayer games or metaverses. This is the real practical usage for NFT. Unfortunatelly this potential isn't being explored by the industry, as there aren't viral NFT games and metaverses going on right now. This niche is pretty dead, saturated and vicious in this year of 2022.
Nfts are altcoins in pictures format.
It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
NFTs seems more like Art.
Most NFTs are a big scam, and now many NFTs have lost more than 90% in price. Many altcoins also lost more than 90% in price, but altcoins have an idea, a blockchain, a community. I buy promising altcoins because their price will rise, for example, the polkadot project. And most of the NFT projects will die, but the users will have a picture for memory.It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
NFTs seems more like Art.
Nfts are altcoins in pictures format.
It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
NFTs seems more like Art.
I am curious to know how many NFT you are holding and what is the use case and will you be getting the same valuation if you want to sell them. The hype was good and some were able to make quick money while it lasted. If an NFT can be used inside a game then it would be great and that could be valuable, other than that what is the point in holding these pictures worth huge amounts It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
NFTs seems more like Art.
. I was riding the NFT hype but now i have second thoughts on its future .
in fact, NFTs are the crossroads between art and altcoins, their markets are similar to those of crypto but it is much more difficult to make money with this type of buying and selling, is a niche market for collectors
Well it's a tokenized art, There are both inside the crypto space. I believe that their market is not the same given that NFTS don't have a pair for it to be able to sell and there are specific type of buyers in the market. I just don't agree that it is difficult to make money from buying and selling of NFTs. During the bull market, I have a friend who make a fortune just by buying and selling NFTs before and compared to me who is trading crypto tokens, He make way more at that time. Everything is driven by supply and demand, Both need demand. So if your asset doesn't have any demand, You shouldn't hope that you can sell at profit whether it's a crypto token or NFT. It means it doesn't matter if it’s a coin or a token or an nft, as long as it has a utility that people are willing to spend money on then it would make sense, otherwise it’s not going to make sense too much to anyone and nobody will invest into it since it would not have any use case at all and no reason to buy.
in fact, NFTs are the crossroads between art and altcoins, their markets are similar to those of crypto but it is much more difficult to make money with this type of buying and selling, is a niche market for collectors
Well it's a tokenized art, There are both inside the crypto space. I believe that their market is not the same given that NFTS don't have a pair for it to be able to sell and there are specific type of buyers in the market. I just don't agree that it is difficult to make money from buying and selling of NFTs. During the bull market, I have a friend who make a fortune just by buying and selling NFTs before and compared to me who is trading crypto tokens, He make way more at that time. Everything is driven by supply and demand, Both need demand. So if your asset doesn't have any demand, You shouldn't hope that you can sell at profit whether it's a crypto token or NFT. 
I don't agree with saying that NFT is a work of art, because the purpose of NFT is to claim ownership but nowadays there are many who say art but are very similar. In my opinion, NFT should only be ownership of the access key to a service, so it's reasonable to appreciate it
Its part of the nft. No nft isnt a form of arts except those jpeg file rocks that has been priced expensive. Well so much for that. A true nft signify an art when its made by people who knew how arts are recognized not by a developer who create nft solely for pump and dump purposes. If only nft could be limited to those supposedly purpose of it then it will be good. 
Nfts are altcoins in pictures format.
I can't even agree with this. Since NFT was actually illiquid and it's a bit different compared with altcoins in the picture format. It's just a proof of ownership to the art. I would like to call that as a asset to prove if you are owning the art rather than token. It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
NFTs seems more like Art.
NFT basically related with art or every assets that can be converted to the art form just like gaming asset and etc. The supply and demand for NFT was actually came from how many people interested to own it. The value still remain unpredictable caused by it's based on people's view. NFTs seems more like Art.
The price can't be predicted. It depends on how people valuing it. The price actually depends on subjectivity.
For me first nfts were acceptable and people doing their best to create a good art and unique one to sell it with prices that only big wallets can have them as personalities and footballers for example. Nowadays unfortunately we see people copying and posting stupid NFTs just to sell them and there's actually people buying copied pictures without doing their research. Now i believe the only NFTs worth to buy are those who are giving interest having them similar to staking or on P2E projects with NFTs stores.
NFT idea was that it would give someone an ownership, it wasn't about this what we have, it was about real art, and real things that you could have an ownership. To put it simply, when you buy a house, you are given a piece of paper that says that you own it right? Otherwise, how would we know who owns which house? In this situation the house is the art that we buy.
However, if you create 10 thousand different styles of the same ape, and call it art? That’s not acceptable at all. People mistook what NFT was about, what it could do for you, and in return that caused a ton of people to make mistakes as well. I hope that in time that all would be fixed and we will have a better situation.
However, if you create 10 thousand different styles of the same ape, and call it art? That’s not acceptable at all. People mistook what NFT was about, what it could do for you, and in return that caused a ton of people to make mistakes as well. I hope that in time that all would be fixed and we will have a better situation.
Nfts are altcoins in pictures format.
It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
Your comparison only focuses on one aspect which is on "obedience to the rule of supply and demand", but did not consider others aspects like how they are traded and valued. There are close similarities between NFT's and Altcoins, but they still cannot be regarded as the same as they still have differences in some other aspects. NFT's are another innovation that people have had to consider in addition to investing in cryptocurrency. It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
Nfts are altcoins in pictures format.
It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
NFTs seems more like Art.
It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
NFTs seems more like Art.
Well you can call it like that, but it's more of an Art for the majority. And it have benefited artist more, if I'm not mistaken. So just imagine if you like art and then you are a crypto enthusiast, that is a win win already.
However, not sure about what you mean by supply and demand. It's hype so if there is someone willing to invest thousands if not millions of dollars then it will continue to thrive even in a bear market.
Nfts are altcoins in pictures format.
It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
NFTs seems more like Art.
Yes NFTs are also tokens Non-fungible tokens It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
NFTs seems more like Art.
But these are different from other tokens like ERC-20 or BEP-20. Let's say, for example, you want to sell an ERC20 or BEP-20 immediately, you only need to send it to an exchange (where that token is listed) and sell it at market price.
However this is not the case with NFTs, you may have to wait weeks or even months to sell your NFT.
Nfts are altcoins in pictures format.
It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
NFTs seems more like Art.
It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
NFTs seems more like Art.
NFT’s were 2021 bull run version of the ICO craze from 2017. They’re basically a massive scam/ponzi. Nobody can tell me that a JPEG image can be worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. I don’t know if you can classify it as art, it’s a massive bubble though that’s not popped & will never recover.
Nfts are altcoins in pictures format.
It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
NFTs seems more like Art.
It seems that they're like that and the hype of those before was greatly appreciated by many but not anymore today. As much as we want them anymore, as their value was high before, due to the bear market the price of those and its value is no longer the same as before. Even the picture that was minted seems to be worth nothing, they've got a value during the all time high and many have spent money on it honestly.It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
NFTs seems more like Art.
Nfts are altcoins in pictures format.
It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
NFTs seems more like Art.
It obeys the rules of supply and demand.
NFTs seems more like Art.
The craze for NFTs has been decreasing over the last few months. I like the NFT technology but not the way it is currently being used.
The idea of combining something valuable to a crypto asset and using it on a blockchain is definitely fascinating.
But I don't like the concept of people buying shit pictures and paying thousands and millions for it.
There has to be a purpose for holding those pictures or you must be a person who loves collectibles other than that nobody would buy NFTs in the long run.
Jump to: