Topic: Number of STOs May Double While IEOs Will Almost Triple By Q4 2019 - page 2. (Read 279 times)
May 16, 2019, 03:46:28 AM
I strongly agree with this post . STOs and IEOs have taken the stage from ICOs. Nobody picks interest in ICOs anymore due to fear of havoc already caused in the past by scam ICOs. For a fact I don't hold Security tokens presently, but held Polymath for a while. Talking about STOs, anyone have an idea where I can source upcoming STOs ? IEOs are cool, they've built trust in investors to an extent knowing fully well that the token will be listed and the team is legit.
May 16, 2019, 03:23:15 AM
Well I would not be surprised if the STO market doubles, because a lot of persons are already tired of investing in ICOs and are looking for an alternative that they could trust in and know that their investment would never be in vain, I am also one of those persons that is tired of ICOs because I have lost a lot of funds to it and I can't risk losing more, this is why I now currently invest in IEO, though I am now kind of scared even in with the investment of IEO since when I heard that a popular exchange has been hacked.
So, the ICO era is going to end finally! I had a big hope on STO projects after the ICO. But almost all of my favourite STO projects are suffering to raise half of their total goal! I thought MOBU, Orbis, Hyghtech STO will be very successful. But people did not invest in MOBU, Orbis is like another likely scam project and hyghtech is suffering very much! So, I don't think STO projects will get popularity this year but I believe in Q4 of 2019, IEOs project number will be triple!
I love to see that STO is growing but still this kind of project is not on investors favor to invest in. But doesn't is good if you can earn dividend instead of just a capital gain from your trade? Perhaps the main problem for STO is that it is hard to pass few country regulation as most countries don't allow their citizen to hold security tokens.
People still prefer to invest in IEO because it gives guarantee instant listing. The problem that happened with ico when that ico is so lazy to create such cooperation with exchange site to listing it. It has already solved when we come to the IEO and so far it seems a good thing to hear that. I like to see more IEO rather than STO. STO still yet gained a lot of demand from the market and we can try to create a comparison between STO and IEO. ICO is the old obsolete method of raising money in the internet. IEO is the main attraction right now and we can clearly see that majority of new startups are gearing up towards IEO instead of ICO.
The guaranteed listing proves to be working mind conditioning that everything will fall into place after the token sale and no more longer waiting time for exchange listing. Unlike other projects that take months after their ICO to get listed on exchange.
I love to see that STO is growing but still this kind of project is not on investors favor to invest in. But doesn't is good if you can earn dividend instead of just a capital gain from your trade? Perhaps the main problem for STO is that it is hard to pass few country regulation as most countries don't allow their citizen to hold security tokens.
People still prefer to invest in IEO because it gives guarantee instant listing. The problem that happened with ico when that ico is so lazy to create such cooperation with exchange site to listing it. It has already solved when we come to the IEO and so far it seems a good thing to hear that. I like to see more IEO rather than STO. STO still yet gained a lot of demand from the market and we can try to create a comparison between STO and IEO.
A lot of projects are now adopting IEO for fund raising as result of the failure of ICO. Although the purpose isvtge same but the platform and procedure are quite different. And as for STO, that is basically for security token but I thing we have more of utility tokens than security tokens.
STOs are the future of Cryptocurrency. With the right ingredients and right regulations, STO would securely connect investors to service providers and making everyone owner of the company. But investors should also realise that everything named STOs are not safe. You need to check out what makes them bound to fulfill their promise.
Noone wants to stay on the edge of the existing trend. In this market where psychology plays a major role, psychologies think that IEOs are more perfect, and many project owners will evaluate it.
I am also a fan of STOs but the problem is that we have yet to see successful and profit sharing STOs i think when we have enough good quality stos then the trend will really boom and people will move towards stos till then things will remain on the slower side.
I love to see that STO is growing but still this kind of project is not on investors favor to invest in. But doesn't is good if you can earn dividend instead of just a capital gain from your trade? Perhaps the main problem for STO is that it is hard to pass few country regulation as most countries don't allow their citizen to hold security tokens.
Source https://hackernoon.com/number-of-stos-may-double-while-ieos-will-almost-triple-by-q4-2019-a90a957d7c3f
With regulators clamping down uncontrolled blockchain funding, I expect the number of ICOs to drop 90% from 980 registered in Q1 2018 to around 100–110 in Q4 2020. At the same time, regulatory compliance would allow STOs and IEOs to flourish. Startups offering security tokens to double by 2020. Concurrently, the number of projects seeking to crowdfund through IEO may surge 730% in the next 20 months.
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*r26XOxtLPB-7F6nygH4JuA.jpeg
Even so, it’s undeniable that ICO process was a revolutionary channel for crypto start-ups to raise funds and breathe life into their projects. Cryptocurrency investors did not need to rely on regular exchange listings and instead pitched their ideas directly to investors. Nonetheless, the famed process has gained a bad rap over the years mostly due to the prevalence of fraud in ICOs.
In recent times, developers have begun looking for alternative fundraising channels. It has been one interesting ride witnessing this industry grow from infancy; through highs and lows to where it is. With Bitcoin seemingly on the rise once again, it is opportune time to discuss these alternatives.
ICOs did create an alternative economy, the likes of which we have never seen. Investors sold tokens to investors through a crowdsale injecting liquidity into their projects. The ICO boom of 2017 brought millions of dollars into this industry. However, because of various issues ranging from concerns over fraud and non-disclosure, and the need to have order in the industry forced regulators in various jurisdictions to take red-tape measures. New processes have come about to diversify the fundraising process and retain investor confidence. This, in turn, forced compliance creating alternative fundraising options in STOs and IEOs to flourish.
STOs created regulatory-compliant token offerings. As such an organization conducting an STO within a given jurisdiction would register as security, attaching to the value of say property, or the company’s dividends. STOs are therefore more secure for investors as they can gain financial benefits. This could be in the form of dividends, equity, profit sharing rights and buy back rights.
As such, STOs are on the rise and may even double in number in the next 18 months. At the moment there 179 but the number could rise to 270 by Q4 2019. Many decentralization proponents view the regulations as excessive and capitulation. The time is taking to list an STO and meet all regulatory requirements can be a hindrance. Nonetheless, they are a necessary process to ensure growth.
IEOs are a relatively new entrant into this domain. It is essentially the best of both worlds. You get an alternative to ICOs without the excessive regulations of STOs. Exchanges are now in the business of listing ICOs to allow them to trade from inception. Exchanges, for a certain fee, list transparent and quality projects and the IEO kicks off.
Bitmex Research states:
You don’t encounter the normal baggage of ICOs like an investor dashboard, roadshows or handling token distribution. Besides, an established exchange gives market through the user database and market credibility. IEOs are therefore excellent and projects realize hard caps in record times. This means investors get returns really fast.
Top exchange platforms by IEO funds raised — US$m, Source: BitMEX Research, IEO Launchpad websites, Coinmarketcap
As a result, such projects are on the rise and although there were 28 such token sales in Q1 2019, the number could hit 176 by end of Q4 2019 for a 620% expansion. However, by Q4 2020, the number would expand 7.3X to 413. The emergence of IEOs and STOs has brought about a slide in ICO numbers and they could be as low as 100 by the end of 2019 dropping from over 980 in Q1 2018.
To conclude IEOs and STOs are necessary replacements to the vital role of ICOs in the market. They both bring about more transparency and credibility to a process that is the lifeblood for cryptocurrency. The regulatory compliance of STOs and efficient marketing of IEOs is an asset to this industry. As a result, more investors will join and remain on the crypto train.
With regulators clamping down uncontrolled blockchain funding, I expect the number of ICOs to drop 90% from 980 registered in Q1 2018 to around 100–110 in Q4 2020. At the same time, regulatory compliance would allow STOs and IEOs to flourish. Startups offering security tokens to double by 2020. Concurrently, the number of projects seeking to crowdfund through IEO may surge 730% in the next 20 months.
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*r26XOxtLPB-7F6nygH4JuA.jpeg
Even so, it’s undeniable that ICO process was a revolutionary channel for crypto start-ups to raise funds and breathe life into their projects. Cryptocurrency investors did not need to rely on regular exchange listings and instead pitched their ideas directly to investors. Nonetheless, the famed process has gained a bad rap over the years mostly due to the prevalence of fraud in ICOs.
In recent times, developers have begun looking for alternative fundraising channels. It has been one interesting ride witnessing this industry grow from infancy; through highs and lows to where it is. With Bitcoin seemingly on the rise once again, it is opportune time to discuss these alternatives.
ICOs did create an alternative economy, the likes of which we have never seen. Investors sold tokens to investors through a crowdsale injecting liquidity into their projects. The ICO boom of 2017 brought millions of dollars into this industry. However, because of various issues ranging from concerns over fraud and non-disclosure, and the need to have order in the industry forced regulators in various jurisdictions to take red-tape measures. New processes have come about to diversify the fundraising process and retain investor confidence. This, in turn, forced compliance creating alternative fundraising options in STOs and IEOs to flourish.
STOs created regulatory-compliant token offerings. As such an organization conducting an STO within a given jurisdiction would register as security, attaching to the value of say property, or the company’s dividends. STOs are therefore more secure for investors as they can gain financial benefits. This could be in the form of dividends, equity, profit sharing rights and buy back rights.
As such, STOs are on the rise and may even double in number in the next 18 months. At the moment there 179 but the number could rise to 270 by Q4 2019. Many decentralization proponents view the regulations as excessive and capitulation. The time is taking to list an STO and meet all regulatory requirements can be a hindrance. Nonetheless, they are a necessary process to ensure growth.
IEOs are a relatively new entrant into this domain. It is essentially the best of both worlds. You get an alternative to ICOs without the excessive regulations of STOs. Exchanges are now in the business of listing ICOs to allow them to trade from inception. Exchanges, for a certain fee, list transparent and quality projects and the IEO kicks off.
Bitmex Research states:
Quote
The ICO market is down around 97% in Q1 2019 (YoY), based on the amount of capital raised. In this relatively challenging climate to raise funds, some projects have changed the “C” in ICO to an “E”, perhaps in an attempt to assist with raising capital. At least for now, to some extent, this appears to be working, with almost $40m having been raised so far this year.
You don’t encounter the normal baggage of ICOs like an investor dashboard, roadshows or handling token distribution. Besides, an established exchange gives market through the user database and market credibility. IEOs are therefore excellent and projects realize hard caps in record times. This means investors get returns really fast.
Top exchange platforms by IEO funds raised — US$m, Source: BitMEX Research, IEO Launchpad websites, Coinmarketcap
As a result, such projects are on the rise and although there were 28 such token sales in Q1 2019, the number could hit 176 by end of Q4 2019 for a 620% expansion. However, by Q4 2020, the number would expand 7.3X to 413. The emergence of IEOs and STOs has brought about a slide in ICO numbers and they could be as low as 100 by the end of 2019 dropping from over 980 in Q1 2018.
To conclude IEOs and STOs are necessary replacements to the vital role of ICOs in the market. They both bring about more transparency and credibility to a process that is the lifeblood for cryptocurrency. The regulatory compliance of STOs and efficient marketing of IEOs is an asset to this industry. As a result, more investors will join and remain on the crypto train.
Jump to: