Topic: Nuclear weapons (Read 1553 times)

Quote from: camelson on May 06, 2017, 11:05:52 PM

Hello guys

i want to know your opinion about the tacticals nuke in all the differents countrys with this kind of weapon... do you believe is fair to have this kind of massic destruction capability that can destroy the entire world? if there are no nukes in the world then it will be create another worse kind of weapon? what do you think?

Not fair at all. Nuclear is too dangerous, even to win the war. We already know what happened to Hiroshima and Nagasaki decades ago. The entire city was destroyed with no residue, the impact on the environment is very dangerous, environment polluted in a long time. If one country has nuclear weapons, maybe it could make them win the war. But the worst thing is if the whole country has nuclear weapons, apocalypse.

True! But after the first nuclear attack, countries developed nuclear weapons for the sake of their own protection and deterrence. As far as winning a war is concerned no one can win it with nuke and at the end they just destroy the beautiful planet earth. Now countries are more interested in developing biological weapons which are even dangerous than nuke.

I do not know about biological weapons, maybe i even do not want to know. But even if nuclear weapons was made for their own protection, people are interesting race and sometime even if we say that we are rational, sometime we are not. People out of fear will do stupid things, and even if later they regret what they have done, it will be too late.

Sithara007

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1352

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

True! But after the first nuclear attack, countries developed nuclear weapons for the sake of their own protection and deterrence. As far as winning a war is concerned no one can win it with nuke and at the end they just destroy the beautiful planet earth. Now countries are more interested in developing biological weapons which are even dangerous than nuke.

Biological weapons are having limited range, and if the recipient country is sufficiently prepared, then the impact will be limited. For example, if someone attacks the US with Anthrax, then the authorities will be able to limit the impact by vaccinating everyone against it.

camelson

copper member

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1000

Quote from: kodes88 on May 06, 2017, 10:48:21 PM

Hello guys

i want to know your opinion about the tacticals nuke in all the differents countrys with this kind of weapon... do you believe is fair to have this kind of massic destruction capability that can destroy the entire world? if there are no nukes in the world then it will be create another worse kind of weapon? what do you think?

Not fair at all. Nuclear is too dangerous, even to win the war. We already know what happened to Hiroshima and Nagasaki decades ago. The entire city was destroyed with no residue, the impact on the environment is very dangerous, environment polluted in a long time. If one country has nuclear weapons, maybe it could make them win the war. But the worst thing is if the whole country has nuclear weapons, apocalypse.

True! But after the first nuclear attack, countries developed nuclear weapons for the sake of their own protection and deterrence. As far as winning a war is concerned no one can win it with nuke and at the end they just destroy the beautiful planet earth. Now countries are more interested in developing biological weapons which are even dangerous than nuke.

kodes88

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: killgald on May 05, 2017, 01:58:42 PM

Hello guys

i want to know your opinion about the tacticals nuke in all the differents countrys with this kind of weapon... do you believe is fair to have this kind of massic destruction capability that can destroy the entire world? if there are no nukes in the world then it will be create another worse kind of weapon? what do you think?

Not fair at all. Nuclear is too dangerous, even to win the war. We already know what happened to Hiroshima and Nagasaki decades ago. The entire city was destroyed with no residue, the impact on the environment is very dangerous, environment polluted in a long time. If one country has nuclear weapons, maybe it could make them win the war. But the worst thing is if the whole country has nuclear weapons, apocalypse.

merchantofzeny

sr. member

Activity: 1036

Merit: 279

Quote from: merchantofzeny on May 05, 2017, 01:50:32 PM

Quote from: Sithara007 on May 05, 2017, 01:19:09 AM

Quote from: merchantofzeny on May 04, 2017, 12:27:34 PM

Nuclear weapon, or the threat of having one, is a reason that Iran and North Korea as still not being invaded.

I would agree with you on North Korea. The only reason why they are still not being invaded is due to the fact that they are having nuclear weapons. But I am not sure about Iran. They are saying that they abandoned their nuclear weapons program. But who knows for sure?

I think they are still capable of assembling a nuclear missile. This is why the past administration in Washington went into deals with them, to make sure they don't build a nuke.

i have to agreed with youmaybe they dont have a nuclear missile built but they have the resource and the machinery to built one... hope they dont use it and bring the ww3

Yup, but if they're pushed into a corner they might just actually hurry. History is made by the greedy, lazy and fearful.

Quote from: Lieldoryn on May 05, 2017, 02:03:21 PM

Quote from: merchantofzeny on May 05, 2017, 01:50:32 PM

Quote from: Sithara007 on May 05, 2017, 01:19:09 AM

Quote from: merchantofzeny on May 04, 2017, 12:27:34 PM

Nuclear weapon, or the threat of having one, is a reason that Iran and North Korea as still not being invaded.

I would agree with you on North Korea. The only reason why they are still not being invaded is due to the fact that they are having nuclear weapons. But I am not sure about Iran. They are saying that they abandoned their nuclear weapons program. But who knows for sure?

I think they are still capable of assembling a nuclear missile. This is why the past administration in Washington went into deals with them, to make sure they don't build a nuke.

You really think that it just took a missile? How many years already exists the Russian institutes in creation of missiles, and they have a big problem too. We constantly witness the failed launches at Baikonur.

They seem to haven't made one already but they are continuing their research. What previous administrations were doing is try to persuade them to not too. Too be fair to the last one in Washington, they managed to get Terhan to agree to allow observers to come in and check their facilities. I don't know if Trump will manage to have rapport with the Persians.

wolfracer

full member

Activity: 294

Merit: 102

well i dont know if iran had nuclear missiles, but they have the tecnology to assemble them? i dont think so they are just a group of religius crazy people come on... They are a third world country

Lieldoryn

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 272

Quote from: merchantofzeny on May 05, 2017, 01:50:32 PM

Quote from: Sithara007 on May 05, 2017, 01:19:09 AM

Quote from: merchantofzeny on May 04, 2017, 12:27:34 PM

Nuclear weapon, or the threat of having one, is a reason that Iran and North Korea as still not being invaded.

I would agree with you on North Korea. The only reason why they are still not being invaded is due to the fact that they are having nuclear weapons. But I am not sure about Iran. They are saying that they abandoned their nuclear weapons program. But who knows for sure?

I think they are still capable of assembling a nuclear missile. This is why the past administration in Washington went into deals with them, to make sure they don't build a nuke.

You really think that it just took a missile? How many years already exists the Russian institutes in creation of missiles, and they have a big problem too. We constantly witness the failed launches at Baikonur.

killgald

full member

Activity: 244

Merit: 100

Quote from: merchantofzeny on May 05, 2017, 01:50:32 PM

Quote from: Sithara007 on May 05, 2017, 01:19:09 AM

Quote from: merchantofzeny on May 04, 2017, 12:27:34 PM

Nuclear weapon, or the threat of having one, is a reason that Iran and North Korea as still not being invaded.

I would agree with you on North Korea. The only reason why they are still not being invaded is due to the fact that they are having nuclear weapons. But I am not sure about Iran. They are saying that they abandoned their nuclear weapons program. But who knows for sure?

I think they are still capable of assembling a nuclear missile. This is why the past administration in Washington went into deals with them, to make sure they don't build a nuke.

i have to agreed with youmaybe they dont have a nuclear missile built but they have the resource and the machinery to built one... hope they dont use it and bring the ww3

merchantofzeny

sr. member

Activity: 1036

Merit: 279

Quote from: Sithara007 on May 05, 2017, 01:19:09 AM

Quote from: merchantofzeny on May 04, 2017, 12:27:34 PM

Nuclear weapon, or the threat of having one, is a reason that Iran and North Korea as still not being invaded.

I would agree with you on North Korea. The only reason why they are still not being invaded is due to the fact that they are having nuclear weapons. But I am not sure about Iran. They are saying that they abandoned their nuclear weapons program. But who knows for sure?

I think they are still capable of assembling a nuclear missile. This is why the past administration in Washington went into deals with them, to make sure they don't build a nuke.

killgald

full member

Activity: 244

Merit: 100

Actually we are now in the surge of a second cold war and with north korea dictator able to launch a nuke in the world the situation is very delicated.

Master_dandosha

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

IF YOU Enjoy Trade with ME ..PUT Feedback Please

Quote from: SimmonenY on May 05, 2017, 08:58:22 AM

Quote from: Master_dandosha on May 05, 2017, 08:22:54 AM

Quote from: Sithara007 on May 05, 2017, 01:19:09 AM

Quote from: merchantofzeny on May 04, 2017, 12:27:34 PM

Nuclear weapon, or the threat of having one, is a reason that Iran and North Korea as still not being invaded.

I would agree with you on North Korea. The only reason why they are still not being invaded is due to the fact that they are having nuclear weapons. But I am not sure about Iran. They are saying that they abandoned their nuclear weapons program. But who knows for sure?

Who said that North Korea fear? It seems to me that the Americans just deciding how to destroy the Kim regime. The Americans can turn all of North Korea into ruins in one day. While Kim has no chance to respond adequately to the United States.

It doesn't matter who has nuclear weapon they might not even use it for their own sake. But I think right now it's more informational war rather than nuclear. NK can't make the first move because it will be their end. USA also can't start it because then the USA will be the agressor.

USA is looking for away to destroy NK without loosing abullet and i think NK has a little less nuclear weapon capabilities to reach far there in usa . If i was UN secretly general i will push all countries with nuclear weapon to destroyed forever for the sake of human being.

Who would agree to destroy the most powerful weapon in their armory and lose the supremacy?

unfortunately that is true no one agree to do that ...but if used again their own communities will force them to do .

Armstand

hero member

Activity: 626

Merit: 500

Quote from: Okurkabinladin on May 05, 2017, 10:03:08 AM

Quote from: SimmonenY on May 05, 2017, 08:58:22 AM

Hello guys

i want to know your opinion about the tacticals nuke in all the differents countrys with this kind of weapon... do you believe is fair to have this kind of massic destruction capability that can destroy the entire world? if there are no nukes in the world then it will be create another worse kind of weapon? what do you think?

Nuclear weapons serve detterent purpose. They are perhaps only thing that prevented vast eastern and western armies from engaging in World War 3 as fear of mutual destruction always brought both sides back to negation table.

If you somehow made them dissappear over night, then scientists all over the world would race to develop more potent chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction. Not, to destroy I hope, but to give their respective government another tool to deter any and all invaders.

I agree. Since the nuclear was discovered, World War was totally settled due to fear on mass destruction. This weapon is just for peace control and at the same time, to show supremacy over other country. Kim is just a hypocrite by thinking that his country can defeat USA because they have nuclear.

Forester618

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: Master_dandosha on May 05, 2017, 08:22:54 AM

Quote from: Sithara007 on May 05, 2017, 01:19:09 AM

Quote from: merchantofzeny on May 04, 2017, 12:27:34 PM

Nuclear weapon, or the threat of having one, is a reason that Iran and North Korea as still not being invaded.

I would agree with you on North Korea. The only reason why they are still not being invaded is due to the fact that they are having nuclear weapons. But I am not sure about Iran. They are saying that they abandoned their nuclear weapons program. But who knows for sure?

Who said that North Korea fear? It seems to me that the Americans just deciding how to destroy the Kim regime. The Americans can turn all of North Korea into ruins in one day. While Kim has no chance to respond adequately to the United States.

It doesn't matter who has nuclear weapon they might not even use it for their own sake. But I think right now it's more informational war rather than nuclear. NK can't make the first move because it will be their end. USA also can't start it because then the USA will be the agressor.

USA is looking for away to destroy NK without loosing abullet and i think NK has a little less nuclear weapon capabilities to reach far there in usa . If i was UN secretly general i will push all countries with nuclear weapon to destroyed forever for the sake of human being.

Who would agree to destroy the most powerful weapon in their armory and lose the supremacy?

What did Kim have a choice? In itself, the possession of nuclear weapons is not a panacea for war. So Kim was afraid he should be able to deliver its nuclear cargo to any point of the earth, and this opportunity Kim no.

Okurkabinladin

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 506

Quote from: Master_dandosha on May 05, 2017, 08:22:54 AM

Hello guys

i want to know your opinion about the tacticals nuke in all the differents countrys with this kind of weapon... do you believe is fair to have this kind of massic destruction capability that can destroy the entire world? if there are no nukes in the world then it will be create another worse kind of weapon? what do you think?

Nuclear weapons serve detterent purpose. They are perhaps only thing that prevented vast eastern and western armies from engaging in World War 3 as fear of mutual destruction always brought both sides back to negation table.

If you somehow made them dissappear over night, then scientists all over the world would race to develop more potent chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction. Not, to destroy I hope, but to give their respective government another tool to deter any and all invaders.

SimmonenY

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: Sithara007 on May 05, 2017, 01:19:09 AM

Quote from: merchantofzeny on May 04, 2017, 12:27:34 PM

Nuclear weapon, or the threat of having one, is a reason that Iran and North Korea as still not being invaded.

I would agree with you on North Korea. The only reason why they are still not being invaded is due to the fact that they are having nuclear weapons. But I am not sure about Iran. They are saying that they abandoned their nuclear weapons program. But who knows for sure?

Who said that North Korea fear? It seems to me that the Americans just deciding how to destroy the Kim regime. The Americans can turn all of North Korea into ruins in one day. While Kim has no chance to respond adequately to the United States.

It doesn't matter who has nuclear weapon they might not even use it for their own sake. But I think right now it's more informational war rather than nuclear. NK can't make the first move because it will be their end. USA also can't start it because then the USA will be the agressor.

USA is looking for away to destroy NK without loosing abullet and i think NK has a little less nuclear weapon capabilities to reach far there in usa . If i was UN secretly general i will push all countries with nuclear weapon to destroyed forever for the sake of human being.

Who would agree to destroy the most powerful weapon in their armory and lose the supremacy?

Master_dandosha

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

IF YOU Enjoy Trade with ME ..PUT Feedback Please

Quote from: Sithara007 on May 05, 2017, 01:19:09 AM

Quote from: merchantofzeny on May 04, 2017, 12:27:34 PM

Nuclear weapon, or the threat of having one, is a reason that Iran and North Korea as still not being invaded.

I would agree with you on North Korea. The only reason why they are still not being invaded is due to the fact that they are having nuclear weapons. But I am not sure about Iran. They are saying that they abandoned their nuclear weapons program. But who knows for sure?

Who said that North Korea fear? It seems to me that the Americans just deciding how to destroy the Kim regime. The Americans can turn all of North Korea into ruins in one day. While Kim has no chance to respond adequately to the United States.

It doesn't matter who has nuclear weapon they might not even use it for their own sake. But I think right now it's more informational war rather than nuclear. NK can't make the first move because it will be their end. USA also can't start it because then the USA will be the agressor.

USA is looking for away to destroy NK without loosing abullet and i think NK has a little less nuclear weapon capabilities to reach far there in usa . If i was UN secretly general i will push all countries with nuclear weapon to destroyed forever for the sake of human being.

SimmonenY

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100