Hey guys,
Just trying to query a few things.
I currently have two bat files set up.
One for low intensity (so i can still use my pc)
One for high intensity - When im asleep/or at work.
1080Ti Aorus edition. Power target at 125% Temp sitting at 68 degrees celcius and Fan at 70% speed.
I7 4930K overclocked to 4 Ghz.
Low intensity config is like this
eqm -l eu -t 6 -u MYBTCHERE -w my pc -cd 0
High Intensity is like this
eqm -l eu -t 12 -u MYBTCHERE -w my pc -cd 0 0
Low Intensity is making 610 Sols
High Intensity is at 670 Sols.
High Intensity my PC is rendered unusable - Mouse Lag and so on.
I Also have 2 x 780 TI Ghz Edition cards (1 of which i use for nvidia PhysX, the other doesnt fit on my mobo due to the size of my 1080TI
While im happy with 670 Sols im slightly frustrated that my 780 card is sitting there doing absolutely nothing.
If i stick with EQM can you suggest any further tweaks to get more out of it?
Can you suggest another program?
Topic: NiceHash EQM Zcash NVIDIA optimized miner [Maxwell/Pascal] + CPU mining v1.0.4c - page 2. (Read 237998 times)
June 13, 2017, 04:50:46 AM
May 25, 2017, 07:36:37 PM
is this better than ewbf?
May 24, 2017, 07:59:15 AM
Use NiceHash Miner and you will get even more speed: https://www.nicehash.com/?p=nhmintro
When will it be available on linux? Been waiting for it forever :-)
As I read the thread, there are a lot of people asking for linux binary.
May 24, 2017, 05:41:48 AM
Use NiceHash Miner and you will get even more speed: https://www.nicehash.com/?p=nhmintro
When will it be available on linux? Been waiting for it forever :-)
May 24, 2017, 05:40:35 AM
Use NiceHash Miner and you will get even more speed: https://www.nicehash.com/?p=nhmintro
May 24, 2017, 03:11:42 AM
Hi there
I have a 1060 3g based 6 way miner and now mining with EQM.
All together it shows about 1522.92 Sols/s.
However, when I use the other mining programs such as Claymore and silentarmy, its mining capability is only 240 Sols/s.
Is it a real data? EQM looks way too high compared to the others.
Could anyone tell me about it?
Thanks!
May 12, 2017, 05:24:56 PM
i got error only cuda devices with sm 5.0 and higher are supported
eqm -l eu -t 16 -u 1B8hT9E6oY6WE6ehQFC6RiPSVHHjYQ4kLg -w tesla786 -cd 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7
i have 8 GPU
eqm -l eu -t 16 -u 1B8hT9E6oY6WE6ehQFC6RiPSVHHjYQ4kLg -w tesla786 -cd 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7
i have 8 GPU
May 01, 2017, 03:14:35 PM
Hi.
Is this the same application that is running through Nicehash miner v1.7.5.9?
Im getting 260MH/s on the Nicehashminer, and 255 on the EQM miner.
What is strange is that, when I run the nicehash miner, it starts on 260 mh, then over the night drops down to 1 MH/s(asus strixx 970). While my other computer which have msi gtx 970, stays at 262 stable.
Testing EQM miner now on my asus card to see if the same happends.
John
Is this the same application that is running through Nicehash miner v1.7.5.9?
Im getting 260MH/s on the Nicehashminer, and 255 on the EQM miner.
What is strange is that, when I run the nicehash miner, it starts on 260 mh, then over the night drops down to 1 MH/s(asus strixx 970). While my other computer which have msi gtx 970, stays at 262 stable.
Testing EQM miner now on my asus card to see if the same happends.
John
I am having a very similar problem with my evga 970sc , i am mining at 260 mh and then it gradually drops to 90 mh AND STILL USES AS MUCH MINING POWER AS IT WAS FOR 260 mh. i also made a thread about this problem.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18825303
using v1.0.4c
EDIT: As of 02/05/2017 seems back to normal, i will try to edit this when drops start to happen.
May 01, 2017, 04:33:01 AM
Ok how do I launch high intensity and two threads? It launches automatically from nicehash miner so I can't control much. Also I do see thst two threads are active. I notice it also down clocks my cards memory by around 400"mhz. So I've since found out if I Oc my memory clock by +800 I get similar speeds to ewbf, but not stable obvously. Somethings wrong..
April 29, 2017, 04:57:47 AM
New to this. I know there is a 0% fee, but since this is locked to nicehash, basically im supplying mining power for buyers on nicehash correct?
So my question is, am I making the BTC equivalent of zcash, that I'd be making if I were mining zcash directly through some pool? Or am I losing a chunk by using this service locked to nice hash
Thanks in advanced
For your question - look at http://whattomine.com/ and compare profit beetwen mining on zcash pool and nicehash. There are some difference, but no much.So my question is, am I making the BTC equivalent of zcash, that I'd be making if I were mining zcash directly through some pool? Or am I losing a chunk by using this service locked to nice hash
Thanks in advanced
Btw, EQM it "old" miner. Use Excavator
If you launch in low intensity mode (one thread) then yes, you get lower hashing speed. And yes, use excavator, it will give more speed (with high intensity of 2+ threads).
April 28, 2017, 11:48:50 PM
New to this. I know there is a 0% fee, but since this is locked to nicehash, basically im supplying mining power for buyers on nicehash correct?
So my question is, am I making the BTC equivalent of zcash, that I'd be making if I were mining zcash directly through some pool? Or am I losing a chunk by using this service locked to nice hash
Thanks in advanced
For your question - look at http://whattomine.com/ and compare profit beetwen mining on zcash pool and nicehash. There are some difference, but no much.So my question is, am I making the BTC equivalent of zcash, that I'd be making if I were mining zcash directly through some pool? Or am I losing a chunk by using this service locked to nice hash
Thanks in advanced
Btw, EQM it "old" miner. Use Excavator
April 28, 2017, 09:23:47 PM
New to this. I know there is a 0% fee, but since this is locked to nicehash, basically im supplying mining power for buyers on nicehash correct?
So my question is, am I making the BTC equivalent of zcash, that I'd be making if I were mining zcash directly through some pool? Or am I losing a chunk by using this service locked to nice hash
Thanks in advanced
For your question - look at http://whattomine.com/ and compare profit beetwen mining on zcash pool and nicehash. There are some difference, but no much.So my question is, am I making the BTC equivalent of zcash, that I'd be making if I were mining zcash directly through some pool? Or am I losing a chunk by using this service locked to nice hash
Thanks in advanced
Btw, EQM it "old" miner. Use Excavator
April 28, 2017, 02:22:32 AM
New to this. I know there is a 0% fee, but since this is locked to nicehash, basically im supplying mining power for buyers on nicehash correct?
So my question is, am I making the BTC equivalent of zcash, that I'd be making if I were mining zcash directly through some pool? Or am I losing a chunk by using this service locked to nice hash
Thanks in advanced
So my question is, am I making the BTC equivalent of zcash, that I'd be making if I were mining zcash directly through some pool? Or am I losing a chunk by using this service locked to nice hash
Thanks in advanced
April 14, 2017, 07:18:06 AM
Hi.
Is this the same application that is running through Nicehash miner v1.7.5.9?
Im getting 260MH/s on the Nicehashminer, and 255 on the EQM miner.
What is strange is that, when I run the nicehash miner, it starts on 260 mh, then over the night drops down to 1 MH/s(asus strixx 970). While my other computer which have msi gtx 970, stays at 262 stable.
Testing EQM miner now on my asus card to see if the same happends.
John
Is this the same application that is running through Nicehash miner v1.7.5.9?
Im getting 260MH/s on the Nicehashminer, and 255 on the EQM miner.
What is strange is that, when I run the nicehash miner, it starts on 260 mh, then over the night drops down to 1 MH/s(asus strixx 970). While my other computer which have msi gtx 970, stays at 262 stable.
Testing EQM miner now on my asus card to see if the same happends.
John
March 01, 2017, 06:04:48 AM
for some reason i cant run my start batch file when trying to mine zcash through nicehash can someone link what the start batch file must look like incase i am putting in something wrong =/
Link yours so that we could analyze what's wrong. (omit your wallet)
March 01, 2017, 02:37:23 AM
for some reason i cant run my start batch file when trying to mine zcash through nicehash can someone link what the start batch file must look like incase i am putting in something wrong =/
February 28, 2017, 05:03:07 PM
so the last version of this compatible with suprnova pool is the 5a version? there are too many version and fork is gettign confused here
which is anyway slower than the EWBF version
which is anyway slower than the EWBF version
This is EQM, not nheqminer.
right, that's what i mean with confusing the two, but no other version are in plan for that? they are both slower than the private miner
I am not sure, on my devices, EQM is equally fast, besides you need to consider devfee and the fact that ideas were copied out of EQM.
ah yeah but the fact that you earn less because it's locked make it less appealing
We open sourced kernel (which is equal). We even said what has to be done on base code to make it same speed, but sadly, no "open source" coder took 1h of job to do it. Maybe if you collect together some bounty or something, you may find someone like sp maybe that will fix it.
February 28, 2017, 04:56:13 PM
so the last version of this compatible with suprnova pool is the 5a version? there are too many version and fork is gettign confused here
which is anyway slower than the EWBF version
which is anyway slower than the EWBF version
This is EQM, not nheqminer.
right, that's what i mean with confusing the two, but no other version are in plan for that? they are both slower than the private miner
I am not sure, on my devices, EQM is equally fast, besides you need to consider devfee and the fact that ideas were copied out of EQM.
ah yeah but the fact that you earn less because it's locked make it less appealing
February 28, 2017, 04:44:52 PM
so the last version of this compatible with suprnova pool is the 5a version? there are too many version and fork is gettign confused here
which is anyway slower than the EWBF version
which is anyway slower than the EWBF version
This is EQM, not nheqminer.
right, that's what i mean with confusing the two, but no other version are in plan for that? they are both slower than the private miner
I am not sure, on my devices, EQM is equally fast, besides you need to consider devfee and the fact that ideas were copied out of EQM.
February 28, 2017, 04:42:33 PM
so the last version of this compatible with suprnova pool is the 5a version? there are too many version and fork is gettign confused here
which is anyway slower than the EWBF version
which is anyway slower than the EWBF version
This is EQM, not nheqminer.
right, that's what i mean with confusing the two, but no other version are in plan for that? they are both slower than the private miner
Jump to: