Pages:
Author

Topic: NODE Revolution "Your money - your way" -Temp. discussion thread- - page 2. (Read 11166 times)

hero member
Activity: 1068
Merit: 523
If you make a list of crypto projects with unique code (not clones with a few modifications) you'll end up with about 20-25 coins.

NODE is on that list, that's why it's worth trying to save it.

Pay-off if successful would be substantial!





This is the reason to try.

My suggestion would be do a 4:3 coin swap (exchange 4 old NODE for 3 new NODE), then use the remaining 25% to pay dev and marketing costs. It's an opportunity for a hungry ambitious dev with enough skills to revive the chain. Nobody expects people to work for free. Could even add an ICO element like lisk::crypti to generate funds, but imo that isn't the best option, Lisk devs set a very bad example now of what happens when clone devs make millions before they've done anything (I.e. they get lazy and go on endless trips/holidays).

I guess any dev who attempted a NODE reboot can set their own parameters though  chances of success would be high, risk to the takeover dev is very small, just try and revive the chain. Realsilk isn't around to complain!

Even if swap is 1:1 you might not get much more than 50-60% coins back. Many people deleted keys or not paying attention. Silk may still have 20% or more...
Problem is where to get a developer who can and want to revive NODE. If Silk can't or doesn't want to give the code to anybody.

afaik Silk's identity was known, might be wrong about that though, but if he is public someone could contact him. He can't really refuse a genuine attempt by investors to salvage this project they helped fund. As for finding a competent dev, the first task might be finding and incentivising a project leader to start things off. Pool of possible devs is a lot smaller than pool of potential project leaders. Key is making it worth their while. For that there's obviously the Lisk example of what can happen to people who dream BIG, afaik Max from lisk isn't a dev himself, more of a project leader organising people and tasks - he's a fiat millionaire today! That's what NODE needs now, a project leader willing to revive a failing project with top 10 potential, which node definitely has/had.
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
Awesome project-- glad to see it still alive.
full member
Activity: 240
Merit: 101
If you make a list of crypto projects with unique code (not clones with a few modifications) you'll end up with about 20-25 coins.

NODE is on that list, that's why it's worth trying to save it.

Pay-off if successful would be substantial!





This is the reason to try.

My suggestion would be do a 4:3 coin swap (exchange 4 old NODE for 3 new NODE), then use the remaining 25% to pay dev and marketing costs. It's an opportunity for a hungry ambitious dev with enough skills to revive the chain. Nobody expects people to work for free. Could even add an ICO element like lisk::crypti to generate funds, but imo that isn't the best option, Lisk devs set a very bad example now of what happens when clone devs make millions before they've done anything (I.e. they get lazy and go on endless trips/holidays).

I guess any dev who attempted a NODE reboot can set their own parameters though  chances of success would be high, risk to the takeover dev is very small, just try and revive the chain. Realsilk isn't around to complain!

Even if swap is 1:1 you might not get much more than 50-60% coins back. Many people deleted keys or not paying attention. Silk may still have 20% or more...
Problem is where to get a developer who can and want to revive NODE. If Silk can't or doesn't want to give the code to anybody.
hero member
Activity: 1068
Merit: 523
If you make a list of crypto projects with unique code (not clones with a few modifications) you'll end up with about 20-25 coins.

NODE is on that list, that's why it's worth trying to save it.

Pay-off if successful would be substantial!





This is the reason to try.

My suggestion would be do a 4:3 coin swap (exchange 4 old NODE for 3 new NODE), then use the remaining 25% to pay dev and marketing costs. It's an opportunity for a hungry ambitious dev with enough skills to revive the chain. Nobody expects people to work for free. Could even add an ICO element like lisk::crypti to generate funds, but imo that isn't the best option, Lisk devs set a very bad example now of what happens when clone devs make millions before they've done anything (I.e. they get lazy and go on endless trips/holidays).

I guess any dev who attempted a NODE reboot can set their own parameters though  chances of success would be high, risk to the takeover dev is very small, just try and revive the chain. Realsilk isn't around to complain!
pt
full member
Activity: 167
Merit: 100
If you make a list of crypto projects with unique code (not clones with a few modifications) you'll end up with about 20-25 coins.

NODE is on that list, that's why it's worth trying to save it.

Pay-off if successful would be substantial!





This is the reason to try.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
Why not just try to talk to bter? What we lose?  Smiley

Ask Alcurex guy (halibit), he once said he had analyzed the code and confirmed it to be good. Take it with a grain of salt because halibit also hired Indian website designers to create the code for Alcurex, I don't know how he analyzed NODE's code and yet didn't know how to make his own exchange if he knows how to code.

I messaged him about it, no reply.  Huh Huh
full member
Activity: 243
Merit: 100
Why not just try to talk to bter? What we lose?  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 1068
Merit: 523
If you make a list of crypto projects with unique code (not clones with a few modifications) you'll end up with about 20-25 coins.

NODE is on that list, that's why it's worth trying to save it.

Pay-off if successful would be substantial!



sr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 268
Why not just accept the obvious fact: This coin is dead and these pitiful rescue attempts without dev or code are senseless.

I disagree, pitiful rescue attempts can be the foundations on which something new can be built. People like a challenge, if someone could revive the blockchain it would attract support, and maybe a new dev, or maybe even the original dev gets a second wind. No harm in trying.

Excuse me sir. I am sure you are an expert.  Cheesy
You are now 10 days registered here and you believe you know how things here are working. Show me only one  successful attempt to revive a coin.

Trying something difficult is not senseless, I know this before I ever heard of crypto currencies. If there are people willing to try and revive this blockchain, who are you to tell them it is senseless ... you don't like a challenge, but some others might.
hero member
Activity: 799
Merit: 1000
Why not just accept the obvious fact: This coin is dead and these pitiful rescue attempts without dev or code are senseless.

I disagree, pitiful rescue attempts can be the foundations on which something new can be built. People like a challenge, if someone could revive the blockchain it would attract support, and maybe a new dev, or maybe even the original dev gets a second wind. No harm in trying.

Excuse me sir. I am sure you are an expert.  Cheesy
You are now 10 days registered here and you believe you know how things here are working. Show me only one  successful attempt to revive a coin.
sr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 268
Why not just accept the obvious fact: This coin is dead and these pitiful rescue attempts without dev or code are senseless.

I disagree, pitiful rescue attempts can be the foundations on which something new can be built. People like a challenge, if someone could revive the blockchain it would attract support, and maybe a new dev, or maybe even the original dev gets a second wind. No harm in trying.
sr. member
Activity: 437
Merit: 250
Why not just accept the obvious fact: This coin is dead and these pitiful rescue attempts without dev or code are senseless.

Only way i see is to try running some old Node wallets and send it to a address for verificiation, from where someone can make a new token without any Nodecode.
hero member
Activity: 799
Merit: 1000
Why not just accept the obvious fact: This coin is dead and these pitiful rescue attempts without dev or code are senseless.
sr. member
Activity: 437
Merit: 250
Forget BTER. The Alcurex guy is very helpful. I'm not sure whether they've retained any Node infrastructure though.

Why is anyone bothering with this? I seem to remember a lot of scepticism from other projects regarding the near instant transactions. It might all have been utter bilge as they never released any code.

Yes this is a problem, it was always a black-box, but if you want to try i would also suggest to ask Alcurex.
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 3056
Welt Am Draht
Forget BTER. The Alcurex guy is very helpful. I'm not sure whether they've retained any Node infrastructure though.

Why is anyone bothering with this? I seem to remember a lot of scepticism from other projects regarding the near instant transactions. It might all have been utter bilge as they never released any code.
full member
Activity: 243
Merit: 100
Well, there's the last chance. Can someone send letters to bter and alcurex asking them to run a node for a while? Also you can suggest them to overtake NODE or ask to share with us what they have, mabe some of them have more up-to-date chain.
Not necessarily one person should write a letter. Each of you can do it, the more the better.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
RealSilkk and koop4u have been offline for sometime now.
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1041
Bitcoin is a bit**

Yes, 48 hours without syncing. It's definitely over.  Roll Eyes


Was worth every cent.  Grin   One of the best stories here, with ups and downs, excitements, tears, Silks infamous posts, fun , a big WTF and incomprehension at the end. Node is like the "x files" of bitcointalk.

THANK YOU SILK, "who was the other guy again?" and last but not least :  the "imaginary team"!

Good fight, good night!
legendary
Activity: 2703
Merit: 1179
Reflinks und User die solche posten sind Scheisse
Does others have that 0.9.6 to try out if the network still works ? I've kept my wallet running for 24+ hours and not in sync yet. Either there's no one else online, or it's not working anymore...
Can somebody confirm if you have tried to connect (with 0.9.6, older versions should not work). I keep my wallet running for couple of days more.

Yes, 48 hours without syncing. It's definitely over.  Roll Eyes
full member
Activity: 243
Merit: 100
I confirm, tried for two days and nights, the same result. I use the one LemonAndFriesOne uploaded, don't know if it's 0.9.6 but I think it is.
So, this is the end?
Pages:
Jump to: