Topic: Non funded projects vs funded projects - page 3. (Read 492 times)
it's just about serious or not developing their project. no matter where the development funds come from, the most important thing is that they must be serious about project development. average old projects are seriously under development and even though their platform is operational they are still trying to update it to make it better. in contrast to the current projects, they are all money-oriented. when the developer has the funds, they seem to forget the original purpose. and in the end everything that was planned could not be realized.
There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.
Current conditions are not as easy as before. It seems that in the past there were very few new projects so they didn't do an ICO and they could survive as long as their team committed to project development. However, for now, many new projects have emerged and the number of competitors has made the crowdfunding process flourish as well. And now is having funds first before funding as it is important too. Because with a team that has sufficient funding, they can choose the top exchange for listing their tokens, right? 
Is it just me or there are many others thinking same thing? Non ICO/IEO projects always have longer life span, where as new projects are all running after funds for better future of their projects, how about those projects that have no ICO, no premine? Some are even funded by the teams without the public penny
There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.
The early non funded projects were experimental and serious with the development and experimentation. But the new projects are aiming the same thing and that is to earn out of the presale. They sell promises from the air which is being bought by many investors. There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.
In the long run, serious projects will win. Those projects that have dedicated developers to prolong the life of the project through usecase and adoption.
^ When a project is built without funding like an ICO or IEO they have no burden on anything, they only focus on being able to develop their project to success without thinking about "profit". Most projects fail because they are not able to profit and return the capital they have used for marketing, bounties, development, listings, etc., so they have to end their project.
If a project don't hold a public fundrising like ICO or IEO, this doesn't mean that it's a non funded project. There should be some private investors or the team itself financially support the project by their own money.
Any project needs a minimum budget to start, even those who run an ICO, they need a budget to do so.
This has nothing to prove about if the project is a success or not.
Is it just me or there are many others thinking same thing? Non ICO/IEO projects always have longer life span, where as new projects are all running after funds for better future of their projects, how about those projects that have no ICO, no premine? Some are even funded by the teams without the public penny
There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.
There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.
yes, but not all non funded project have a better future buddy
sometimes non funded project will use their own fund to start the project my friend
and in my opinion thats a big sign if the project team is very serious to develop their project
It depends, sometimes the team are known to both crypto and the tech world, famous bankers, influencer, businessman, actors and actresses are also part of them. They also have the money and in the end they d not need to do ICO and the sorts just to fund their project. So investors will definitely be engaging because they will feel secure knowing those famous people are somewhat related. They give positive vibes, I remember some of the alts way back and surprisingly they have managed to make it until now.
I love the non-funded project because :
- The supply more friendly
- The price can more reasonable calculated from the mining hash
- Entering with an early adopter
But, as always before entering a non-funded project you should know the project was riskier than other projects with having a fund and need long patience. I got a few project with non-funded like ICO/IEO and a few of them give me a good profit around x10-x20 with around 6 month for the faster and more than 1 years for a long wait.
- The supply more friendly
- The price can more reasonable calculated from the mining hash
- Entering with an early adopter
But, as always before entering a non-funded project you should know the project was riskier than other projects with having a fund and need long patience. I got a few project with non-funded like ICO/IEO and a few of them give me a good profit around x10-x20 with around 6 month for the faster and more than 1 years for a long wait.
Is it just me or there are many others thinking same thing? Non ICO/IEO projects always have longer life span, where as new projects are all running after funds for better future of their projects, how about those projects that have no ICO, no premine? Some are even funded by the teams without the public penny
There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.
There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.
I think it works both ways; there are several non funded projects with long life span; and also there are funded projects in the crypo currency who also have a long time spam. The most important feature to look out for is that the developer and team are genuine and true; the product is real and achievable. Any project with such feature either funded or non funded will definitely be around for a long time.
^ When a project is built without funding like an ICO or IEO they have no burden on anything, they only focus on being able to develop their project to success without thinking about "profit". Most projects fail because they are not able to profit and return the capital they have used for marketing, bounties, development, listings, etc., so they have to end their project.
I think funded project are best to choose for investment between non funded & funded projects.because non funded projects need money to development, need money to list that on exchanges.even listing on good exchange like Binance is so costly, that they can't afford.even can scam but people can trust on funded project.they can check processes and feel free to investment there. Although funded projects could also cheat with people too
Is it just me or there are many others thinking same thing? Non ICO/IEO projects always have longer life span, where as new projects are all running after funds for better future of their projects, how about those projects that have no ICO, no premine? Some are even funded by the teams without the public penny
There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.
There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.
For have coins alive you dont need money, but for listing purposes you cant do much since money is important thing to have listing ticket. So for infamous coin, money is needed mostly for marketing purposes, imo
If the team are not greedy and passionate about their project, there is nothing bad in conducting an ico/ieo. Many of the funded project are not in haste to achieve anything, they do things at their own pace unlike the non funded. It all depends on the team members and how futurely commited and passionate about the project.
I have came across several non funded projects that has performed extraordinary, though if a project is lucky to be listed like binance, Okex, Gate exchange and some popular reputable exchanges seems to perform better too.
I have also experience some ico projects like DIA raised $18m during their bonding curve sell, their token increased in price from $0.8 to $5 but was dumped due to kucoin hacked. It's still hasn't go below ICO price which is a good thing.
Do proper and personal research, there are good coins that worth investing on either for long and short term.
I have also experience some ico projects like DIA raised $18m during their bonding curve sell, their token increased in price from $0.8 to $5 but was dumped due to kucoin hacked. It's still hasn't go below ICO price which is a good thing.
Do proper and personal research, there are good coins that worth investing on either for long and short term.
Is it just me or there are many others thinking same thing? Non ICO/IEO projects always have longer life span, where as new projects are all running after funds for better future of their projects, how about those projects that have no ICO, no premine? Some are even funded by the teams without the public penny
There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.
Agree. When a project doesn't hold an ICO or IEO it means they have to build something with utility to generate funds for the devs to be successful. That's why I only invest in POW projects like 0xMonero and Raven. There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.
Is it just me or there are many others thinking same thing? Non ICO/IEO projects always have longer life span, where as new projects are all running after funds for better future of their projects, how about those projects that have no ICO, no premine? Some are even funded by the teams without the public penny
There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.
There are many old altcoins alive today that are not funded, litecoin, XMR etc, they did no ICO and they rocks.
Jump to: