Pages:
Author

Topic: Nothing at stake in proof of stake - page 3. (Read 2982 times)

legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
December 09, 2016, 03:43:01 PM
#2
Hi Bitcoiners

This is my first post on the forum, please be kind  Smiley

I recently read up about impossibility of proof of stake and nothing at stake problem. I still do not follow what is so fundamental about it. Why can't we have a 'rule' that a node can generate only one block at given height and a running 'black-list' of public keys to enforce that rule. We can have black-listing someone as a mining operation with rewards several times block reward so that black-listing would be an equilibrium strategy.

One node can have as many public keys as it wants. Public keys are not assigned to nodes.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
December 09, 2016, 10:57:00 AM
#1
Hi Bitcoiners

This is my first post on the forum, please be kind  Smiley

I recently read up about impossibility of proof of stake and nothing at stake problem. I still do not follow what is so fundamental about it. Why can't we have a 'rule' that a node can generate only one block at given height and a running 'black-list' of public keys to enforce that rule. We can have black-listing someone as a mining operation with rewards several times block reward so that black-listing would be an equilibrium strategy.
Pages:
Jump to: