Pages:
Author

Topic: NiceHash EQM Zcash NVIDIA optimized miner [Maxwell/Pascal] + CPU mining v1.0.4c - page 47. (Read 238050 times)

hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 501
Overclocked 1070:

Code:
[14:37:05][0x00000a3c][info] Measured: 74.1961 I/s
[14:37:05][0x00000a3c][info] Measured: 140.803 Sols/s
[14:37:05][0x00000a3c][info] Theoretical: 139.418 Sols/s
hero member
Activity: 526
Merit: 502
Palit GTX 1060 3GB   core clock 1620   memory 4422   tdp 61%   -ct 94   84,5Sol/s pic.
full member
Activity: 243
Merit: 105


with your code i'm not getting that hash but more like 105 sol for a 1070, what are your gpu setting?


It is clean SA5 + eXtremal's code + my  ht_store(I posted it in SA thread, but it slower on cuda), on linux. Overclock +1600 mem(equal +800 in win). I wrote in readme.md(on github), that cuda port is slower, then opencl, and I don't know why.
hero member
Activity: 539
Merit: 500
New version: EQM v1.0.1a

Only adjusted for Pascal cards so far. Report your Maxwell speeds.

GTX 1070: ~125 Sol/s @ 110 W
GTX 1060 6GB: ~85 Sol/s @ 80 W


GTX 980 Ti: ~125 Sol/s
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 501
New version: EQM v1.0.1b

Added ability to set multiple threads/instances per device.

Example:
Code:
eqm -cd 0 0
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
New version: EQM v1.0.1a

Only adjusted for Pascal cards so far. Report your Maxwell speeds.

GTX 1070: ~125 Sol/s @ 110 W
GTX 1060 6GB: ~85 Sol/s @ 80 W


Again closed source  Shocked Shocked Shocked

Open source cuda port and latest SA5 (with eXtremal updates) can achieve these speeds.

Code:
Total 723.6 sol/s [dev0 122.7, dev1 118.7, dev2 121.2, dev3 122.7, dev4 122.5, dev5 121.8] 99 shares
Total 724.2 sol/s [dev0 121.5, dev1 120.9, dev2 124.3, dev3 124.4, dev4 122.3, dev5 123.9] 99 shares
Total 722.6 sol/s [dev0 121.2, dev1 121.1, dev2 123.6, dev3 122.7, dev4 123.2, dev5 122.5] 100 shares
Total 723.0 sol/s [dev0 123.6, dev1 121.1, dev2 124.4, dev3 123.1, dev4 120.7, dev5 122.5] 102 shares
Total 723.7 sol/s [dev0 123.2, dev1 121.0, dev2 122.6, dev3 124.7, dev4 120.1, dev5 121.7] 102 shares
Total 725.0 sol/s [dev0 122.9, dev1 122.2, dev2 124.6, dev3 125.1, dev4 120.6, dev5 123.0] 104 shares
Total 724.6 sol/s [dev0 122.2, dev1 121.7, dev2 123.0, dev3 122.2, dev4 123.2, dev5 123.8] 105 shares
Total 722.7 sol/s [dev0 120.4, dev1 123.0, dev2 123.1, dev3 124.8, dev4 121.8, dev5 122.8] 106 shares

with your code i'm not getting that hash but more like 105 sol for a 1070, what are your gpu setting?

New version: EQM v1.0.1a

Only adjusted for Pascal cards so far. Report your Maxwell speeds.

GTX 1070: ~125 Sol/s @ 110 W
GTX 1060 6GB: ~85 Sol/s @ 80 W


Again closed source  Shocked Shocked Shocked

Open source cuda port and latest SA5 (with eXtremal updates) can achieve these speeds.

but how can you run that in windows?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16903714
hero member
Activity: 968
Merit: 624
Still a manic miner
New version: EQM v1.0.1a

Only adjusted for Pascal cards so far. Report your Maxwell speeds.

GTX 1070: ~125 Sol/s @ 110 W
GTX 1060 6GB: ~85 Sol/s @ 80 W


Again closed source  Shocked Shocked Shocked

Open source cuda port and latest SA5 (with eXtremal updates) can achieve these speeds.

but how can you run that in windows?
full member
Activity: 243
Merit: 105
New version: EQM v1.0.1a

Only adjusted for Pascal cards so far. Report your Maxwell speeds.

GTX 1070: ~125 Sol/s @ 110 W
GTX 1060 6GB: ~85 Sol/s @ 80 W


Again closed source  Shocked Shocked Shocked

Open source cuda port and latest SA5 (with eXtremal updates) can achieve these speeds.

Code:
Total 723.6 sol/s [dev0 122.7, dev1 118.7, dev2 121.2, dev3 122.7, dev4 122.5, dev5 121.8] 99 shares
Total 724.2 sol/s [dev0 121.5, dev1 120.9, dev2 124.3, dev3 124.4, dev4 122.3, dev5 123.9] 99 shares
Total 722.6 sol/s [dev0 121.2, dev1 121.1, dev2 123.6, dev3 122.7, dev4 123.2, dev5 122.5] 100 shares
Total 723.0 sol/s [dev0 123.6, dev1 121.1, dev2 124.4, dev3 123.1, dev4 120.7, dev5 122.5] 102 shares
Total 723.7 sol/s [dev0 123.2, dev1 121.0, dev2 122.6, dev3 124.7, dev4 120.1, dev5 121.7] 102 shares
Total 725.0 sol/s [dev0 122.9, dev1 122.2, dev2 124.6, dev3 125.1, dev4 120.6, dev5 123.0] 104 shares
Total 724.6 sol/s [dev0 122.2, dev1 121.7, dev2 123.0, dev3 122.2, dev4 123.2, dev5 123.8] 105 shares
Total 722.7 sol/s [dev0 120.4, dev1 123.0, dev2 123.1, dev3 124.8, dev4 121.8, dev5 122.8] 106 shares
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
New version: EQM v1.0.1a

Only adjusted for Pascal cards so far. Report your Maxwell speeds.

GTX 1070: ~125 Sol/s @ 110 W
GTX 1060 6GB: ~85 Sol/s @ 80 W
palit gtx1070 oc @ 117W 134sol/s
palit gtx750 1gb oc 34sol/s
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 501
New version: EQM v1.0.1a

Only adjusted for Pascal cards so far. Report your Maxwell speeds.

GTX 1070: ~125 Sol/s @ 110 W
GTX 1060 6GB: ~85 Sol/s @ 80 W
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Thanks for this.

Where can i look at how i'm mining and at what intervals will the payment to my btc happen?

stiff
hero member
Activity: 676
Merit: 500
What is wrong with your eth miner , I am doing 180mh , but the miner goes to 180 and then down to 120-140 most of the time, using claymore miner i don't have this issue! What is going on?
legendary
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
managed to get locked mem pages working
Not a big deal, 4 threads run as fast as 5 threads without locked pages Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030

I run a GTX 960 OC-II / i5 in my desktop rig and I notice the combination of the lappy's i7 + 950m comes in at only 3-4 Sol/s less, on average, over 8-10 hours. Yet, the 960 does it's job with much more ease. (I usually keep my RX480 off the books unless on a final payout run and need to get some OC'd U/V'd daggerhash shares done.


 GTX 950 vs GTX 960 (on actual cards) show almost identical hashrates for ZEC and ETH - it's the memory system that's the limit, and they both have the same memory system.

 There is stuff the 960 is noticeably better on vs. the 950, but ZEC and ETH were specifically designed as "ASIC resistant" through heavy usage of large amounts of memory on the GPU itself.

 The really sad part - my (last year purchase) $200 R9 290s despite being about 3 generations older and a LOT lower clocks do better ETH hashrate than my $400 GTX 1070s, and by report a LOT better ZEC sol/s.

 There's a serious advantage sometimes to a wider memory bus.
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
Yes , but my 100$280x is making 110sol/s and my 450$1070 only 90sol! This is crap!

600EUR 1080 making 60sol/s  - Disaster!
full member
Activity: 243
Merit: 105
Made a cuda port of SA5. If anyone need.

https://github.com/krnlx/nheqminer

thanks but it doesn't start any kernel on the devices.
no ram usage, nothing.
ubuntu 16.04, cuda 8.
do I need cuda 7.5?

No, cuda 8, 1070 and exactly same options on start as in readme
legendary
Activity: 1164
Merit: 1010
There are very few mining algorytmns where NVidia is competative with AMD - and the one ZCash uses isn't one of them, except perhaps on a hahs/watt basis (like ETH/ETC).

 I have a bunch of 1070-based rigs but they're not intended long-term for ZEC or ETH mining, they're just doing it right now to help pay for their cost to build. 8-)



That said, there are a few algorithms where nvidia is the clear performer.  Neoscrypt and Decred's algo comes to mind...
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
There are very few mining algorytmns where NVidia is competative with AMD - and the one ZCash uses isn't one of them, except perhaps on a hash/watt basis (like ETH/ETC).

 I have a bunch of 1070-based rigs but they're not intended long-term for ZEC or ETH mining, they're just doing it right now to help pay for their cost to build as those coins are a bit more profitable RIGHT NOW than what I built the rigs for.

legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1046
Yes , but my 100$280x is making 110sol/s and my 450$1070 only 90sol! This is crap!
!!!
hero member
Activity: 676
Merit: 500
Yes , but my 100$280x is making 110sol/s and my 450$1070 only 90sol! This is crap!
Pages:
Jump to: