Pages:
Author

Topic: nice gambling hack - page 2. (Read 3643 times)

sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
January 04, 2016, 04:16:36 PM
#58
Not see any "hack"', it's just martingale......
sr. member
Activity: 431
Merit: 250
January 04, 2016, 04:11:42 PM
#57
I knew better than to read your post lol.. Thank you for wasting a few minutes of my life...

By the way.... Dice,Coins they don't have memory. It makes absolutely no difference how many whatevers you rolled or flipped before this roll or flip.
 coin the odds are 50/50.. period. you could flip 1000000000000000 heads in a row the odds would still be the same next flip...50/50
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
「きみはこれ&#
January 04, 2016, 02:40:28 PM
#56
The video link seems to be broken.Would you mind fixing it ? Smiley Sounds okay,since you're trying to beat the probability factor with another probability event that is flipping the coin.Also this is not a gambling hack,its just a strategy you use which works for you and not exactly will satisfy my constraints of betting such as I never roll on dices with winnings odds less than 10X.
sr. member
Activity: 274
Merit: 250
January 04, 2016, 01:54:06 PM
#55
I could not follow the part where you go from 10,20,40,80...Since you asked for a trick this is what I do :

Bet with small amounts like really small example 0.001 with probability a little higher say 30%.I will bet 5 times in a row ,now if those 5 times if i win I still get good returns since the odds for 30% are quite big.If i don't win for the consecutive 5 times,6th time I will increase the bet to 0.004(only on the 6th roll) it gives me good returns to cover up all the previous loses .

0.001*5 loss=0.005
after that 0.004*30% win= 0.0012 profit but your total profit 0.005-0.0012=-0.0038 how is that profitable?
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1115
Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!
January 04, 2016, 01:46:34 PM
#54
I could not follow the part where you go from 10,20,40,80...Since you asked for a trick this is what I do :

Bet with small amounts like really small example 0.001 with probability a little higher say 30%.I will bet 5 times in a row ,now if those 5 times if i win I still get good returns since the odds for 30% are quite big.If i don't win for the consecutive 5 times,6th time I will increase the bet to 0.004(only on the 6th roll) it gives me good returns to cover up all the previous loses .
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1058
January 04, 2016, 01:35:15 PM
#53
such thing u say is called "the mistake of gamblers", or sth like that. this way of thinking is fail, just follow the maths, it's always around 50/50, each flip time is independent, stand alone, no conection at all. I read it from the famous manga "The Liar Game".
Most gambling systems and strategies are based on several basic errors in logic - errors that we usually commit every day. Correct term for this errors is 'Gambler's fallacy'.
The most common of them is believing in this scenario: "I lost 3 times in a row, so next roll will be the lucky one for sure!'' or "The ball hit red 4 times, there is no way it will hit the same color 5 times in a row. I will bet all on black!".

That is true. Many players just play dice and other casino games by just applying logic but that's human nature that if we have a losing streak for a long time, we expect the next move to be a winning one. Many use bot scripts which is not allowed in gambling and is against the TOS.
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1016
January 04, 2016, 12:11:00 PM
#52
Forgive the OP, he is just human and needs to earn money thru referrals. Just as everyone pointed out already, this is not a hack and it won't work either short term or long term. Move on.

yah he tried his best to find a method to offer to us in exchange for refferal but sadly to say, he didnt really do any proper research at all. it is just like coming here to teach us what is bitcoin when we all should have known the basic.
hero member
Activity: 1005
Merit: 500
January 04, 2016, 11:24:41 AM
#51
its not a hack what are you talking about? its just a same old martingale strategy on dice that has a very big house edge, i think you are just trying to get as much referrals as possible in order to make money out of their faucet claims
yes it was not a hack. The only trick, the trick will not apply within the due time. The only advantage of the weakness of a system.
Nowadays it is not easily implemented this due to that the house has developed strong systems to counter it.Maybe you can try your luck with a little amount for fun!
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1001
January 04, 2016, 11:09:01 AM
#50
its not a hack what are you talking about? its just a same old martingale strategy on dice that has a very big house edge, i think you are just trying to get as much referrals as possible in order to make money out of their faucet claims
yes it was not a hack. The only trick, the trick will not apply within the due time. The only advantage of the weakness of a system.
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1069
January 04, 2016, 11:06:15 AM
#49
Forgive the OP, he is just human and needs to earn money thru referrals. Just as everyone pointed out already, this is not a hack and it won't work either short term or long term. Move on.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
January 04, 2016, 11:05:24 AM
#48
such thing u say is called "the mistake of gamblers", or sth like that. this way of thinking is fail, just follow the maths, it's always around 50/50, each flip time is independent, stand alone, no conection at all. I read it from the famous manga "The Liar Game".
Most gambling systems and strategies are based on several basic errors in logic - errors that we usually commit every day. Correct term for this errors is 'Gambler's fallacy'.
The most common of them is believing in this scenario: "I lost 3 times in a row, so next roll will be the lucky one for sure!'' or "The ball hit red 4 times, there is no way it will hit the same color 5 times in a row. I will bet all on black!".
hero member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 505
January 04, 2016, 10:58:04 AM
#47
This is just martingale and it will not work in the long run. I have seen people losing more than twenty times in a row. You will bust your capital sooner or later.

It won't work in the short term either, I don't know why people keep saying it won't work in the long term implying it works on the short term, if it worked on the short term it would have to work on the long term aswell unless your math is different than mine.
legendary
Activity: 3304
Merit: 3094
January 04, 2016, 10:52:42 AM
#46
i wrote this hack some time ago, it works in dice and in roulette.


its simple, take a coin and choose head or tails and stick with what you pick. Now flip it calling tails and see how many time you lose. The fact is to lose 10 times in a row the odds get higher of losing. so if you just double up until you win then you never lose. example bet like this 10-20-40-80-160-320-640-1280 . now that is 8 times losing you will bet .the chances of you losing 20 times in a row flipping 50/50 is not 50% even though math says you still have 50%. It is possible but not probable.

good luck


I added a video of me doing it for ten min without losing in the link below

http://bitcoinfaucetrelay.com/bitcoin-faucet-hack

also if you know any other hacks please explain for us.  Smiley

This hack isn't new, his name is MITM (man in the Martingale)  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1000
January 04, 2016, 10:37:07 AM
#45
This is just martingale and it will not work in the long run. I have seen people losing more than twenty times in a row. You will bust your capital sooner or later.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
January 04, 2016, 10:31:11 AM
#44
i wrote this hack some time ago, it works in dice and in roulette.


its simple, take a coin and choose head or tails and stick with what you pick. Now flip it calling tails and see how many time you lose. The fact is to lose 10 times in a row the odds get higher of losing. so if you just double up until you win then you never lose. example bet like this 10-20-40-80-160-320-640-1280 . now that is 8 times losing you will bet .the chances of you losing 20 times in a row flipping 50/50 is not 50% even though math says you still have 50%. It is possible but not probable.

good luck


I added a video of me doing it for ten min without losing in the link below

http://bitcoinfaucetrelay.com/bitcoin-faucet-hack

also if you know any other hacks please explain for us.  Smiley

such thing u say is called "the mistake of gamblers", or sth like that. this way of thinking is fail, just follow the maths, it's always around 50/50, each flip time is independent, stand alone, no conection at all. I read it from the famous manga "The Liar Game".
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
January 04, 2016, 10:13:19 AM
#43
its a nice strategy i must admit, i will have to try it out in my opinion and check if it can bring me some money however i doubt that a lot, also i will not be able to use your ref link because i already have my account there
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
January 04, 2016, 09:57:03 AM
#42
its not a hack what are you talking about? its just a same old martingale strategy on dice that has a very big house edge, i think you are just trying to get as much referrals as possible in order to make money out of their faucet claims
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
January 04, 2016, 09:12:30 AM
#41
he call the martingale strategy a hack to attrack more referals on his site
well op, for your knowlegde everybody here in the forum knows that strategy,
maybe op gambles and use martinagale,but the truth is he doesnt know that strategy so
he calls it a hack 
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1205
January 04, 2016, 09:06:57 AM
#40
What the fuck have you been smoking?


Quote
so if you just double up until you win then you never lose


Quote
its almost like martingale but not exactly


   No, actually this is precisely what martingale is.


-snipped pic-

edit: accidentally double posted...erased other.

Its different because of the way i am betting. when i lose if you look at the betting i have provided its not just doubling but x times 2 so its the loss times 2 not the bet it self
And do you honestly believe that change x for 2 is some kind of lucky charm or something? It is still the same principle. It doesn't matter if you increase it by 2,3,4, 100 or 1000.
It is still variation of the same old strategy - there are many versions of martingale already: normal, inverted, variable - the point is every single one of them is not working in the long run.

The common point in every martingale strategy is that it is supposed that the previous results will influence the next draw (I. E.after 6 tails an head seems more probable), and that's simply not true, as teacher by math and empirical experience
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
January 04, 2016, 09:02:41 AM
#39
What the fuck have you been smoking?


Quote
so if you just double up until you win then you never lose


Quote
its almost like martingale but not exactly


   No, actually this is precisely what martingale is.


-snipped pic-

edit: accidentally double posted...erased other.

Its different because of the way i am betting. when i lose if you look at the betting i have provided its not just doubling but x times 2 so its the loss times 2 not the bet it self
And do you honestly believe that change x for 2 is some kind of lucky charm or something? It is still the same principle. It doesn't matter if you increase it by 2,3,4, 100 or 1000.
It is still variation of the same old strategy - there are many versions of martingale already: normal, inverted, variable - the point is every single one of them is not working in the long run.
Pages:
Jump to: