Topic: Not Fair Allocation ! (Read 548 times)
It is true that sometimes injustice is not only caused by the manager but the ICO team changes it. I have experienced this several times from several bounty projects that have been followed, can only surrender without being able to resist even though our time is up to follow his bounty
Yes, things like this can happen in a project, an uneven allocation may be one of the reasons that the team does not meet the target, but hopefully if this happens the team will be able to handle it so that everything will run normally
Sometime we found bm not fair about token allocation. All bounty hunter must have felt this and if our protests are certainly not a lot of things we can do. As a bounty hunter we should also be careful. Do you have this experience also ? and what are you doing after that ?
-Edited-
The problem may be not only in the bounty manager but also in ICO team reduces the allocation of tokens. I will explain more clearly so there is no misunderstanding. What I mean not fair here is about the token allocation changes as at the end of the bounty and not in accordance with the time of the first thread posted. Even if it is because wrong bounty manager in writing or indeed the ICO team cheat would be better if the bounty manager speak up and explain the details of the problem instead of letting all the questions without any answers and make bounty think negatively. The main thing is more speak up and explain.
I think there is a reason behind the change of allocation on the bounty reward, that is perhaps the selling doesn't reach the hardcap, that way there are coins that are not sold, and the team has to make a re-calculation for the allocation of their coins. -Edited-
The problem may be not only in the bounty manager but also in ICO team reduces the allocation of tokens. I will explain more clearly so there is no misunderstanding. What I mean not fair here is about the token allocation changes as at the end of the bounty and not in accordance with the time of the first thread posted. Even if it is because wrong bounty manager in writing or indeed the ICO team cheat would be better if the bounty manager speak up and explain the details of the problem instead of letting all the questions without any answers and make bounty think negatively. The main thing is more speak up and explain.
You have a point and im sick of it already ,the only way to get this fix is whenever you are ready to join a bounty always go for the ones that doesn't have rules that anything about the bounty campaign might be change by either ICO dev or bounty manager
there is nothing we can do as a bounty manager, some bounty managers do cheat but some are indeed carried out by the ICO team, this in my opinion is a risk that must be experienced by bounty hunters when there is a change in allocation
an unfair allocation is indeed often becoming a problem on the bounty. The manager should at least give you an idea clearly to indicate the allocation they provide so that is not the case a misunderstanding. but only a small part of the bounty and a bold manager want to give information when discrepancies occur.
The problem is when they are all not even reading the rules and agreement properly before try to join in any bounty. If they are realizing the agreement that has been putting by the team and they should put their main concern on this word " the team can change the total allocation anytime" To create any protests will be worthless. 
an unfair allocation is indeed often becoming a problem on the bounty. The manager should at least give you an idea clearly to indicate the allocation they provide so that is not the case a misunderstanding. but only a small part of the bounty and a bold manager want to give information when discrepancies occur.
I'd even say the bounty Manager had nothing to do with it. He only does his job. Another thing is when he conspires with the project team. Then the Manager is also responsible. But I agree with you that whatever the situation, he has to explain everything. If managers made contact and tried their best to help, there would be no negative to them.
There's a lot of reason to this one of the main reason is the number of participants, but if you mean deducting allocation after the campaign i haven't seen that, because you can easily see that in their spreadsheet the computation of the allocation, this is the reason I prefer bounty with spreadsheet for transparency.
if you mean reducing the allocation of bounty during distribution, then in my opinion it is indeed unfair, because from the beginning the team has promised the allocation they announced in a thread bounty then they should not reduce it because the allocation for bounty is only a few percent and there is actually no reason right to reduce bounty allocation.
but unfortunately whatever we say they will always answer that this must be done and finally we can only surrender
but unfortunately whatever we say they will always answer that this must be done and finally we can only surrender
bounty program before was way way more different nowadays. I remember that applying for bounties are like job interview. Your profile is being reviewed and being accepted to a bounty program is a privilege to be a port of a project. In my experience, bounty allocations are just copy and paste Technic, traditionally they are only following what was done before. The main difference is, most of the projects now are turning into a scam project.
Well, that's the reality that is in the bounty right now. Many projects are more directed at fraud, so that it harms many people here. After working as a bounty participant and hoping to get a token, unfortunately it turns out to be a wasted token. 
I did not face an unfair reward, only if I broke the rules or did not fulfill the task, as the manager demanded, I also do not like that the rules can change in the company, but what can I do about it. ..
I have ever experienced this kind of not fair allocation. When the bounty or ICO start, they give the big allocation or about 2% from the total token, but, when the ICO has ended, they changed the rules, only 2% from the token sold. This is absolutely not fair. And we, can only protest but it cannot help much because they have the right to change the rule. So sad.
I don't think that as a bounty hunter, I can do more, the most important thing for me personally is to keep paying according to our work. I think the bounty manager is not cheating but it is wrong to write down the allocation, even as a bounty hunter we have to actively ask also in the official grub that is brought by the bounty manager, so we can remind if the bounty manager miswrites the allocatio
Another fact sometimes bounty manager not too open about it. Would be fair if they explain these things openly so there would be not much to ask and think negatively. New project - Bounty Manager - Bounty hunters as part of a mutually bonded and open with each other will certainly be better.
I don't think that as a bounty hunter, I can do more, the most important thing for me personally is to keep paying according to our work. I think the bounty manager is not cheating but it is wrong to write down the allocation, even as a bounty hunter we have to actively ask also in the official grub that is brought by the bounty manager, so we can remind if the bounty manager miswrites the allocation
Sometime we found bm not fair about token allocation. All bounty hunter must have felt this and if our protests are certainly not a lot of things we can do. As a bounty hunter we should also be careful. Do you have this experience also ? and what are you doing after that ?
i have experienced that not just once. it's not just about token allocation but also distribution reward.
the most hurt one was a project that succesfully reached softcap but the ICO project stated if bounty hunter not that helpfull so they decide to cut the reward from 10% to less than 1 %. BM can't do anything about it since their job was calculate stake and the one responsible for paying was the project itself. so we can't blame BM cause they do their job properly.
from here i learn that we should carefully choose not just good BM but also a good project to promote.
If you think it's not fair so you just need to find another bounty campaign which you think is better to join. That's all, you can't do anything to change token allocation for each part in bounty campaign, it decided by bounty manager and they'll not change it just because of a single bounty hunter like you.
Do you bounty manager ? it looks like you don't know what I mean. Please read first well and give your comments. If we knew from the beginning they will change the allocation of we will leave the bounty but when they change it when the bounty is over it's like our hard work useless because the allocation is not in according with what they write from the beginning. Sometime we found bm not fair about token allocation. All bounty hunter must have felt this and if our protests are certainly not a lot of things we can do. As a bounty hunter we should also be careful. Do you have this experience also ? and what are you doing after that ?
Token allocation is always written at the beginning including the rules so if you felt not enough and not worth for your effort so you just simply not to join unless they changing after bounty , though they have all the rights but its unfair , then that is the time to protest .
Sometimes bounty managers can just make a mistake in the calculations. I think that all we can do is to choose the most reliable and proven managers of bounty companies.
If you think it's not fair so you just need to find another bounty campaign which you think is better to join. That's all, you can't do anything to change token allocation for each part in bounty campaign, it decided by bounty manager and they'll not change it just because of a single bounty hunter like you.
Jump to: