Now my question is this, do you think because bitcoin is still widely in use in countries where it has alot of restrictions makes it not banned or people who use it are breaking some sort of law?
I think a lot of bitcoin transactions are done clandestinely in countries that have made bitcoin illegal. Basically no one does bitcoin transactions publicly but people use bit cards for a privacy purpose where most of the countries governments get many benefits by using this bitcoin. I think the government of the country that has made bitcoin illegal also accepts bitcoin through transactions in different countries that use bitcoin. Although Bitcoin is legal in many countries but Bitcoin transactions in banks are not completed but banned, I could not say anything accurate about this. However, even in countries where Bitcoin is not legal, a large amount of Bitcoin is being used and various tasks are being done with Bitcoin. Bitcoins are being traded in secret despite breaking government laws, of course in countries where the government has made Bitcoin illegal, stealing and using Bitcoins is definitely against the law.
The topic appears complex, like the freedom vs. regulation discussion. One view is that adults are wise and restrained enough to make decisions. Another view is that society needs a structure to prevent harm.
Advertising's omnipresence must be considered. It affects us consciously and subconsciously. We believe adults should have the freedom to acquire information and make decisions, but persuasive ads have power over individuals.
Internet is a huge, unregulated area, as said. Stakeholders must ensure a safe environment despite poor content.
Personal freedom is highlighted by the China issues. Although its important not to violate an individual's autonomy, one must consider if theres a middle ground where freedom doesnt mean perfect liberty but doesnt mean extreme censorship either. The balance is delicate, and perhaps, thats the real challenge.