Topic: Not all bounty hunters do research on projects - page 8. (Read 6081 times)
This is something I agree, most of the bounty hunters only see the allocation of the fund and enter all the project that they could, they just hope they get lucky, it's really seldom to see bounty hunters understand what they are promoting, but to be honest, even if they do their research its still hard to predict the result, as we know most of the project end up with failure
Because new bounty hunters only aim on what rewards they can get after the bounty ends. They are not giving enough time to research about the project and only thinks about the rewards.
I think the problems most bounty hunters are facing is entirely their faults ,bounty hunters are responsible for their end results because many never learn to read or do thorough research and later they will start complaining about time wasted of bounties.
You hit the nail in the coffin dude, I don't want to generalise, but majority of the members here who joined bounty are suckered by the projects, luring them with the promise of a good bounty pay. But then they are totally disappointed when the projects pulls an exit scam, when all the the signs that this project is not to be trusted, still they join and now later they will complain and bitch around. But if you look closely, if just for 5 minutes they do some research around the community, then they could have save a lot of effort and time.
Some of the most ambitious hunters are easily tempted by large prizes from proye projects,without careful consideration by checking the whitepaper and team on the project,not many of them suffered losses because the project was scam because it was fooled by a big prize,It is clear to us hunters to be more careful in choosing projects to follow
even now I don't see any projects that pay dearly for their bounty participants. it seems like now the bounty hunter is also having trouble finding a really good project, everything is speculation in my opinion. 
Many bounty hunters are still promoting worse projects that have worse Whitepaper and teams with no past experience of how cryptocurrency works ,what makes a team pro?its their past history of achievements with other projects or companies but I'm still surprised that people are promoting very very worse projects on here ,the last one I checked hours ago has no team but its been run by one person or two ,no office address and the Whitepaper is not making sense at all and its like a copycat project but guess what? The bounty spreadsheet is already full of hunters.
I think the problems most bounty hunters are facing is entirely their faults ,bounty hunters are responsible for their end results because many never learn to read or do thorough research and later they will start complaining about time wasted of bounties.
Maybe because these bounty hunters are also run by almost same person and sometimes managers also accused of having own alt accounts in their own bounty campaign.I think the problems most bounty hunters are facing is entirely their faults ,bounty hunters are responsible for their end results because many never learn to read or do thorough research and later they will start complaining about time wasted of bounties.
So basically they are part of those scam and shit projects,no on in his bright mind will participate in such unless they are stupid and non educated person who’s just joining anything that comes their way
Many bounty hunters are still promoting worse projects that have worse Whitepaper and teams with no past experience of how cryptocurrency works ,what makes a team pro?its their past history of achievements with other projects or companies but I'm still surprised that people are promoting very very worse projects on here ,the last one I checked hours ago has no team but its been run by one person or two ,no office address and the Whitepaper is not making sense at all and its like a copycat project but guess what? The bounty spreadsheet is already full of hunters.
I think the problems most bounty hunters are facing is entirely their faults ,bounty hunters are responsible for their end results because many never learn to read or do thorough research and later they will start complaining about time wasted of bounties.
I think the problems most bounty hunters are facing is entirely their faults ,bounty hunters are responsible for their end results because many never learn to read or do thorough research and later they will start complaining about time wasted of bounties.
Some of the most ambitious hunters are easily tempted by large prizes from proye projects,without careful consideration by checking the whitepaper and team on the project,not many of them suffered losses because the project was scam because it was fooled by a big prize,It is clear to us hunters to be more careful in choosing projects to follow
the name you mentioned is the manager who still exists until now, they still manage the bounty campaign very well even now I'm a participant in one of the names you mentioned earlier.
most of us choose campaigns from managers who promote the project. I also did that, but I will not immediately join because I have to see the project with real products.even some of the managers mentioned are those who hold projects with BTC payments.
Actually I do bounties but I check the team and website first before joining. But it happened on I was banned for joining a scam campaign which I didn't now because at first look the project really looks legit. I advice you do real research before joining bounties.
I also do that because I think that's a very important point to know. but now such a simple research method seems ineffective to do because fraudulent projects also update their ways to look genuine.
Many bounty hunters are still promoting worse projects that have worse Whitepaper and teams with no past experience of how cryptocurrency works ,what makes a team pro?its their past history of achievements with other projects or companies but I'm still surprised that people are promoting very very worse projects on here ,the last one I checked hours ago has no team but its been run by one person or two ,no office address and the Whitepaper is not making sense at all and its like a copycat project but guess what? The bounty spreadsheet is already full of hunters.
I think the problems most bounty hunters are facing is entirely their faults ,bounty hunters are responsible for their end results because many never learn to read or do thorough research and later they will start complaining about time wasted of bounties.
I think the problems most bounty hunters are facing is entirely their faults ,bounty hunters are responsible for their end results because many never learn to read or do thorough research and later they will start complaining about time wasted of bounties.
Bounty hunters should do due diligence, they can start in the scam sections there are tools that people can use to check if the project is indeed legit, but sometimes there are projects that look really good, all the criteria to make it a good project are all there but unfortunately this did not stop them from scamming investors and bounty hunters.
Actually I do bounties but I check the team and website first before joining. But it happened on I was banned for joining a scam campaign which I didn't now because at first look the project really looks legit. I advice you do real research before joining bounties.
I also do that because I think that's a very important point to know. but now such a simple research method seems ineffective to do because fraudulent projects also update their ways to look genuine.The managers you mentioned do really study the bounty first before accepting it. Or in the case that it is being called a scam, they will simply stop the bounty. Sadly, though there are are lots of bounty managers who didn't do that and at the same time, bounty hunters will easily bite on those bounties specially if the supposedly ICO price is good in papers.
Yes . there are some established managers that bites on a scam bounties even though they already knew that it was a scam because the offer is way too promising that they would risk their career for the pot money . this is why the last decision will still go to ours and not a manager .
we must still do our own research as much as we can just to ensure that we wont get scammed but bounties isnt about scams because there were also bounties that are legit but the problem is that they cannot get thier desired qouta of investors so they will end up postponed .
Actually I do bounties but I check the team and website first before joining. But it happened on I was banned for joining a scam campaign which I didn't now because at first look the project really looks legit. I advice you do real research before joining bounties.
I also do that because I think that's a very important point to know. but now such a simple research method seems ineffective to do because fraudulent projects also update their ways to look genuine.The managers you mentioned do really study the bounty first before accepting it. Or in the case that it is being called a scam, they will simply stop the bounty. Sadly, though there are are lots of bounty managers who didn't do that and at the same time, bounty hunters will easily bite on those bounties specially if the supposedly ICO price is good in papers.
Actually I do bounties but I check the team and website first before joining. But it happened on I was banned for joining a scam campaign which I didn't now because at first look the project really looks legit. I advice you do real research before joining bounties.
I also do that because I think that's a very important point to know. but now such a simple research method seems ineffective to do because fraudulent projects also update their ways to look genuine.I agree with this, I believe most of the bounty hunters did not do research, they join whenever the reward is attractive and the reputation of the team is just their last priority. Mostly the campaign manager is the ones who do the research, so if the county manager is not reputable, bounty hunters also are hesitant to join.
Yes, people won't bother about the research that's why many people will join under best bounty managers. They will bother much about the once they campaign to get into a scam. So always try to do your best before working for any campaign, research is always a good part even for investing in trading.
Actually I do bounties but I check the team and website first before joining. But it happened on I was banned for joining a scam campaign which I didn't now because at first look the project really looks legit. I advice you do real research before joining bounties.
I also do that because I think that's a very important point to know. but now such a simple research method seems ineffective to do because fraudulent projects also update their ways to look genuine.
Experienced bounty hunters will choose good prizes, I see there are projects that look bad and have the same ideas but are successful, it is very difficult to see new projects that have great teams, but I always do research before joining to see good gifts. because many prizes run more than 3 months but eventually fail
I agree with this, I believe most of the bounty hunters did not do a research, they join whenever the reward is attractive and reputation of the team is just their last priority. Mostly the campaign manager are the ones who do the research, so if the bounty manager is not reputable, bounty hunters also are hesitant to join.
Many still find it hard to read ,they believe that reading is a waste of time ,even on telegram groups many members will we asking same questions over and over again while the answer is already on the pinned message ,the problem is people find it hard to read
Yes that is true have many bounty hunter their take promoting scam project and this is what they know about the condition. After scrubbing scam too much that project needs to be stopped but it depends only on the basis of bounty hunter. Therefore, you need to good research about project before anyone bounty.
Many bounty hunters are lazy and just want to participate as many bounty campaigns they like without even reading anything about the project, then in the end they will just realized that they wasted so much effort and time because the project is fake since the beginning.
The point here is that a lot of bounty hunters are damn lazy. They do not really take a careful look at the project's credentials before jumping into its promotion. Whitepapers are very important for any project. If one does not at least browse over it, one is like gambling. The risk is very high. It is 50:50, getting paid or not, scammed or not. At the end of the day, efforts are wasted. And worse, your effort might have successfully attracted an investor or two into a scam project, running away with their money.
Jump to: