Pages:
Author

Topic: Noble Prize Winner who predicted Housing Bubble: Bitcoin is a bubble for sure! (Read 5736 times)

donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019


muahaha, awesome! Thanks for taking the time to do this.

* molecular makes mental note to search for "bubble stages chart answer pic bookmark"
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
If mainstream media (including RT) wasn't hating on bitcoin I would be suspicious.

+1

IF Obama suggested everyone to start investing into bitcoin I'd be definitely reaching for my tinfoil hat paper wallet.

ftfm
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
So how far does the price have to drop before this is officially a bubble pop and not a normal market correction? The previous ATH of $260? more?
hero member
Activity: 703
Merit: 502
There is no nobel price for economics.. there is only a price sponsored by a huge bank in sweden named after nobel

1. You are correct, there has never been a "nobel price" for economics, only a price "in memory of Alfred Nobel". The reason is that Nobel himself didn't think the field of economics was WORTHY of any price. Seeing the current state of economic theory it's hard not to agree with him.

2. If it WAS a Nobel price it still wouldn't mean anything. It just someone somewhere decided to give you some money. See some of the recent "peace price" awards for examples (Obama and the EU!? Really?). People put way too much emphasis on being "accepted" by authority.

3. Getting the price is no proof you're not a blithering idiot, see Paul Krugman.

4. Even if Shiller's price was legitimate, it doesn't mean he'll be correct about everything he'll ever says. Smart people are frequently wrong, as proven by the fact that smart people frequently DISAGREE about almost everything. They can't all be right.

It's prize, damn it. You americans totally forgot engrish by now.


I was always told there was a price for everything
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
hm
Bitcoin is currently in the ''return to normal/euphoria's last gasp'' phase.



I think people posted this chart in 2010 the first time, when Bitcoin crashed from 50Cent to 20Cent. When did Bitcoin reach the phase "new paradigma"?
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Aren't these the same guys who caused the financial crash in the first place??
Must be hard for them not having control..
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1018
Buzz App - Spin wheel, farm rewards
The  Nobel Laureate in Economics is a big joke.

You must, absolutely must buy into the bullshit fabrication known as contemporary monetary policy to get award this award.  It is not awarded to anyone who sees things at all differently.  (At least as far as I know, can't say I studied it much, pls correct me if I'm wrong).

As bitcoin is in many ways different than the prevailing popular believes in economics, of course a Nobel Laurete is likely to be opposed to it. This doesn't seem very surprising to me.  Besides, many of these baby boomers probably just mastered the science of sending an email, I don't think they are even capable of understanding how bitcoin even works, it's probably as far-fetched as traveling faster than light to them.
member
Activity: 107
Merit: 10


My God, you're right! I've run my own independent analysis, and have obtained eerily similar results:



Oh wait, never mind, I seem to have gathered outdated information.

legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1137
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
And for me the beauty of the bitcoin was to solve in elegant way the "consensus problem" in a distributed system ... that was a stroke of genius
And what happens to be if the next "stroke of genius" happens to be Proof-of-useful-work?
The internet is well and alive, Usenet fairly deserted and the Gopher protocol replaced some wierd little startup called Google. Nowadays the only part of the internet that most people know is the web. Well, "Web 2.0" as they call it.
"I tell ye, back in the days, it was madness. We were just wasting leccy on solving stupid crypto puzzles. And now? The CureForCancerCoin has already found treatments for 37 different variaties of cancer. Thanks to the SearchForFTLCoin the communication to mars takes less than a second. We used to have higher latency between Australia and the States often enough back then. Ah ye, CryptoCurrencies 1.0, what a waste. But we used to love em anyway."
I predict, based on my own personal feeling and opinion, that the alt coins you mentioned will totally fail.  You can take that to the bank.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1010
Borsche
There is no nobel price for economics.. there is only a price sponsored by a huge bank in sweden named after nobel

1. You are correct, there has never been a "nobel price" for economics, only a price "in memory of Alfred Nobel". The reason is that Nobel himself didn't think the field of economics was WORTHY of any price. Seeing the current state of economic theory it's hard not to agree with him.

2. If it WAS a Nobel price it still wouldn't mean anything. It just someone somewhere decided to give you some money. See some of the recent "peace price" awards for examples (Obama and the EU!? Really?). People put way too much emphasis on being "accepted" by authority.

3. Getting the price is no proof you're not a blithering idiot, see Paul Krugman.

4. Even if Shiller's price was legitimate, it doesn't mean he'll be correct about everything he'll ever says. Smart people are frequently wrong, as proven by the fact that smart people frequently DISAGREE about almost everything. They can't all be right.

It's prize, damn it. You americans totally forgot engrish by now.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
And for me the beauty of the bitcoin was to solve in elegant way the "consensus problem" in a distributed system ... that was a stroke of genius
And what happens to be if the next "stroke of genius" happens to be Proof-of-useful-work?
The internet is well and alive, Usenet fairly deserted and the Gopher protocol replaced some wierd little startup called Google. Nowadays the only part of the internet that most people know is the web. Well, "Web 2.0" as they call it.
"I tell ye, back in the days, it was madness. We were just wasting leccy on solving stupid crypto puzzles. And now? The CureForCancerCoin has already found treatments for 37 different variaties of cancer. Thanks to the SearchForFTLCoin the communication to mars takes less than a second. We used to have higher latency between Australia and the States often enough back then. Ah ye, CryptoCurrencies 1.0, what a waste. But we used to love em anyway."
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
I'm always grumpy in the morning.
There is no nobel price for economics.. there is only a price sponsored by a huge bank in sweden named after nobel

1. You are correct, there has never been a "nobel price" for economics, only a price "in memory of Alfred Nobel". The reason is that Nobel himself didn't think the field of economics was WORTHY of any price. Seeing the current state of economic theory it's hard not to agree with him.

2. If it WAS a Nobel price it still wouldn't mean anything. It just someone somewhere decided to give you some money. See some of the recent "peace price" awards for examples (Obama and the EU!? Really?). People put way too much emphasis on being "accepted" by authority.

3. Getting the price is no proof you're not a blithering idiot, see Paul Krugman.

4. Even if Shiller's price was legitimate, it doesn't mean he'll be correct about everything he'll ever says. Smart people are frequently wrong, as proven by the fact that smart people frequently DISAGREE about almost everything. They can't all be right.
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1015
If mainstream media (including RT) wasn't hating on bitcoin I would be suspicious.

+1

IF Obama suggested everyone to start investing into bitcoin I'd be definitely reaching for my tinfoil hat.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Stand on the shoulders of giants
would be not surprise to me they also could argue that internet is a bubble as well ... 
But, the internet was the prime example of bubble back in 2000, known as the .com-bubble. Even know, 10 years later Microsoft, is worth barely more than half of what it was worth back then. Sure, some stocks are worth quite a lot more than after the bubble bursting, but a lot of companies went bust.
So, who knows, in ten years time ... maybe BTC at $500, DOGE market cap at $2B, 90% of the alts gone forever. As the saying goes, those who dont remember history are doomed to repeat it. And there are a lot of similiarities. People investing money in all kinds of coins without even knowing what they are even supposed to be for, unwaivering faith in future possibilities and completely ignoring economical fundamental data.

+1

The Internet clearly wasn't a bubble.

Internet Companies circa 2000 clearly were.

So you need to decide, does Bitcoin have the radical disruption factor and potential permanence of the Internet, or the flash-in-the-pan "nothing really new here" of a Pets.com.

I'd say it's closer to the former than the latter.



Yes but one can argue that you mistake bitcoin with the protocol.

And for me the beauty of the bitcoin was to solve in elegant way the "consensus problem" in a distributed system ... that was a stroke of genius

legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1003
If mainstream media (including RT) wasn't hating on bitcoin I would be suspicious.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Stand on the shoulders of giants
would be not surprise to me they also could argue that internet is a bubble as well ...  
But, the internet was the prime example of bubble back in 2000, known as the .com-bubble. Even know, 10 years later Microsoft, is worth barely more than half of what it was worth back then. Sure, some stocks are worth quite a lot more than after the bubble bursting, but a lot of companies went bust.
So, who knows, in ten years time ... maybe BTC at $500, DOGE market cap at $2B, 90% of the alts gone forever. As the saying goes, those who dont remember history are doomed to repeat it. And there are a lot of similiarities. People investing money in all kinds of coins without even knowing what they are even supposed to be for, unwaivering faith in future possibilities and completely ignoring economical fundamental data.

yep, but only if you see internet as a bunch of company's ...but if you see internet as a way to connect thousand of networks, billions hosts across the globe ..in my point of view is another thing ... but the bubble analogy can be applied to many things even our universe since the big bang is a bubble .. and by the way can start contract instead expand tomorrow ... who knows ?
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
would be not surprise to me they also could argue that internet is a bubble as well ... 
But, the internet was the prime example of bubble back in 2000, known as the .com-bubble. Even know, 10 years later Microsoft, is worth barely more than half of what it was worth back then. Sure, some stocks are worth quite a lot more than after the bubble bursting, but a lot of companies went bust.
So, who knows, in ten years time ... maybe BTC at $500, DOGE market cap at $2B, 90% of the alts gone forever. As the saying goes, those who dont remember history are doomed to repeat it. And there are a lot of similiarities. People investing money in all kinds of coins without even knowing what they are even supposed to be for, unwaivering faith in future possibilities and completely ignoring economical fundamental data.

+1

The Internet clearly wasn't a bubble.

Internet Companies circa 2000 clearly were.

So you need to decide, does Bitcoin have the radical disruption factor and potential permanence of the Internet, or the flash-in-the-pan "nothing really new here" of a Pets.com.

I'd say it's closer to the former than the latter.

hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Moderator
would be not surprise to me they also could argue that internet is a bubble as well ... 
But, the internet was the prime example of bubble back in 2000, known as the .com-bubble. Even know, 10 years later Microsoft, is worth barely more than half of what it was worth back then. Sure, some stocks are worth quite a lot more than after the bubble bursting, but a lot of companies went bust.
So, who knows, in ten years time ... maybe BTC at $500, DOGE market cap at $2B, 90% of the alts gone forever. As the saying goes, those who dont remember history are doomed to repeat it. And there are a lot of similiarities. People investing money in all kinds of coins without even knowing what they are even supposed to be for, unwaivering faith in future possibilities and completely ignoring economical fundamental data.

+1
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
would be not surprise to me they also could argue that internet is a bubble as well ... 
But, the internet was the prime example of bubble back in 2000, known as the .com-bubble. Even know, 10 years later Microsoft, is worth barely more than half of what it was worth back then. Sure, some stocks are worth quite a lot more than after the bubble bursting, but a lot of companies went bust.
So, who knows, in ten years time ... maybe BTC at $500, DOGE market cap at $2B, 90% of the alts gone forever. As the saying goes, those who dont remember history are doomed to repeat it. And there are a lot of similiarities. People investing money in all kinds of coins without even knowing what they are even supposed to be for, unwaivering faith in future possibilities and completely ignoring economical fundamental data.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Stand on the shoulders of giants
pure economics analysis guys have tendency to analyse bitcoin as financial instrument only therefore anything can be a bubble, they cant see bitcoin as a protocol but just in case they could see it... would be not surprise to me they also could argue that internet is a bubble as well ... 
Pages:
Jump to: