Pages:
Author

Topic: nlocktime Electrum issue/help (Read 384 times)

legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3238
The Stone the masons rejected was the cornerstone.
January 15, 2021, 07:44:41 AM
#26
If it helps: I've only tried locktime with coinb.in, not with Electrum.

 Thanks Loyce...problem if there was any has been solved.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
January 15, 2021, 06:01:33 AM
#25
If it helps: I've only tried locktime with coinb.in, not with Electrum.
legendary
Activity: 3682
Merit: 1580
January 14, 2021, 04:09:34 AM
#24
yeah bitcoin is a very expensive clock.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 4418
Crypto Swap Exchange
January 13, 2021, 09:13:34 PM
#23
Having the transaction appear in block explorers doesn't mean that it is necessarily valid, when it comes to the timestamp. The network consensus with BIP113 is that the timestamp has to be the median of the last 11 block which means that it can deviate from the actual time by 1 hour, and that explains why your transaction couldn't broadcast at 7PM and you could at 8PM. If you're looking to do nLocktime, you should set it an hour in advance.

The fact that the blockexplorer threw a non-final error basically shows that the transaction is still behind the unix time. I'm not sure why Blockcypher accepted it but if it didn't get propagated, then their timestamps logic could be wrong.
full member
Activity: 1318
Merit: 184
Krogothmanhattan alt account
January 13, 2021, 08:01:53 PM
#22
copper member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
January 13, 2021, 05:58:13 PM
#21

  I try to push on smartbit.com.au and I get PUSH TRANSACTION ERROR: 64: NON-FINAL




There's only 2 reasons I think this error could occur:
1. You added a space or extra character somewhere that it wasn't expecting so it couldn't parse it
2. It's just broken. I'm leaning towards the second.

3. Also was it definitely past the blockheight? The 10 minutes if you did use blockheight might be out as the 10 minutes is a targeted average.

There's also a chance the fee was too low. That seems to be a common error and a lot of nodes used to not hold.more than 20mb in their mempool (but I imagine these explorers could hold at least 128gb in their mempool without exceeding the capacity of a single ram chip.
full member
Activity: 1318
Merit: 184
Krogothmanhattan alt account
January 13, 2021, 05:30:38 PM
#20
I pushed it on blockstream now....and it really broadcast..I also see it in my wallet as well

https://blockstream.info/tx/7fde5a833eabc42b5f90d3a5a8015372e449d6749fa090c678a2f7746b76d007

 And it shows everywhere!

But why earlier would  https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/tx/7fde5a833eabc42b5f90d3a5a8015372e449d6749fa090c678a2f7746b76d007/

say its broadcast and it never was??
 
full member
Activity: 1318
Merit: 184
Krogothmanhattan alt account
January 13, 2021, 04:42:26 PM
#19
So I nothing has yet arrived in my wallet from the first tx  7fde5a833eabc42b5f90d3a5a8015372e449d6749fa090c678a2f7746b76d007

So I looked it up on blockchain and blockchair...and it never existed as they came up with nothing!

  Tried again on blockcypher and I get  

Error validating transaction: Transaction with hash 7fde5a833eabc42b5f90d3a5a8015372e449d6749fa090c678a2f7746b76d007 already exists..

  I try to push on smartbit.com.au and I get PUSH TRANSACTION ERROR: 64: NON-FINAL


legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3238
The Stone the masons rejected was the cornerstone.
January 13, 2021, 03:59:37 PM
#18
Here is a 2nd one I made......my time is 4pm and I placed a 7pm timelock....so 3 hours in the future


Code:
020000000156ca7e2bdb24ecc2fc1e7fc7a764edd3feeb7bb0702450fb3c471f57b8201de6000000006a47304402201fa31e2b081b05ae06273862b6b7a528565970d1b613a8420f27c05cde182d590220125ccf210c00e9f8e958d5b97649d5bc3d9ff9b960de9191771464c8144270b201210249cfee87a6f55d0bd9e2be09adc8b72e434789b87d53860d628df167eba00de1fdffffff01155d0000000000001976a914549c9f4f0f5911f080a8b6c1f3ec137afc8f823c88ac9789ff5f

Code:
  Decoded Transaction
{
    "addresses": [
        "14kBzTFSfgbzHipBwob38RNiigLcByuRVJ",
        "18iPPRURq13LgLdsNKcM2e7K5DQpsNTBvY"
    ],
    "block_height": -1,
    "block_index": -1,
    "confirmations": 0,
    "double_spend": false,
    "fees": 3840,
    "hash": "7b2dc71b40eabcb593cc65b1578d4af23edfa765023344cfaa7ee59a044dcfec",
    "inputs": [
        {
            "addresses": [
                "14kBzTFSfgbzHipBwob38RNiigLcByuRVJ"
            ],
            "age": 0,
            "output_index": 0,
            "output_value": 27669,
            "prev_hash": "e61d20b8571f473cfb502470b07bebfed3ed64a7c77f1efcc2ec24db2b7eca56",
            "script": "47304402201fa31e2b081b05ae06273862b6b7a528565970d1b613a8420f27c05cde182d590220125ccf210c00e9f8e958d5b97649d5bc3d9ff9b960de9191771464c8144270b201210249cfee87a6f55d0bd9e2be09adc8b72e434789b87d53860d628df167eba00de1",
            "script_type": "pay-to-pubkey-hash",
            "sequence": 4294967293
        }
    ],
    "lock_time": 1610582423,
    "opt_in_rbf": true,
    "outputs": [
        {
            "addresses": [
                "18iPPRURq13LgLdsNKcM2e7K5DQpsNTBvY"
            ],
            "script": "76a914549c9f4f0f5911f080a8b6c1f3ec137afc8f823c88ac",
            "script_type": "pay-to-pubkey-hash",
            "value": 23829
        }
    ],
    "preference": "low",
    "received": "2021-01-13T20:57:38.181377299Z",
    "relayed_by": "3.80.72.207",
    "size": 191,
    "total": 23829,
    "ver": 2,
    "vin_sz": 1,
    "vout_sz": 1


   This time it did not broadcast! So will update when I do broadcast at 7pm.
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3238
The Stone the masons rejected was the cornerstone.
January 13, 2021, 03:36:12 PM
#17
Ok so I made a new locktime for 240pm EST as follows...


 
Code:
020000000156ca7e2bdb24ecc2fc1e7fc7a764edd3feeb7bb0702450fb3c471f57b8201de6000000006a47304402200714987225e63727f37d8b7c38ec9e1ab4079b234ef88e49d147c5663620d32f0220158a7aa47e1e0dd93501408658f064213c740930994e06feb9431024206bb6b901210249cfee87a6f55d0bd9e2be09adc8b72e434789b87d53860d628df167eba00de1fdffffff0155680000000000001976a914549c9f4f0f5911f080a8b6c1f3ec137afc8f823c88acad5aff5f

Code:
Decode A Transaction
Decoded Transaction
{
    "addresses": [
        "18iPPRURq13LgLdsNKcM2e7K5DQpsNTBvY",
        "14kBzTFSfgbzHipBwob38RNiigLcByuRVJ"
    ],
    "block_height": -1,
    "block_index": -1,
    "confirmations": 0,
    "double_spend": false,
    "fees": 960,
    "hash": "7fde5a833eabc42b5f90d3a5a8015372e449d6749fa090c678a2f7746b76d007",
    "inputs": [
        {
            "addresses": [
                "14kBzTFSfgbzHipBwob38RNiigLcByuRVJ"
            ],
            "age": 0,
            "output_index": 0,
            "output_value": 27669,
            "prev_hash": "e61d20b8571f473cfb502470b07bebfed3ed64a7c77f1efcc2ec24db2b7eca56",
            "script": "47304402200714987225e63727f37d8b7c38ec9e1ab4079b234ef88e49d147c5663620d32f0220158a7aa47e1e0dd93501408658f064213c740930994e06feb9431024206bb6b901210249cfee87a6f55d0bd9e2be09adc8b72e434789b87d53860d628df167eba00de1",
            "script_type": "pay-to-pubkey-hash",
            "sequence": 4294967293
        }
    ],
    "lock_time": 1610570413,
    "opt_in_rbf": true,
    "outputs": [
        {
            "addresses": [
                "18iPPRURq13LgLdsNKcM2e7K5DQpsNTBvY"
            ],
            "script": "76a914549c9f4f0f5911f080a8b6c1f3ec137afc8f823c88ac",
            "script_type": "pay-to-pubkey-hash",
            "value": 26709
        }
    ],
    "preference": "low",
    "received": "2021-01-13T20:30:43.6295312Z",
    "relayed_by": "52.23.194.197",
    "size": 191,
    "total": 26709,
    "ver": 2,
    "vin_sz": 1,
    "vout_sz": 1
}


   I wanted to see if it would broadcast...and it did before the 10 minutes to broadcast arrived here



   https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/tx/7fde5a833eabc42b5f90d3a5a8015372e449d6749fa090c678a2f7746b76d007/




   Funny thing,is I do not see it in my receiving wallet yet. Perhaps after 340pm est?


   I will try another one, but had to post this one..no idea what I am doing wrong..will give it a 30 min lead time this time.

HCP
legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 4361
January 13, 2021, 03:37:35 AM
#16
It would appear that with the very large number of unconfirmed transactions over the last few days, that the "mempoolminfee" code got triggered... Undecided

Note that the error you had in Electrum explicitly mentioned "mempool min fee"... and not the usual "min relay fee" etc:



legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 2033
Crypto Swap Exchange
January 13, 2021, 02:29:51 AM
#15
The electrum server you're sending it to wants a higher fee to be paid. Not sure why though since it says it's 2 sat per byte (maybe trying to. Help people not get transactions stuck with a custom script on that specific node).
https://statoshi.info/dashboard/db/memory-pool?panelId=3&fullscreen&from=1609918343354&to=1610523143354
full member
Activity: 1318
Merit: 184
Krogothmanhattan alt account
January 12, 2021, 09:49:15 AM
#14
So I took the raw data from electrum and went to qr.io and converted it to a qr code. Scanned and it matched the hex data perfectly. THAT problem is solved. Tomorrow will work on the time lock. Thanks again all
full member
Activity: 1318
Merit: 184
Krogothmanhattan alt account
January 12, 2021, 09:43:48 AM
#13
I also scanned qr code with qr code reader...and i get

IR50$Z8DV9UHO1YOOKBX*9NI033H28X3S-Q-5ESIZ2V5HQ-JPW18UDS691CJ+.CIE7XGACT412SAI96-*P44ZI12UYT3A28YI61ZY5722529932R0+Y4V.JPZ952*17A/X8$:-N1J:I300AA5XZ5K0N3Q*C1B3-L8F+KN2MD6:J30.PTTPU*7V0/+FDLJECPDUR1MLCMPY2Z-5G$XCF*6USTR6G$PE14$GK..V7H.6.X/X$:JMXEWJH2HP33QMX:EH6NRWAM1/1O04

     Why? Is there a specific reader that will convert qr code to the original raw data?
Electrum uses base43 encoding for their QR codes. It helps to save the limited space for QR codes and Electrum will decode it when you're using the desktop client to scan the QR code.

If you want to get it in hex format, you can just use this: https://github.com/jacoblyles/base43js. It's the only converter that I'm aware of.

Funny thing i had tried the blockheight the night before on another PC and it worked. That computer is older than this 2 month old laptop I used.
If it still doesn't work, PM me the raw TX and I'll take a look.


Ok...that makes sense now..thanks for all the help. Appreciate it. Will be back home tomorrow night...hopefully will have time to create another timelock..will let you know. Thanks
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 4418
Crypto Swap Exchange
January 12, 2021, 07:38:28 AM
#12
I also scanned qr code with qr code reader...and i get

IR50$Z8DV9UHO1YOOKBX*9NI033H28X3S-Q-5ESIZ2V5HQ-JPW18UDS691CJ+.CIE7XGACT412SAI96-*P44ZI12UYT3A28YI61ZY5722529932R0+Y4V.JPZ952*17A/X8$:-N1J:I300AA5XZ5K0N3Q*C1B3-L8F+KN2MD6:J30.PTTPU*7V0/+FDLJECPDUR1MLCMPY2Z-5G$XCF*6USTR6G$PE14$GK..V7H.6.X/X$:JMXEWJH2HP33QMX:EH6NRWAM1/1O04

     Why? Is there a specific reader that will convert qr code to the original raw data?
Electrum uses base43 encoding for their QR codes. It helps to save the limited space for QR codes and Electrum will decode it when you're using the desktop client to scan the QR code.

If you want to get it in hex format, you can just use this: https://github.com/jacoblyles/base43js. It's the only converter that I'm aware of.

Funny thing i had tried the blockheight the night before on another PC and it worked. That computer is older than this 2 month old laptop I used.
If it still doesn't work, PM me the raw TX and I'll take a look.
full member
Activity: 1318
Merit: 184
Krogothmanhattan alt account
January 12, 2021, 06:55:30 AM
#11
I also scanned qr code with qr code reader...and i get

IR50$Z8DV9UHO1YOOKBX*9NI033H28X3S-Q-5ESIZ2V5HQ-JPW18UDS691CJ+.CIE7XGACT412SAI96-*P44ZI12UYT3A28YI61ZY5722529932R0+Y4V.JPZ952*17A/X8$:-N1J:I300AA5XZ5K0N3Q*C1B3-L8F+KN2MD6:J30.PTTPU*7V0/+FDLJECPDUR1MLCMPY2Z-5G$XCF*6USTR6G$PE14$GK..V7H.6.X/X$:JMXEWJH2HP33QMX:EH6NRWAM1/1O04

     Why? Is there a specific reader that will convert qr code to the original raw data?
full member
Activity: 1318
Merit: 184
Krogothmanhattan alt account
January 12, 2021, 04:50:53 AM
#10
I deleted it and tried with blockheight afterwards..same issue.
 
  Funny thing i had tried the blockheight the night before on another PC and it worked. That computer is older than this 2 month old laptop I used.

    Will try again when home. Thanks for the input all
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 10611
January 12, 2021, 01:19:46 AM
#9
I tried again an hour later and still same results.
Could you try it today too?
I'm wondering if there were any issued with your PC clock or with the conversion of your local time to GMT by Electrum. 1610392963 (the locktime in the picture in OP) is January 11, 2021 7:22:43 PM GMT, your picture is showing 2:22:43 PM since there is 5 hour difference and if there were any issues there (such as your clock, timezone or bug in Electrum), only 1 hour waiting wouldn't be enough.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 6080
Self-proclaimed Genius
January 11, 2021, 11:54:45 PM
#8
I just tried with a block number...and I am getting same issues. Why? The deposit I placed in Electrum wallet is unconfirmed....thats the only thing I can see that might be an issue..but I doubt it Huh
It can't be the unconfirmed UTXO, unless it's from a local transaction but it should produce a different error for a different issue.

I've tried it in v4.0.9 testnet and it got rejected when it was broadcast before the set block height (as expected).
And then waited for the next block to come (same height as nLocktime) and it was successfully sent.

Maybe it's the server's node that you're connected to?
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 4418
Crypto Swap Exchange
January 11, 2021, 07:58:44 PM
#7
I tried again an hour later and still same results. I am using blockheight  now as an experiment and see how that goes. But I want the time lock exact not guessing what the time might be.
You'll have some inaccuracy when using unix time as nlocktime, that is by design. nLocktime uses the median time past of the 11 blocks prior to the block that includes your transaction. As such, you might have to wait up to an hour before it can be relayed. Exact timing will not be possible.



Your transaction appears to be rejected with non-final. Is the nlocktime specified smaller than the current block height? The nlocktime specifies that the current block height must be strictly greater than the nlocktime. As for the decoding on transaction, I'm aware that Blockchain.com appears to be bugged and can't process the raw transaction.
Pages:
Jump to: